scholarly journals Comparison between 1.5- and 3-T Magnetic Resonance Acquisitions for Direct Targeting Stereotactic Procedures for Deep Brain Stimulation: A Phantom Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (5) ◽  
pp. 337-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaëtan Poulen ◽  
Emilie Chan Seng ◽  
Nicolas Menjot De Champfleur ◽  
Laura Cif ◽  
Fabienne Cyprien ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Phantom Study ◽  
Direct Targeting ◽  
Deep Brain

scholarly journals Fully Automated Targeting Using Nonrigid Image Registration Matches Accuracy and Exceeds Precision of Best Manual Approaches to Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation Targeting in Parkinson Disease

Neurosurgery ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 756-765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srivatsan Pallavaram ◽  
Pierre-François D'Haese ◽  
Wendell Lake ◽  
Peter E. Konrad ◽  
Benoit M. Dawant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Image Registration ◽  
Parkinson Disease ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Red Nucleus ◽  
Nonrigid Image Registration ◽  
Direct Targeting ◽  
Fully Automatic ◽  
Stn Dbs ◽  
Deep Brain

Abstract BACKGROUND: Finding the optimal location for the implantation of the electrode in deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery is crucial for maximizing the therapeutic benefit to the patient. Such targeting is challenging for several reasons, including anatomic variability between patients as well as the lack of consensus about the location of the optimal target. OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of popular manual targeting methods against a fully automatic nonrigid image registration-based approach. METHODS: In 71 Parkinson disease subthalamic nucleus (STN)-DBS implantations, an experienced functional neurosurgeon selected the target manually using 3 different approaches: indirect targeting using standard stereotactic coordinates, direct targeting based on the patient magnetic resonance imaging, and indirect targeting relative to the red nucleus. Targets were also automatically predicted by using a leave-one-out approach to populate the CranialVault atlas with the use of nonrigid image registration. The different targeting methods were compared against the location of the final active contact, determined through iterative clinical programming in each individual patient. RESULTS: Targeting by using standard stereotactic coordinates corresponding to the center of the motor territory of the STN had the largest targeting error (3.69 mm), followed by direct targeting (3.44 mm), average stereotactic coordinates of active contacts from this study (3.02 mm), red nucleus-based targeting (2.75 mm), and nonrigid image registration-based automatic predictions using the CranialVault atlas (2.70 mm). The CranialVault atlas method had statistically smaller variance than all manual approaches. CONCLUSION: Fully automatic targeting based on nonrigid image registration with the use of the CranialVault atlas is as accurate and more precise than popular manual methods for STN-DBS.

Successful Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery With Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging on a Difficult Neuroacanthocytosis Case

Neurosurgery ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. E184-E188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thien Thien Lim ◽  
Hubert H. Fernandez ◽  
Scott Cooper ◽  
Kathryn Mary K. Wilson ◽  
Andre G. Machado
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Imaging Guidance ◽  
Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guidance ◽  
Deep Brain

Abstract BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: Chorea acanthocytosis is a progressive hereditary neurodegenerative disorder characterized by hyperkinetic movements, seizures, and acanthocytosis in the absence of any lipid abnormality. Medical treatment is typically limited and disappointing. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: We report on a 32-year-old patient with chorea acanthocytosis with a failed attempt at awake deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery due to intraoperative seizures and postoperative intracranial hematoma. He then underwent a second DBS operation, but under general anesthesia and with intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging guidance. Marked improvement in his dystonia, chorea, and overall quality of life was noted 2 and 8 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: DBS surgery of the bilateral globus pallidus pars interna may be useful in controlling the hyperkinetic movements in neuroacanthocytosis. Because of the high propensity for seizures in this disorder, DBS performed under general anesthesia, with intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging guidance, may allow successful implantation while maintaining accurate target localization.

Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Directed Frame-Based Stereotaxis

2011 ◽  
Vol 70 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. ons114-ons124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nova B. Thani ◽  
Arul Bala ◽  
Christopher R. P. Lind
Keyword(s):  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Entry Point ◽  
Mean Deviation ◽  
Guide Tube ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Deep Brain

Abstract BACKGROUND: Accurate placement of a probe to the deep regions of the brain is an important part of neurosurgery. In the modern era, magnetic resonance image (MRI)-based target planning with frame-based stereotaxis is the most common technique. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the inaccuracy in MRI-guided frame-based stereotaxis and to assess the relative contributions of frame movements and MRI distortion. METHODS: The MRI-directed implantable guide-tube technique was used to place carbothane stylettes before implantation of the deep brain stimulation electrodes. The coordinates of target, dural entry point, and other brain landmarks were compared between preoperative and intraoperative MRIs to determine the inaccuracy. RESULTS: The mean 3-dimensional inaccuracy of the stylette at the target was 1.8 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-2.1. In deep brain stimulation surgery, the accuracy in the x and y (axial) planes is important; the mean axial inaccuracy was 1.4 mm (95% CI, 1.1-1.8). The maximal mean deviation of the head frame compared with brain over 24.1 ± 1.8 hours was 0.9 mm (95% CI, 0.5-1.1). The mean 3-dimensional inaccuracy of the dural entry point of the stylette was 1.8 mm (95% CI, 1.5-2.1), which is identical to that of the target. CONCLUSION: Stylette positions did deviate from the plan, albeit by 1.4 mm in the axial plane and 1.8 mm in 3-dimensional space. There was no difference between the accuracies at the dura and the target approximately 70 mm deep in the brain, suggesting potential feasibility for accurate planning along the whole trajectory.

ISOLATION OF THE BRAIN‐RELATED FACTOR OF THE ERROR BETWEEN INTENDED AND ACHIEVED POSITION OF DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION ELECTRODES IMPLANTED INTO THE SUBTHALAMIC NUCLEUS FOR THE TREATMENT OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE

2009 ◽  
Vol 64 (suppl_5) ◽  
pp. ons374-ons384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Slawomir Daniluk ◽  
Keith G. Davies ◽  
Peter Novak ◽  
Thai Vu ◽  
Jules M. Nazzaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Subthalamic Nucleus ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Related Factor ◽  
Technical Error ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Computed Tomographic ◽  
Deep Brain

Abstract OBJECTIVE Although a few studies have quantified errors in the implantation of deep brain stimulation electrodes into the subthalamic nucleus (STN), a significant trend in error direction has not been reported. We have previously found that an error in axial plane, which is of most concern because it cannot be compensated for during deep brain stimulation programming, had a posteromedial trend. We hypothesized that this trend results from a predominance of a directionally oriented error factor of brain origin. Accordingly, elimination of nonbrain (technical) error factors could augment this trend. Thus, implantation accuracy could be improved by anterolateral compensation during target planning. METHODS Surgical technique was revised to minimize technical error factors. During 22 implantations, targets were selected on axial magnetic resonance imaging scans up to 1.5 mm anterolateral from the STN center. Using fusion of postoperative computed tomographic and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans, implantation errors in the axial plane were obtained and compared with distances from the lead to the STN to evaluate the benefit of anterolateral compensation. RESULTS Twenty errors and the mean error had a posteromedial direction. The average distances from the lead to the target and to the STN were 1.7 mm (range, 0.8–3.1 mm) and 1.1 mm (range, 0.1–1.9 mm), respectively. The difference between the 2 distances was significant (paired t test, P < 0.0001). The lower parts of the lead were consistently bent in the posteromedial direction on postoperative scout computed tomographic scans, suggesting that a brain-related factor is responsible for the reported error. CONCLUSION Elimination of the technical factors of error during STN deep brain stimulation implantation can result in a consistent posteromedial error. Implantation accuracy may be improved by compensation for this error in advance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document