scholarly journals Association between Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Inflammatory Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Dermatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Nouf Almuhanna ◽  
Alexandra Finstad ◽  
Raed Alhusayen
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Inflammatory Arthritis ◽  
Hidradenitis Suppurativa ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
High Prevalence

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Several studies report a high prevalence of inflammatory arthritis among hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) patients. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To study the association between HS and inflammatory arthritis. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to the PRISMA guidelines to identify the association between HS and inflammatory arthritis, spondyloarthritis, ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Seven studies were entered in the analysis, with 200,361 HS patients and 385,599 controls. Pooled analysis illustrated a significantly increased risk of inflammatory arthritis in HS patients compared to controls (odds ratio [OR] 3.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.92–6.17). There was also a statistically significant association between HS and spondyloarthritis (OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.40–3.15), and between HS and AS (OR 1.89; 95% CI 1.14–3.12). Moreover, pooled analysis showed a statistically significant association between HS and RA (OR 1.96; 95% CI 1.28–2.98). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Our findings show that HS patients have a 3-fold increased risk of developing inflammatory arthritis. HS patients are specifically at a higher risk for spondyloarthritis, its subtype AS, and RA.

scholarly journals Psychosis in children of separated parents: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Ayerbe ◽  
María Pérez-Piñar ◽  
Quintí Foguet-Boreu ◽  
Salma Ayis
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Psychotic Disorders ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Childhood Adversity ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Parental Separation ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Cross Sectional Studies

Abstract Background. Parental separation is a very common childhood adversity. The association between other adverse childhood experiences and an increased risk of psychosis has been reported. However, the evidence on the risk of psychosis for children of separated parents is limited. In this systematic review, cohort, case–control, and cross-sectional studies, comparing the risk of psychotic disorders for people with and without separated parents, were searched, critically appraised, and summarized. Methods. Studies were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and the Web of Science, from database inception to September 2019. A meta-analysis, using random-effects models, was undertaken to obtain pooled estimates of the risk of psychosis among participants with separated parents. Results. Twelve studies, with 305,652 participants from 22 countries, were included in the review. A significantly increased risk of psychosis for those with separated parents was observed, with a pooled odds ratio: 1.53 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.29–1.76), p < 0.001. The association remained significant when cohort, case–control, and cross-sectional studies were analyzed separately. The five cohort studies included in this review showed and increased risk of psychosis with odds ratio: 1.47 (95% CI: 1.26–1.69), p < 0.001. Conclusions. Parental separation is a common childhood adversity associated with an increased risk of psychosis. Although the risk for an individual child of separated parents is still low, given the high proportion of couple that separate, the increased rates of psychosis may be substantial in the population. Further studies on the risk of psychosis in those with separated parents, and the explanatory factors for this association, are required.

P960Association of peri-procedural intravenous morphine use on clinical outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated by percutaneous coronary intervention: systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Batchelor ◽  
D Liu ◽  
J Bloom ◽  
S Noaman ◽  
W Chan
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
St Elevation

Abstract Background Morphine analgesia may affect absorption of co-prescribed P2Y12 antagonists attenuating platelet inhibition. The impact of peri-procedural intravenous (IV) morphine administration on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is not well defined. Purpose To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring clinical outcomes with peri-procedural IV morphine in patients undergoing PPCI for STEMI. Methods Analysis of the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Scopus, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov for association of peri-PCI IV morphine use with myocardial infarction (MI) and mortality. Primary and secondary outcomes were in-hospital or 30-day MI and all-cause mortality respectively. Results Eleven studies (1 randomised controlled trial; 10 cohort studies) were included for systematic review. Five studies, including 3,748 patients were included in meta-analysis of the primary outcome. Of 3,748 patients, 2,239 were treated concurrently with ticagrelor, 1,256 treated with clopidogrel and 253 with prasugrel. As shown in the Figure, there was a trend towards increased risk of myocardial infarction with IV morphine (odds ratio 1.88; 95% CI 0.87–4.09, I2 0%). Across seven studies and 6585 patients, no increased risk of mortality at the same composite time endpoint was evident (odds ratio 0.70, 95% CI 0.40–1.23, I2 19%). Figure 1. MI in hospital or at 30 days Conclusion Based on current literature, evidence of an association between IV morphine and myocardial infarction in patients undergoing PPCI for STEMI is limited by observational methodology and conflicting results. There is no evidence of an association between intravenous peri-procedural morphine and mortality. Clinical trial evidence with strong documentation of adverse events data is required to demonstrate association or causality. Acknowledgement/Funding None

scholarly journals Serum Sclerostin Levels in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis and Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianfeng Shi ◽  
Haijian Ying ◽  
Juping Du ◽  
Bo Shen
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Data Analyses ◽  
Standard Mean Difference ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Sclerostin Level

Objective. Current studies of serum sclerostin levels in AS and RA patients are inconsistent. This meta-analysis was performed to identify the association of serum sclerostin level with AS and RA patients. Methods. Embase, PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases (up to 25 January 2017) were used to collect all relevant published articles. Studies were pooled and standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. All data analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3. Results. Totally eight studies of AS including 420 AS patients and 317 healthy controls (HC) and three studies of RA including 145 RA patients and 127 HC were finally included in this meta-analysis. The results revealed that the serum sclerostin levels in both AS patients (SMD=-0.14; 95% CI=[-0.39,0.11]; P=0.28) and RA patients (SMD=-0.10; 95% CI=[-0.34,0.15]; P=0.43) were not significantly different from those in HC. Conclusion. The difference of serum sclerostin levels in AS and RA patients was not significantly different from HC, indicating that the sclerostin may not associate with the development of AS and RA.

Risk of fall and clinical fracture associated with androgen receptor inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 71-71
Author(s):  
Zin Myint ◽  
Harry D. Momo ◽  
Danielle E. Otto ◽  
Donglin Yan ◽  
Robert S. DiPaola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Increased Risk

71 Background: Patients treated with androgen receptor inhibitors (ARIs) report a higher incidence of falls; although a potential mechanism of action is unknown. This systematic review evaluates the relative risk (RR) of fall and fracture in prostate cancer (PCa) patients that receive ARIs. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search using Cochrane, Scopus and MedlinePlus databases from inception through August 2019, and evaluated all published prospective phase II, III and IV randomized controlled trials that treated PCa patients with ARIs. Reported fall and fractures as adverse events (AEs) were extracted for analysis. Retrospective, phase I, non-randomized phase II, and studies with control arms that used one of the ARIs were excluded. A mixed effects model was used to estimate effects of ARI on the RR, with the included studies treated as random effects and study arms treated as fixed effects in the pooled analysis. Sample size for each study was used to weight the mixed model. Results: Eleven studies met our inclusion criteria. The total population was 11,382; 6536 were in the ARI arm and 4846 in the control (CTL) arm. Study types were: 8 phase III; 2 phase II; 1 phase IV. Subjects in the ARI arm received enzalutamide, apalutamide or darolutamide in combination with androgen deprivation therapy or other enzalutamide combinations while in the CTL arm received placebo, bicalutamide or abiraterone. Treatment duration ranged from 5.4 to 20.5 mo for ARI vs. 5.4 to 18.3 mo for CTL. The reported incidence of fall was 481 (7.4%) in ARI and 201 (4.1%) for CTL. The incidence of fracture was 204 (3.1%) in ARI and 93 (1.9%) in control. The use of ARI was associated with an increased risk: all fall grades (RR 1.83; 95% CI 1.56-2.15; p <0.01); high grade fall (RR 1.69; 95% CI 1.09 – 2.62; p=0.019); all grade fracture (RR 1.56; 95% CI 1.23-1.97; p <0.01) and likely high grade fracture (RR 1.62; 95% CI 0.97 – 2.69; p=0.063). Conclusions: The use of ARI significantly increases falls and fractures in PCa patients as assessed by this meta-analysis study. Further studies would be warranted to identify and understand potential mechanisms and develop strategies to decrease falls and fractures associated with ARI use.

PROGNOSIS OF DIFFERENTIATED THYROID CARCINOMA IN PATIENTS WITH GRAVES DISEASE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 1323-1337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Poemlarp Mekraksakit ◽  
Pattara Rattanawong ◽  
Rudruidee Karnchanasorn ◽  
Chanavuth Kanitsoraphan ◽  
Natnicha Leelaviwat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Thyroid Carcinoma ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Distant Metastasis ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma ◽  
Graves Disease ◽  
Increased Risk

Objective: It is still controversial whether differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) in patients with Graves disease (GD) can be more aggressive than non-Graves DTC. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the association between GD and prognosis in patients with DTC. Methods: We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to March 2019. We included published studies that compared the risk of mortality and prognosis between DTC patients with GD and those with non-GD. Data from each study were combined using the random-effects model. Results: Twenty-five studies from February 1988 to May 2018 were included (987 DTC patients with GD and 2,064 non-Graves DTC patients). The DTC patients with GD had a significantly higher risk of associated multifocality/multicentricity (odds ratio, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 2.02; I 2, 6.5%; P = .381) and distant metastasis at the time of cancer diagnosis (odds ratio, 2.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.08 to 4.47; I 2, 0.0%; P = .497), but this was not associated with DTC-related mortality and recurrence/persistence during follow-up. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis demonstrates a statistically significant increased risk of multifocality/multicentricity and distant metastasis at the time of cancer diagnosis in DTC patients with GD than those without GD. Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; DTC = differentiated thyroid carcinoma; GD = Graves disease; LN = lymph node; OR = odds ratio; PTC = papillary thyroid carcinoma; TC = thyroid carcinoma; TSAb = thyroid-stimulating antibody; TSH = thyroid-stimulating hormone

scholarly journals The incidence of depression and anxiety in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie YE Park ◽  
Alyssa M Howren ◽  
Enav Z Zusman ◽  
John M Esdaile ◽  
Mary A De Vera
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Included Study ◽  
Depression And Anxiety ◽  
Random Effects Models ◽  
Cochrane Database ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Multivariable Regression ◽  
Psychiatric Complications

Abstract Background: As awareness for the importance of mental health continues to expand in rheumatology, it is important to understand the epidemiology of psychiatric complications in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) with the ultimate goal of future prevention and improved quality of care. This study aims to review evidence on the incidence and determinants of depression and/or anxiety among patients with AS. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL Complete, and PsycINFO for full-length observational studies that involved a sample or population of patients with AS and assessed depression and/or anxiety. Primary outcomes extracted were: 1) risk estimates for depression and/or anxiety (e.g., relative risk [RR]); and 2) determinants or factors identified as independent predictors of depression and/or anxiety using multivariable regression approaches and corresponding estimates (e.g., odds ratios [OR]). Where relevant, we pooled estimates using random effects models. Results: Out of 783 titles from our search strategy, we reviewed 39 manuscripts. Four studies assessed the incidence of depression and meta-analyzing reported estimates from three of these studies yielded a pooled RR of 1.51 (95% CI 1.28 to 1.79). Differences in risk of depression among men and women with AS were inconclusive, suggesting need for further study. The incidence of anxiety was comparatively less studied with only one included study reporting a hazard ratio of 1.85 (95% CI 1.37 to 2.49). Education level was a key determinant, with lower levels associated with higher odds of depression (OR 6.65; 9% CI 1.36 to 32.51) and anxiety (OR 9.31; 9% CI 1.39 to 62.19) among AS patients. Conclusions: Our systematic review and meta-analysis shows an increased risk of depression and anxiety among patients with AS. These findings suggest the importance of monitoring and care for psychiatric conditions in AS.

HLA-B27 is a Risk Factor for Rheumatoid Arthritis: Suggestion for an Evidence-based Update

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-10
Author(s):  
Seyyed Amir Yasin Ahmadi ◽  
Reza Mohammadrezaei-Khorramabadi ◽  
Saber Abbaszadeh ◽  
Jafar Rezaian ◽  
Farhad Shahsavar
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Human Leukocyte ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Hla B27 ◽  
Leukocyte Antigen ◽  
And Personalized Medicine

Previously, the association of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B27 with ankylosing spondylitis has been investigated as original and meta-analysis studies. However, the association of HLA-B27 with rheumatoid arthritis is not currently investigated as a meta-analysis. Hence, in this letter, a brief meta-analysis on this association will be performed. Although there were some studies on the association of RA and HLA-B27, however, there was not a pooled odds ratio reported in textbooks. Based on this brief metaanalysis, number 2.687 can be reported as the odds ratio of this association. It shows that this association is neither sensitive nor specific, but can be an idea for pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine as a potential risk factor. Such other associations should be reported numerically and updated in textbooks.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document