scholarly journals Prevalence and Clinical Implications of the Mirror and TV Signs in Advanced Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementia with Lewy Bodies

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-62
Author(s):  
Yasuhiro Nagahama ◽  
Toshiya Fukui ◽  
Hiroshi Akutagawa ◽  
Hiroko Ohtaki ◽  
Momoka Okabe ◽  
...  

Objective: To explore the prevalence and clinical implications of the mirror and TV signs in the moderate to advanced stages of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Methods: We retrospectively examined the prevalence of clinical and psychiatric symptoms including the mirror and TV signs in 200 subjects with AD and 200 with DLB and evaluated the relationships among the symptoms. Results: The mirror sign was found in 3.0% of AD and 4.5% of DLB subjects. The TV sign was found in 1.5% of AD and 4.0% of DLB subjects. The prevalence of the mirror and TV signs was not significantly different between the AD and DLB groups. Visual hallucination, visual illusion, misidentification of person, and sleep talking were significantly more frequent in DLB than in AD subjects. The mirror sign was significantly associated with lower Mini-Mental State Examination scores, whereas the TV sign was significantly associated with the misidentification of person. Conclusions: Both the mirror and TV signs were rare even in the moderate to advanced stages of AD and DLB. The mirror sign may be independent from other delusional misidentification syndromes (DMSs). Being associated mainly with global cognitive decline, the mirror sign is unlikely attributed to any specific cognitive impairment or the dysfunction of localized brain areas. In contrast, the TV sign was significantly more often coexistent with the misidentification of person, suggesting that the TV sign may partly share common neuropsychological mechanisms with DMSs.

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 1839-1848 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Sheei-Meei Wang ◽  
Ming-Chyi Pai ◽  
Pai-Lien Chen ◽  
Nien-Tsen Hou ◽  
Pei-Fang Chien ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTBackground:The aim of this study was to examine and test the sensitivity, specificity, and threshold scores of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and determine those that best correspond to a clinical diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB).Methods:Sixty-seven Alzheimer's disease (AD), 36 DLB, and 62 healthy participants without dementia (NC), aged 60 to 90, were enrolled. All three groups took the MoCA and MMSE tests at the same time. The Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel tests and receiver operating characteristics curve analysis were used to compare the different neuropsychological test results among the groups.Results:The cut-off point of the MoCA for AD was 21/22 with a sensitivity of 95.5% and a specificity of 82.3% (area under the curve (AUC): 0.945), and the cut-off point for DLB was 22/23 with a sensitivity of 91.7% and a specificity of 80.6% (AUC: 0.932). For the MMSE, the cut-off points for AD and for DLB from NC were all 24/25, with a sensitivity of 88.1% and a specificity of 85.5% for AD (AUC: 0.92), and a sensitivity of 77.8% and a specificity of 85.5% for DLB (AUC: 0.895). After controlling sex, age, and education, AD and DLB had lower scores in all MoCA subscales than the NC group (p < 0.05), except for the orientation and naming in DLB. In addition, AD had a lower score in the MoCA orientation (p = 0.03) and short-term memory (p = 0.02) than did DLB.Conclusions:The MoCA is a more sensitive instrument than the MMSE to screen AD or DLB patients from non-dementia cases.


2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Santana ◽  
Diana Duro ◽  
Raquel Lemos ◽  
Vanessa Costa ◽  
Miguel Pereira ◽  
...  

<p><strong>Introduction:</strong> The Mini-Mental State Examination is the most commonly used cognitive screening test. In Portugal, the cut-off scores are defined according to literacy groups, but different proposals have been recommended by more representative studies. We therefore propose to confirm the influence of demographical variables, such as age and education, in the subject’s performance; evaluating the discriminant ability of the new normative data; and to further examine the diagnostic acuity of the validated cut-off scoring for mild cognitive impairment and for the most prevalent types of dementia.<br /><strong>Material and Methods:</strong> Our study includes 1 441 educated subjects, divided into seven subgroups: Mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer’s disease, frontotemporal dementia, vascular dementia, dementia with Lewy bodies, community-controls and memory clinic-controls.<br /><strong>Results:</strong> Altogether age and education explain 10.4% of the Mini-Mental State Examination results variance, with both variables contributing significantly to the results’ prediction. The diagnostic acuity based on the most recent normative data was always higher than the one obtained through the validation cut-off scoring, revealing an overall excellent specificity (superior to 90%) and different sensitivity values: excellent for mild Alzheimer’s disease (91%), good for dementia with Lewy Bodies (78%) and low for mild cognitive impairment (65%), frontotemporal dementia and vascular dementia (55%).<br /><strong>Discussion and Conclusions:</strong> The performance on the Mini-Mental State Examination is influenced by age and education, supporting the use of normative data that consider those variables. With this approach, the Mini-Mental State Examination could be a sensitive and specific instrument for the Alzheimer’s disease screening among all healthcare levels. Nevertheless, its diagnostic acuity is limited in other conditions frequently seen in memory clinics, such as Mild Cognitive Impairment and other types of dementia.</p>


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 244-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mamoru Hashimoto ◽  
Yusuke Yatabe ◽  
Tomohisa Ishikawa ◽  
Ryuji Fukuhara ◽  
Keiichiro Kaneda ◽  
...  

Background/Aims: Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are common in the clinical manifestation of dementia. Although most patients with dementia exhibit some BPSD during the course of the illness, the association of BPSD with the stage of dementia remains unclear. It was the aim of this study to evaluate the impact of severity of dementia on the expression of BPSD in patients with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods: Ninety-seven patients with DLB and 393 patients with AD were recruited from 8 dementia clinics across Japan. BPSD were assessed by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). A relationship between BPSD and dementia stage classified by the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) in each type of dementia was assessed. Results: No significant difference was seen in NPI total score across CDR staging in the DLB group. On the other hand, the NPI total score significantly increased with dementia stage in the AD group. Conclusion: The relationship of dementia stage with the expression of BPSD was different according to the type of dementia. BPSD and dementia stage were correlated in AD subjects, in whom psychiatric symptoms increase as the disease progresses, but not in DLB subjects.


2021 ◽  
pp. 155005942199714
Author(s):  
Lucia Zinno ◽  
Anna Negrotti ◽  
Chiara Falzoi ◽  
Giovanni Messa ◽  
Matteo Goldoni ◽  
...  

Introduction. An easily accessible and inexpensive neurophysiological technique such as conventional electroencephalography may provide an accurate and generally applicable biomarker capable of differentiating dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) from Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease-associated dementia (PDD). Method. We carried out a retrospective visual analysis of resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) recording of 22 patients with a clinical diagnosis of 19 probable and 3 possible DLB, 22 patients with probable AD and 21 with PDD, matched for age, duration, and severity of cognitive impairment. Results. By using the grand total EEG scoring method, the total score and generalized rhythmic delta activity frontally predominant (GRDAfp) alone or, even better, coupled with a slowing of frequency of background activity (FBA) and its reduced reactivity differentiated DLB from AD at an individual level with an high accuracy similar to that obtained with quantitative EEG (qEEG). GRDAfp alone could also differentiate DLB from PDD with a similar level of diagnostic accuracy. AD differed from PDD only for a slowing of FBA. The duration and severity of cognitive impairment did not differ between DLB patients with and without GRDAfp, indicating that this abnormal EEG pattern should not be regarded as a disease progression marker. Conclusions. The findings of this investigation revalorize the role of conventional EEG in the diagnostic workup of degenerative dementias suggesting the potential inclusion of GRDAfp alone or better coupled with the slowing of FBA and its reduced reactivity, in the list of supportive diagnostic biomarkers of DLB.


2007 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 414-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Merory ◽  
Joanne E. Wittwer ◽  
Christopher C. Rowe ◽  
Kate E. Webster

Author(s):  
Victor Calil ◽  
Andrea Silveira de Souza ◽  
Felipe Kenji Sudo ◽  
Gustavo Santiago‐Bravo ◽  
Naima Assunção ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 456-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elijah Mak ◽  
Li Su ◽  
Guy B. Williams ◽  
Rosie Watson ◽  
Michael Firbank ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document