scholarly journals Lung Sestamibi Uptake on Myocardial Perfusion Imaging and Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Julia Bian ◽  
Charles A. Herzog ◽  
Janani Rangaswami ◽  
Ron Wald ◽  
Jennifer A. Stratman ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background and Objectives:</i></b> In patients with CKD and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), cardiac stress testing has low sensitivity and specificity for coronary disease. Alternate markers that are derived during the stress testing may enhance the predictive characteristic of stress testing. The objective was to examine the predictive characteristic of lung-to-heart ratio (LHR) in patients with CKD and ESKD. <b><i>Design, Setting, Participants, and Measurements:</i></b> Retrospective parallel cohort of ESKD and CKD not on dialysis (CKD-ND) who underwent stress testing with nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging utilizing sestamibi tracer and regadenoson. Stress LHR was calculated by the processing software and reported. Patients were analyzed by tertile of LHR (≤0.28, 0.29–0.32, ≥0.33). The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, hospitalization for myocardial infarction or unstable angina, or revascularization. <b><i>Results:</i></b> There were 144 CKD-ND and 145 ESKD patients. Patients with ESKD had greater comorbidity burden than CKD-ND. Stress tests were more often performed for pre-operative risk assessment among ESKD versus CKD-ND (53.8 vs. 5.6%, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). ESKD patients more likely had ischemia identified on stress testing (19.3 vs. 8.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.001). Mean LHR was 0.31 (Standard deviation – SD: 0.09) and was similar across CKD-ND stages and ESKD. Primary outcome in the lowest (23%) and highest (33.3%) LHR tertile was higher than the middle tertile (12.8%); <i>p</i> = 0.005. This finding was similar between CKD-ND and ESKD and persisted in multivariable analysis. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> LHR ≤0.28 and ≥0.33 are independently associated with higher risk for death in patients with CKD-ND and ESKD. Future studies are warranted to understand the association of extreme LHR values and outcomes in this high-risk population.

ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 593-600
Author(s):  
Danilo Neglia ◽  
Juhani Knuuti

The use of nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) for the assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) may have advantages in specific patient populations. While in asymptomatic individuals it is in general not recommended, it can be considered to detect myocardial ischaemia and CAD in specific patients at high risk such as patients with diabetes. In patients with angina but without obstructive CAD, MPI and in particular positron emission tomography (PET), is considered the reference imaging modality to evaluate the presence and extent of coronary microvascular dysfunction. Quantitation by PET, and more recently by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve is able to stratify the prognostic risk in this population. This is one of the reasons why SPECT and in particular PET have a specific application to recognize suspected CAD in women. In fact, even if women frequently have less anatomical obstructive disease than men, they are not necessarily protected from ischaemic cardiovascular events, possibly because of higher prevalence of diffuse endothelial/microvascular coronary dysfunction. In the growing elderly population with higher prevalence of obstructive CAD, stress nuclear MPI (with pharmacological vasodilatation in patients unable to adequately exercise) is particularly useful for its high sensitivity to diagnose significant CAD and its ability to stratify the risk and indicate possible revascularization. Similarly, nuclear MPI is particularly useful in patients with angina and chronic kidney disease who have a higher probability of obstructive CAD. On the other hand, no data exist that demonstrate a clinical benefit for screening asymptomatic patients with chronic kidney disease by MPI imaging.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document