scholarly journals Risk-Adjusted Cancer Screening and Prevention (RiskAP): Complementing Screening for Early Disease Detection by a Learning Screening Based on Risk Factors

Breast Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Rita K. Schmutzler ◽  
Björn Schmitz-Luhn ◽  
Bettina Borisch ◽  
Peter Devilee ◽  
Diana Eccles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Preventive Measures ◽  
Outcome Evaluation ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Early Disease Detection ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Cancer Screening And Prevention ◽  
Screening And Prevention

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Risk-adjusted cancer screening and prevention is a promising and continuously emerging option for improving cancer prevention. It is driven by increasing knowledge of risk factors and the ability to determine them for individual risk prediction. However, there is a knowledge gap between evidence of increased risk and evidence of the effectiveness and efficiency of clinical preventive interventions based on increased risk. This gap is, in particular, aggravated by the extensive availability of genetic risk factor diagnostics, since the question of appropriate preventive measures immediately arises when an increased risk is identified. However, collecting proof of effective preventive measures, ideally by prospective randomized preventive studies, typically requires very long periods of time, while the knowledge about an increased risk immediately creates a high demand for action. <b><i>Summary:</i></b> Therefore, we propose a risk-adjusted prevention concept that is based on the best current evidence making needed and appropriate preventive measures available, and which is constantly evaluated through outcome evaluation, and continuously improved based on these results. We further discuss the structural and procedural requirements as well as legal and socioeconomical aspects relevant for the implementation of this concept.

scholarly journals Assessment of Risk Factors, Feasibility and Acceptability of VIA for Cervical Cancer Screening and Prevention

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-57
Author(s):  
Pappu Rijal ◽  
Tarun Pradhan ◽  
A Agrawal ◽  
R Rai ◽  
R Bhatta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Acetic Acid ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Cervical Cancer Screening ◽  
Visual Inspection ◽  
National Guidelines ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Cancer Screening And Prevention ◽  
Screening And Prevention

Aims – To assess feasibility of visual inspection with acetic acid and treatment with cryotherapy for cervical cancer screening and prevention and assess risk factors for cervical cancer in the screened population.Methods – A prospective analysis of all patients enrolled for cervical cancer screening by visual inspection, meeting the eligibility criteria for screening and treatment as per national guidelines 2011 was analyzed form March 2012 to April 2013.Results – A total of 4138 met the eligibility criteria and were counseled for screening, 33 rejected for screening. Out of 4105 screened 241 were visual inspection with acetic acid positive, 211 were treated with cryotherapy, 25 treated with LEEP, 5 rejected to  treatment.  Mean age of patient in year’s ± SD 41.48 ± 9.72. The visual inspection with acetic acidpositivity rate was 5.9 %Conclusion – Single visit approach is a feasible and acceptable form of cervical cancer screening strategy in our population.

scholarly journals Recommendations on breast cancer screening and prevention in the context of implementing risk stratification: impending changes to current policies

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 615 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Gagnon ◽  
E. Lévesque ◽  
F. Borduas ◽  
J. Chiquette ◽  
C. Diorio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
International Perspective ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Screening Programs ◽  
Cancer Screening And Prevention ◽  
Screening And Prevention ◽  
Tool Building

In recent years, risk stratification has sparked interest as an innovative approach to disease screening and prevention. The approach effectively personalizes individual risk, opening the way to screening and prevention interventions that are adapted to subpopulations. The international perspective project, which is developing risk stratification for breast cancer, aims to support the integration of its screening approach into clinical practice through comprehensive tool-building. Policies and guidelines for risk stratification—unlike those for population screening programs, which are currently well regulated—are still under development. Indeed, the development of guidelines for risk stratification reflects the translational aspects of perspective.Here, we describe the risk stratification process that was devised in the context of perspective, and we then explain the consensus-based method used to develop recommendations for breast cancer screening and prevention in a risk-stratification approach. Lastly, we discuss how the recommendations might affect current screening policies.

Therapeutic options in male osteoporosis

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (04) ◽  
pp. 271-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Farahmand ◽  
J. D. Ringe
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Vitamin D ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Male Osteoporosis ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Modes Of Action ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Long Term Treatment ◽  
Male Patients

SummaryOsteoporosis in men is increasingly recognized as an important public health problem but affected patients are still under-diagnosed and -treated. As in women the diagnostic and therapeutic strategy has to be adapted to the individual case. In the practical management it is very important to detect possible causes of secondary osteoporosis, to explain the possibilities of basic therapy counteracting individual risk factors and communicate that osteoporosis is a chronic disease and adherence to a long-term treatment is crucial. In established severe osteoporosis a careful analgesic therapy is important to avoid further bone loss related to immobility. In elderly men with increased risk of falling insufficient Vitamin D supply or impaired activation of Vitamin D due to renal insufficiency must be taken into consideration. Specific medications available today for the treatment of male osteoporosis comprise among antiresorptive drugs the bis phosphonates alendronate, risedronate and zoledronic acid. Denosumab, the first biological therapy is approved for men with androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. An important advantage of this potent antiresorptive drug is the increased adherence due to the comfortable application by sixmonthly subcutaneous injections. Study results from the 2-year multi-center randomized controlled ADAMO-Study will very soon allow the use of denosumab in all types of male osteoporosis. Teriparatide, the 34 N-terminal amino acid sequence of parathyroid hormone was approved for men with osteoporosis as an anabolic agent based on proven efficacy by different studies. Among drugs with other modes of action the D-hormone pro-drug alfacalcidol can be used in men alone or in combination with the advantage of pleiotropic effects on calcium absorption, parathyroids, bone and muscle. Recently also Strontium-ranelate was approved for male patients with the limitation to exclude men with clinical relevant cardiovascular risk factors. In general the possibilities to treat male osteoporosis have considerably improved during recent years. Today there is a choice of a spectrum of drugs from mild to strong potency with different modes of action on bone turnover to design strategies for individual male patients.

Cardiovascular Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Mechanistic Links: From Pathophysiology to Treatment

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 431-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
George E. Fragoulis ◽  
Ismini Panayotidis ◽  
Elena Nikiphorou
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Pharmacological Intervention ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
The Past ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Cv Disease ◽  
Obesity Hypertension ◽  
Inflammatory Burden

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune inflammatory arthritis. Inflammation, however, can spread beyond the joints to involve other organs. During the past few years, it has been well recognized that RA associates with increased risk for cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD) compared with the general population. This seems to be due not only to the increased occurrence in RA of classical CVD risk factors and comorbidities like smoking, obesity, hypertension, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and others but also to the inflammatory burden that RA itself carries. This is not unexpected given the strong links between inflammation and atherosclerosis and CVD. It has been shown that inflammatory cytokines which are present in abundance in RA play a significant role in every step of plaque formation and rupture. Most of the therapeutic regimes used in RA treatment seem to offer significant benefits to that end. However, more studies are needed to clarify the effect of these drugs on various parameters, including the lipid profile. Of note, although pharmacological intervention significantly helps reduce the inflammatory burden and therefore the CVD risk, control of the so-called classical risk factors is equally important. Herein, we review the current evidence for the underlying pathogenic mechanisms linking inflammation with CVD in the context of RA and reflect on the possible impact of treatments used in RA.

scholarly journals Risk of QTc Interval Prolongation Associated With Circulating Anti‐Ro/SSA Antibodies Among US Veterans: An Observational Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pietro Enea Lazzerini ◽  
Gabriele Cevenini ◽  
Yongxia Sarah Qu ◽  
Frank Fabris ◽  
Nabil El‐Sherif ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Observational Cohort Study ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Qtc Interval ◽  
Qtc Prolongation ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Observational Cohort ◽  
Us Veterans

Background Anti‐Sjögren's syndrome‐related antigen A‐antibodies (anti‐Ro/SSA‐antibodies) are responsible for a novel form of acquired long‐QT syndrome, owing to autoimmune‐mediated inhibition of cardiac human ether‐a‐go‐go‐related gene‐potassium channels. However, current evidence derives only from basic mechanistic studies and relatively small sample‐size clinical investigations. Hence, the aim of our study is to estimate the risk of QTc prolongation associated with the presence of anti‐Ro/SSA‐antibodies in a large population of unselected subjects. Methods and Results This is a retrospective observational cohort study using the Veterans Affairs Informatics and Computing Infrastructure. Participants were veterans who were tested for anti‐Ro/SSA status and had an ECG. Descriptive statistics and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for heart rate‐corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation. The study population consisted of 7339 subjects (61.4±12.2 years), 612 of whom were anti‐Ro/SSA‐positive (8.3%). Subjects who were anti‐Ro/SSA‐positive showed an increased prevalence of QTc prolongation, in the presence of other concomitant risk factors (crude odds ratios [OR], 1.67 [1.26–2.21] for QTc >470/480 ms; 2.32 [1.54–3.49] for QTc >490 ms; 2.77 [1.66–4.60] for QTc >500 ms), independent of a connective tissue disease history. Adjustments for age, sex, electrolytes, cardiovascular risk factors/diseases, and medications gradually attenuated QTc prolongation estimates, particularly when QT‐prolonging drugs were added to the model. Nevertheless, stepwise‐fully adjusted OR for the higher cutoffs remained significantly increased in anti‐Ro/SSA‐positive subjects, particularly for QTc >500 ms (2.27 [1.34–3.87]). Conclusions Anti‐Ro/SSA‐antibody positivity was independently associated with an increased risk of marked QTc prolongation in a large cohort of US veterans. Our data suggest that within the general population individuals who are anti‐Ro/SSA‐positive may represent a subgroup of patients particularly predisposed to ventricular arrhythmias/sudden cardiac death.

scholarly journals P54 Pneumocystis jirovecii prophylaxis in patients on rituximab

Rheumatology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kishore Warrier1 ◽  
Catherine Salvesani ◽  
Samundeeswari Deepak
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
T Cell ◽  
B Cells ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Pneumocystis Jirovecii ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Pneumocystis Jirovecii Pneumonia ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background Rituximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that depletes the B cell population by targeting cells bearing the CD20 surface marker and is used widely in the management of paediatric rheumatological conditions like juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE), juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM), mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) is a potentially fatal opportunistic infection associated with congenital and acquired defects in T cell–mediated immunity. Our guideline did not recommend prophylaxis against PCP for patients on rituximab, unlike patients on cyclophosphamide, who are on cotrimoxazole until three months after cessation of the treatment. Cyclophosphamide is an alkylating agent which affects both B and T lymphocytes. Following the death of 16 year-old girl with JSLE due to PCP, the team reviewed the possible contributing factors, undertook a review of literature and discussed this at multi-disciplinary meetings involving the microbiology and immunology teams. This patient was found to have other risk factors for PCP – low CD4 T cells, concomitant use of corticosteroids and hypogammaglobulinaemia (IgG 3.0g/L). Although there is limited evidence that rituximab on its own increases the risk of PCP, there is emerging data that B cells may have a role in the protection against pneumocystis. Following the review, it was concluded that children on rituximab and an additional immunosuppressant (including corticosteroids) should receive prophylactic cotrimoxazole to cover PCP. Methods Retrospective audit carried out by the team to look at adherence to the new guideline regarding the use of cotrimoxazole for PCP prophylaxis in patients who have had rituximab between August 2017 and May 2019. Results P54 Table 1 Total number of patients who had rituximab 10 Number of patients who had other immunosuppressants concomitantly / recently (within previous 3 months) 7 Number of patients on rituximab monotherapy 2 Number of patients who are 6 months post-treatment 1 Number of patients with other risk factors for PCP 1 (hypogammaglobulinaemia) Number of patients who are eligible for prophylaxis, as per the guideline 8 (7 for concomitant immunosuppression and 1 for hypogammaglobulinaemia) Number of patients on cotrimoxazole 7 (87.5%) - one of the patients is on methotrexate, which is advised not to combine with cotrimoxazole We achieved 87.5% compliance in prescribing cotrimoxazole for PCP prophylaxis to all rheumatology patients receiving rituximab alongside another immunosuppressant agent; the one patient who this was not adhered to was due to potential adverse drug pharmacodynamic interaction between cotrimoxazole and methotrexate. Conclusion Although the current evidence points to increased risk of PCP in patients with inherited and iatrogenic defect of T cell function, there is emerging evidence that B cells may have a role too. Hence more work is required to determine the risk of PCP in patients on B cell targeted therapy (BCTT) and the need for prophylaxis. Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document