scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes of Dialysis Patients Treated with Drug-Eluting Stent for Left Main Distal Bifurcation Lesions

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-108
Author(s):  
Yusuke Watanabe ◽  
Satoru Mitomo ◽  
Ozan M. Demir ◽  
Kuan-Liang Liu ◽  
Ying-Chang Tung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Drug Eluting Stent ◽  
Left Main ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Drug Eluting ◽  
Bifurcation Lesions ◽  
Target Lesion Failure

<b><i>Aims:</i></b> We assessed clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) distal bifurcation lesions using drug-eluting stents (DES) in hemodialysis (HD) patients compared to non-HD patients. <b><i>Methods and Results:</i></b> We identified 1,858 consecutive patients who underwent PCI for ULMCA distal bifurcation lesions at 4 high-volume centers in Japan, Italy, and Taiwan between January 2005 and December 2015. Of them, 1,416 patients were treated with DES including 113 HD patients and 1,303 non-HD patients. The primary end point was target lesion failure (TLF) defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and myocardial infarction. HD patients were more likely to be younger and have diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, peripheral artery disease, lower ejection fraction, and higher EuroSCORE. TLF rate at 3 years was significantly higher in HD group than in non-HD group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.43 [1.75–3.38], <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). Cardiac mortality and TLR rate were also significantly higher in HD group than in non-HD group (adjusted HR 3.85 [2.34–6.34], <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001, and HR 2.10 [1.41–3.14], <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001, respectively). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> HD was strongly associated with adverse cardiac events after PCI for ULMCA distal bifurcation lesions with DES.

The Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Clinical Outcomes after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Drug-Eluting Stents for Left Main Distal Bifurcation Lesions in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 382-391
Author(s):  
Yusuke Watanabe ◽  
Satoru Mitomo ◽  
Toru Naganuma ◽  
Kensuke Takagi ◽  
Satoshi Matsuoka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Drug Eluting Stents ◽  
Left Main ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Drug Eluting ◽  
Bifurcation Lesions ◽  
The Impact

<b><i>Background:</i></b> The impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main (ULM) distal bifurcation lesions in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is poorly understood in the era of drug-eluting stents (DESs). <b><i>Objective:</i></b> We assessed the impact of DM on clinical outcomes after PCI for ULM distal bifurcation lesions in CKD patients compared to patients without DM. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We identified 1,832 consecutive patients who underwent PCI for ULM lesions at New Tokyo Hospital, Matsudo, Japan, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy, and EMO-GVM, Centro Cuore Columbus, Milan, Italy between January 2005 and August 2015. Of the 1,832 patients, 1,391 were treated with DESs. We excluded 750 patients without CKD and 89 hemodialysis patients. Finally, 552 patients with CKD were included: 219 with DM (DM group) and 333 without DM (no DM group). The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF) at 5 years. TLF was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and myocardial infarction. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Patients in the DM group were more likely to have hypertension, dyslipidemia, peripheral artery disease, and lower ejection fraction and were more frequently using insulin for DM. The TLF rate during the follow-up period was significantly higher in the DM than in the no DM group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06–2.13; <i>p</i> = 0.023). Cardiac mortality was comparable between both groups (adjusted HR 1.11; 95% CI 0.63–1.95; <i>p</i> = 0.71). The TLR rate was significantly higher in the DM group than in the no DM group (adjusted HR 1.69; 95% CI 1.12–2.54; <i>p</i> = 0.012). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> DM is strongly associated with adverse event after PCI for ULM distal bifurcation lesions in CKD patients compared to those without DM.

scholarly journals Clinical Implications of Bifurcation Angles in Left Main Bifurcation Intervention Using a Two-Stent Technique

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
You-Jeong Ki ◽  
Ji Hyun Jung ◽  
Jung-Kyu Han ◽  
Sukkeun Hong ◽  
Jang Hyun Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Drug Eluting Stent ◽  
Left Main ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Group A ◽  
Drug Eluting ◽  
Target Lesion Failure ◽  
The Impact

Objectives. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical impact of 3 bifurcation angles in left main (LM) bifurcation treated with the 2-stent technique. Background. Data are limited regarding the impact of bifurcation angles after LM percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods. Using patient-level 4 multicenter registries in Korea, 462 patients undergoing LM bifurcation PCI with the 2-stent technique were identified (181 crush, 167 T-stenting; 63% 1st generation drug-eluting stent (DES), 37% 2nd generation DES). Three bifurcation angles, between the LM and left anterior descending (LAD), the LM and left circumflex (LCX), and the LAD and LCX, were measured. The primary outcome was target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Results. In patients treated with the crush technique, the best cutoff value (BCV) to predict TLF was 152° of the LM-LAD angle. In the crush group, a significantly higher TLF rate, mostly driven by TLR, was observed in the LM-LAD angle ≥152° group compared with the <152° group (35.7% vs. 14.6%; adjusted hazard ratio 3.476; 95% confidence interval 1.612–7.492). An LM-LAD angle ≥152° was an independent predictor of TLF. In the T-stenting, no bifurcation angle affected the clinical outcomes. Conclusions. In LM bifurcation PCI using the 2-stent technique, wide LM-LAD angle (≥152°) was associated with a greater risk of TLF in the crush, whereas none of the bifurcation angles affected T-stenting outcomes.

P6530Clinical outcomes of dialysis patients treated with current generation DES for left main distal bifurcation

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Watanabe ◽  
S Mitomo ◽  
T Naganuma ◽  
A Nakajima ◽  
K Tani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Left Main ◽  
Current Generation ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Drug Eluting ◽  
Bifurcation Lesions ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
General Populations ◽  
Target Lesion Failure

Abstract Objectives We assessed clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main (ULM) using current generation drug eluting stents (cDES) in hemodialysis (HD) patients compared to general populations. Methods We identified 1269 consecutive patients who underwent PCI for ULM distal bifurcation lesions. Of them, 563 patients were treated with cDES (512 non HD and 51 HD patients). The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF) at 3 years, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and myocardial infarction (MI). Results HD group was more likely to have diabetes mellitus (70.0% vs. 45.8%, p=0.002), peripheral artery disease (56.0% vs. 14.9%, p<0.001), and lower ejection fraction (52.6% vs. 56.3%, p=0.026). The rate of TLF at 3 years was significantly higher in the HD group (adjusted Hazard ratio [HR] 2.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.54–4.37; p<0.001). Cardiac mortality was significantly higher in the HD group (adjusted HR 4.49; 95% CI, 2.07–9.74; p<0.001). The rates of TLR for LM-left anterior descending artery (LAD) and left circumflex ostium (LCXos) were significantly higher in the HD group (LMT-LAD: adjusted HR 3.10; 95% CI, 1.31–7.33; p=0.01, LCXos: adjusted HR 2.56; 95% CI, 1.32–4.94; p=0.005). The rate of MI was similar between the 2 groups. Conclusions Hemodialysis was strongly associated with adverse events after PCI for ULM distal bifurcation lesions even with cDES.

scholarly journals One-year clinical and angiographic outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions in ostial versus distal left main lesions – a retrospective single center study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tilman Stephan ◽  
Nadine Goldberger ◽  
Mirjam Keßler ◽  
Dominik Felbel ◽  
Manuel Rattka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Left Main ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary

Abstract Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of left main coronary artery disease (LMD) is associated with appropriate clinical and angiographic outcomes, resulting in a class I recommendation in patients with less complex coronary anatomy. Due to higher SYNTAX scores and worse clinical outcomes, PCI in distal LMD is accomplished with a lower strength of recommendations for revascularization compared to ostial LM lesions. We compare angiographic and clinical outcomes of ostial/midshaft lesions versus distal lesion in LMD after PCI. Methods: This retrospective study included 176 patients with LMD undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents. The study population was divided into 34 patients with ostial/midshaft LMD and 142 patients with distal LMD. Patients were routinely scheduled for 9 months of angiographic and 12 months of clinical follow-up. Quantitative coronary analysis (QCA) was performed for all lesions, using an 11-segment model. Primary outcome was MACE (major adverse cardiac events) defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Results: The primary outcome measure was comparable in both cohorts after 12 months follow-up (20.6% in ostial/midshaft LMD vs. 17.6% in distal LMD, P=0.71). As expected, TLR rates were increased in distal LM lesions compared to ostial LM lesions, but without reaching statistical significance (14.1% vs. 5.9%, P=0.15). Late lumen loss (LLL) in ostial/midshaft LMD was 0.42±0.33mm. In distal LM lesions value for LLL in the main vessel was 0.42±0.97 mm, with the highest values observed in segments adjacent to the bifurcation (0.37±1.13mm and 0.37±0.73 mm). On cox proportional regression analysis LLL in a bifurcation segment (P=0.03, HR 1.68 [1.1-2.7]) and diabetes mellitus (P=0.046, HR 2.77 [1.0-7.5] were independent correlates for occurrence of MACE. Conclusion: PCI of distal LM lesions result in comparable angiographic and clinical outcomes compared to ostial LM lesions. Highest rates for binary restenosis were observed in segments nearest to the bifurcation.

P971Impact of treatment strategy on 1-year outcome for Left Main trifurcation lesions

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Tani ◽  
S Mitomo ◽  
K Tanaka ◽  
S Tahara ◽  
S Nakamura
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Drug Eluting Stent ◽  
Restenosis Rate ◽  
Left Main ◽  
Circumflex Artery ◽  
Left Circumflex Artery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Drug Eluting

Abstract Background/Introduction Limited data exist regarding procedural strategy and clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main (LM) trifurcation lesion. Purpose The aim of this study is to evaluate 1-year clinical outcomes after LM trifurcation PCI comparing different strategies in kissing balloon inflation (KBI). Methods From 1, January, 2011 to 31, March, 2017, patients who underwent LM trifurcation PCI with second generation drug-eluting stent in our center were retrospectively analyzed. They were categorized into single-stent KBT group (KBT in left anterior descending artery [LAD] and left circumflex artery [LCX], or LAD and high lateral branch [HL]) and no-KBT group. Primary endpoint is restenosis in the lesions. Results Among 1301 patients who underwent LM PCI during the study period, 163 patients (12.5%) had a trifurcation lesion. Regarding the number of stents used for the lesions, 1, 2 and 3 stents were used in 75.4%, 22.0% and 2.5%, respectively. Median follow-up period of LM trifurcation patients was 265 days (interquartile range: 81–564). In the no-KBT group (64 patients), 19 patients experienced restenosis of HL and LCX (HL: 8 patients, LCX: 0 patient, and both: 11 patients). In the KBT-group, KBT for LAD and LCX was performed in 47 patients, and of them, 19 patients experienced restenosis of LM-LAD, HL and LCX (HL: 12 patients, LCX: 6 patients and all: 1 patient). On the other hand, in 9 patients with KBT for LAD and HL, there were no restenosis cases at 1-year follow-up. There was no statistically significant difference in restenosis rate between the no-KBI and KBT group (29.6% vs. 40.4%, p=0.69). Restenosis rates in each segments Conclusion After LM trifurcation PCI, restenosis rate at 1-year follow-up was high, and no difference between no-KBT and KBT group overall. However, there was no restenosis case in patients with KBT for LAD and HL.

Abstract 3138: Impact of “Off Label” Utilization of Drug-Eluting Stents on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Probal Roy ◽  
Ashesh N Buch ◽  
Aamir Javaid ◽  
Teruo Okabe ◽  
Vikram Raya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Drug Eluting Stents ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Off Label ◽  
Repeat Revascularization ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Drug Eluting ◽  
Q Wave

Background: The utilization of drug-eluting stents (DES) in “real world” practice has deviated substantially from Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved indications. The outcomes of patients undergoing intracoronary DES implantation (versus BMS) for non-FDA approved indications has not been determined. Methods : The clinical outcomes of 546 patients undergoing DES implantation for ≥1 non-FDA approved (“Off label”) indication after device approval were assessed. This group was then compared to 546 propensity-matched patients receiving BMS prior to DES approval for the same indications. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events [MACE; death-all cause, non-fatal Q-wave MI and target vessel revascularization (TVR)] at 12 months. Results: Baseline clinical and procedural characteristics were well matched. Patients in the BMS group were more likely to be treated with larger diameter and shorter stents. Though both in-hospital and 30-day all-cause mortality was greater in the DES group, there was no significant difference in cardiac death at both time points. At 30 days all other clinical outcomes were comparable. At 12 months MACE was significantly reduced in the DES group (27.8% vs. 21.4% p=0.014) driven by reductions in repeat revascularization [target lesion revascularization (TLR): 16.4% vs. 7.8% p<0.001, TVR: 20.2% vs.13.1% p<0.003]. There was no significant increase in death and non-fatal Q-wave MI with DES. Conclusions: The utilization of DES for non-FDA approved indications proved to be efficacious and safe when compared to a propensity-matched BMS cohort. These findings support broadening the current FDA indications for DES use.

6112Usefulness of the trans-stent fractional flow reserve gradient for predicting clinical outcomes

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Lim ◽  
H M Yang ◽  
M H Yoon ◽  
K W Seo ◽  
B J Choi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Fractional Flow Reserve ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Drug Eluting Stent ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Fractional Flow ◽  
Flow Reserve ◽  
Stent Length

Abstract Aims The clinical meaning of a trans-stent pressure gradient after DES implantation has not been estimated adequately. We evaluated the usefulness of a fractional flow reserve (FFR) gradient across the stent (ΔFFRstent) for long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a drug-eluting stent (DES). Methods and results FFR pull-back and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) were performed after successful PCI in 135 left anterior descending artery lesions. ΔFFRstent was defined as the FFR gradient across the stent. The ΔFFRstent/length was defined as the ΔFFRstent value divided by the total stent length multiplied by 10 [= (ΔFFRstent ÷ stent length) x 10]. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were the composite of all-cause death, target vessel related myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularisation. Despite successful PCI without significant complications on IVUS, ΔFFRstent >0 was observed in 98.5% of cases. ΔFFRstent ≥0.04 and ΔFFRstent/length ≥0.009 predicted suboptimal stenting defined as final minimal stent area <5.5 mm2. During 2183±898 days, the MACE-free survival rate was significantly lower in patients with ΔFFRstent ≥0.04 and ΔFFRstent/length ≥0.009 compared to those with lower values (69.6 vs. 93.4%, log-rank p=0.031; 72.1 vs. 97.7%, log-rank p=0.003, respectively). ΔFFRstent/length ≥0.009 (hazard ratio 10.1, p=0.032) was an independent predictor of MACE. Trans-stent FFR and MACE Conclusion A trans-stent FFR gradient was frequently observed in DES-treated patients despite successful PCI results. ΔFFRstent and ΔFFRstent/length are useful indicators for optimising a DES and are related to long-term outcomes.

Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Our Experiences at a Tertiary Hospital

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-111
Author(s):  
S Munwar ◽  
AHMW Islam ◽  
S Talukder ◽  
AQM Reza ◽  
T Ahmed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Left Main Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Drug Eluting Stent ◽  
Bare Metal ◽  
Coronary Artery Diseases ◽  
Left Main ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Drug Eluting

Background: Aim of the study was to evaluate the primary procedural success of percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis using either Bare-metal stents or drug eluting stent. Methods: Total 33 patients were enrolled in this very preliminary non-randomized prospective cohort study. Among them, Male: 25 and Female: 8. Total 35 stents were deployed. Mean age were for Male: 59 yrs, for Female: 62 yrs. Associated coronary artery diseases risk factors were dyslipidemia, High Blood pressure, Diabetes Mellitus, Positive family history for coronary artery diseases and smoking. Results: Among the study group; 26 (78%) were Dyslipidemic, 24(70%) were hypertensive; 17 (51.5%) patients were Diabetic, 11(33%) were smoker and 7(21%) patients had family history of Ischaemic heart disease. Female patients were more obese (BMI M 26: F 27) and developed coronary artery diseases in advance age. Common stented territory were left main: 20 (60%), Left main to left anterior descending artery 7 (22%) and Left main to left circumflex artery 6 (18%). Average length and diameter of stent was 3.5 and 18 mm respectively. Stent used: Bare Metal Stent 5 (15%), Drug Eluting Stent: 28 (85%). Among the different Drug Eluting Stents, Everolimus eluting stents were 11 (39.3%), Sirolimus eluting 10(35.7%), Paclitaxel eluting 3 (10.7%), Biolimus eluting 3 (10.7%) and Zotarolimus eluting1 (3.6%). In the present study, overall survival outcome was 94% (31 patient), mortality of cardiac cause 3% (1 patient) and 1 patient (3%) died of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusion: Our study has shown that percutaneous coronary intervention of the unprotected left main is a safe and effective alternative to Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/cardio.v6i2.18349 Cardiovasc. j. 2014; 6(2): 107-111

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document