scholarly journals Postoperative Lead Movement after Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery and the Change of Stimulation Volume

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Nathanael Göransson ◽  
Johannes D. Johansson ◽  
Karin Wårdell ◽  
Peter Zsigmond
Keyword(s):  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Significant Variable ◽  
Postoperative Changes ◽  
The Right ◽  
Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Anchoring Technique ◽  
Deep Brain ◽  
Left Lead

Introduction: Lead movement after deep brain stimulation may occur and influence the affected volume of stimulation. The aim of the study was to investigate differences in lead position between the day after surgery and approximately 1 month postoperatively and also simulate the electric field (EF) around the active contacts in order to investigate the impact of displacement on affected volume. Methods: Twenty-three patients with movement disorders underwent deep brain stimulation surgery (37 leads). Computed tomography at the 2 time points were co-fused respectively with the stereotactic images in Surgiplan. The coordinates (x, y, and z) of the lead tips were compared between the 2 dates. Eleven of these patients were selected for the EF simulation in Comsol Multiphysics. Postoperative changes of EF spread in the tissue due to conductivity changes in perielectrode space and due to displacement were evaluated by calculating the coverage coefficient and the Sørensen-Dice coefficient. Results: There was a significant displacement (mean ± SD) on the left lead: x (0.44 ± 0.72, p < 0.01), y (0.64 ± 0.54, p < 0.001), and z (0.62 ± 0.71, p < 0.001). On the right lead, corresponding values were: x (−0.11 ± 0.61, ns), y (0.71 ± 0.54, p < 0.001), and z (0.49 ± 0.81, p < 0.05). The anchoring technique was a statistically significant variable associated with displacement. No correlation was found between bilateral (n = 14) versus unilateral deep brain stimulation, gender (n = 17 male), age <60 years (n = 8), and calculated air volume. The simulated stimulation volume was reduced after 1 month because of the perielectrode space. When considering perielectrode space and displacement, the volumes calculated the day after surgery and approximately 1 month later were partly overlapped. Conclusion: The left lead tip displayed a tendency to move lateral, anterior, and inferior and the right a tendency to move anterior and inferior. The anchoring technique was associated to displacement. New brain territory was affected due to the displacement despite considering the reduced stimulated volume after 1 month. Postoperative changes in perielectrode space and small lead movements are reasons for delaying programming to 4 weeks following surgery.

The impact of brain shift in deep brain stimulation surgery: observation and obviation

2012 ◽  
Vol 154 (11) ◽  
pp. 2063-2068 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. Slotty ◽  
M. A. Kamp ◽  
C. Wille ◽  
T. M. Kinfe ◽  
H. J. Steiger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Brain Shift ◽  
Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Deep Brain

Prognostic value of globus pallidus internus volume in primary dystonia treated by deep brain stimulation

2009 ◽  
Vol 110 (2) ◽  
pp. 220-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Vasques ◽  
Laura Cif ◽  
Olivier Hess ◽  
Sophie Gavarini ◽  
Gerard Mennessier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Globus Pallidus ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Globus Pallidus Internus ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Primary Dystonia ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Deep Brain

Object Given that improvement is variable from one patient to another, the authors analyzed the impact of globus pallidus internus (GPi) volume on the result of deep brain stimulation (DBS) by comparing highly and less improved patients with primary dystonodyskinetic syndromes. Methods A stereotactic model was developed to visualize and quantify the relationship between the isofield lines generated by the DBS lead and GPi target. The model was used in 30 right-handed selected patients with primary dystonodyskinetic syndromes who had been treated using bilateral stimulation of the sensorimotor GPi. Ten healthy control individuals were also included in the study. First, the authors compared the GPi volumes between patients and healthy controls. Second, the stimulated GPi volumes, that is, the intersection between the volume of each isofield value and the GPi volumes, were compared between less improved and highly improved patients. Results Improvement in the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale's motor score was rated > 90% in 20 patients (97 ± 4.6%) and < 60% in 10 patients (56.9 ± 6%). The mean volume of the right (461.8 ± 81.8 mm3) and left (406.6 ± 113.2 mm3) GPi in patients showing less response to DBS was significantly smaller than the GPi volume of patients who responded well (right 539.9 ± 86.6 mm3, left 510.6 ± 88.7 mm3) and healthy controls (right 557.8 ± 109.1 mm3, left 525.1 ± 40.8 mm3). Conclusions On the left side, the mean stimulated volumes (isofield line range 0.2–1 V/mm) were significantly larger in highly improved than in less improved patients. In this model, the threshold for functional effect was calculated at 0.2 V/mm.

Effects of deep brain stimulation on sleep-wake disturbances in patients with Parkinson's disease: A narrative review

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Jin Jung ◽  
Han-Joon Kim ◽  
Sun Ha Paek ◽  
Beomseok Jeon
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Motor Symptoms ◽  
Specific Effects ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Non Motor Symptoms ◽  
Deep Brain

: Sleep-wake disturbances (SWD) are one of the most common non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) and can appear in the early stage even before the onset of motor symptoms. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for the motor symptoms in patients with advanced PD. However, the effect of DBS on SWD and its specific mechanisms are not widely understood and remain controversial. In addition to the circuit-mediated direct effect, DBS may improve SWD by an indirect effect such as the resolution of nocturnal motor complications and a reduction of dopaminergic medication. Here, the authors review the recent literatures regarding the impact of DBS on SWD in patients with PD. Furthermore, the selection of the DBS targets and the specific effects of applying DBS to each target on SWD in PD are also discussed.

Avoiding the ventricle: a simple step to improve accuracy of anatomical targeting during deep brain stimulation

2009 ◽  
Vol 110 (6) ◽  
pp. 1283-1290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ludvic Zrinzo ◽  
Arjen L. J. van Hulzen ◽  
Alessandra A. Gorgulho ◽  
Patricia Limousin ◽  
Michiel J. Staal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Electrode Placement ◽  
Neurosurgical Procedures ◽  
Electrode Implantation ◽  
Clinical Observations ◽  
Simple Step ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Deep Brain

Object The authors examined the accuracy of anatomical targeting during electrode implantation for deep brain stimulation in functional neurosurgical procedures. Special attention was focused on the impact that ventricular involvement of the electrode trajectory had on targeting accuracy. Methods The targeting error during electrode placement was assessed in 162 electrodes implanted in 109 patients at 2 centers. The targeting error was calculated as the shortest distance from the intended stereotactic coordinates to the final electrode trajectory as defined on postoperative stereotactic imaging. The trajectory of these electrodes in relation to the lateral ventricles was also analyzed on postoperative images. Results The trajectory of 68 electrodes involved the ventricle. The targeting error for all electrodes was calculated: the mean ± SD and the 95% CI of the mean was 1.5 ± 1.0 and 0.1 mm, respectively. The same calculations for targeting error for electrode trajectories that did not involve the ventricle were 1.2 ± 0.7 and 0.1 mm. A significantly larger targeting error was seen in trajectories that involved the ventricle (1.9 ± 1.1 and 0.3 mm; p < 0.001). Thirty electrodes (19%) required multiple passes before final electrode implantation on the basis of physiological and/or clinical observations. There was a significant association between an increased requirement for multiple brain passes and ventricular involvement in the trajectory (p < 0.01). Conclusions Planning an electrode trajectory that avoids the ventricles is a simple precaution that significantly improves the accuracy of anatomical targeting during electrode placement for deep brain stimulation. Avoidance of the ventricles appears to reduce the need for multiple passes through the brain to reach the desired target as defined by clinical and physiological observations.

Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery

2012 ◽  
pp. 903-920
Author(s):  
Ryan Uitti ◽  
Yashiko Baba ◽  
Robert Wharen
Keyword(s):  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery ◽  
Deep Brain
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document