scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Glandular Flap Techniques in Surgical Treatment of Large Ductal Carcinoma in situ

Breast Care ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Lutfi Dogan ◽  
Mehmet Ali Gulcelik
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Efficacy And Safety

Trends in the surgical treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

1992 ◽  
Vol 164 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Ann Coleman ◽  
Larry G. Kessler ◽  
Lap-Ming Wun ◽  
Eric J. Feuer
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma

Disparities in time to definitive surgical treatment between black and white women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ

2007 ◽  
Vol 194 (4) ◽  
pp. 521-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Pocock ◽  
Sarah Nash ◽  
Laura Klein ◽  
Mahmoud El-Tamer ◽  
Freya R. Schnabel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
White Women ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Black And White

Preoperative Breast MRI in the Surgical Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luisa C. Kropcho ◽  
Shawn T. Steen ◽  
Alice P. Chung ◽  
Myung-Shin Sim ◽  
Daniel L. Kirsch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Breast Mri ◽  
Preoperative Breast Mri

Local and national trends over a decade in the surgical treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ

2003 ◽  
Vol 186 (6) ◽  
pp. 723-729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cyrus Kotwall ◽  
Carla Brinker ◽  
Debra Covington ◽  
Tana Hall ◽  
Mary Sue Hamann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
National Trends

Pathological classification of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast correlates with surgical treatment and may be predicted by mammography

The Breast ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 495-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riccardo Ponzone ◽  
Annelis Dominguez ◽  
Vincenzo Marra ◽  
Alberto Pisacane ◽  
Furio Maggiorotto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Pathological Classification

scholarly journals Breast Reconstruction after Surgical Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

Chirurgia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 116 (500) ◽  
pp. S88
Author(s):  
Manuela Bottoni ◽  
Alessandra Gottardi ◽  
Mario Rietjens
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma

scholarly journals Active Monitoring Versus Immediate Treatment of Women With Localised, Low-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Does It Make Economic Sense?

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. 73s-73s
Author(s):  
H.L. Bromley ◽  
T.E. Roberts ◽  
D. Petrie ◽  
B.G. Mann ◽  
D. Rea ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Active Monitoring

Background: Controversy persists about the overdiagnosis of low risk breast cancers identified by breast cancer screening programs. Low risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a noninvasive breast condition with an uncertain risk of invasive progression. Standard management consists of immediate surgical treatment, with or without radiotherapy and adjuvant therapy. Active monitoring of low risk DCIS via annual mammography is proposed as an alternative strategy to immediate surgery to reduce the harm of overdiagnosis, whereby the disease is only treated upon disease progression. However, the costs and benefits of active monitoring are not well researched in the breast cancer setting. Aim: To assess the cost-effectiveness of active monitoring versus immediate surgical management in women diagnosed with low grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Methods: A Markov state transition model was constructed for a theoretical cohort of women aged 50 years and over with low risk DCIS over a lifetime horizon. A cost-utility analysis was performed to compare a strategy of observation (active monitoring) versus immediate surgical treatment using an annual time cycle. Transition probabilities, costs and utilities were obtained from national mortality and cost data, published meta-analyses, primary data collection of utilities and expert opinion. A healthcare perspective was adopted to present the results. Primary outcomes were assessed in terms of cost per quality-adjusted-life-year (cost per QALY). Multiple sensitivity analyses were undertaken to determine effect of parameter uncertainty on results. Results: The cumulative costs and QALYs for each age cohort are presented. Active monitoring is a cost-effective strategy for the management of low risk breast cancer in older women with comorbid conditions. Sensitivity analyses revealed the ICERs for all women to be affected by baseline probability of disease progression, age, cost of surgery and utility. Conclusion: Conservative management of ductal carcinoma in situ via active monitoring may be cost-effective compared with immediate surgical treatment in a selected cohort of older women with low risk disease.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document