Renal Replacement Therapy for Acute Kidney Injury in French Intensive Care Units: A Nationwide Survey of Practices

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Jean-Pierre Quenot ◽  
Idris Amrouche ◽  
Jean-Yves Lefrant ◽  
Kada Klouche ◽  
Samir Jaber ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> The frequency of acute kidney injury (AKI) can be as high as 50% in the intensive care unit (ICU). Despite the publication of national guidelines in France in 2015 for the use of RRT, there are no data describing the implementation of these recommendations in real-life. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We performed a nationwide survey of practices from November 15, 2019, to January 24, 2020, in France. An electronic questionnaire based on the items recommended in the national guidelines was sent using an online survey platform, to the chiefs of all ICUs in France. The questionnaire comprised a section for the Department Chief about local organization and facilities, and a second section destined for individual physicians about their personal practices. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We contacted the Department Chief in 356 eligible ICUs, of whom 88 (24.7%) responded regarding their ICU organization. From these 88 ICUs, 232/285 physicians (82%) completed the questionnaire regarding individual practices. The practices reported by respondent physicians were as follows: intermittent RRT was first-line choice in &#x3e;75% in a patient with single organ (kidney) failure at the acute phase, whereas continuous RRT was predominant (&#x3e;75%) in patients with septic shock or multi-organ failure. Blood and dialysate flow for intermittent RRT were 200–300 mL/min and 400–600 mL/min, respectively. The dose of dialysis for continuous RRT was 25–35 mL/kg/h (65%). Insertion of the dialysis catheter was mainly performed by the resident under echographic guidance, in the right internal jugular vein. The most commonly used catheter lock was citrate (53%). The most frequently cited criterion for weaning from RRT was diuresis, followed by a drop in urinary markers (urea and creatinine). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This study shows a satisfactory level of reported compliance with French guidelines and recent scientific evidence among ICU physicians regarding initiation of RRT for AKI in the ICU.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. 33-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henrique Palomba ◽  
Pedro Paulo Zanella do Amaral Campos ◽  
Thiago Domingos Corrêa ◽  
Frederico Bruzzi de Carvalho ◽  
Glauco Westphal ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. S2
Author(s):  
A. BACA ◽  
M. Carmoma Antonio ◽  
M. Wasung ◽  
P. Visoso ◽  
M. Sebastian Alberto

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
O Brown ◽  
T Crisp ◽  
M Flatman ◽  
C Hing

Abstract Introduction Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with prolonged admission and 3.5 times increased mortality for trauma patients requiring intensive care (ICU) treatment. Blunt trauma confers greater risk of AKI than penetrating trauma, potentially related to long bone fracture. The relationship between skeletal trauma and AKI in ICU has not previously been investigated. Method Retrospective data was analysed from 202 consecutive adult patients admitted to ICU with skeletal trauma from 01/06/2018 to 01/06/2019. AKI was defined by creatinine rise &gt;1.5 times baseline. Results AKI was found in 70/202 (34.65%) patients aged 16-99 years, 138 males and 64 females. Mean limb Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) was significantly higher in AKI (AIS= 2.57 (SD 0.53) versus non-AKI AIS=2.38 (SD 0.61), p = 0.027). Other body regions and total Injury Severity Score (ISS) were non-significant. AKI was associated with a significantly worse Glasgow Outcome Score (AKI 3.28 (SD 1.52) versus 4.02 (SD 1.08) p &lt; 0.001), increased intensive care stay (AKI 7.03 (SD 8.30) days versus non-AKI 3.8 (SD 4.1) days p &lt; 0.001) and increased 30-day mortality (AKI 18/70 (25.71%) versus non-AKI 10/132 (7.58%) p &lt; 0.001) Conclusions Skeletal trauma patients have a high incidence of AKI, which was significantly correlated with severity of skeletal limb trauma but not overall ISS.


2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 1537-1541 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. T. Kielstein ◽  
C. Eugbers ◽  
S. M. Bode-Boeger ◽  
J. Martens-Lobenhoffer ◽  
H. Haller ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 131
Author(s):  
Konlawij Trongtrakul ◽  
Sujaree Poopipatpab ◽  
Ploynapas Limphunudom ◽  
Chawika Pisitsak ◽  
Kaweesak chittawatanarat ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 313-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prashant Parulekar ◽  
Ed Neil-Gallacher ◽  
Alex Harrison

Acute kidney injury is common in critically ill patients, with ultrasound recommended to exclude renal tract obstruction. Intensive care unit clinicians are skilled in acquiring and interpreting ultrasound examinations. Intensive Care Medicine Trainees wish to learn renal tract ultrasound. We sought to demonstrate that intensive care unit clinicians can competently perform renal tract ultrasound on critically ill patients. Thirty patients with acute kidney injury were scanned by two intensive care unit physicians using a standard intensive care unit ultrasound machine. The archived images were reviewed by a Radiologist for adequacy and diagnostic quality. In 28 of 30 patients both kidneys were identified. Adequate archived images of both kidneys each in two planes were possible in 23 of 30 patients. The commonest reason for failure was dressings and drains from abdominal surgery. Only one patient had hydronephrosis. Our results suggest that intensive care unit clinicians can provide focussed renal tract ultrasound. The low incidence of hydronephrosis has implications for delivering the Core Ultrasound in Intensive Care competencies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document