scholarly journals Need for vitreous surgeries in proliferative diabetic retinopathy in 10 years follow-up: India Retinal Disease Study (IRDS) group Report no.2

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rehana Khan ◽  
Janani Surya ◽  
Ramachandran Rajalakshmi ◽  
Padmaja Kumari Rani ◽  
Giridhar Anantharaman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Panretinal Photocoagulation ◽  
Vitreous Surgery ◽  
Retinal Surgery

Introduction: To report the 10 - year rate of vitrectomies and the associated factors in people with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) from a multicentric cohort of people with diabetes mellitus. Methods: Ten centres in India with established vitreoretinal services for over 10 years were invited to provide long-term data on PDR. People with Type 1 or 2 diabetes with a clinical diagnosis of active PDR in one or both eyes were included. Baseline data collected included age, sex, duration of diabetes, source of referral and best-corrected visual acuity and diabetic retinopathy status in both eyes. Available follow-up data included the numbers of panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) sessions, cataract surgery, treatment of diabetic macular edema, use of anti- vascular endothelial growth factor therapy, vitrectomy with or without retinal surgeries over 10 years. Results: Over 10 years, 89 % needed supplemental PRP after initial complete PRP. One – third required retinal surgery, 16 % needed intravitreal injection. Men (74.5%) had significant higher risk for vitreous surgery. Of the group with low risk PDR, 56.8% did not require vitreoretinal surgery, p <0.001. Of the patients who underwent cataract surgery and had intravitreal anti-VEGF injections, 78.5% and 28.2% needed subsequent vitreous surgery (VR), p=0.006 and <0.0001 respectively. Independent predictors of need for vitreo-retinal surgery included those who underwent cataract surgery and those with poor baseline visual acuity (logMAR). Eyes at lower risk for VR surgery included the eyes previously treated with PRP and low-risk PDR at baseline. Conclusion: Despite initial ‘complete’ PRP, one third of our study cohort needed vitrectomies over 10 years, highlighting that these patients require regular follow-up for a long period of time.

scholarly journals Triamcinolone and Bevacizumab as Adjunctive Therapies to Panretinal Photocoagulation for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Lopez-Lopez ◽  
F. Gomez-Ulla ◽  
M. J. Rodriguez-Cid ◽  
L. Arias
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Contrast Sensitivity ◽  
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Panretinal Photocoagulation ◽  
Central Macular Thickness ◽  
Intravitreal Triamcinolone ◽  
Corrected Visual Acuity ◽  
Best Corrected Visual Acuity

Purpose. To evaluate efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone (IVT) and bevacizumab (IVB) as adjunctive treatments to panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) in proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Methods. In 60 eyes of 45 patients with PDR, PRP (PRP group), PRP with IVT (IVT group), or PRP with IVB (IVB group) was performed. Regression of new vessels (NV), changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and contrast sensitivity at 1,2, and 6 months were evaluated. Results. Initial mean numbers of active NV and BCVA were 3.45 and 67.35 in the PRP group, 4.35 and 76.65 in the IVT group, and 4.79 and 75.53 in the IVB group. At the 6-month follow-up, numbers of active NV were 2.5 (P=0.064), 1.11 (P=0.000), and 1.11 (P=0.002), and there was a mean loss of 2,6 (P=0.055), 3.9 (P=0.011), and 0.9 letters (P=0.628) in the PRP, IVT, and IVB groups, respectively. Changes in CMT in the PRP and IVT groups were not significant, but significantly increased in the IVB group (P=0.032). Contrast sensitivity remained stable in PRP and IVB groups and slightly decreased in IVT group. Conclusions. Adjunctive use of both triamcinolone and bevacizumab with PRP lead to a greater reduction of active NV than PRP alone in PDR, although no differences were seen between the two of them.

scholarly journals Factors correlated with visual outcomes at two and four years after vitreous surgery for proliferative diabetic retinopathy

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. e0244281
Author(s):  
Katsuhiro Nishi ◽  
Koichi Nishitsuka ◽  
Teiko Yamamoto ◽  
Hidetoshi Yamashita
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Vitreous Hemorrhage ◽  
Severe Case ◽  
Vitreous Surgery ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Postoperative Visual Acuity ◽  
Treatment Provision

Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is the most severe case of diabetic retinopathy that can cause visual impairment. This study aimed to reveal the factors correlated with better postoperative visual acuity after a long follow-up in patients who underwent vitrectomy for PDR. We retrospectively analyzed the data set including systemic findings, ocular findings, and surgical factors from registered patients who could be completely followed up for 2 or 4 years after vitrectomy. We ultimately enrolled 128 eyes from 100 patients who underwent vitrectomy for PDR between January 2008 and September 2012 and were followed up for >2 years. Among them, 91 eyes from 70 patients could be followed up for 4 years. Factors related to the postoperative visual acuity of ≥20/40 and ≥20/30 after 2 and 4 years were investigated by logistic regression analysis. Better postoperative visual acuity correlated with the following factors: no rubeosis iridis ([≥20/40 at 2 years; odds ratio {OR}, 0.068; 95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.012–0.39; P = 0.003], [≥20/30 at 2 years; OR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01–0.40; P = 0.03], [≥20/30 at 4 years; OR, 0.078; 95% CI, 0.006–0.96; P = 0.04]), no fibrovascular membrane [(≥20/40 at 2 years; OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.061–0.81; P = 0.02), (≥20/40 at 4 years; OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.07–0.94; P = 0.04), (≥20/30 at 4 years; OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.04–0.52; P = 0.004)], existing vitreous hemorrhage (≥20/30 at 2 years; OR, 9.55; 95% CI, 1.03–95.27; P = 0.04), and no reoperation ([≥20/40 at 4 years; OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.03–0.78; P = 0.02], [≥20/30 at 4 years; OR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.07–0.54; P = 0.01]). Treatment provision before disease severity and treatment without complications were associated with good postoperative visual acuity.

Endolaserless Vitrectomy With Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy-Related Vitreous Hemorrhage (LASER LESS TRIAL)

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 127-137
Author(s):  
Dennis M. Marcus ◽  
Harinderjit Singh ◽  
Davis C. Starnes ◽  
Harveen Walia ◽  
Amina Farooq ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Vitreous Hemorrhage ◽  
Panretinal Photocoagulation ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Intravitreal Aflibercept ◽  
Central Subfield Thickness ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Purpose: For proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) eyes not requiring vitrectomy, Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Protocol S and the CLARITY trial demonstrated better visual function and anatomical outcomes with less proliferative and diabetic macular edema consequences in the antivascular endothelial growth factor groups compared to the panretinal photocoagulation groups. Intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) may represent a useful therapy with vitrectomy for PDR-related vitreous hemorrhage (VH) as a viable alternative to intraoperative endolaser during vitrectomy. We will determine the safety and efficacy when aflibercept is used for PDR-related VH with endolaserless vitrectomy. Methods: Evaluation of endolaserless vitrectomy and 2 mg IAI for PDR-related VH. Eyes receive 1 preoperative and intraoperative IAI followed by randomization to a q8week group receiving 4 postoperative q4week IAI followed by q8week IAI or q16week group receiving 2 postoperative q4week IAI followed by q16week IAI. Main Outcome Measures: Herein, we present pooled safety and efficacy outcomes through 4 months. Results: Twenty-one of 24 eyes were randomized. Preoperative average visual acuity (VA) was 36 letters (20/200). At 4-month follow-up, 18 of 21 randomized eyes showed an average VA of 72 letters (20/40) with an average visual gain of 38 (range, 0-84 gain) letters. Average optical coherence tomography (OCT) central subfield thickness (CST) at 1-month postoperative follow-up was 311 µm. Average OCT CST at 4-month follow-up was 272 µm (average thinning of 38 µm). No significant short-term ocular or systemic adverse events were observed through 4 months. Conclusions: Endolaserless vitrectomy with IAI for PDR-related VH demonstrates short-term safety with significant VA improvement.

scholarly journals A Randomized Controlled Trial of Conbercept Pretreatment before Vitrectomy in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaochun Yang ◽  
Jianbiao Xu ◽  
Ruili Wang ◽  
Yan Mei ◽  
Huo Lei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Intraoperative Bleeding ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Pars Plana ◽  
Effective Adjunct

Purpose.To determine the efficacy and safety of preoperative intravitreal conbercept (IVC) injection before vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).Methods.107 eyes of 88 patients that underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for active PDR were enrolled. All patients were assigned randomly to either preoperative IVC group or control group. Follow-up examinations were performed for three months after surgery. The primary bioactivity measures were severity of intraoperative bleeding, incidence of early and late recurrent VH, vitreous clear-up time, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) levels. The secondary safety measures included intraocular pressure, endophthalmitis, rubeosis, tractional retinal detachment, and systemic adverse events.Results.The incidence and severity of intraoperative bleeding were significantly lower in IVC group than in the control group. The average vitreous clear-up time of early recurrent VH was significantly shorter in IVC group compared with that in control group. There was no significant difference in vitreous clear-up time of late recurrent VH between the two groups. Patients that received pretreatment of conbercept had much better BCVA at 3 days, 1 week, and 1 month after surgery than control group. Moreover, both patients with improved BCVA were greater in IVC group than in control group at each follow-up.Conclusions.Conbercept pretreatment could be an effective adjunct to vitrectomy in accelerating postoperative vitreous clear-up and acquiring stable visual acuity restoration for PDR.

scholarly journals Intravitreal aflibercept compared with panretinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: the CLARITY non-inferiority RCT

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sobha Sivaprasad ◽  
Philip Hykin ◽  
A Toby Prevost ◽  
Joana Vasconcelos ◽  
Amy Riddell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Research ◽  
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Biomedical Research ◽  
Research Centre ◽  
Panretinal Photocoagulation ◽  
Intravitreal Aflibercept ◽  
The Uk

Background Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) has been the standard of care for patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) for the last 40 years. It prevents severe visual loss in PDR but is also associated with adverse effects on visual functions. Objectives The clinical efficacy and mechanistic evaluation of aflibercept for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (CLARITY) trial evaluated the clinical efficacy, mechanisms and cost-effectiveness of intravitreal aflibercept (Eylea®, Regeneron, Tarrytown, NY, USA/Bayer Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany therapy for PDR. Design A multicentre, prospective, individually randomised, single-masked, active-controlled trial with concurrent economic evaluation that tested the non-inferiority of intravitreal aflibercept versus standard care PRP at 52 weeks. A subset of the participants enrolled in a mechanistic evaluation substudy. Setting 22 UK NHS clinical sites. Participants Patients aged at least 18 years having either treatment-naive PDR or active retinal neovascularisation (NV) despite prior PRP requiring treatment and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 54 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters or better in the study eye were included. Eyes with evidence of macular oedema at baseline confirmed by central subfield thickness > 320 µm on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography were excluded. Intervention In the intervention arm, intravitreal aflibercept injections were given at baseline, 4 and 8 weeks and patients were subsequently reviewed every month and injected pro re nata based on the treatment response defined by degree of regression of retinal NV. In the comparator arm, PRP was completed in 2-weekly sessions and then supplemented if necessary at 8-weekly intervals. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the mean change in BCVA at 52 weeks utilising a linear mixed-effects model incorporating data from both week 12 and week 52. Results A total of 232 participants (116 per arm) were recruited between August 2014 and November 2015. A total of 221 and 210 participants contributed to the intention-to-treat (ITT) model and per-protocol (PP) analysis, respectively. Economic evaluation was undertaken on 202 participants (101 per arm) with complete cost and outcome data. Aflibercept was non-inferior and superior to PRP in both the ITT population [mean BCVA difference 3.9 letters, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3 to 5.6 letters; p < 0.0001] and the PP population (difference 4.0 letters, 95% CI 2.4 to 5.7 letters; p < 0.0001). From a public sector multiagency perspective that covers health and social care services, treatment with aflibercept costs more in terms of total resource use (mean adjusted total additional cost per patient = £5475, bootstrapped 95% CI £5211 to £5750) than PRP over a 12-month follow-up period. There were a small number of important safety events in each arm. Patients were more satisfied with aflibercept than PRP. Limitations This study is limited to 1 year of follow-up. Conclusions At an additional cost, the study shows that intravitreal aflibercept is an effective alternative treatment option for PDR in the first year. Future work Future research is needed to evaluate the long-term benefits of aflibercept in comparison with PRP and other anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents for this condition. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN32207582. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Efficacy and Mechanistic Evaluation programme, a Medical Research Council and NIHR partnership. Aflibercept was supplied by Bayer Plc (Reading, UK). The study was sponsored by NIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre and supported by the UK Clinical Research Network. The research was supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and University College London Institute of Ophthalmology, the NIHR Moorfields Clinical Research Facility and the UK Clinical Reasearch Collaboration-registered King’s Clinical Trials Unit at King’s Health Partners, which is partly funded by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London.

scholarly journals Visual Acuity, Retinal Sensitivity, and Macular Thickness Changes in Diabetic Patients without Diabetic Retinopathy after Cataract Surgery

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Spela Stunf Pukl ◽  
Nataša Vidović Valentinčič ◽  
Mojca Urbančič ◽  
Irena Irman Grčar ◽  
Rok Grčar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Retinal Sensitivity ◽  
Diabetic Retina ◽  
Corrected Visual Acuity ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study

Aim. Functional and morphological macular study after cataract surgery in a group of diabetics without diabetic retinopathy compared to nondiabetics to evaluate the effect of surgical oxidative stress on diabetic retina.Methods. Prospective, comparative study. Preoperative eye exam, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured by ETDRS letters, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were followed by standard cataract surgery. The follow-up visits at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively included BCVA, OCT, and microperimetry, to analyze changes within and between the groups.Results. The BCVA improved significantly in diabetics and controls: 64.2 to 81.0 and 61.9 to 82.1 ETDRS at 6 months, respectively. The central macula at OCT significantly thickened in both groups, while the central 5 fields, corresponding to the microperimetry area, subclinically thickened from 284.20 to 291.18 μm at 6 months only in diabetics (p=0.026). A matching slight decrease in the microperimetry sensitivity from 1 to 6 months was found also only in diabetics, with mean average difference −0.75 dB (p=0.04).Conclusion. Underlying diabetes does not influence the surgical outcome in diabetics without diabetic retinopathy. However, slight thickening of wider macula and corresponding decrease in retinal sensitivity observed in diabetics 6 months postoperatively might influence visual function on long term.

scholarly journals Effect of Intravitreous Aflibercept vs Vitrectomy With Panretinal Photocoagulation on Visual Acuity in Patients With Vitreous Hemorrhage From Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

JAMA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 324 (23) ◽  
pp. 2383
Author(s):  
Andrew N. Antoszyk ◽  
Adam R. Glassman ◽  
Wesley T. Beaulieu ◽  
Lee M. Jampol ◽  
Chirag D. Jhaveri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Vitreous Hemorrhage ◽  
Panretinal Photocoagulation

scholarly journals Visual outcomes and complications following One-way Air-fluid exchange technique for vitreous hemorrhage post vitrectomy in proliferative diabetic retinopathy patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qun Wang ◽  
Jie Zhao ◽  
Qing Xu ◽  
Cui Han ◽  
Baojie Hou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Vitreous Hemorrhage ◽  
Fluid Exchange ◽  
Treatment Room ◽  
Procedural Complications ◽  
The One

Abstract Background To evaluate the efficacy and outcomes following one-way surgical technique for the treatment of vitreous hemorrhage post vitrectomy in proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) patients. Methods Those PDR patients who had vitrectomy with balance saline tamponade and then developed vitreous hemorrhage post vitrectomy were included in this study. 47 patients underwent the one-way air-fluid exchange surgical procedure with a 10 ml syringe used to exchange between 4.5–5.5 ml of fluid in the treatment room. After the air-fluid surgical exchange procedure, additional treatments were administered when needed. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and occurrence of intra-procedural and post-procedural complications were collected and analyzed. Results A total of 47 eyes of 47 PDR patients with a mean age of 50.8 ± 12.0 years were reviewed. All 47 eyes had undergone vitrectomy with balance saline tamponade because of PDR. 4 of them were diagnosed with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), and 43 of them were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). All the 47 eyes were given the one-way air-fluid exchange procedure in the treatment room. In 4 cases the procedure was administered twice, and in 1 case the procedure was administered three times, followed by additional retinal photocoagulation and one intravitreal injection of Conbercept. The BCVA at the final follow-up was significantly improved from the initial acuity baseline in all cases. No complications were observed during the follow-ups. Conclusion This one-way air-fluid exchange procedure could effectively exchange the vitreous hemorrhage and improve visual acuity without obvious complications in treating vitreous hemorrhage post vitrectomy.

scholarly journals Single-Session Low Duration Panretinal Photocoagulation Using Conventional Laser on Central Subfield Macular Thickness in Diabetic Retinopathy

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 308-313
Author(s):  
Arief S Kartasasmita ◽  
Prettyla Yollamanda ◽  
Grimaldi Ihsan ◽  
Rova Virgana
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Macular Thickness ◽  
Panretinal Photocoagulation ◽  
Single Session ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Conventional Laser

Objective:To compare the change in central subfield macular thickness following single-session and multiple-session laser panretinal photocoagulation in subjects with diabetic retinopathy.Methods:A single-center, randomized controlled trial study was performed on 28 eyes of 16 patients with severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy or proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Eyes were randomly assigned for treatment with panretinal photocoagulation performed either in single-session or multiple-session divided into three sessions during two-week period. Central subfield macular thickness was quantified using spectral domain optical coherence tomography and changes at four weeks follow-up were compared to the baseline measurement.Result:Mean baseline central subfield macular thickness of 12 eyes underwent single-session and 16 eyes underwent multiple-session panretinal photocoagulation were 342.91+109.51 micrometers and 354+171.79 micrometers (p> .05), respectively. Mean post laser central subfield macular thickness in the single-session group was 305.83+81.95 micrometers and 389.75+229.51 micrometers in the multiple-session group (p> .05). Mean central subfield macular thickness changes four weeks post laser was 37.08+94.21 micrometers for eyes treated with single-session and -35.75+123.62 micrometers for the multiple-session treated eyes (p= .101).Conclusion:There was no significant difference in change of central subfield macular thickness at four weeks post laser from treatment with single-session and multiple-session panretinal photocoagulation. Single-session panretinal photocoagulation can be used as effective multiple-session panretinal photocoagulation for the treatment of diabetic retinopathy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document