scholarly journals Allogeneic Platelet-Rich Plasma: Is It Safe and Effective for Wound Repair?

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Shiva Akbarzadeh ◽  
Maxwell B. McKenzie ◽  
Md. Mostafizur Rahman ◽  
Heather Cleland
Keyword(s):  
Wound Repair ◽  
English Language ◽  
Chronic Wounds ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Safe Alternative ◽  
Preparation Methods ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Ovid Medline ◽  
Platelet Releasate

Background: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and its derivatives are an emerging biotechnology whereby concentrated platelets provide damaged tissue with growth factors, cytokines, and other mediators to improve healing outcomes. Although there is strong evidence in the benefits of autologous PRP for both acute and chronic wounds, allogeneic PRP has been studied far less in comparison. Summary: In this mini-review, we discuss critical steps of allogenic PRP (and its derivatives) preparation. We performed a non-systematic review of the literature to identify animal and human subject studies testing allogenic PRP for wound treatment. We searched OVID Medline and PubMed for articles using the keywords “wound, ulcer, lesion, skin, and cutaneous” and “PRP, or platelet-rich plasma, or platelet-rich fibrin, or PRF, or platelet releasate” and “homologous, allogeneic or allogenic,” which were limited to non-review articles and English language. Two studies in animal models and 8 studies in patients were reviewed. There were inconsistencies in preparation methods, treatment regimens, and some lacked a control group in their studies. Despite these variations, none of the studies identified any major side effects or adverse events. The treatment resulted in a reduced time to heal and/or reduced wound size in most cases. Key Messages: In situations where autologous PRP is not available or suitable, allogeneic PRP appears to provide a safe alternative. Its efficacy, however, requires larger-scale studies with appropriate controls. Standardization in PRP preparation and treatment regime are also needed to be able to interpret allogenic PRP efficacy.

scholarly journals Platelet-rich plasma accelerates skin wound healing by promoting re-epithelialization

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pengcheng Xu ◽  
Yaguang Wu ◽  
Lina Zhou ◽  
Zengjun Yang ◽  
Xiaorong Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wound Healing ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Wound Repair ◽  
Chronic Wounds ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Skin Wound ◽  
Local Inflammation ◽  
Skin Wound Healing

Abstract Background Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been suggested to be effective for wound healing. However, evidence for its use in patients with acute and chronic wounds remains insufficient. The aims of this study were to comprehensively examine the effectiveness, synergy and possible mechanism of PRP-mediated improvement of acute skin wound repair. Methods Full-thickness wounds were made on the back of C57/BL6 mice. PRP or saline solution as a control was administered to the wound area. Wound healing rate, local inflammation, angiogenesis, re-epithelialization and collagen deposition were measured at days 3, 5, 7 and 14 after skin injury. The biological character of epidermal stem cells (ESCs), which reflect the potential for re-epithelialization, was further evaluated in vitro and in vivo. Results PRP strongly improved skin wound healing, which was associated with regulation of local inflammation, enhancement of angiogenesis and re-epithelialization. PRP treatment significantly reduced the production of inflammatory cytokines interleukin-17A and interleukin-1β. An increase in the local vessel intensity and enhancement of re-epithelialization were also observed in animals with PRP administration and were associated with enhanced secretion of growth factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor and insulin-like growth factor-1. Moreover, PRP treatment ameliorated the survival and activated the migration and proliferation of primary cultured ESCs, and these effects were accompanied by the differentiation of ESCs into adult cells following the changes of CD49f and keratin 10 and keratin 14. Conclusion PRP improved skin wound healing by modulating inflammation and increasing angiogenesis and re-epithelialization. However, the underlying regulatory mechanism needs to be investigated in the future. Our data provide a preliminary theoretical foundation for the clinical administration of PRP in wound healing and skin regeneration.

scholarly journals ON IMPROVING THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC WOUNDS OF VENOUS GENESIS

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 75-78
Author(s):  
Ya.V. Rybalka
Keyword(s):  
Wound Healing ◽  
Chronic Wounds ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Wound Area ◽  
Area Reduction ◽  
Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Autologous Platelet ◽  
Group 1

Introduction. The analysis of the effectiveness of applying autologous platelet-rich plasma was performed in order to improve the results of surgical treatment of patients with wounds that heal slowly. Materials. The study is based on the analysis of the treatment of 61 patients who suffered from slow-healing wounds of venous genesis with a diameter of no more than 8 cm on the lower extremities and took the treatment at the surgical ward. The proposed method was based on obtaining autologous enriched platelet plasma followed by its injection along the periphery of the wound. The degree of reduction of the wound surface area was assessed by the method of contact planimetry per day. The patients of the 1st group demonstrated the wound area reduction by 5.1 ± 0.6%, and the patients of the group 2 – by 1.8 ± 0.4% (p <0005). The results indicate an increase in the rate of wound healing in patients in group 1 compared with patients in group 2. During the entire follow-up period (12 weeks), complete wound epithelialisation occurred in 21 (70%) patients in group 1 and in 10 (33.3%) patients of the group 2. The wound area decreased by more than 50% in 6 patients of group 1 (20%) and in 2 (7%) patients of the control group. The wound area decreased less than by 50% in 3 patients in group 1 (10%), and in 19 patients in group 2 (60%). The use of PRP therapy has been proven to have a significant positive effect on the process of wound healing compared with the use of standard methods used for the control group. Conclusion: increase in the wound healing pace in patients of group 1 (test) compared with patients of group 2 (control) can be explained by using autologous platelet-enriched plasma as an additional means to the standard therapy.

scholarly journals Efficacy of autologous platelet rich plasma versus regular dressing in chronic wounds

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 4103
Author(s):  
Asif . ◽  
N. Chandramouli
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Wounds ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Research Centre ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Percentage Decrease ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials ◽  
Effective Treatment Modality ◽  
Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Autologous Platelet

Background: Chronic wounds are a frequent problem and pose a heavy burden to the service provider. Platelet extract containing several growth factors used on chronic wounds has shown impressive results in both healing percentage and time for epithelisation. Platelet extract from the patient’s own blood has been used in trials as a cheap and equally effective alternative to commercial platelet gels. The aim of the study was to demonstrate the therapeutic role of autologous platelet rich plasma (APRP) in epithelialisation and reduction in size of chronic wounds of lower limb.Methods: It is a case control study, conducted at Sri Adichunchanagiri Hospital and Research Centre, B.G. Nagara, Karnataka. Conducted during January 2017 to June 2018 this study consisted of 30 patients with chronic ulcers between the age group of 18-80 years, with duration of ulcer ranging from 12 to 26 weeks. After obtaining consent they were randomly allotted into control and test groups with 15 patients each. Control group patients were treated with conventional dressing and in test group APRP dressing was done. Later percentage decrease in wound size was assessed.Results: Ulcer size decreased significantly (p<0.0001) in test group compared to control group. No unwanted effects or complications noted.Conclusions: APRP is a safe and effective treatment modality for chronic non-healing ulcers. It enhances healing and also decreases the associated cost and morbidity. Further research and randomized controlled clinical trials on larger patient population are necessary to validate the results.

scholarly journals Efficacy of platelet rich plasma in chronic leg ulcers: a prospective randomized controlled study

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 78
Author(s):  
Naphisabet Wanniang ◽  
Pankaj Shukla ◽  
Varadraj V. Pai
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Wounds ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
The United States ◽  
Complete Healing ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Leg Ulcers ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Chronic Leg Ulcers ◽  
Area And Volume

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Chronic wounds affect approximately 1-2% of the population in Europe and the United States. Platelet rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as an effective, inexpensive, minimally invasive treatment modality for chronic leg ulcers. Objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of PRP, and to compare the effectiveness of PRP to regular antiseptic dressing in the management of chronic leg ulcers.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> A hundred patients with chronic leg ulcers of more than 6 weeks duration were randomized into two groups (PRP and conventional dressing group). Patients in the PRP group received weekly intradermal injections of PRP to the wound in addition to conventional daily dressings till complete healing of the ulcers or up to a maximum of 6 weekly PRP sessions. Percentage of improvement in the area and volume of the ulcers were recorded. Patients were followed up at 1 month post PRP treatment.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> The mean reduction in the area of the ulcers at the end of 6 weeks was 66.39% in the PRP group and 28.6% in the control group. The mean reduction in volume of the ulcers at the end of 6 weeks was 71.80% and 37.88% in the case and control group respectively. At the end of 1 month post treatment follow-up, 74% and 10% of the ulcers treated with PRP and with conventional dressing respectively showed complete healing.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Leg ulcers treated with PRP showed a significantly higher reduction in the area and volume of the ulcers compared to ulcers treated with conventional moist dressing.</p>

scholarly journals Hydrogel Preparation Methods and Biomaterials for Wound Dressing

Life ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1016
Author(s):  
Jingjing Su ◽  
Jiankang Li ◽  
Jiaheng Liang ◽  
Kun Zhang ◽  
Jingan Li
Keyword(s):  
Wound Dressing ◽  
Wound Repair ◽  
Chronic Wounds ◽  
Healing Process ◽  
3D Structure ◽  
Skin Wound ◽  
Wound Dressings ◽  
Wound Healing Process ◽  
Skin Wound Healing ◽  
Preparation Methods

Wounds have become one of the causes of death worldwide. The metabolic disorder of the wound microenvironment can lead to a series of serious symptoms, especially chronic wounds that bring great pain to patients, and there is currently no effective and widely used wound dressing. Therefore, it is important to develop new multifunctional wound dressings. Hydrogel is an ideal dressing candidate because of its 3D structure, good permeability, excellent biocompatibility, and ability to provide a moist environment for wound repair, which overcomes the shortcomings of traditional dressings. This article first briefly introduces the skin wound healing process, then the preparation methods of hydrogel dressings and the characteristics of hydrogel wound dressings made of natural biomaterials and synthetic materials are introduced. Finally, the development prospects and challenges of hydrogel wound dressings are discussed.

Allogenic Pure Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy for Adhesive Capsulitis: A Bed-to-Bench Study With Propensity Score Matching Using a Corticosteroid Control Group

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110186
Author(s):  
Min Ji Lee ◽  
Kang Sup Yoon ◽  
Sohee Oh ◽  
Sue Shin ◽  
Chris Hyunchul Jo
Keyword(s):  
Muscle Strength ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Inflammatory Cytokines ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Corticosteroid Injection ◽  
Adhesive Capsulitis ◽  
Shoulder Function ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Inflammatory Condition

Background: While platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been widely studied for musculoskeletal disorders, few studies to date have reported its use for adhesive capsulitis (AC). Fully characterized and standardized allogenic PRP may provide clues to solve the underlying mechanism of PRP with respect to synovial inflammation and thus may clarify its clinical indications. Purpose: To clinically evaluate the safety and efficacy of a fully characterized pure PRP injection in patients with AC and to assess the effects of pure PRP on synoviocytes with or without inflammation in vitro. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study and cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: For the clinical analysis, a total of 15 patients with AC received an ultrasonography-guided intra-articular PRP injection and were observed for 6 months. Pain, range of motion (ROM), muscle strength, shoulder function, and overall satisfaction in the patients were evaluated using questionnaires at 1 week as well as at 1, 3, and 6 months after the PRP injection and results were compared with the results of a propensity score−matched control group that received a corticosteroid injection (40 mg triamcinolone acetonide). For the in vitro analysis, synoviocytes were cultured with or without interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and PRP. The gene expression of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines as well as matrix enzymes and their inhibitors was evaluated. Results: At 6-month follow-up, pure PRP significantly decreased pain and improved ROM, muscle strength, and shoulder function to levels comparable with those after a corticosteroid injection. All pain values, strength measurements, and functional scores significantly improved up to 6 months in the PRP group, but these measures improved up to 3 months and then were decreased at 6 months in the corticosteroid group. ROM was significantly improved in the 2 groups at 6 months compared with baseline. Allogenic PRP did not cause adverse events. For the in vitro findings, PRP induced inflammation but significantly improved the IL 1β−induced synovial inflammatory condition by decreasing proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, tumor necrosis factor−α, IL-6, cyclooxygenase-2, and microsomal prostaglandin E synthase−1 and decreased matrix enzymes (matrix metalloproteinase−1, −3, and −13 as well as a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs−4 and −5) and further increasing anti-inflammatory cytokines such as vasoactive intestinal peptide. Conclusion: This study showed that PRP decreased pain and improved shoulder ROM and function to an extent comparable with that of a corticosteroid in patients with AC. Allogenic pure PRP acted in a pleiotropic manner and decreased proinflammatory cytokines only in the inflammatory condition. Clinical Relevance: Allogenic PRP could be a treatment option for the inflammatory stage of AC.

Foot and Ankle Injections in Athletes

2021 ◽  
pp. 194173812110036
Author(s):  
Jonathan K. Ochoa ◽  
Christopher E. Gross ◽  
Robert B. Anderson ◽  
Andrew R. Hsu
Keyword(s):  
English Language ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Autologous Blood ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Placental Tissue ◽  
Ankle Injuries ◽  
Extensive Literature ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Level Of Evidence

Context: Injections are commonly used by health care practitioners to treat foot and ankle injuries in athletes despite ongoing questions regarding efficacy and safety. Evidence Acquisition: An extensive literature review was performed through MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and EBSCOhost from database inception to 2021. Keywords searched were injections, athletes, sports, foot and ankle, corticosteroids, platelet-rich plasma, and placental tissue. Search results included articles written in the English language and encompassed reviews, case series, empirical studies, and basic science articles. Study Design: Clinical review. Level of Evidence: Level 4. Results: Corticosteroids, platelet-rich plasma/autologous blood, anesthetic, and placental tissue injections are commonly used in the treatment of foot and ankle injuries. Primary indications for injections in athletes include plantar fasciitis, Achilles tendinosis, isolated syndesmotic injury, and ankle impingement with varying clinical results. Conclusions: Despite promising results from limited case series and comparative studies, the data for safety and efficacy of injections for foot and ankle injuries in athletes remain inconclusive.

scholarly journals Systematic Review: Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Platelet-Rich Plasma and Biomaterials as New Regenerative Strategies in Chronic Skin Wounds and Soft Tissue Defects

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 1538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pietro Gentile ◽  
Simone Garcovich
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Stem Cells ◽  
Wound Healing ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Chronic Wounds ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Skin Wounds ◽  
Soft Tissue Defects ◽  
Chronic Skin ◽  
Tissue Defects

The number of clinical trials evaluating adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and biomaterials efficacy in regenerative plastic surgery has exponentially increased during the last ten years. AD-MSCs are easily accessible from various fat depots and show intrinsic plasticity in giving rise to cell types involved in wound healing and angiogenesis. AD-MSCs have been used in the treatment of soft tissue defects and chronic wounds, employed in conjunction with a fat grafting technique or with dermal substitute scaffolds and platelet-rich plasma. In this systematic review, an overview of the current knowledge on this topic has been provided, based on existing studies and the authors’ experience. A multistep search of the PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, PreMEDLINE, Ebase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Clinicaltrials.gov, Scopus database, and Cochrane databases has been performed to identify papers on AD-MSCs, PRP, and biomaterials used in soft tissue defects and chronic wounds. Of the 2136 articles initially identified, 422 articles focusing on regenerative strategies in wound healing were selected and, consequently, only 278 articles apparently related to AD-MSC, PRP, and biomaterials were initially assessed for eligibility. Of these, 85 articles were excluded as pre-clinical, experimental, and in vitro studies. For the above-mentioned reasons, 193 articles were selected; of this amount, 121 letters, expert opinions, commentary, and editorials were removed. The remaining 72 articles, strictly regarding the use of AD-MSCs, PRP, and biomaterials in chronic skin wounds and soft tissue defects, were analyzed. The studies included had to match predetermined criteria according to the patients, intervention, comparator, outcomes, and study design (PICOS) approach. The information analyzed highlights the safety and efficacy of AD-MSCs, PRP, and biomaterials on soft tissue defects and chronic wounds, without major side effects.

scholarly journals Effect of Oral Losartan on Orthobiologics: Implications for Platelet-Rich Plasma and Bone Marrow Concentrate—A Rabbit Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (19) ◽  
pp. 7374
Author(s):  
Gilberto Y. Nakama ◽  
Sabrina Gonzalez ◽  
Polina Matre ◽  
Xiaodong Mu ◽  
Kaitlyn E. Whitney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Osteochondral Defect ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Bone Marrow Concentrate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Losartan Group ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
And Control ◽  
Tgf Β1

Recent efforts have focused on customizing orthobiologics, such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and bone marrow concentrate (BMC), to improve tissue repair. We hypothesized that oral losartan (a TGF-β1 blocker with anti-fibrotic properties) could decrease TGF-β1 levels in leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP) and fibrocytes in BMC. Ten rabbits were randomized into two groups (N = 5/group): osteochondral defect + microfracture (control, group 1) and osteochondral defect + microfracture + losartan (losartan, group 2). For group 2, a dose of 10mg/kg/day of losartan was administrated orally for 12 weeks post-operatively. After 12 weeks, whole blood (WB) and bone marrow aspirate (BMA) samples were collected to process LP-PRP and BMC. TGF-β1 concentrations were measured in WB and LP-PRP with multiplex immunoassay. BMC cell populations were analyzed by flow cytometry with CD31, CD44, CD45, CD34, CD146 and CD90 antibodies. There was no significant difference in TGF-β1 levels between the losartan and control group in WB or LP-PRP. In BMC, the percentage of CD31+ cells (endothelial cells) in the losartan group was significantly higher than the control group (p = 0.008), while the percentage of CD45+ cells (hematopoietic cells-fibrocytes) in the losartan group was significantly lower than the control group (p = 0.03).

Allogeneic Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy as an Effective and Safe Adjuvant Method for Chronic Wounds

2020 ◽  
Vol 246 ◽  
pp. 284-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuan Liao ◽  
Jun-Xian Liang ◽  
Sheng-Hong Li ◽  
Su Huang ◽  
Jian-Xin Yan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Wounds ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Plasma Therapy
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document