Real-Life Clinical and Functional Effects of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol-Combined Triple Therapy in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Respiration ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Corrado Pelaia ◽  
Giada Procopio ◽  
Maria Rosaria Deodato ◽  
Olivia Florio ◽  
Angelantonio Maglio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Fluticasone Furoate ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Copd Exacerbations ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Inhaled Therapy ◽  
Long Acting

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Triple therapy consisting of a drug association including an inhaled corticosteroid, a long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonist and a long-acting β<sub>2</sub>-adrenergic agonist, delivered via a single device, can be a valuable treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients experiencing frequent disease exacerbations. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> The aim of this real-life, single-center, observational study was to evaluate, in 44 COPD patients with recurrent exacerbations, the effects of the triple inhaled therapy combining fluticasone furoate, umeclidinium, and vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Within such a therapeutic context, several clinical and lung functional parameters were considered at baseline and after 24 weeks of treatment with combined inhaled triple therapy. <b><i>Results:</i></b> With respect to baseline, after 24 weeks of treatment with FF/UMEC/VI, significant changes were recorded with regard to Modified British Medical Research Council (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001) and COPD Assessment Test (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001) scores, COPD exacerbations (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001), forced expiratory volume in the first second (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001), residual volume (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.01), forced mid-expiratory flow between 25 and 75% of FVC (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001), inspiratory capacity (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.01), forced vital capacity (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05), and peak expiratory flow (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001). Moreover, in a subgroup of 28 patients, a significant increase of diffusion lung capacity (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.01) was also detected. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In conclusion, our real-life results suggest that triple inhaled therapy with FF/UMEC/VI, when given to COPD patients with frequent exacerbations, is able to positively impact on dyspnea and global health status as well as to significantly decrease COPD exacerbations and improve airflow limitation and lung hyperinflation.

scholarly journals Costs, exacerbations and pneumonia after initiating combination tiotropium olodaterol versus triple therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (15) ◽  
pp. 1299-1316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Swetha R Palli ◽  
Ami R Buikema ◽  
Mary DuCharme ◽  
Monica Frazer ◽  
Shuchita Kaila ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Inverse Probability ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Medicare Database

Aim: To compare health plan-paid costs, exacerbations and pneumonia outcomes for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) initiating combination tiotropium olodaterol (TIO + OLO) versus triple therapy (TT: long-acting muscarinic antagonist + long-acting β2 agonists + inhaled corticosteroid). Patients & methods: COPD patients initiating TIO + OLO or TT between 1 January 2014 and 30 June 2016 were identified from a managed care Medicare database and balanced for baseline characteristics using inverse probability of treatment weighting before assessment of outcomes. Results: Annual COPD-related and all-cause costs were US$4118 (35%) and US$5384 (23%) lower for TIO + OLO versus TT (both p ≤ 0.001). TIO + OLO patients had nearly half the severe exacerbations (8.3 vs 15.5%; p = 0.014) and pneumonia was also less common (18.9 vs 30.9%; p < 0.001). Conclusion: TIO + OLO was associated with improved economic and COPD health outcomes versus TT.

scholarly journals Prescribing pathways to triple therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the United States

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 175346662110010
Author(s):  
Vernon Schabert ◽  
Surbhi Shah ◽  
Ulf Holmgren ◽  
Claudia Cabrera
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Median Time ◽  
The United States ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Long Acting

Background: Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines recommend triple therapy (TT) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients based on severity. TT utilization by severity is infrequently studied in real-world settings and may deviate significantly from current clinical recommendations. This study describes prescribing pathways to TT among patients with COPD in the United States. Methods: This study analyzed Geisinger Health System electronic medical records from 1 January 2004 to 30 November 2016. Two retrospective cohorts of COPD patients were included: (1) incident COPD, and (2) incident TT users. COPD treatment patterns, including time to TT, were summarized. Time to TT was estimated using Kaplan–Meier methods. Predictors of the relative hazard for TT among incident COPD patients were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regressions. Results: Incident COPD and TT cohorts included 57,141 and 8173 patients, respectively. TT was used by 9.6% of incident COPD patients. In the year before TT, 34.3% of incident TT patients received treatment combinations recommended before TT according to GOLD recommendations, which mainly included: long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs), long-acting beta agonists (LABAs) + LAMAs, and inhaled corticosteroids  + LABAs. Among incident TT patients, median time from COPD diagnosis to TT exceeded 2 years. The hazard for TT over time was associated with lower forced expiratory volume in 1 s values, more frequent exacerbations, current/previous smoking, and comorbid lung conditions such as pulmonary vascular disease, acute respiratory failure, and lung cancer. About 15–20% of the incident TT patients stepped down to a one- or two-drug regimen. Median time to TT discontinuation or step-down were 2 and 9 months, respectively. Conclusion: The study has revealed discrepancies in the treatment of COPD patients between GOLD guidelines and actual clinical practices in the United States. Pathways to TT differed from recommended therapy regimes. Further studies are needed to understand barriers to the use of guideline-recommended TTs by healthcare providers. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

scholarly journals Prognostic and functional impact of perioperative LAMA/LABA inhaled therapy in patients with lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoko Azuma ◽  
Atsushi Sano ◽  
Takashi Sakai ◽  
Satoshi Koezuka ◽  
Hajime Otsuka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Lung Function ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Inhaled Therapy ◽  
Long Acting

Abstract Background Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an important risk factor for postoperative complications and mortality. To determine the effects of perioperative combination therapy, using a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and a long-acting β2 agonist (LABA), on preoperative lung function, postoperative morbidity and mortality, and long-term outcome in COPD patients. Methods Between January 2005 and October 2019, 130 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed COPD underwent surgery for lung cancer. We conducted a retrospective review of their medical record to evaluate that LAMA/LABA might be an optimal regimen for patients with COPD undergoing surgery for lung cancer. All patients were received perioperative rehabilitation and divided into 3 groups according to the type of perioperative inhaled therapy and management: LAMA/LABA (n = 64), LAMA (n = 23) and rehabilitation only (no bronchodilator) (n = 43). We conducted a retrospective review of their medical records. Results Patients who received preoperative LAMA/LABA therapy showed significant improvement in lung function before surgery (p < 0.001 for both forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1%pred). Compared with patients who received preoperative LAMA therapy, patients with LAMA/LABA therapy had significantly improved lung function (ΔFEV1, LAMA/LABA 223.1 mL vs. LAMA 130.0 mL, ΔFEV1%pred, LAMA/LABA 10.8% vs. LAMA 6.8%; both p < 0.05). Postoperative complications were lower frequent in the LAMA/LABA group than in the LAMA group (p = 0.007). In patients with moderate to severe air flow limitation (n = 61), those who received LAMA/LABA therapy had significantly longer overall survival and disease-free survival compared with the LAMA (p = 0.049, p = 0.026) and rehabilitation-only groups (p = 0.001, p < 0.001). Perioperative LAMA/LABA therapy was also associated with lower recurrence rates (vs. LAMA p = 0.006, vs. rehabilitation-only p = 0.008). Conclusions We believe this treatment combination is optimal for patients with lung cancer and COPD.

Current opportunities of inhaled corticosteroid therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-87
Author(s):  
I. V. Leshchenko ◽  
A. S. Meshcheryakova
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Fixed Combination ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Delivery Device ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Blood Eosinophils

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the leading cause of death in the structure of respiratory diseases. The problem of rational pharmacotherapy of COPD have attracted attention of the medical scientific society for many years. The understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease has deepened and approaches to the therapy have changed. Some COPD patients need regular fixed-combination therapy: long-acting bronchodilators (LABD) and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in order to prevent exacerbations and reduce the severity of symptoms of the disease. Blood eosinophils count is one of criteria for choosing regular therapy. The appearance of fixed triple combinations of ICS/LABD increased the effectiveness of COPD therapy, and a new delivery device for fixed combination of budesonide/formoterol makes it possible to use ICS successfully in the most severe patients.

scholarly journals Periodontal Health and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niamh Kelly ◽  
Lewis Winning ◽  
Christopher Irwin ◽  
Fionnuala Lundy ◽  
Dermot Linden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Periodontal Health ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Copd Exacerbations ◽  
Copd Patients

Abstract BackgroundA growing body of evidence suggests a role for oral bacteria in lung infections. This systematic review aimed to analyse the association between poor periodontal health and the frequency of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. MethodsPubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL and Medline were searched for studies published until May 2020, with no language restriction. Studies reporting periodontal condition, or periodontal treatment outcomes, with data on the frequency of exacerbations of COPD, were identified. The primary outcome was the frequency of exacerbations and secondary outcomes included quality of life and hospitalisation. Studies were assessed for eligibility and quality by two assessors independently.Results Searches identified 532 records and 8 met the inclusion criteria. The data from intervention studies showed reduction in the frequency of exacerbations following periodontal treatment. Data from observational studies suggest association of worse plaque scores with exacerbation but not pocket depth or clinical attachment loss. Better periodontal health was also associated with reduced frequency of COPD exacerbations, hospitalisations and improved quality of life in COPD patients. Due to the high heterogeneity no meta-analysis was performed. The quality of some of the included studies was low and there was evidence of high risk of bias.ConclusionThe data supports possible association between poor periodontal health, the frequency of exacerbations and quality of life in COPD patients. The evidence is limited by high risk of bias suggesting need for well-designed and adequately powered randomised control trials.The PROSPERO registration number CRD42020180328

scholarly journals Prevention of COPD exacerbations: medications and other controversies

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 00011-2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jørgen Vestbo ◽  
Peter Lange
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Short Review ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Copd Exacerbations ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Long Acting

Exacerbations have significant impact on the morbidity and mortality of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Most guidelines emphasise prevention of exacerbations by treatment with long-acting bronchodilators and/or anti-inflammatory drugs. Whereas most of this treatment is evidence-based, it is clear that patients differ regarding the nature of exacerbations and are likely to benefit differently from different types of treatment. In this short review, we wish to highlight this, suggest a first step in differentiating pharmacological exacerbation prevention and call for more studies in this area. Finally, we wish to highlight that there are perhaps easier ways of achieving similar success in exacerbation prevention using nonpharmacological tools.

scholarly journals LABA/LAMA fixed-dose combinations versus LAMA monotherapy in the prevention of COPD exacerbations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175346662093719
Author(s):  
Ching-Yi Chen ◽  
Wang-Chun Chen ◽  
Chi-Hsien Huang ◽  
Yi-Ping Hsiang ◽  
Chau-Chyun Sheu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Similar Efficacy ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Copd Exacerbations ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
History Of ◽  
Long Acting

Background: Long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) monotherapy is recommended for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with high risk of exacerbations. It is unclear whether long-acting β2-agonist (LABA)/LAMA fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) are more effective than LAMAs alone in preventing exacerbations. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature to investigate whether LABA/LAMA FDCs are more effective than LAMA monotherapy in preventing exacerbations. Methods: We searched several databases and manufacturers’ websites to identify relevant randomized clinical trials comparing LABA/LAMA FDC treatment with LAMAs alone ⩾24 weeks. Outcomes of interest were time to first exacerbation and rates of moderate to severe, severe and all exacerbations. Results: We included 10 trials in 9 articles from 2013 to 2018 with a total of 19,369 patients for analysis in this study. Compared with LAMA monotherapy, LABA/LAMA FDCs demonstrated similar efficacy in terms of time to first exacerbation [hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79–1.18; p = 0.71], moderate to severe exacerbations [risk ratio (RR), 0.96; 95% CI 0.90–1.03; p = 0.28], severe exacerbations (RR, 0.92; 95% CI 0.81–1.03; p = 0.15), and a marginal superiority in terms of all exacerbations (RR, 0.92; 95% CI 0.86–1.00; p = 0.04). The incidence of all exacerbation events was lower in the LABA/LAMA FDC group for the COPD patients with a history of previous exacerbations and those with a longer treatment period (52–64 weeks). Conclusion: This study provides evidence that LABA/LAMA FDCs are marginally superior in the prevention of all exacerbations compared with LAMA monotherapy in patients with COPD. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

scholarly journals Reassessing the Role of Eosinophils as a Biomarker in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tinè ◽  
Biondini ◽  
Semenzato ◽  
Bazzan ◽  
Cosio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Exacerbation Risk ◽  
Blood Eosinophils

Blood eosinophils measurement, as proxy for tissue eosinophils, has become an important biomarker for exacerbation risk and response to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Its use to determine the pharmacological approach is recommended in the latest COPD guidelines. The potential role of blood eosinophils is mainly based on data derived from post-hoc and retrospective analyses that showed an association between increased blood eosinophils and risk of exacerbations, as well as mitigation of this risk with ICS. Yet other publications, including studies in real life COPD, do not confirm these assumptions. Moreover, anti-eosinophil therapy targeting interleukin (IL)-5 failed to reduce exacerbations in COPD patients with high blood eosinophils, which casts significant doubts on the role of eosinophils in COPD. Furthermore, a reduction of eosinophils might be harmful since COPD patients with relatively high eosinophils have better pulmonary function, better life quality, less infections and longer survival. These effects are probably linked to the role of eosinophils in the immune response against pathogens. In conclusion, in COPD, high blood eosinophils are widely used as a biomarker for exacerbation risk and response to ICS. However, much is yet to be learned about the reasons for the high eosinophil counts, their variations and their controversial effects on the fate of COPD patients.

scholarly journals The Importance of Inhaler Adherence to Prevent COPD Exacerbations

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose R Jardim ◽  
Oliver A. Nascimento
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Good Adherence ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Life Study ◽  
Copd Exacerbations

It has been shown that the better outcomes of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are closely associated with adherence to drug therapy, independent of the treatment administered. The clinical trial Towards a Revolution in COPD Health (TORCH) study clearly showed in a three year follow up that patients with good adherence to their inhaler treatment presented a longer time before the first exacerbation, a lower susceptibility to exacerbation and lower all-cause mortality. The Latin American Study of 24-hour Symptoms in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (LASSYC), a real-life study, evaluated the self-reported inhaler adherence in COPD patients in seven countries in a cross-sectional non-interventional study and found that approximately 50% of the patients had good adherence, 30% moderate adherence and 20% poor adherence. Adherence to inhaler may be evaluated by the specific inhaler adherence questionnaire, the Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI). Several factors may predict the incorrect use of inhalers or adherence in COPD outpatient, including the number of devices and the daily dosing frequency. Ideally, patient education, simplicity of the device operation, the use of just one device for multiple medications and the best adaptation of the patient to the inhaler should guide the physician in prescribing the device.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document