Daily Distance Traveled Is Associated with Greater Brain Size in Primates

2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 654-668
Author(s):  
Marco Vidal-Cordasco ◽  
Lucía Rodríguez-González ◽  
Olalla Prado-Nóvoa ◽  
Guillermo Zorrilla-Revilla ◽  
Mario Modesto-Mata
Keyword(s):  
Group Size ◽  
Social Group ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Ecological Factors ◽  
Primate Species ◽  
Brain Mass ◽  
Daily Movement ◽  
Size Evolution ◽  
Movement Distance ◽  
Extant Primate

Explanations for the brain size increments through primate and, particularly, human evolution are numerous. Commonly, these hypotheses rely on the influence that behavioral and ecological variables have on brain size in extant primates, such as diet quality, social group size, or home range (HR) area. However, HR area does not reflect the time spent moving. As such, it has not been properly addressed whether the effort involved in movement could have affected brain size evolution in primates. This study aimed to test the influence of daily movement on primates’ brain sizes, controlling for these other behavioral and ecological factors. We used a large comparative dataset of extant primate species and phylogenetic comparative methods. Our results show a significant correlation between daily movement and brain mass, which is not explained by the influence of diet, social group size, HR, or body mass. Hence, from an evolutionary timescale, a longer daily movement distance is not a constraining factor for the energetic investment in a larger brain. On the contrary, increased mobility could have contributed to brain mass incrementations through evolution.

scholarly journals Coevolution of cultural intelligence, extended life history, sociality, and brain size in primates

2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (30) ◽  
pp. 7908-7914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sally E. Street ◽  
Ana F. Navarrete ◽  
Simon M. Reader ◽  
Kevin N. Laland
Keyword(s):  
Life History ◽  
Social Learning ◽  
Group Size ◽  
Social Group ◽  
Brain Volume ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Research Effort ◽  
Human Cognition ◽  
Primate Species ◽  
Brain Expansion

Explanations for primate brain expansion and the evolution of human cognition and culture remain contentious despite extensive research. While multiple comparative analyses have investigated variation in brain size across primate species, very few have addressed why primates vary in how much they use social learning. Here, we evaluate the hypothesis that the enhanced reliance on socially transmitted behavior observed in some primates has coevolved with enlarged brains, complex sociality, and extended lifespans. Using recently developed phylogenetic comparative methods we show that, across primate species, a measure of social learning proclivity increases with absolute and relative brain volume, longevity (specifically reproductive lifespan), and social group size, correcting for research effort. We also confirm relationships of absolute and relative brain volume with longevity (both juvenile period and reproductive lifespan) and social group size, although longevity is generally the stronger predictor. Relationships between social learning, brain volume, and longevity remain when controlling for maternal investment and are therefore not simply explained as a by-product of the generally slower life history expected for larger brained species. Our findings suggest that both brain expansion and high reliance on culturally transmitted behavior coevolved with sociality and extended lifespan in primates. This coevolution is consistent with the hypothesis that the evolution of large brains, sociality, and long lifespans has promoted reliance on culture, with reliance on culture in turn driving further increases in brain volume, cognitive abilities, and lifespans in some primate lineages.

scholarly journals Evolutionary pressures on primate intertemporal choice

2014 ◽  
Vol 281 (1786) ◽  
pp. 20140499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey R. Stevens
Keyword(s):  
Group Size ◽  
Social Group ◽  
Intertemporal Choice ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Waiting Times ◽  
Home Range Size ◽  
Primate Species ◽  
Relative Brain Size ◽  
Phylogenetic Regression ◽  
Intertemporal Choices

From finding food to choosing mates, animals must make intertemporal choices that involve fitness benefits available at different times. Species vary dramatically in their willingness to wait for delayed rewards. Why does this variation across species exist? An adaptive approach to intertemporal choice suggests that time preferences should reflect the temporal problems faced in a species's environment. Here, I use phylogenetic regression to test whether allometric factors relating to body size, relative brain size and social group size predict how long 13 primate species will wait in laboratory intertemporal choice tasks. Controlling for phylogeny, a composite allometric factor that includes body mass, absolute brain size, lifespan and home range size predicted waiting times, but relative brain size and social group size did not. These findings support the notion that selective pressures have sculpted intertemporal choices to solve adaptive problems faced by animals. Collecting these types of data across a large number of species can provide key insights into the evolution of decision making and cognition.

Brain size evolution in anurans: a review

2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 265-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun Lan Mai ◽  
Wen Bo Liao
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Life History ◽  
Life History Traits ◽  
Developmental Stages ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Ecological Factors ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Sperm Length ◽  
Testis Size ◽  
Size Evolution

Abstract Selection pressure is an important force in shaping the evolution of vertebrate brain size among populations within species as well as between species. The evolution of brain size is tightly linked to natural and sexual selection, and life-history traits. In particular, increased environmental stress, intensity of sexual selection, and slower life history usually result in enlarged brains. However, although previous studies have addressed the causes of brain size evolution, no systematic reviews have been conducted to explain brain size in anurans. Here, we review whether brain size evolution supports the cognitive buffer hypothesis (CBH), the expensive tissue hypothesis (ETH), or the developmental cost hypothesis (DCH) by analyzing the intraspecific and/or interspecific patterns in brain size and brain regions (i.e., olfactory nerves, olfactory bulbs, telencephalon, optic tectum, and cerebellum) associated with ecological factors (habitat, diet and predator risk), sexual selection intensity, life-history traits (age at sexual maturity, mean age, longevity, clutch size and egg size, testis size and sperm length), and other energetic organs. Our findings suggest that brain size evolution in anurans supports the CBH, ETH or DCH. We also suggest future directions for studying the relationships between brain size evolution and crypsis (i.e., ordinary mucous glands in the skin), and food alteration in different developmental stages.

Brain-Behavior Relations in Primates and Cetaceans: Implications for the Ubiquity of Factors Leading to the Evolution of Complex Intelligence

1997 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. 553-560
Author(s):  
Lori Marino
Keyword(s):  
Information Processing ◽  
Social Behavior ◽  
Group Size ◽  
Social Group ◽  
Primate Species ◽  
Behavioral Evolution ◽  
Brain Organization ◽  
Body Weights ◽  
Evolutionary Paths ◽  
Brain Behavior

AbstractThis paper describes the results of a project aimed at addressing questions about the evolution of intelligence by utilizing comparisons of brain-behavior relations in cetaceans (dolphins and whales) and primates. Three specific questions were asked. First, have any cetaceans reached a hominid level of encephalization? Second, are cetacean-primate comparisons of brain organization useful for grappling with the differences that are bound to exist between any extraterrestrial organism and ourselves? Third, are there similarities in brain-behavior relations in cetaceans and primates that suggest behavioral evolution is shaped by general factors? Brain and body weights for cetacean and primate species were collected and compared with each other and with data on brain organization and social behavior. The results revealed that a hominid level of encephalization is not unique in mammalian history. Furthermore, cetacean-primate comparisons can be useful in understanding the different ways in which information processing systems can be organized. Finally, a comparison of the relation between encephalization and social group size in primates and cetaceans preliminarily suggests that similar mental capacities can be achieved through different independent evolutionary paths and that there may be factors common to behavioral evolution in all intelligent organisms.

scholarly journals Unique allometry of group size and collective brain mass in humans and primates relative to other mammals

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus J. Hamilton ◽  
Robert S. Walker
Keyword(s):  
Social Networks ◽  
Body Size ◽  
Group Size ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Social Groups ◽  
Group Living ◽  
Null Model ◽  
Mammalian Brain ◽  
Brain Mass ◽  
Trade Offs

AbstractGroup living is common in mammals, particularly in primates and humans. Across species, groups are social networks where co-residing members exchange information and balance trade-offs between competition and cooperation for space, resources, and reproductive opportunities. From a macroecological perspective, species-specific group sizes are ultimately constrained by body size, population density, and the environmental supply rate of home ranges. Here, we derive an allometric null model for group size in mammals based on individual energy demands and ecological constraints. Using Bayesian phylogenetic mixed models we show that primates exhibit unique allometries relative to other mammals. Moreover, as large-bodied primates, human hunter-gatherers have among the largest social groups of any mammal. We then explore the consequences of this unique social allometry by considering how mammalian brain size scales up in social groups that differ in size across mammals. We show similarly unique allometries in what we term the collective brain mass of social groups in primates relative to all other mammals. These results show that for a given body size primates have both larger brains and larger social networks than other mammals. Consequently, proportionally larger primate brains interact in proportionally larger social networks with important consequences for group cognition. We suggest that the size, scale, and complexity of human social networks in the 21st century have deep evolutionary roots in primate ecology and mammalian brain allometry.

scholarly journals Host anemone size as a determinant of social group size and structure in the orange clownfish (Amphiprion percula)

PeerJ ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. e5841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliette Chausson ◽  
Maya Srinivasan ◽  
Geoffrey P. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Path Analysis ◽  
Group Size ◽  
Social Group ◽  
Environmental Gradients ◽  
Social Groups ◽  
Ecological Factors ◽  
Habitat Patch ◽  
Behavioral Interactions ◽  
Amphiprion Percula ◽  
Size And Structure

The size and structure of social groups of animals can be governed by a range of ecological factors and behavioral interactions. In small, highly site-attached coral reef fishes, group size is often constrained by the size of the habitat patch they are restricted to. However, group size may also be influenced by changes in abundance along important environmental gradients, such as depth or distance offshore. In addition, the body size and sex structure within social groups can be determined by the size of the habitat patch and the dominance relationships among group members. Here we examined the roles of ecological factors and behavioral interactions in governing group size and structure in the orange clownfish, Amphiprion percula, on inshore reefs in Kimbe Bay, Papua New Guinea. We quantified relationships between ecological variables (anemone size, depth, and distance from shore) and social group variables (group size, and total body length of the three largest individuals (ranks 1, 2, and 3)). Anemone size explained the greatest amount of variation in group variables, with strong, positive relationships between anemone surface area and group size, and total length of individuals ranked 1, 2, and 3. Group structure was also weakly correlated with increasing depth and distance from shore, most likely through the indirect effects of these environmental gradients on anemone size. Variation in group size and the lengths of ranks 2 and 3 were all closely related to the length of rank 1. Path analysis indicated that anemone size has a strong direct effect on the length of rank 1. In turn, the length of rank 1 directly affects the size of the subordinate individuals and indirectly affects the group size through its influence on subordinates. Hence, anemone size directly and indirectly controls social group size and structure in this space-limited fish species. It is also likely that anemonefish have feedback effects on anemone size, although this could not be differentiated in the path analysis.

Association of social group with both life-history traits and brain size in cooperatively breeding birds

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 261-278
Author(s):  
Ying Jiang ◽  
Long Jin ◽  
Yi Qiang Fu ◽  
Wen Bo Liao
Keyword(s):  
Life History ◽  
Group Size ◽  
Social Group ◽  
Life History Traits ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Size Variation ◽  
Breeding Birds ◽  
Alloparental Care ◽  
Cooperatively Breeding ◽  
Relative Brain Size

Abstract Social group is associated with life-history traits and can predict brain size variation in cooperative primates and some other mammal groups, but such explicit relationships remain enigmatic in cooperatively breeding birds. Indeed, some compositions of social group in cooperative species (e.g., helper number and group size) would affect the fitness of breeders by providing alloparental care. Here, we conducted comparative tests of the relationship between the social group and both life-history traits and brain size across 197 species of cooperatively breeding birds using phylogenetically controlled comparative analyses. We did not find any correlations between helper numbers and both life-history traits and brain size. However, we found that maximum group size was positively associated with clutch size. Moreover, average group size has positive associations with body mass and relative brain size. Our findings suggest that helper numbers cannot promote variation in relative brain size, while larger groups may predict bigger brains in cooperatively breeding birds.

scholarly journals A Farewell to the Encephalization Quotient: A New Brain Size Measure for Comparative Primate Cognition

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Carel P. van Schaik ◽  
Zegni Triki ◽  
Redouan Bshary ◽  
Sandra A. Heldstab
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Cognitive Abilities ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Estimation Error ◽  
Primate Species ◽  
Mammal Species ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Encephalization Quotient ◽  
Body Sizes ◽  
Size Measure

Both absolute and relative brain sizes vary greatly among and within the major vertebrate lineages. Scientists have long debated how larger brains in primates and hominins translate into greater cognitive performance, and in particular how to control for the relationship between the noncognitive functions of the brain and body size. One solution to this problem is to establish the slope of cognitive equivalence, i.e., the line connecting organisms with an identical bauplan but different body sizes. The original approach to estimate this slope through intraspecific regressions was abandoned after it became clear that it generated slopes that were too low by an unknown margin due to estimation error. Here, we revisit this method. We control for the error problem by focusing on highly dimorphic primate species with large sample sizes and fitting a line through the mean values for adult females and males. We obtain the best estimate for the slope of circa 0.27, a value much lower than those constructed using all mammal species and close to the value expected based on the genetic correlation between brain size and body size. We also find that the estimate of cognitive brain size based on cognitive equivalence fits empirical cognitive studies better than the encephalization quotient, which should therefore be avoided in future studies on primates and presumably mammals and birds in general. The use of residuals from the line of cognitive equivalence may change conclusions concerning the cognitive abilities of extant and extinct primate species, including hominins.

scholarly journals Molecular evolutionary analysis of human primary microcephaly genes

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nashaiman Pervaiz ◽  
Hongen Kang ◽  
Yiming Bao ◽  
Amir Ali Abbasi
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary History ◽  
Genetic Basis ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Primate Species ◽  
Evolutionary Analysis ◽  
Australopithecus Afarensis ◽  
Primary Microcephaly ◽  
Modern Humans ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Brain

Abstract Background There has been a rapid increase in the brain size relative to body size during mammalian evolutionary history. In particular, the enlarged and globular brain is the most distinctive anatomical feature of modern humans that set us apart from other extinct and extant primate species. Genetic basis of large brain size in modern humans has largely remained enigmatic. Genes associated with the pathological reduction of brain size (primary microcephaly-MCPH) have the characteristics and functions to be considered ideal candidates to unravel the genetic basis of evolutionary enlargement of human brain size. For instance, the brain size of microcephaly patients is similar to the brain size of Pan troglodyte and the very early hominids like the Sahelanthropus tchadensis and Australopithecus afarensis. Results The present study investigates the molecular evolutionary history of subset of autosomal recessive primary microcephaly (MCPH) genes; CEP135, ZNF335, PHC1, SASS6, CDK6, MFSD2A, CIT, and KIF14 across 48 mammalian species. Codon based substitutions site analysis indicated that ZNF335, SASS6, CIT, and KIF14 have experienced positive selection in eutherian evolutionary history. Estimation of divergent selection pressure revealed that almost all of the MCPH genes analyzed in the present study have maintained their functions throughout the history of placental mammals. Contrary to our expectations, human-specific adoptive evolution was not detected for any of the MCPH genes analyzed in the present study. Conclusion Based on these data it can be inferred that protein-coding sequence of MCPH genes might not be the sole determinant of increase in relative brain size during primate evolutionary history.

scholarly journals Different environmental variables predict body and brain size evolution in Homo

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Will ◽  
Mario Krapp ◽  
Jay T. Stock ◽  
Andrea Manica
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Factors ◽  
Cognitive Abilities ◽  
Net Primary Productivity ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Environmental Influence ◽  
Size Variation ◽  
Evolutionary Pattern ◽  
Statistical Framework ◽  
Size Evolution ◽  
Major Predictor

AbstractIncreasing body and brain size constitutes a key macro-evolutionary pattern in the hominin lineage, yet the mechanisms behind these changes remain debated. Hypothesized drivers include environmental, demographic, social, dietary, and technological factors. Here we test the influence of environmental factors on the evolution of body and brain size in the genus Homo over the last one million years using a large fossil dataset combined with global paleoclimatic reconstructions and formalized hypotheses tested in a quantitative statistical framework. We identify temperature as a major predictor of body size variation within Homo, in accordance with Bergmann’s rule. In contrast, net primary productivity of environments and long-term variability in precipitation correlate with brain size but explain low amounts of the observed variation. These associations are likely due to an indirect environmental influence on cognitive abilities and extinction probabilities. Most environmental factors that we test do not correspond with body and brain size evolution, pointing towards complex scenarios which underlie the evolution of key biological characteristics in later Homo.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document