scholarly journals Induction of Effector and Memory Cellular Immunity in a Patient with Long-Term Complete Molecular Response to Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 990-996
Author(s):  
Tatsuro Jo ◽  
Haruna Shioya ◽  
Hiroo Tominaga ◽  
Takahiro Sakai ◽  
Shizuka Hayashi ◽  
...  

This case report is about a patient who suffered from Philadelphia chromosome (Ph1)-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The blasts were positive for myeloid-lineage markers including CD13 and CD33, as well as B-cell-lineage markers. Minor bcr-abl1 mRNA was detected by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Chromosomal abnormality monosomy 7 was also observed, in addition to Ph1. Despite treatment difficulties that were anticipated based on these findings, the patient had long-time complete molecular response (CMR) for approximately 5 years using chemotherapy and two tyrosine kinase inhibitors, imatinib and dasatinib. Lymphocytes were elevated after the patient switched from imatinib to dasatinib, and a T-cell receptor (TCR) V beta gene repertoire analysis revealed oligoclonal expansion of effector and memory cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), including Wilms tumor 1-specific CTLs. More specifically, the two memory CTLs expressing TCR V beta 3 and V beta 7.1 gradually increased after dasatinib administration. The activation and maintenance of anti-leukemia immunity may have allowed the patient to obtain long-time CMR. These results highlight that obtaining memory CTLs for leukemia cells may lead to safe withdrawal from dasatinib in the patient.

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4014-4014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Anne Couturier ◽  
Xavier Thomas ◽  
Francoise Huguet ◽  
Céline Berthon ◽  
Célestine Simand ◽  
...  

Abstract Prognosis of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph1+ ALL) has been considerably improved since the beginning of the BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) era 20 years ago. However, the prognosis of patients with a refractory/relapsed (including molecular relapse) disease is still very dismal. New drugs or combination of new drugs may improve outcomes of these patients. For example, ponatinib, a 3rd-generation oral TKI, known to have activity against BCR-ABL1 T315I mutations, has shown some efficacy in this context. Similarly, a recent study has reported very encouraging results of the bispecific anti-CD3/CD19 monoclonal antibody blinatumomab as single-agent in refractory/relapsed Ph1+ ALL. Data regarding the efficacy and tolerance of a combination of blinatumomab+ponatinib (blina/pona) are still scarce. This was a retrospective study with the aim to report outcomes of patients receiving a combination of blina/pona for refractory/relapsed Ph1+ ALL in France. Fifteen adults from 8 French centers were identified and data were collected by physicians of each centers, then gathered for the purpose of this study. There were 9 males and 6 females, with a median age of 53 years (range:17-72). All patients, but 2 with blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia, had de novo Ph1+ ALL. Four cases had BCR-ABL1 T315I mutation. Patients received the blina/pona combination, either after a first (n=8) or a second (n=7) cytologic relapse. There was no refractory patient in theses series. Previous allograft and autograft has been performed in 7 and 2 patients, respectively. The majority of patients (n=12) had previously received 2 or more lines of TKI. The median time between the first cycle of blina/pona and diagnosis was 14 months (range: 8-40). The median number of blinatumomab cycle (28 mg/day by continuous infusion for 28 days every 6 weeks) administered per patient was 3 (range: 1-6) while ponatinib was concomittantly administered continuously at an initial dose of 45 mg once daily in 11 pts (73%) and 30 mg in 4 pts (27%). Median duration of ponatinib administration was 4 months (range: 1.1-10.9) from first blinatumomab cycle. The toxicity profile was safe: all patients received a complete first cycle without grade 3-4 adverse events. After cycle 1, blinatumomab was stopped in 47% of cases because of neurologic events in 4 and infections in 3; ponatinib was stopped in 33% of cases because of neurologic events in 3, fluid retention in 1 and severe arteriopathy in 1 patient with other vascular disease risk factors. All neurologic events resolved after stopping blinatumomab or ponatinib. The majority of patients were evaluated after one cycle (n=11, after cycle 2 n=3, after cycle 3 n=1). All but one patients (93%) obtained a cytologic complete remission (CR), of whom 12/14 (86%) achieved a complete molecular response. However, 2 patients were documented with CNS relapse at the time of blina/pona evaluation although in bone marrow molecular remission. Both obtained clearance of leukemic blasts after intrathecal infusion of chemotherapy. Then, 5 patients underwent allogeneic transplant (including 2 patients already allotransplanted before blina/pona) and 1 patient received donor lymphocyte infusion. Seven cases pursued maintenance therapy with ponatinib as single agent after stopping blinatumomab. With a median follow-up of 8 months (range: 2.6-30.2) for alive patients, median overall and leukemia-free survivals from first cycle of blina/pona were 8.5 months (range: 1.7-30.2) and 8 months (range: 1.3-30.2), respectively. At last follow-up (July 2018), only 4 relapses had occurred at a median of 3.3 months (range: 1.3-8.3) from first blina/pona cycle and 6 patients had died (3 bacterial infections, 1 fungal infection, 1 secondary cancer and 1 ALL relapse). All alive patients (n=9) but one (cytologic CR but detectable minimal residual disease) are in complete molecular response. Four patients are still under ponatinib medication at last follow-up. The combination of blinatumomab+ponatinib appears effective and tolerable in relapsed Ph1+ALL patients and may replace chemotherapy salvage regimens. The combination should be tested in first-line therapy in the future. Our results have also to be confirmed prospectively on a larger cohort of patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3971-3971
Author(s):  
Inas Ahmed Asfour ◽  
Shereen Ahmed El Shazly

Abstract The Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome is the result of a reciprocal translocation between chromosomes 9 and 22 [t (9; 22)] and is characterized at the molecular level by expression of the BCR-ABL fusion gene. It is the most frequent genetic aberration in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), being detectable in 30–40%of patients with B-precursor ALL. In our initial work we report two cases of grossly negative (Ph) ALL, that showed a complete molecular response after an imatinib based chemotherapy. In the first case we report a 17-year-old male who was admitted because of bony aches and fever. A diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia was made on the basis of a 95% infiltration of leukemic cells in his bone marrow. Standard G-banding chromosome analysis of bone marrow cells revealed a normal karyotype. And subsequent fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) examination showed a 20% positivity for the Philadelphia chromosome. As for the second case we report a 19 years old male patient who was presented with complaints of recurrent epistaxis and bony aches. He was also found to have acute lymphoblastic leukemia due to bone marrow infiltration with 55% blasts that showed a normal karyotype using the G- banding, and a positive Philadelphia chromosome-using FISH method - in 31 % of the examined cells. Both patients received combination chemotherapy incorporating imatinib mesylate; Glivec® in a dose of 400 mg/day continuously all through the induction, consolidation and subsequent re-enforcement courses. They both achieved complete hematological, cytogenetic as well as molecular remission that was maintained-thus far- for a total period of 20 and 11 months respectively. We postulated that there might have been two clones, both a Ph-positive clone and Ph-negative clone, with subsequent sensitivity of this Ph positive clone to the incorporated targeted treatment, as was evidenced by disappearance of the Ph-positive cells in subsequent FISH analysis and the negativity of the real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-QPCR) for BCR/ABL gene. Several investigators have studied the role of Hematopoeitic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in the context of Ph+ ALL patients, which showed superior results when compared to conventional chemotherapy in means of remission induction as well as relapse rates, Dombret et al.2002. The highly successful introduction of the first ABL-kinase inhibitor imatinib into the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has led to clinical testing of imatinib in Ph+ALL. It has recently been approved for Ph+ALL in Europe and Japan. Given the much more aggressive nature of Ph+ALL when compared with chronic or even accelerated phase CML, a variety of imatinib-based treatment strategies have been explored in ALL(Ottman et al.,2007). Yet thus far the exploration of these treatment modalities in the very rare entity of gross normal karyotype and molecular level cytogenetic aberrations remains to be elucidated. Conclusion: Molecular remission on tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patient with ALL Ph +ve may open the door to revising the treatment strategies offered thus far for that subset of patients, as a new stratifying factor. Our work offers a unique protocol for utilizing imatinib as an integral part of the chemotherapy protocols normally offered for these patients, but yet at a lower dose, and raises the question of whether they should be transplanted in accordance with the current guidelines and if so when? More patients experience and controlled randomized trials are needed and eagerly awaited.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3977-3977
Author(s):  
Nicholas J. Short ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Rebecca Garris ◽  
Susan M. O'Brien ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Achievement of a complete molecular response (CMR) in patients (pts) with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is associated with improved survival. We sought to evaluate the patterns of molecular and overt relapse in pts who achieved CMR with chemotherapy plus a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Methods: We identified 164 adult pts with Ph+ ALL who received frontline hyper-CVAD plus a TKI at our institution between 4/2001 and 6/2016 and had minimal residual disease (MRD) testing after approximately 3 months of therapy; 98 pts (60%) achieved CMR and are the subject of this analysis. MRD assessment was performed using BCR-ABL1 by RQ-PCR on a remission bone marrow (BM) (sensitivity = 0.01%). CMR was defined as the absence of a quantifiable BCR-ABL1 transcript. Overt relapse was defined as recurrence of BM blasts ≥5% or CNS leukemia.MRD relapse was defined as a BCR-ABL1/ABL1 transcript level >0.01% on two occasions or one level ≥0.1%, identified in the peripheral blood or BM and in the absence of overt relapse. Results: The median duration of follow-up was 43 months (range, 6-171 months). The TKI received was imatinib in 13 (13%), dasatinib in 46 (47%), and ponatinib in 39 (40%). 19 pts (19%) underwent allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) in first remission, 17 of whom were in CMR at the time of SCT. Overall 21 pts (21%) experienced overt relapse with a median time from first remission to relapse of 17 months (range 10-59 months); only 2 of these pts underwent SCT in CR1. All but 3 overt relapses occurred within 30 months of first remission; these 3 pts experienced CNS-only relapse, after 32, 46, and 59 months of remission. The median overall survival (OS) from time of overt relapse was 14 months; the 2-year OS rate was 15%. 79 pts had at least one MRD assessment after achievement of CMR and are evaluable for analysis of MRD relapse (Figure 1). Overall, 15 pts (19%) met criteria for MRD relapse. The median time from achievement of CMR to MRD relapse was 13 months (range, 2-54 months). The median OS for pts with MRD relapse was 22 months, and the 2-year OS rate was 34%. Of the 15 pts who developed MRD relapse, 9 (60%) also developed overt relapse and 6 (40%) did not. Among the 9 pts with MRD relapse followed by overt relapse, the median time to overt relapse was 54 days (range, 21-705 days). 1 pt on dasatinib had the dose increased but overt relapse occurred 5 months after MRD relapse. In the remaining 8 pts, no preemptive treatment for MRD relapse was given. Among the 6 pts with MRD relapse who did not develop overt relapse, 2 had been off TKI therapy; upon re-initiation of a TKI, both again achieved CMR. 2 pts underwent SCT and are currently alive without overt relapse 21 and 42 months after MRD relapse, 1 pt had persistent low-level BCR-ABL1/ABL1 levels <0.1% but eventually attained CMR again without change of therapy, and 1 pt died in CR 1 month after MRD relapse. Among 64 pts who did not develop MRD relapse, 11 (17%) experienced overt relapse. 4 of these pts had had a previous positive MRD test (i.e. BCR-ABL1/ABL1 ratio >0.01%)but not meeting criteria for MRD relapse: 3 had preceding low-level MRDon one occasion not meeting criteria for MRD relapse (ratios: 0.03, 0.07 and 0.08), and 1 had an unquantifiable positive test that preceded overt relapse. Among the 7 pts who relapsed without a prior positive MRD test, 6 experienced overt relapse with concomitant positive test for BCR-ABL1 ≥0.1% and 1 experienced BM relapse with negative PCR (though confirmed Ph+ by cytogenetics and FISH). In 3 pts, change of TKI with or without SCT appeared to prevent overt hematologic relapse. 1 pt on dasatinib with a BCR-ABL1/ABL1 ratio of 0.08 (but not meeting criteria for MRD relapse) was given intensification of hyper-CVAD and switched to ponatinib; this pt did not undergo SCT and is still alive without overt relapse 14 months after possible MRD relapse. 2 pts on dasatinib who experienced CNS-only relapse had their TKI changed (1 to nilotinib, 1 to ponatinib) and SCT was performed. Both pts died from SCT-related complications in second CR with survival from time of MRD relapse of 22 and 19 months, respectively. Conclusion: In pts with Ph+ ALL who achieve CMR, PCR-based monitoring of BCR-ABL1 can identify pts with MRD relapse at high risk for overt relapse and death. While various therapeutic strategies for pts who experience MRD relapse can be successful, the optimal treatment in this setting remains to be established. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Cortes: ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding. O'Brien:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Jabbour:ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (4) ◽  
pp. 504-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas J. Short ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Koji Sasaki ◽  
Keyur Patel ◽  
Susan M. O’Brien ◽  
...  

Key Points In patients with Ph+ ALL, achievement of CMR at 3 months is independently associated with improved survival. CMR at 3 months may identify patients with Ph+ ALL who have excellent long-term outcomes without SCT in first CR.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (14) ◽  
pp. 3239-3245
Author(s):  
Ryan D. Cassaday ◽  
Kelsey-Leigh A. Garcia ◽  
Jonathan R. Fromm ◽  
Mary-Elizabeth M. Percival ◽  
Cameron J. Turtle ◽  
...  

Abstract The presence of measurable residual disease (MRD) in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) confers a poor prognosis. CD19-targeted immunotherapy is effective against MRD but is logistically challenging, potentially toxic, and not applicable to T-cell ALL. We thus hypothesized that inhibition of PD-1 with pembrolizumab could also be effective for MRD, but without lineage restriction. The primary objective of this phase 2 study was to evaluate the efficacy of pembrolizumab in patients with ALL and MRD. Key eligibility criteria included adults with B- or T-cell ALL and MRD detectable by multiparameter flow cytometry or quantitative polymerase chain reaction from bone marrow aspirate (BMA) despite chemotherapy (plus ABL kinase inhibitor if Philadelphia chromosome positive). Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV was given every 3 weeks. Response was assessed by BMA using methods that previously detected MRD. The primary end point was complete MRD response rate. We stopped enrollment early; only 1 of 12 (8%) experienced a complete MRD response, which lasted 3 weeks. Interestingly, this patient had previously received hematopoietic cell transplantation and CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor–modified T-cell therapy and was the only patient to experience an immune-related adverse event from pembrolizumab (grade 3 Stevens-Johnson syndrome). Median overall survival from enrollment was 12.7 months. In summary, pembrolizumab had minimal activity against MRD but was generally well tolerated. These data can be compared with ongoing anti-PD-1 combination studies in ALL, and they further establish the role of trials specifically for patients with MRD. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02767934.


Chemotherapy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingying Ma ◽  
Quanchao Zhang ◽  
Peiyan Kong ◽  
Jingkang Xiong ◽  
Xi Zhang ◽  
...  

With the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has entered a new era. The efficacy of TKIs compared with other ALL treatment options is emphasized by a rapid increase in the number of TKI clinical trials. Subsequently, the use of traditional approaches, such as combined chemotherapy and even allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), for the treatment of ALL is being challenged in the clinic. In light of the increased use of TKIs in the clinic, several questions have been raised. First, is it necessary to use intensive chemotherapy during the induction course of therapy to achieve a minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status? Must a patient reach a complete molecular response/major molecular response before receiving allo-HSCT? Does MRD status affect long-term survival after allo-HSCT? Is auto-HSCT an appropriate alternative for allo-HSCT in those Ph+ ALL patients who lack suitable donors? Here, we review the recent literature in an attempt to summarize the current status of TKI usage in the clinic, including several new therapeutic approaches, provide answers for the above questions, and speculate on the future direction of TKI utilization for the treatment of Ph+ ALL patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document