scholarly journals Blood Pressure Variability and Outcomes in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients on Dialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 631-644
Author(s):  
Huihui Li ◽  
Jing Xue ◽  
Wenjie Dai ◽  
Xiaohua Liao ◽  
Peng Zhu ◽  
...  

Objective: Previous studies have suggested that blood pressure variability (BPV) is associated with an increased risk of mortality and cardiovascular events in patients on dialysis. However, the results are inconsistent. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to analyze the association between BPV and outcomes in patients on dialysis. Methods: Articles in Embase, Medline, and Web of Science from the date of inception through January 1, 2020, were identified. The outcomes were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and cardiovascular events. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale tool. Random effects models were used to pool the overall effect sizes. Two reviewers extracted the data independently. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed to explore potential heterogeneity. Results: Fifteen eligible studies were included, and all enrolled hemodialysis recipients only. The overall risk of bias for the included studies was low. A 1-SD increase in systolic BPV was associated with higher risks of all-cause mortality (HR = 1.18; 95% CI 1.11–1.26, I2 = 53.8%), cardiovascular mortality (HR = 1.23; 95% CI 1.10–1.37, I2 = 57.2%), and cardiovascular events (HR = 1.27; 95% CI 1.07–1.51, I2 = 69.3%). Likewise, a 1-SD increase in diastolic BPV was associated with higher HR for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (HR = 1.14; 95% CI 1.05–1.23, I2 = 0.0%, and HR = 1.14; 95% CI 0.94–1.38, I2 = 0.0%, respectively). Conclusions: A greater BPV is associated with higher risks of cardiovascular and mortality outcomes in patients on hemodialysis. Further research is required to determine whether BPV may be useful either as a marker enabling individualized treatment of cardiovascular risk or as a treatment target in its own right.

2022 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingyan Huang ◽  
Linzi Long ◽  
Ling Tan ◽  
Aling Shen ◽  
Mi Deng ◽  
...  

Background: The association between isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH) and cardiovascular events has been inconsistently reported. This meta-analysis of cohort studies was designed to investigate the effect of the 2018 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) definition of IDH on the risk of composite cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and all strokes including ischemic stroke (IS) and hemorrhagic stroke (HS).Methods: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from inception to July 6, 2021. Cohort studies that investigated the association between IDH and cardiovascular events risk, compared to normotension, were included. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were calculated using a random-effects models and heterogeneity was evaluated using Q-test and I2 statistic. The robustness of the associations was identified using sensitivity analysis. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plot, trim-and-fill method, Begg's test, and Egger's test.Results: A total of 15 cohort studies (13 articles) including 489,814 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The follow-up period ranged from 4.3 to 29 years. IDH was significantly associated with an increased risk of composite cardiovascular events (HR 1.28, 95% CI: 1.07–1.52, p = 0.006), cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.45, 95% CI: 1.07–1.95, p = 0.015), all strokes (HR 1.44, 95% CI: 1.04–2.01, p = 0.03), and HS (HR 1.64, 95% CI: 1.18–2.29, p = 0.164), but not associated with all-cause mortality (HR 1.20, 95% CI: 0.97–1.47, p = 0.087) and IS (HR 1.56, 95% CI: 0.87–2.81, p = 0.137). Subgroup analysis further indicated that IDH in the younger patients (mean age ≤ 55 years) and from Asia were significantly associated with an increased risk of composite cardiovascular events, while the elderly patients (mean age ≥ 55 years), Americans, and Europeans were not significantly associated with an increased risk of composite cardiovascular events.Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides evidence that IDH defined using the 2018 ESC criterion is significantly associated with an increased risk of composite cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, all strokes and HS, but not significantly associated with all-cause death and IS. These findings also emphasize the importance for patients with IDH to have their blood pressure within normal, especially in the young adults and Asians.Trial Registration: PROSPERO, Identifier: CRD42021254108.


Hypertension ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kátia B Scapini ◽  
Valéria C Hong ◽  
Janaína B Ferreira ◽  
Sílvia B Souza ◽  
Naomi V Ferreira ◽  
...  

Background: Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing hemodialysis are susceptible to the development of autonomic dysfunction, which is associated with an increased risk of sudden death. Experimental and clinical evidence suggest a crucial role of autonomic dysfunction for both, the progression of renal disease and for the high rate of cardiovascular events in these patients. In the present study, we evaluated the heart rate variability (HRV), the blood pressure variability (BPV) and the baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) in ESRD patients undergoing hemodialysis and normal controls. Methods: Nine ESRD patients undergoing hemodialysis (mean age 53.4±10.2 years, 4 male) and nine age-matched healthy controls (mean age 52.8±10.2 years, 4 male) were assessed. Non−invasive curves of blood pressure (BP) were recorded continuously (Finometer ®) for 10 minutes, at rest, in the supine position. The heart rate variability (HRV) and systolic blood pressure variability (BPV) were estimated in the time and frequency domain (spectral analysis). The BRS was quantified by alpha index. Statistical analyzes were performed by Student's t test and the results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Results: ESRD patients presented lower HRV in time domain than healthy controls (SDNN: 25.8±10.7 vs. 44.6±11.7 ms, p<0.01; VAR NN: 768.3±607.4 vs. 2113.9±1261.6 ms 2 , p=0.01). All frequency domain analyzed indexes, i.e., total power (361.9±297.0 vs. 1227.2±696.3 ms 2 , p<0.01), high-frequency (181.8±128.7 vs. 358.7±179.8 ms 2 , p=0.047), low-frequency (55.1±44.2 vs. 444.6±389.9 ms 2 , p=0.02) and very-low-frequency (72.5±75.1 vs. 279.2±119.5 ms 2 , p<0.01) of HRV were lower in ESRD patients. The BPV was higher in ESRD patients when compared to controls (VAR PAS: 98.4±72.0 vs. 35.4±21.4 ms 2 , p=0.03) and BRS was lower in ESRD patients (alpha index: 4.34±3.05 vs. 7.56±2.50 ms/mmHg, p<0.02). Conclusion: ESRD patients undergoing hemodialysis presents reduced HRV, increase in BPV and reduced baroreflex sensitivity. These impairments may be associated with mortality in ESRD.


2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 184-192
Author(s):  
Toby O Smith ◽  
Julia Ann Sillito ◽  
Choon-Hian Goh ◽  
Abdel-Rahman Abdel-Fattah ◽  
Alice Einarsson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Blood pressure variability (BPV) is a possible risk factor for adverse cardiovascular outcomes and mortality. There is uncertainty as to whether BPV is related to differences in populations studied, measurement methods or both. We systematically reviewed the evidence for different methods to assess blood pressure variability (BPV) and their association with future cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality. Methods Literature databases were searched to June 2019. Observational studies were eligible if they measured short-term BPV, defined as variability in blood pressure measurements acquired either over a 24-hour period or several days. Data were extracted on method of BPV and reported association (or not) on future cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality. Methodological quality was assessed using the CASP observational study tool and data narratively synthesised. Results Sixty-one studies including 3,333,801 individuals were eligible. BPV has been assessed by various methods including ambulatory and home-based BP monitors assessing 24-hour, “day-by-day” and “week-to-week” variability. There was moderate quality evidence of an association between BPV and cardiovascular events (43 studies analysed) or all-cause mortality (26 studies analysed) irrespective of the measurement method in the short- to longer-term. There was moderate quality evidence reporting inconsistent findings on the potential association between cardiovascular mortality, irrespective of methods of BPV assessment (17 studies analysed). Conclusion An association between BPV, cardiovascular mortality and cardiovascular events and/or all-cause mortality were reported by the majority of studies irrespective of method of measurement. Direct comparisons between studies and reporting of pooled effect sizes were not possible.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Burnier ◽  
L R Ruilope ◽  
G B Bader ◽  
S D Durg ◽  
P B Brunel

Abstract Background Blood pressure (BP) control is critical in delaying the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD), which otherwise results in an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, are recommended by several guidelines as first-line treatment for patients with hypertension and CKD. Purpose We reviewed and analysed the effect of ARB treatment on BP and renal outcomes (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), serum creatinine (SCr), creatinine clearance (CrCl) or proteinuria) in patients with hypertension and CKD with or without diabetes, including large clinical trials such as RENAAL and IDNT. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, and BIOSIS databases were searched for literature from the earliest available date to July 2017. Randomised (parallel-group) controlled trials of ≥8 weeks assessed the impact of ARBs on systolic/diastolic BP (SBP/DBP), eGFR, SCr, CrCl or proteinuria were included in the analysis. Meta-analysis (post- versus pre-treatment) and meta-regression were conducted in R-statistical software (v3.4.1) using meta- and metafor-packages. Mean difference (MD, generic inverse variance) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was used to pool data for an outcome in a single forest plot. The risk of bias (quality) of included studies was assessed by the six items of the Cochrane instrument. Results Of the 165 articles assessed for eligibility, 24 studies were included in the analysis (19 evaluated ARBs as monotherapy, 4 evaluated ARBs in combination with other antihypertensives and 1 evaluated ARBs both as mono- and combination therapy). Treatment with ARBs as monotherapy for ≥8 weeks to <1 year significantly reduced mean office SBP (MD, −12.60 mmHg; 95% CI, −18.53 to −6.67)/DBP (−6.52 mmHg; −11.27 to −1.77) (p<0.01). BP reduction was also significant (p<0.01) with ARB monotherapy for ≥1 year SBP (−14.84 mmHg; −17.82 to −11.85)/DBP (−10.27 mmHg; −12.26 to −8.27). ARBs also significantly reduced SBP/DBP when combined with other antihypertensive treatments for ≥8 weeks to <1 year as well as for ≥1 year (Figure). Moreover, ARBs induced significant reductions (p<0.01) in proteinuria (≥8 weeks to <1 year [MD, −0.6 g/L; 95% CI, −0.93 to −0.26; ≥1 year [−0.9 g/L; −1.22 to −0.59]), but no significant changes in eGFR, CrCl or SCr levels. The beneficial effect of ARBs was maintained overtime with no significant additional impact on SBP change (estimate: 0.025; 95% CI, –0.14 to 0.19) or eGFR (estimate: 0.068; 95% CI, −0.14 to 0.28; p=0.53). The overall risk of bias was judged to be low. Effect of ARBs on blood pressure changes Conclusion Treatment with ARBs effectively and sustainably lowered BP and proteinuria with no significant change in eGFR in patients with hypertension and CKD with or without diabetes.


2002 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 307-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Fung ◽  
Donald J. Sherrard ◽  
Daniel L. Gillen ◽  
Craig Wong ◽  
Bryan Kestenbaum ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 44-44
Author(s):  
Bhaskar VKS Lakkakula ◽  
Rajeev Lochan Khare ◽  
Henu Kumar Verma ◽  
Smaranika Pattnaik

Introduction: Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is a progressive renal disease characterized by persistent albuminuria that leads to end-stage renal disease in both type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays a major role in the onset and progression of DN. Objectives: The present meta-analysis is intended to synthesize evidence on the association between ACE gene insertion and deletion (ACE I/D) polymorphism and the risk of DN. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and Embase were searched to retrieve relevant publications. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the association between ACE I/D polymorphism and DN risk. The Cochrane Q test and I2 statistic were used to detect heterogeneity. To assess between-study heterogeneity, subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed. Funnel plots and Egger’s test were used to estimate publication bias. Results: Around 45 articles (47 studies) with 6124 patients of DN and 2492 T2DM patients (controls) were ultimately considered for meta-analysis. Overall, the ACE I/D polymorphism was associated with DN under three different genetic models (allelic model: OR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.20- 1.49; P<0.001; dominant model: OR= 1.54; 95% CI: 1.31- 1.81; P<0.001; and recessive model: OR= 1.39; 95% CI: 1.19- 1.63; P<0.001). Significant heterogeneity (I2 > 50%) was present in the analysis for all ethnic groups. Further, there is no evidence for publication bias in this meta-analysis. Conclusion: The current meta-analysis provided confirmation that the ACE I/D polymorphism is correlated with an increased risk of DN in patients with T2DM and the D allele of ACE I/D was a susceptible factor.


BMJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. m3222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongling Luo ◽  
Yunjiu Cheng ◽  
Haifeng Zhang ◽  
Mingchuan Ba ◽  
Pengyuan Chen ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate and quantify the future risk of cardiovascular events in young adults with high blood pressure.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesMedline, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception to 6 March 2020. Relative risks were pooled using a random effects model and expressed with 95% confidence intervals. Absolute risk difference was calculated. Dose-response relations between blood pressure and individual outcomes were assessed by a restricted cubic spline model.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesStudies were selected that investigated the adverse outcomes of adults aged 18-45 with raised blood pressure. The primary study outcome was a composite of total cardiovascular events. Coronary heart disease, stroke, and all cause mortality were examined as secondary outcomes.ResultsSeventeen observational cohorts consisting of approximately 4.5 million young adults were included in the analysis. The average follow-up was 14.7 years. Young adults with normal blood pressure had increased risk of cardiovascular events compared with those with optimal blood pressure (relative risk 1.19, 95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.31; risk difference 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.16 to 0.61 per 1000 person years). A graded, progressive association was found between blood pressure categories and increased risk of cardiovascular events (high normal blood pressure: relative risk 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.22 to 1.49; risk difference 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.43 to 0.97 per 1000 person years; grade 1 hypertension: 1.92, 1.68 to 2.19; 1.81, 1.34 to 2.34; grade 2 hypertension: 3.15, 2.31 to 4.29; 4.24, 2.58 to 6.48). Similar results were observed for coronary heart disease and stroke. Generally, the population attributable fraction for cardiovascular events associated with raised blood pressure was 23.8% (95% confidence interval 17.9% to 28.8%). The number needed to treat for one year to prevent one cardiovascular event was estimated at 2672 (95% confidence interval 1639 to 6250) for participants with normal blood pressure, 1450 (1031 to 2326) for those with high normal blood pressure, 552 (427 to 746) for those with grade 1 hypertension, and 236 (154 to 388) for those with grade 2 hypertension.ConclusionsYoung adults with raised blood pressure might have a slightly increased risk of cardiovascular events in later life. Because the evidence for blood pressure lowering is limited, active interventions should be cautious and warrant further investigation.


Meta Gene ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 100703
Author(s):  
Vikas Gupta ◽  
Poonam Mehta ◽  
Ajay Kumar ◽  
Manoj Chaudhary ◽  
Subhash Chandra Diyundi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chu-Lin Chou ◽  
Jin-Shuen Chen ◽  
Yi-No Kang ◽  
Yuan-Jen Chen ◽  
Te-Chao Fang

Objective: Apart from dietary restriction and medical therapy, the benefits of cardiovascular protection offered by polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) supplements in patients with ESRD receiving maintenance dialysis remain unclear.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document