scholarly journals A Phase II Study of Ibrutinib in Advanced Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

2019 ◽  
Vol 110 (5) ◽  
pp. 377-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taymeyah Al-Toubah ◽  
Michael J. Schell ◽  
Mauro Cives ◽  
Jun-Min Zhou ◽  
Heloisa P. Soares ◽  
...  

Background: Ibrutinib is an orally administered inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (Btk). Preclinical data suggest that mast cells are recruited within neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) where they stimulate angiogenesis and tumor growth. Ibrutinib inhibits mast cell degranulation and has been associated with regression of tumors in a mouse insulinoma model. Methods: A prospective, phase II trial evaluated patients with advanced gastrointestinal (GI)/lung NENs and pancreatic NENs (pNENs) who had evidence of progression within 12 months of study entry on at least one prior therapy. Patients received ibrutinib 560 mg daily until unacceptable toxicity, progression of disease, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. Results: Twenty patients were enrolled on protocol from November 2015 to December 2017 (15 advanced GI/lung NENs and 5 pNENs). No patient reached an objective response. Median PFS was 3.0 months. A total of 44 drug-related adverse events (AEs) were captured as probably or definitely associated with ibrutinib. Five patients experienced probably or definitely related grade 3 AEs, and 1 patient experienced a probably related grade 4 AE. Five patients discontinued treatment prior to radiographic assessment. Conclusions: Ibrutinib does not show significant evidence of activity in well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic and lung NENs.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 434-434
Author(s):  
Taymeyah E. Al-Toubah ◽  
Tiffany Valone ◽  
Michael J. Schell ◽  
Jonathan R. Strosberg

434 Background: Ibrutinib is an orally administered, inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (Btk). Preclinical data suggest that mast cells are recruited with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) where they remodel the stroma and stimulate angiogenesis, driving macroscopic tumor expansion. Ibrutinib inhibits mast cell degranulation, and has been associated with regression of a mouse insulinoma model. Methods: A prospective, phase II trial evaluated patients with advanced GI/lung NETs and pNETs who had evidence of progression within 12 months of study entry on at least one prior therapy. Patients received ibrutinib 560mg daily until unacceptable toxicity, progression of disease, or withdrawal of consent. Primary endpoint was objective response rate. Results: 20 patients were enrolled on protocol from November 2015 – December 2017 (15 carcinoid and five pNETs). No patients experienced objective response. Median PFS was 3.1 months. A total of 43 drug related AEs were captured as probably or definitely associated with ibrutinib. Five patients experienced probably or definitely related grade 3 AEs and one patient experienced a probably related grade 4 AE. Five patients discontinued treatment prior to radiographic assessment. Conclusions: Ibrutinib does not show significant evidence of activity when compared to other agents (e.g. Everolimus) in well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic and lung NETs. Clinical trial information: 02575300.


1990 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Raghavan ◽  
P Gianoutsos ◽  
J Bishop ◽  
J Lee ◽  
I Young ◽  
...  

Thirty-one patients with advanced malignant mesothelioma, previously untreated or having received only one prior cytotoxic regimen, were treated in a prospective, single-arm phase II trial with carboplatin (NSC 241240) at a dose of 150 mg/m2 per day intravenously (IV) for 3 days (450 mg/m2/course). One complete remission and four partial remissions were achieved, yielding an overall objective response rate of 16% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.4% to 34%). The median duration of remission was 8 months (range, 5 to 17). Nonhematological toxicity was mild (only 12% with World Health Organization [WHO] grade 3 vomiting); 16% suffered WHO grade 3 to 4 hematological toxicity, but there were no life-threatening episodes and no treatment-related deaths. Carboplatin has modest activity against malignant mesothelioma and, because of its low toxicity, has a role in the management of this disease.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4044-4044 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. H. Kulke ◽  
K. Stuart ◽  
C. C. Earle ◽  
P. Bhargava ◽  
J. W. Clark ◽  
...  

4044 Background: Inhibitors of the VEGF pathway have been shown to have activity in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Temozolomide (TMZ), an oral analog of dacarbazine is also active in this setting. We performed a prospective, phase II study to assess the safety and efficacy of TMZ, administered in combination with bevacizuamb, in patients (pts) with advanced NETs. Methods: Pts received TMZ, 150 mg/m2/day po for 7 days every other week, and bevacizumab, 5 mg/kg IV every other week. Due to anticipated lymphopenia, pts received prophylaxis with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1 DS tablet q MWF) and acyclovir (400 mg po TID). Pts were followed for toxicity, response, and survival. Results: Enrolled patients (n=34) had the following characteristics: M:F = 19:15; median age 61 (range 37–75); ECOG PS 0/1/2 = 12/20/2; carcinoid/pancreatic NET = 16/18. Prior treatments included chemoembolization (n=7) chemotherapy (n=12); and octreotide (n=17); pts on octreotide remained on octreotide at stable doses for the duration of the study. Pts had either well-differentiated tumors (n=27) or moderately/poorly-differentiated NETs (n=7); pts with small cell carcinoma were not eligible for the study. Pts have received treatment for a median of 22 weeks. Grade 3–4 toxicities included: lymphopenia (n=21, 62%), leukopenia (n=2, 6%), thrombocytopenia (n=7, 21%), neutropenia (n=2, 6%), hyponatremia (n=1, 3%), vomiting (n=3, 9%), nausea (n=2, 6%), dehydration (n=1, 3%), fatigue (n=2, 6%), constipation (n=1, 3%), and hypertension (n=1, 3%). 20 pts had elevated CGA levels (>36.4 ng/ml) at baseline; 0/9 (0%) carcinoid and 4/11 (36%) pancreatic NET experienced CGA decreases of >50% from baseline on two consecutive assessments. 29 pts are currently evaluable for radiologic response ( Table ). Conclusions: The combination of TMZ and bevacizumab can be safely administered and shows promising activity in pts with advanced pancreatic NETs. Additional studies with this combination are warranted. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14599-14599
Author(s):  
N. Lee ◽  
S. Bae ◽  
S. Lee ◽  
D. Kim ◽  
K. Kim ◽  
...  

14599 Background: We prospectively conducted a phase II trial to test the efficacy and safety of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) regimens for the first-line treatment of previously untreated patients with recurrent or metastatic advanced CRC. Methods: Thirty-four previously untreated patients with advanced CRC were enrolled in this study from June 2001 to December 2006. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma, no prior systemic therapy in palliative setting, ECOG PS = 2, adequate organ function, written informed consent and at least one measurable disease. The patients received either irinotecan 180 mg/m2 on day 1 with a LV bolus of 200 mg/m2 and a FU bolus of 400 mg/m2, and this was followed by a FU continuous infusion of 600 mg/m2 on day 1 and day 2 (the classic FOLFIRI regimen), or they were treated with a LV bolus of 400 mg/m2 and a FU bolus of 400 mg/m2 followed by a FU continuous infusion of 2,400 mg/m2 for 46 hours (the simplified FOLFIRI regimen), and these treatments were repeated every 2 weeks until disease progression. Results: There were 13 females and 21 males with median age of 54 years (range: 41–79). The most common metastatic sites were lung and liver. A total of 262 cycles were administrated with median 6 cycles per patient (range: 1–22). All pts were evaluable for toxicity, and 30 pts for response to the treatment. The objective response rate was 26.4% with 2 complete responses respectively. Sixteen (47%) pts had stable disease and 7 (20.5%) had a progression. The tumor control rate was 73.4%. The median TTP was 5.3 months, and the overall survival was 10.1 months. The prognostic factor for longer TTP and survival was the ECOG performance status (PS). The type of regimens was not affected on response rate, TTP and survival. The chemotherapy was generally well tolerated and the most common grade 3–4 toxicities were neutropenia, diarrhea. The non- hematological toxicities were similar for both treatment groups, with more frequent grade =3 neutropenia being noted for the simplified FOLFIRI regimen. Conclusions: The FOLFIRI regimen was demonstrated to have a moderate antitumor activity with acceptable toxicity profiles, and tend to show more favorable outcome for patients with good ECOG PS. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20541-e20541
Author(s):  
Paul K. Paik ◽  
Enriqueta Felip ◽  
Remi Veillon ◽  
Jürgen Scheele ◽  
Rolf Bruns

e20541 Background: Approximately 3-4% of lung adenocarcinomas express a truncated form of c-Met (c-Metex14) due to mutation-induced exon 14 skipping. c-Metex14 accumulates on the cell surface and is constitutively active with the ability to drive NSCLC. Data suggest that lung adenocarcinomas harboring c-METex14 are sensitive to c-Met kinase inhibitors. The highly selective c-Met inhibitor tepotinib is well tolerated and active at an oral dose of 500 mg QD. This single-arm phase II trial (NCT02864992) is investigating the efficacy and safety of tepotinib in patients (pts) with advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring METex14. Methods: Adults with stage IIIB/IV lung adenocarcinoma who have failed 1 or 2 lines of systemic therapy, including a platinum doublet-containing regimen, are eligible. Tumors must harbor mutations that are known to cause exon 14 skipping, confirmed by a central laboratory, but not activating EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements. Pts receive tepotinib 500 mg QD until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal from treatment for other reasons. The primary endpoint is objective response rate. Secondary endpoints include progression-free and overall survival, safety, pharmacokinetics, and quality of life. Recruitment of 60 patients in Europe, USA, and Japan is planned. Results: Four pts (age 64–77 years; 3 stage IV, 1 stage IIIB, all Caucasian males) have been enrolled. All had received two prior chemotherapy regimens including a platinum doublet. Pts have currently completed 1–5 cycles of tepotinib therapy. The majority of adverse events observed to date have been grade 1/2 in severity; grade 3 disease-related dyspnea, pulmonary embolism, and pleural effusion were observed in one patient and grade 3 tepotinib-related elevated serum amylase in another. Of the 3 pts with post-baseline tumor evaluations, two have had an unconfirmed partial response and the third (with only one post-baseline assessment) stable disease. Conclusions: These initial data suggest that the efficacy of tepotinib 500 mg QD is comparable to that of less selective c-Met inhibitors in pts with c-METex14 NSCLC (ORR > 40%). Tepotinib is also well tolerated. Recruitment to the trial is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02864992.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4538-4538
Author(s):  
E. Woell ◽  
R. Greil ◽  
W. Eisterer ◽  
M. Fridrik ◽  
B. Grünberger ◽  
...  

4538 Background: Patients (pts.) suffering from advanced gastric cancer have still a poor prognosis and treatment options are limited. In our previous phase II trial (AGMT-Gastric-1) we could show that the combination of oxaliplatin and irinotecan was well tolerated and showed an objective response rate of 58% (Anticancer Res 28:2901–2906, 2008). This chemotherapy regimen was tested in combination with cetuximab in a multicenter phase II trial. Methods: Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 biweekly and irinotecan 125 mg/m2 biweekly were combined with cetuximab 400 mg/m2 loading dose and subsequently weekly 250 mg/m2. 51 patients with histological proven unresectable and/or metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma were treated in a first line setting. Median age: 62 years (range 19–79 years), PS 0: 25 patients, PS 1+2 26 patients, single metastatic site: 24 patients, multiple metastases: 27 patients. Results: Frequently reported adverse events (more than 20% of pts.) were predominantly grade 1 or 2 and included neutropenia (35% of pts.), thrombocytopenia (33%), anemia (73%), nausea (45%), diarrhea (57%), alopecia (22%), and fatigue (37%). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities included neutropenia in 9/1 pts., thrombocytopenia in 1/0 pts., anemia in 3/1 pts., nausea in 2/0 pts., and diarrhea in 7/2 pts. Sensory neuropathy occurred mostly as grade 1 and 2 in 37% of pts., in 7 pts. grade 3 neurotoxicity was observed. Acneiform skin rash grade 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 was reported in 31% / 20% / 6% / 2% of pts. respectively. 16 pts. went off-study due to neutropenia (n=5), nausea/vomiting (n=1), diarrhea (n=1), progressive disease (n=3), toxic colon (n=2), and allergic reaction to cetuximab at first (n=2), second (n=1) or third infusion (n=1). 35 patients are assessable for response with 1 pt. (3%) showing a CR, 21 pts. (60%) a PR, 7 pts. (20%) a SD and PD in 6 pts. (17%). A disease control rate was achieved in 83%. Median time to progression was 24.8 weeks (n=29), median overall survival 38.1 weeks (n=32). Conclusions: The combination of oxaliplatin and irinotecan with cetuximab is feasible, safe and active in advanced gastric cancer. [Table: see text]


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6015-6015 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Mesia ◽  
S. Vázquez ◽  
J. J. Grau ◽  
J. A. García-Sáenz ◽  
C. Bayona ◽  
...  

6015 Background: TPF combination is the new standard IC. Adding cetuximab to PF chemotherapy is superior to PF alone in metastatic disease. We incorporated cetuximab into IC with TPF and subsequent radiotherapy (RT) in unresectable SCCHN. Methods: Phase II trial conducted in 7 Spanish hospitals. Previously untreated pts aged 18–70 yrs, ECOG PS 0–1 with unresectable SCCHN were eligible. Induction comprised T 75mg/m2 day 1, P 75mg/m2 day 1, F 750mg/m2 days 1–5, and cetuximab 250mg/m2 days 1, 8, and 15 (initial dose 400mg/m2 on cycle (C) 1, day 1), repeated every 21 days x 4 C, with prophylactic antibiotics and G-CSF support. Subsequently, pts received accelerated RT with a concomitant boost (69.9Gy) and cetuximab 250mg/m2 weekly. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (RR) to cetuximab TPF as neoadjuvant therapy. Simon's optimal two-stage design was used to calculate the sample size of 49 evaluable pts. Results: 50 pts were enrolled: median age 54 yrs (33–68); 44 male; all stage IV (T4=31, N2–3=40). Primary sites were: oropharynx, 23; hypopharynx, 16; oral cavity, 5; larynx, 4.41(82%) pts received all 4 cycles of cetuximab TPF; 47 pts received ≥2 C and were evaluable for response using RECIST. 3 pts received <2 C (2 deaths from intercurrent disease and febrile neutropenia, 1 secondary neoplasm diagnosed). The table shows RR. Serious grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were: neutropenia 24%; neutropenic fever 20%; infection 6%; thrombocytopenia 4%; diarrhea 12%; hepatotoxicity 4%; hypomagnesemia 2%. Grade 3 AEs were: nausea/vomiting 2%; mucositis 6%; renal failure 4%; asthenia 4%; rash 4%; hypotension 4%. There were 2 AE-related deaths (febrile neutropenia and hepatic insufficiency). Conclusions: The addition of cetuximab to TPF IC in pts with unresectable SCCHN yields a high RR, mainly CR, potentially prolonging survival. Cetuximab TPF combination should be given to pts with good PS with specialized support provided. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 102-102
Author(s):  
Marla Lipsyc-Sharf ◽  
Fang-Shu Ou ◽  
Matthew B. Yurgelun ◽  
Douglas Adam Rubinson ◽  
Deborah Schrag ◽  
...  

102 Background: Combination irinotecan and cetuximab is approved for irinotecan-refractory mCRC; it is unknown if the addition of bevacizumab would improve outcomes. We studied the efficacy and safety of CBI compared with CI in patients (pts) with RAS wildtype, irinotecan-refractory mCRC. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial, pts with RAS wildtype mCRC and no prior anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy who failed at least 1 irinotecan-based chemotherapy regimen and received bevacizumab in at least 1 prior line of therapy were randomized 1:1 to irinotecan 180 mg/m2 (or previously tolerated dose), cetuximab 500 mg/m2, and bevacizumab 5 mg/kg vs CI every 2 wks until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models stratified by number of prior lines of therapy and bevacizumab receipt in immediate prior line were performed. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs). The study was closed early in January 2018 for reasons related to accrual and funding after enrollment of 36 out of a planned 60 pts. Results: Between July 2015 and December 2017, 36 pts were randomized (19 to CBI, 17 to CI). 34 pts (94%) were treated with 2 or more prior chemotherapy regimens. Baseline characteristics were similar between arms. Median PFS was 9.7 vs 5.5 mo for CBI and CI arms, respectively (log-rank P =0.76; multivariable HR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.25-1.66). Median OS was 19.7 vs 10.2 mo for CBI and CI (log-rank P= 0.04; multivariable HR = 0.41; 95% CI, 0.15-1.09). ORR was 37% for CBI vs 12% for CI ( P =0.13). Grade 3 or higher AEs occurred in 47% of pts receiving CBI vs 35% for CI ( P =0.46). Conclusions: In this prematurely discontinued trial, there were non-significant increases in PFS and ORR and a statistically significant 9.5 mo increase in median OS in favor of CBI compared to CI. Further investigation of CBI for treatment of irinotecan-refractory mCRC is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT02292758.


2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Wang ◽  
Xiangrui Meng ◽  
Hangrui Liu ◽  
Qingxia Fan

Abstract   The benefit of systemic treatment in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) which has progressed after chemotherapy is still uncertain. Anlotinib (AL3818) is a novel multi-target TKI, inhibiting tumor angiogenesis and proliferation. A phase II trial (NCT02649361) has demonstrated that anlotinib has a durable antitumor activity with a manageable adverse event profile in refractory metastatic ESCC. This study (NCT03387904) aimed at comparing the effects and safety of Anlotinib Plus Irinotecan versus Irinotecan in patients with ESCC. Methods We conducted a prospective randomized, multicenter, phase II trial to compare the efficacy of Anlotinib Plus Irinotecan with Irinotecan in recurrent ESCC patients who had resistance to platinum or taxane-based chemotherapy. Eligible patients were adults with pathologically confirmed recurrent ESCC, and 82 patients were randomized 1:1 to Irinotecan (65 mg/m2/day 1 and day 8) with or without anlotinib (12 mg qd day 1 to 14) of a 21-day cycle till progression or intolerable. The primary endpoint is the disease control rate (DCR) and progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary end points are objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Results Between 13/1 2019 and 20/1 2020, a total of 43 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the anlotinib plus irinotecan (n = 22) or the irinotecan group (n = 21).The mPFS was longer in trial group than in control group (89 days vs 66 days, HR = 0.447, P = 0.055). The Disease control rate (DCR) was 54.5% in trial group and 38.1% in the control group. The treatment-related adverse events (&gt;10%) were fatigue (59.1%), nausea (50.0%), decreased appetite (36.4%), hoarseness (27.3%), thyroid-stimulating hormone elevation (22.7%), diarrhea (9.1%), and decreased lymphocytes count(9.1%) in trial group. Grade 3 AEs included fatigue (4.5% vs 4.8%), nausea (4.5% vs 0%) and diarrhea (4.5% vs 0%) in two groups. Conclusion Anlotinib plus irinotecan was similarly tolerable but prolonged PFS compared to irinotecan monotherapy as a second-line treatment in patients with recurrent ESCC.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 487-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Driessen ◽  
Rouven Müller ◽  
Urban Novak ◽  
Nathan Cantoni ◽  
Daniel Betticher ◽  
...  

Abstract Rationale: Proteasome inhibitor-refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients are a difficult to treat population with a very poor prognosis. The activity of registered, current or next generation MM drugs (pomalidomide, carfilzomib, daratumumab) in heavily pretreated, proteasome inhibitor-refractory MM is in the range of 30%. The biology of proteasome inhibitor resistance is driven by adaptive downregulation of the unfolded protein response (UPR), which regulates plasma cell maturation and sensitivity to proteasome inhibitor treatment (Leung-HagesteijnC. et al., Cancer Cell 2013 Sep 9;24(3):289-304). The oral HIV protease inhibitor nelfinavir (NFV) has anti-MM activity in vivo, triggers UPR activation, sensitizes MM to proteasome inhibitors and overcomes proteasome inhibitor resistance in vitro. Combination therapy with NFV and bortezomib (BTZ) showed UPR activation in vivo and strong signals of activity in bortezomib-refractory MM in the SAKK 65/08 phase I trial (Driessen C. et al.,Haematologica 2016 Mar;101(3):346-55). Objective: We performed a prospective, multicenter phase II trial to assess the activity ofnelfinavir,bortezomiband dexamethasone (NVd) in proteasome inhibitor-refractory MM. Methods: Patients with progressing, measurable, proteasome inhibitor-refractory MM (IMWG criteria) were included in this multicenter phase II trial. Further selection criteria included WHO performance status ≤ 3, platelets ≥ 50 x 109/L, hemoglobin ≥ 80 g/L (both may be achieved by transfusion) and adequate hepatic function. Concomitant use of other anti-cancer medication or radiotherapy, except for local pain control, was excluded. Patient age or prior number or types of therapy were not limited. Simon's two stage design was used to differentiate a promising activity (best response at any time point, partial response (PR) or better, ≥ 35 %) from an uninteresting activity (≤ 15% PR; power 80%, alpha 5%). Results: 34 patients were treated with oral nelfinavir 2500 mg days 1-14 b.i.d. in combination with bortezomib + dexamethasone (BTZ 1.3 mg/m2 days 1, 4, 8, 11, dexamethasone 20 mg p.o. days 1-2, 4-5, 8-9, 11-12) for a maximum of 6 21-day cycles at 9 SAKK trial sites throughout Switzerland. Patients (median age 67.5 years, range 42-82 years) had a median of 5 (range 2-12) prior therapy lines, 26 (76%) patients had prior high dose chemotherapy, and 13 (39%) had known poor prognosis cytogenetic abnormalities. All treated patients had proteasome inhibitor refractory MM according to IMWG criteria, i.e. they had progressed during or within 60 days after adequately dosed proteasome inhibitor-containing therapy. Moreover, 26 (76%) patients werelenalidomide-refractory by IMWG criteria (double refractory). Trial therapy is still ongoing in 2 patients. The median number of treatment cycles delivered per patient is 4. 22 patients achieved an objective response with a PR or better, resulting in an overall response rate (OR) of 65% (90% CI 49.2%-75.7%) to date. VGPR was reached in 5 patients, PR in 17 patients, MR in 3 patients, SD in 4 patients and PD in 3. Inpatients double-refractory for proteasome inhibitors andlenalidomide, the OR was 69%, in patients with poor prognosis cytogenetic abnormalities it was 77%. The OR was independent from the number of prior therapy lines (OR rate 69% with < 5 prior therapy lines, OR rate 61% with ≥ 5 prior lines). Most frequent > grade (G) 2 adverse events to date were anemia (G3 29%), thrombocytopenia (G3 24%, G4 18%), infections (G3 24%, G4 9%, G5 3%), hyperglycemia (G3 18%, G4 3%) and fatigue (G3 12%). Six patients maintained their PR or better for the full 6 cycles per protocol while on study. Four patients continuedNVd therapy on a compassionate use basis after completing the study. Updated final data will be provided at the meeting. Conclusion: Nelfinavir in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone (NVd) is a reasonable, active, safe and widely available treatment option for patients with proteasome inhibitor-refractory multiple myeloma. The objective response rate of 65% observed in this very advanced, heavily pretreated, mostly dual-refractory patient population is exceptional. Our results warrant further development of nelfinavir as a sensitizing drug for proteasome inhibitor-based treatments and promising new agent for MM therapy. Figure Maximum relative change in serum M-protein or serum free light chain concentration in individual evaluable patients. Figure. Maximum relative change in serum M-protein or serum free light chain concentration in individual evaluable patients. Disclosures Driessen: Mundipharma-EDO: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; celgene: Consultancy; janssen: Consultancy. Samaras:Celgene (Adboard, educational talk), Amgen (adboard), Takeda (Adboard), Roche (Adboard), Sanofi (Adboard), Novartis (Adboard): Consultancy, Honoraria. Zander:Bristol Myers, Celgene, Amgen, Mundipharma, Janssen-Cilag, Takeda Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document