scholarly journals Suture Bridge Repair of Proximal Hamstring Avulsion: A Case Report

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-15
Author(s):  
Chad A. Edwards ◽  
Brian H. Goldman ◽  
Andrew Hadeed ◽  
Daniel Kalbac
Keyword(s):  
Technical Difficulty ◽  
Suture Bridge ◽  
Patient Morbidity ◽  
Surgical Fixation ◽  
Proximal Hamstring Avulsion ◽  
Proximal Hamstring ◽  
Anchor Fixation ◽  
Suture Bridge Technique ◽  
Severe Patient

Proximal hamstring avulsion injuries can represent a challenging problem and lead to severe patient morbidity if not treated appropriately. The most common method for acute surgical fixation involves the use of between two and five suture anchors in a variety of configurations. The five-anchor fixation has become the gold standard due to the increased biomechanical stability. However, the technique has also been criticized due to the need for greater exposure and technical difficulty. We report on an individual with a proximal hamstring avulsion injury who was managed with a modified approach, utilizing only three anchors in a suture bridge technique. The patient had good clinical outcomes at their 3-month follow-up visit, demonstrating this technique to be a viable option that is less technically demanding.

Exploring the Perth Hamstring Assessment Tool and Lower Extremity Functional Scale in a Proximal Hamstring Avulsion Cohort: A Cross-sectional Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110085
Author(s):  
Elsa Pihl ◽  
Kenneth B. Jonsson ◽  
Mida Berglöf ◽  
Nina Brodin ◽  
Olof Sköldenberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Activity Limitations ◽  
Functional Tests ◽  
Functional Scale ◽  
Proximal Hamstring Avulsion ◽  
Proximal Hamstring ◽  
Lower Extremity Functional Scale

Background: The goal of treatment for a proximal hamstring avulsion (PHA) is an objectively restored muscle and a subjectively satisfied, pain-free patient at follow-up. Different self-reported and performance-based outcome measures have been used to evaluate recovery, but their validity is poorly investigated. Purpose: To investigate 1) the correlation between the commonly used self-reported outcome measurements, the Perth Hamstring Assessment Tool (PHAT) and the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS); 2) to what extent these scores can be explained by physical dysfunction as measured by performance-based tests; 3) whether performance-based tests can discriminate between the injured and uninjured extremity; and 4) which activity limitations are perceived by patients several years after the injury. Study design: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We included a consecutive series of patients treated for or diagnosed with PHA in our department between 2007 and 2016 having at least 2 tendons avulsed from the ischial tuberosity. Participants attended 2 study visits, answered questionnaires (PHAT, LEFS, and Patient-Specific Functional Scale [PSFS]), and performed physical performance–based tests (single-leg hop tests, single–step down test, and isometric and isokinetic strength tests). Results: A total of 50 patients were included (26 men [52%], 24 women [48%]; mean age, 50.9 years [SD, 9.8 years]). The mean follow-up time was 5.5 years (SD, 2.7 years), and 74% had been surgically treated. The correlation between PHAT and LEFS was strong ( r = 0.832) and statistically significant ( P < .001). Seven of the performance-based tests exhibited a statistically significant but weak correlation with LEFS (0.340-0.488) and 3 of the tests to PHAT (–0.304 to 0.406). However, only peak torque could significantly discriminate between the extremities. The activity limitation most commonly mentioned in PSFS was running (16 patients [32%]). Conclusion: Although PHAT and LEFS correlated strongly, the correlations between functional tests and the patient-reported outcome scores were weak, and most functional tests failed to discriminate between the injured and uninjured lower extremity in patients with PHA 5 years after injury. In general, patients alleged few activity limitations, but running difficulty was a common sequela after PHA.

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Using Modified Mason-Allen Medial Row Stitch

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 2440-2447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Girl Rhee ◽  
Nam Su Cho ◽  
Chong Suck Parke
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Knot Tying ◽  
Suture Bridge ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Suture Bridge Technique

Background: When using a method of suture bridge technique, there may be a possibility of strangulation of the rotator cuff tendon at the medial row. The style of knots chosen to secure the medial row might conceivably be a factor to reduce this possibility. Purpose: To compare the clinical results and repair integrity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between a knotless and a conventional knot-tying suture bridge technique for patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears and to evaluate retear patterns in the cases with structural failure after arthroscopic repair by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: After arthroscopic repair for medium-sized rotator cuff tears, 110 patients available for postoperative MRI evaluation at least 6 months were enrolled in this study. According to the repair technique, 51 shoulders were enrolled in a knotless suture bridge technique group (group A) and 59 shoulders in a conventional knot-tying suture bridge technique group (group B). The mean age at the time of the operation was 61.0 years (range, 44-68 years) in group A and 57.6 years (range, 45-70 years) in group B. The mean follow-up period was 21.2 months (range, 12-34 months) and 22.1 months (range, 13-32 months), respectively. Results: The Constant score of group A increased from the preoperative mean of 65.2 points to 79.1 points at the last follow-up ( P < .001). The corresponding figures for group B improved from 66.6 points to 76.3 points ( P < .001). The preoperative Shoulder Rating Scale of the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score was 21.1 points in group A and 18.3 points in group B. The UCLA score at the last follow-up was 31.0 points in group A and 27.9 points in group B ( P < .001, P < .001). Retear rate was significantly lower in group A (5.9%) than group B (18.6%) ( P < .001). In group B, retear occurred at the musculotendinous junction in 72.7%, but group A had no medial cuff failure. Conclusion: In arthroscopic suture bridge repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears, clinical results of both a knotless and a conventional knot-tying group showed improvement without significant difference between the 2 groups. However, the knotless group had a significantly lower retear rate compared with the conventional knot-tying group. A knotless suture bridge technique could be a new supplementary repair technique to conventional technique.

scholarly journals Repair of avulsion fracture of the anterior superior iliac spine by knotless suture bridge: Surgical technique and a review of 5 cases

2021 ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Avulsion Fracture ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Visual Analogue Score ◽  
Anterior Superior Iliac Spine ◽  
Early Recovery ◽  
Suture Bridge ◽  
Pain Symptoms ◽  
Suture Bridge Technique

Background: Avulsion fracture of the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) is a rare form of apophyseal avulsion fracture of the pelvis, and there is a lack of evidence-based guidelines for the selection of treatment options. There are various surgical procedures, but there is the risk of secondary removal of internal fixator and growth disturbance caused by epiphyseal fixation. Methods: We treated 5 patients with avulsion fracture of the anterior superior iliac spine by knotless suture bridge technique who visited our hospital from 2015 to 2020.The surgical treatment results were retrospectively analyzed. Results: 5 patients with fractures were healed after the surgery, no associated complications, the mean postoperative follow-up was 29.2 months (6-60months), all patients were not reported pain symptoms (visual analogue score of 0), they don’t have the limitation of daily activities, and the hip joint function recovered well, and very pleased with the results (Harris score 100 points) at the final follow-up. Conclusion: Knotless suture bridge technique is simple and effective in the repair of the avulsion fracture of anterior superior iliac spine. For such patients, this surgical technique can provide stable and reliable fixation, allow early recovery, and provide a feasible scheme for clinical practice.

Arthroscopic Repair of the Isolated Subscapularis Full-Thickness Tear: Single- Versus Double-Row Suture-Bridge Technique

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 1427-1433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji-Sang Yoon ◽  
Sung-Jae Kim ◽  
Yun-Rak Choi ◽  
Sang-Ho Kim ◽  
Yong-Min Chun
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Arthroscopic Repair ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Single Row ◽  
Suture Bridge ◽  
Active Range Of Motion ◽  
Suture Bridge Technique

Background: No clinical comparative study has addressed isolated subscapularis tears after arthroscopic repair with either single-row or double-row suture-bridge technique. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcomes and structural integrity after arthroscopic repair of an isolated subscapularis full-thickness tear with either the single-row technique or the double-row suture-bridge technique. The authors hypothesized that there would be no significant differences in clinical outcomes and structural integrity between approaches. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This study included 56 patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of an isolated subscapularis full-thickness tear with grade II or less fatty infiltration in the subscapularis muscle with either a single-row technique (n = 31) or a double-row suture-bridge technique (n = 25). Functional outcomes were assessed with the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score, and active range of motion. Magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) or computed tomographic arthrography (CTA) was performed 6 months after surgery to assess the structural integrity of the repaired tendon. Results: At the 2-year follow-up, all scoring parameters applied (VAS, SSV, ASES, and UCLA), subscapularis strength, and active range of motion improved significantly in both groups as compared with preoperative values ( P < .001). However, there were no significant differences between groups in any of these clinical outcome measurements (VAS, 1.2 vs 1.1; SSV, 91.3 vs 91.8; ASES, 91.0 vs 91.4; UCLA, 31.9 vs 32.1). On follow-up MRA or CTA, the overall retear rate did not differ significantly between the single-row group (13%, 4 of 31) and the double-row group (12%, 3 of 25). Conclusion: Arthroscopic single-row repair and double-row suture-bridge repair of isolated full-thickness subscapularis tears both yielded satisfactory clinical outcomes and structural integrity with no significant differences among patients with good muscle quality.

Surgical Management of Chronic Incomplete Proximal Hamstring Avulsion Injuries

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 1160-1167
Author(s):  
Babar Kayani ◽  
Atif Ayuob ◽  
Fahima Begum ◽  
Natalia Khan ◽  
Fares S. Haddad
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Muscle Strength ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
High Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Clinical Recurrence ◽  
Sporting Activity ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
Proximal Hamstring Avulsion ◽  
Proximal Hamstring

Background: Chronic incomplete proximal hamstring avulsion injuries are debilitating injuries associated with prolonged periods of convalescence and poor return to preinjury level of function. This study explores the efficacy of operative intervention for these injuries on patient satisfaction, muscle strength, range of motion, functional performance, return to preinjury level of sporting activity, and injury recurrence. Hypothesis: Surgical intervention of chronic incomplete proximal hamstring avulsion injuries enables return to preinjury level of sporting function with low risk of clinical recurrence. Study Design: Case series: Level of evidence, 4. Methods: This prospective single-surgeon study included 41 patients with incomplete proximal hamstring avulsion injuries refractory to 6 months of nonoperative treatment. All study patients underwent primary operative repair of the avulsed proximal hamstring tendon and received standardized postoperative rehabilitation. Predefined outcomes were recorded at regular intervals after surgery. Mean follow-up time was 28.2 months (range, 25.0-35.0 months) from date of surgery. Results: All patients returned to their preinjury level of sporting activity. Mean ± SD time from surgery to return to full sporting activity was 22.2 ± 6.7 weeks. There were no episodes of clinical recurrence. At 3 months after surgery, 39 patients (95.1%) were satisfied/very satisfied with the outcomes of their surgery, and as compared with preoperative values, improvements were recorded in isometric hamstring muscle strength at 0° (84.9% ± 10.9% vs 40.4% ± 8.8%; P < .001), 15° (89.6% ± 7.6% vs 44.2% ± 11.1%; P < .001), and 45° (94.1% ± 5.1% vs 66.4% ± 9.0%; P < .001); mean passive straight leg raise angle (71.2°± 13.5° vs 45.4°± 11.9°; P < .001); mean lower extremity functional score (70.9 ± 5.1 vs 48.4 ± 5.2; P < .001); and mean Marx activity rating score (5.6 ± 2.8 vs 2.7 ± 1.0; P < .001). High patient satisfaction and functional outcome scores were maintained at 1- and 2-year follow-up. Conclusion: Operative repair of chronic incomplete proximal hamstring avulsion injuries enabled return to preoperative level of sporting function with no episodes of clinical recurrence at short-term follow-up. Surgical intervention was associated with high patient satisfaction and improved isometric hamstring muscle strength, range of motion, and functional outcome scores as compared with preoperative values. High patient satisfaction and improved functional outcomes were sustained at 2-year follow-up.

scholarly journals All-Suture and Solid Medial Row Anchors Produce Similar Clinical Outcomes for Double Row Suture Bridge Rotator Cuff Repair (227)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0033
Author(s):  
John Feldman ◽  
Mims Ochsner ◽  
Glenn Fleisig ◽  
Rob Tatum ◽  
Lindsay Grosz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Sports Medicine ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Suture Bridge ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Anchor Fixation

Objectives: All-suture anchor use for rotator cuff repair is increasing. Potential benefits of these anchors include less bone loss from anchor hole drilling and decreased injury to the chondral surface with anchor pullout. Minimal evidence exists comparing clinical outcomes of all suture to solid medial row anchor fixation in double row suture bridge rotator cuff repair. The purpose of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes for rotator cuff tears treated with all-suture medial row anchors to those treated with more traditional solid anchors. The null hypothesis was that there is no difference in outcomes between the all-suture and solid anchor rotator cuff repairs. Methods: Three sports medicine fellowship trained surgeons performed rotator cuff repairs using the double row suture bridge technique with minimum 3 years of follow up. Patients were separated into two groups based on whether or not they received all-suture or solid anchor fixation for the medial row of their repair. All lateral row fixation was performed with solid anchors. Primary outcomes were evaluated with telephone follow-up and included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Score (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The Rehabilitation protocol was the same for all subjects in the study. Results: 3 sports medicine fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons performed 153 rotator cuff repairs. 91 of these subjects had all-suture fixation of the medial row and 62 received solid anchor fixation. Follow up was 3.6 years ± 0.6 for the all-suture group and 3.7 years ± 0.6 in the solid anchor group (p= 0.28). ASES scores were 92 ± 16 in the all-suture group and 90 ± 17 in the solid group (p =0.35). SANE scores were 91 ± 13 in the all-suture and also 91 ± 13 in the solid anchor cohort (p = 0.97). VAS scores were 1.1 ± 2.0 in the all-suture and 0.7± 1.8 in the solid anchor group (p=0.17). There were no significant differences between groups with regards to re-operation rate or anchor configuration. Conclusions: All suture anchors used in medial row fixation for double row suture bridge rotator cuff repairs have similar clinical outcomes to rotator cuff tears treated in similar fashion with solid medial row anchors.

scholarly journals Suture Slippage After Arthroscopic Cuff Repair: Medial Displacement of Suture Knots on Follow-up Ultrasonography

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 232596712110218
Author(s):  
Hyungsuk Kim ◽  
Sung Bin Han ◽  
Hyun Seok Song
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Final Visit ◽  
Suture Bridge ◽  
Pull Out ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Slippage Distance ◽  
Suture Bridge Technique

Background: Compared with the single-row technique, the double-row rotator cuff repair technique is known to have a higher load to failure and a lower frequency of gap formation, leading to a lower retear rate. There are some patients with poor clinical outcomes or poor muscle strength without radiologic retear. Purpose/Hypothesis: To assess the postoperative position of suture knots via serial ultrasonography in patients who had undergone arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with the suture-bridge technique. Our hypothesis was that the suture would pull out of the lateral anchor (suture slippage), changing the positions of the medial suture knots during healing. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: This study included 53 patients (55 shoulders) who underwent arthroscopic suture-bridge repair and were evaluated for a minimum of 24 months. On serial ultrasonography, a straight line was drawn between the top of the greater tuberosity and the medial cortex of the anchor hole. The distances between the knots of the medial rows and the perpendicular line through the center of the anchor hole were measured in longitudinal plane images of the supraspinatus. Follow-up ultrasonography was performed at 2, 3, and 6 months postoperatively as well as at the final visit. The visual analog scale, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, the Constant score, and the University of California, Los Angeles shoulder score were recorded preoperatively and on the final follow-up. Results: Of the 55 shoulders, 6 developed retears at repaired sites. The mean follow-up duration was 37.5 months (range, 24-65 months). Slippage distance increased significantly over time ( P < .001). The slippage at the final visit did not differ between patients with retear and no retear (13.4 mm for retear group; 10.6 mm for no retear group [ P = .096]). Conclusion: Suture knots of the medial row migrated medially via a suture pullout from the lateral row anchor of suture-bridge technique. Suture slippage distance did not differ significantly between retear and no retear groups.

scholarly journals A combined endoscopic and open surgical approach for chronic retracted proximal hamstring avulsion

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 284-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ran Atzmon ◽  
Eyal Amar ◽  
Dror Maor ◽  
Ehud Rath
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Surgical Approach ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Reconstruction Surgery ◽  
Surgical Fixation ◽  
Open Surgical Approach ◽  
Proximal Hamstring Avulsion ◽  
Proximal Hamstring

Abstract Proximal hamstring avulsion is an uncommon injury which usually requires surgical intervention. When possible, primary surgical fixation is recommended. In chronic hamstring avulsion with significant retraction of the tendon, hamstring reconstructions using an autograft or allograft are required in order to bridge the gap. This is mainly performed using an open surgical technique. We describe a combined endoscopic and open surgical approach to hamstring reconstruction surgery.

Functional Results and Outcomes After Repair of Partial Proximal Hamstring Avulsions at Midterm Follow-up

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (14) ◽  
pp. 3436-3443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin W. Arner ◽  
Halle Freiman ◽  
Craig S. Mauro ◽  
James P. Bradley
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Case Series ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Functional Score ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Surgical Fixation ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Proximal Hamstring

Background: Partial avulsions of the proximal hamstring origin remain a challenging problem with nonoperative treatments frequently providing limited success. The literature is limited regarding the outcomes of operative management in the active and athletic population. Hypothesis: Surgical fixation of proximal hamstring ruptures will have favorable outcomes at midterm follow-up. Study design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A total of 64 patients with partial avulsions of the proximal hamstring origin treated with surgical fixation by a single surgeon were reviewed at a 2-year minimum follow-up. All patients had initially undergone failed nonoperative treatment. Patient-reported outcome scores on the Lower Extremity Functional Score (LEFS), Marx Activity Rating Scale, custom LEFS and Marx scales, and total proximal hamstring score were evaluated. Data on patient-perceived strength, return to sport, and satisfaction were also collected. Results: The cohort included 27 male and 37 female (N = 64) patients with a mean age of 47.3 years (range, 16-65 years), and all were reviewed at a mean 6.5-year (range, 2-12.5 years) follow-up. The average postoperative LEFS was 96% (range, 68%-100%), with the custom LEFS being 90% (range, 39%-100%). The mean Marx score was 12.4 (range, 4-16). The Marx custom score demonstrated no disability with activities of daily living. The mean total proximal hamstring score was 94% (range, 69%-100%). No differences in any outcome measures were seen when comparing acute versus chronic repairs. Three patients underwent further hamstring surgery. No patients reported symptoms of numbness in the operative extremity at rest, while 3 patients had a superficial stitch abscess treated with antibiotics alone. The most commonly reported difficulty was with prolonged sitting. Ninety-seven percent were satisfied with surgery, 92% reported they could participate in strenuous activity, and 97% estimated their strength to be >75%, while 64% estimated it to be 100% of their contralateral side. Patients returned to sport at an average of 11.1 months, and all that returned were satisfied with their performance. Conclusion: Both early and delayed anatomic surgical repair of partial proximal hamstring avulsions leads to successful functional outcomes, a high rate of return to athletic activity, and low complication rates at the 6.5-year follow-up. Nonoperative treatments should first be attempted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document