EVALUATION AND VALIDATION OF A NEW SCORE TO MEASURE THE SEVERITY OF SMALL-BOWEL ANGIODYSPLASIA ON VIDEO CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY (CESBAI)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Garcia-Compean ◽  
Angel Noe del Cueto-Aguilera ◽  
Jose Alberto Gonzalez-Gonzalez ◽  
Joel Omar Jaquez-Quintana ◽  
Omar David Borjas-Almaguer ◽  
...  

Introduction: Angiodysplasias are responsible of 50 % of small bowel bleeding. An endoscopic method that allows measuring its severity is not available Aims: to validate a new endoscopic score with VCE to measure the severity of small bowel angiodysplasias (SBAD). Methods: Four endoscopists independently reviewed VCE videos of 22 patients with SBAD. The score graded three variables: A. Extent of lesions: E1: located in one half of the intestine and E2:in both halves. B. Number of lesions: N1 <5; N2: 5-10 and N3: >10 lesions. C. Probability of bleeding: P1: pale red spots; P2: bright red spots; P3: bleeding stigmata and P4: active bleeding. CESBAI was calculated as follows: E x 1 + N x 2 + P x 3. Interobserver variability was analyzed by the Spearman's correlation and agreement Kappa statistic tests. Results. The mean CESBAI scores by observers (O) were: O1= 11.6 ± 4.1; O2 =: 11.3 ± 4.8; O3 = 11.1 ± 4.9 and O 4 = 11.8 ± 4.2 (p>0.05). Spearman’s correlation values of CESBAI between every two observers were from 0.61 to 0.94 ( p <0.001) with a global correlation of 0.73 among all observers. Kappa values of CESBAI between every two observers ranged from 0.42 to 0.87 (p<0.001) with global agreement of 0.57 among all observers. All evaluators stated that the method was easy to use. Conclusions: CESBAI is a reliable and reproducible score. Nevertheless, these results must be validated in other studies with larger population before assessing its power for predicting bleeding recurrence.

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Blanco-Velasco ◽  
OM Solorzano-Pineda ◽  
O Hernandez-Mondragon ◽  
JM Blancas-Valencia

2018 ◽  
Vol 0 (3) ◽  
pp. 34-37
Author(s):  
U. I. Grechana

Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheilla Achieng ◽  
John A Reynolds ◽  
Ian N Bruce ◽  
Marwan Bukhari

Abstract Background/Aims  We aimed to establish the validity of the SLE-key® rule-out test and analyse its utility in distinguishing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) from other autoimmune rheumatic connective tissue diseases. Methods  We used data from the Lupus Extended Autoimmune Phenotype (LEAP) study, which included a representative cross-sectional sample of patients with a variety of rheumatic connective tissue diseases, including SLE, mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), inflammatory myositis, systemic sclerosis, primary Sjögren’s syndrome and undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD). The modified 1997 ACR criteria were used to classify patients with SLE. Banked serum samples were sent to Immune-Array’s CLIA- certified laboratory Veracis (Richmond, VA) for testing. Patients were assigned test scores between 0 and 1 where a score of 0 was considered a negative rule-out test (i.e. SLE cannot be excluded) whilst a score of 1 was assigned for a positive rule-out test (i.e. SLE excluded). Performance measures were used to assess the test’s validity and measures of association determined using linear regression and Spearman’s correlation. Results  Our study included a total of 155 patients of whom 66 had SLE. The mean age in the SLE group was 44.2 years (SD 13.04). 146 patients (94.1%) were female. 84 (54.2%) patients from the entire cohort had ACR SLE scores of ≤ 3 whilst 71 (45.8%) had ACR SLE scores ≥ 4. The mean ACR SLE total score for the SLE patients was 4.85 (SD 1.67), ranging from 2 to 8, with mean disease duration of 12.9 years. The Sensitivity of the SLE-Key® Rule-Out test in diagnosing SLE from other connective tissue diseases was 54.5%, specificity was 44.9%, PPV 42.4% and NPV 57.1 %. 45% of the SLE patients had a positive rule-out test. SLE could not be ruled out in 73% of the MCTD patients whilst 51% of the UCTD patients had a positive Rule-Out test and &gt;85% of the inflammatory myositis patients had a negative rule-out test. ROC analysis generated an AUC of 0.525 illustrating weak class separation capacity. Linear regression established a negative correlation between the SLE-key Rule-Out score and ACR SLE total scores. Spearman’s correlation was run to determine the relationship between ACR SLE total scores and SLE-key rule-out score and showed very weak negative correlation (rs = -0.0815, n = 155, p = 0.313). Conclusion  Our findings demonstrate that when applied in clinical practice in a rheumatology CTD clinic setting, the SLE-key® rule-out test does not accurately distinguish SLE from other CTDs. The development of a robust test that could achieve this would be pivotal. It is however important to highlight that the test was designed to distinguish healthy subjects from SLE patients and not for the purpose of differentiating SLE from other connective tissue diseases. Disclosure  S. Achieng: None. J.A. Reynolds: None. I.N. Bruce: Other; I.N.B is a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Senior Investigator and is funded by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre. M. Bukhari: None.


Author(s):  
Yukiko Handa ◽  
Shinya Fukushima ◽  
Shogen Yo ◽  
Motoyasu Osawa ◽  
Takahisa Murao ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110318
Author(s):  
Victor Kong ◽  
Cynthia Cheung ◽  
Nigel Rajaretnam ◽  
Rohit Sarvepalli ◽  
William Xu ◽  
...  

Introduction Combined omental and organ evisceration following anterior abdominal stab wound (SW) is uncommon and there is a paucity of literature describing the management and spectrum of injuries encountered at laparotomy. Methods A retrospective study was undertaken on all patients who presented with anterior abdominal SW involving combined omental and organ evisceration who underwent laparotomy over a 10-year period from January 2008 to January 2018 at a major trauma centre in South Africa. Results A total of 61 patients were eligible for inclusion and all underwent laparotomy: 87% male, mean age: 29 years. Ninety-two percent (56/61) had a positive laparotomy whilst 8% (5/61) underwent a negative procedure. Of the 56 positive laparotomies, 91% (51/56) were considered therapeutic and 9% (5/56) were non-therapeutic. In addition to omental evisceration, 59% (36/61) had eviscerated small bowel, 28% (17/61) had eviscerated colon and 13% (8/61) had eviscerated stomach. A total of 92 organ injuries were identified. The most commonly injured organs were small bowel, large bowel and stomach. The overall complication rate was 11%. Twelve percent (7/61) required intensive care unit admission. The mean length of hospital stay was 9 days. The overall mortality rate for all 61 patients was 2%. Conclusions The presence of combined omental and organ evisceration following abdominal SW mandates laparotomy. The small bowel, large bowel and stomach were the most commonly injured organs in this setting.


2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 556-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
U.A. Bahçeci ◽  
Ş. Özdek ◽  
Z. Pehlivanli ◽  
I. Yetkin ◽  
M. Önol

Purpose To evaluate the changes in intraocular pressure (IOP), corneal thickness (CT), and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) in patients with hypothyroidism before and after treatment. Methods A complete ophthalmic examination including visual acuity, IOP, anterior segment, and fundus examination together with CT and RNFLT measurements were performed for each patient with newly diagnosed hypothyroidism, at the initial diagnosis and the third and ninth months of the L-thyroxine treatment. Wilcoxon signed rank test and Spearman's correlation test were used for statistical evaluation of the results. Results A total of 56 eyes of 28 patients were included in the study. The mean IOP and CT values were found to decrease with medical treatment (p=0.000). There was no significant change in any of the RNFLT parameters measured with scanning laser Polarimeter after L-thyroxine treatment (Wilcoxon, p>0.05). The change in IOP levels was not correlated with the change in thyroid hormone levels (Spearman's correlation test, p>0.05). The mean increase in serum free T3 and serum free T4 levels and the mean decrease in serum TSH levels at the ninth month of the therapy were found to be correlated with the decrease in CT in the left eyes (Spearman's correlation test, R>0.4 and p<0.05). Conclusions Hypothyroidism seems to cause a reversible increase in CT and IOP. IOP changes may be secondary to CT changes. RNFLT parameters measured with scanning laser Polarimeter do not seem to be affected by hypothyroidism. When the CT is taken into account and the IOPs corrected for CT, the prevalence of glaucoma in hypothyroidism may not be as high as previously reported. This issue should be taken into account while assessing glaucoma in patients with hypothyroidism.


2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
María Alejandra Arriola ◽  
Diana Valencia ◽  
Carolina Olano

Introduction. The small bowel capsule endoscopy is the first line procedure in patients with suspected small bowel bleeding. Data regarding overt suspected small bowel bleeding and its predictive factors remain still limited. Aim. To assess the diagnostic yield of the capsule endoscopy and the factors predicting positive findings in patients with overt suspected small bowel bleeding. Methods. Patients with overt suspected small bowel bleeding (melena or enterorrhagia) and negative upper and lower endoscopy were included. A positive diagnostic yield was considered when the capsule endoscopy diagnosed one or more P2 or P3 type lesions (Modified Saurin Classification) Demographic and laboratory data were recorded. Results. 79 patients were included (mean age 62.92 (15-89); F:M 46:33). The diagnostic yield of the capsule endoscopy was 62%. The most frequent finding was angioectasia (44.8%), followed by nonspecific inflammation/ulceration (20.4%). The multivariate analysis found that age older than 50 years and male sex were independent variables that were associated with an increased risk of positive findings and angioectasia. Conclusions. In this group of patients with overt suspected small bowel bleeding, the capsule endoscopy was useful (with a diagnostic yield of 62%). The most frequent lesions were the vascular ones. Age over 50 and male sex were independent predictors of finding lesions and angioectasia.


2014 ◽  
Vol 53 (03) ◽  
pp. 195-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Choi ◽  
C. Jung ◽  
Y. Chae ◽  
M. Kang ◽  
J. Kim ◽  
...  

SummaryBackground: Mapping of drug indications to ICD-10 was undertaken in Korea by a public and a private institution for their own purposes. A different mapping approach was used by each institution, which presented a good opportunity to compare the validity of the two approaches.Objectives: This study was undertaken to compare the validity of a direct mapping approach and an indirect terminology based mapping approach of drug indications against the gold standard drawn from the results of the two mapping processes.Methods: Three hundred and seventy-five cardiovascular reference drugs were selected from all listed cardiovascular drugs for the study. In the direct approach, two experienced nurse coders mapped the free text indications directly to ICD-10. In the indirect terminology based approach, the indications were extracted and coded in the Korean Standard Terminology of Medicine. These terminology coded indications were then manually mapped to ICD-10. The results of the two approaches were compared to the gold standard. A kappa statistic was calculated to see the compatibility of both mapping approaches. Recall, precision and F1 score of each mapping approach were calculated and analyzed using a paired t-test.Results: The mean number of indications for the study drugs was 5.42. The mean number of ICD-10 codes that matched in direct approach was 46.32 and that of indirect terminology based approach was 56.94. The agreement of the mapping results between the two approaches were poor (kappa = 0.19). The indirect terminology based approach showed higher recall (86.78%) than direct approach (p < 0.001). However, there was no difference in precision and F1 score between the two approaches.Conclusions: Considering no differences in the F1 scores, both approaches may be used in practice for mapping drug indications to ICD-10. However, in terms of consistency, time and manpower, better results are expected from the indirect terminology based approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document