Current Topics and Practical Considerations of Cytology Practice in Lung Cancer: Reflexions from the Lung Symposium at the 42nd European Congress of Cytology, Malmö, 2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 463-470
Author(s):  
Sule Canberk ◽  
Verena Tischler ◽  
Marianne Engels

In June 2019, a lung symposium was held at the 42nd European Congress of Cytology in Malmö, Sweden. Due to the current importance of cytological samples in the diagnoses and molecular analysis to set up the utmost management of lung cancer patients, cytologists from different countries shared the experience of their institutions. The place of the cytological samples gains more and more importance on the potential long-term survival gain through personalized medicine and this harbors the improvement of the guidelines both in pathology and cytology field. In this symposium, the new 6-tiered reporting system for pulmonary cytology proposed by the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology and detailed cytomorphological approach to lung carcinoma including lookalike lesions and DNA- and RNA-based analysis of cytology material have been discussed. The cytopathologist plays a pivotal role in ensuring success of a correct triage for the cytology material to be sure of the adequacy and quality of the yield from the rapid on-site evaluation till the report which should encompass molecular profile in rational patient management.

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 8657-8660 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.X. Zhang ◽  
W. Tan ◽  
R.X. Zhang ◽  
Y.L. Tian ◽  
H.M. Gao ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9103-9103
Author(s):  
Opher Globus ◽  
Jair Bar ◽  
Amir Onn ◽  
Inbal Uri ◽  
Sivan Lieberman ◽  
...  

9103 Background: Millions of dollars invested in improving outcomes for metastatic lung cancer patients are essentially aimed at extending long term survival, with significant benefits being achieved over the last decade. However, little is known about lung cancer patients who die rapidly after diagnosis, potentially being deprived of these advances. We analyzed population-based data to describe real-world outcomes in metastatic lung cancer patients focusing on patients with early mortality. Methods: Using the Survival, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Database we analyzed adult metastatic lung cancers diagnosed between 1994-2014. This period was divided into 3 equal time periods: 1994-2000 (TP1), 2001-2007 (TP2) and 2008-2014 (TP3). Early mortality was defined as death within 2 months of diagnosis. Correlations between categorical variables were analyzed with chi squared tests and survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Of 276,527 patients diagnosed with metastatic lung cancer, median age was 67 (range 20-105) and 154,465 (56%) were males. Thirty eight percent (103,830) of all patients died within 2 months of diagnosis. Of these early deaths, 96,344 (92.8%) were due to lung cancer. While the 2-year survival almost doubled from TP1 compared to TP3 (6% vs 11%, p < 0.001), the percentage of patients who died within 2 months only marginally improved (39.7% vs. 36.2% in TP1 vs TP3, respectively). For patients surviving at least 2 months, 2-year survival increased from 10% to 18% in TP1 vs TP3 (p < 0.001). Factors associated with early mortality include age > 65 (45% vs 31%), unmarried status (42% vs 34%), male sex (39% vs 36%), liver metastases (47% vs 32%) and large cell carcinoma vs adenocarcinoma (44% vs 36%) (all p < 0.001). Conclusions: While there has been a steady improvement in the long-term overall survival of patients with metastatic lung cancer, over one third of patients still die within 2 months of diagnosis. This has only marginally improved in the last 20 years. Research is urgently needed to identify causative and treatable factors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document