Colon Capsule Endoscopy versus CT Colonography in Patients with Large Non-Polypoid Tumours: A Multicentre Prospective Comparative Study (4CN Study)

Digestion ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 101 (5) ◽  
pp. 615-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenichi Utano ◽  
Shinichi Katsuki ◽  
Tomoki Matsuda ◽  
Katsuhiko Mitsuzaki ◽  
Tomoki Fujita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Capsule Endoscopy ◽  
Ct Colonography ◽  
Colon Capsule Endoscopy ◽  
Colon Capsule ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study

scholarly journals Application of colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) to evaluate the whole gastrointestinal tract: a comparative study of single-camera and dual-camera analysis

2013 ◽  
pp. 185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Remes-Troche ◽  
Josefa María García Montes ◽  
Federico Roesch-Dietlen ◽  
Juan Manuel Herrerías-Gutiérrez ◽  
Victoria Alejandra Jiménez-García ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Tract ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Capsule Endoscopy ◽  
Single Camera ◽  
Colon Capsule Endoscopy ◽  
Colon Capsule

scholarly journals Mo1669 DETECTION OF ≥10MM POLYPS BY COLON CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY VERSUS CT COLONOGRAPHY: A POST-HOC ANALYSIS

2018 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. AB471
Author(s):  
Shinichi Katsuki ◽  
Kenichi Utano ◽  
Tomoki Matsuda ◽  
Tomoki Fujita ◽  
Katsuhiko Mitsuzaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Capsule Endoscopy ◽  
Ct Colonography ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Colon Capsule Endoscopy ◽  
Colon Capsule ◽  
Post Hoc

scholarly journals Colon capsule endoscopy versus CT colonography in FIT-positive colorectal cancer screening subjects: a prospective randomised trial—the VICOCA study

BMC Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Begoña González-Suárez ◽  
Mario Pagés ◽  
Isis Karina Araujo ◽  
Cristina Romero ◽  
Cristina Rodríguez de Miguel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Capsule Endoscopy ◽  
Ct Colonography ◽  
Colorectal Neoplasia ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Crc Screening ◽  
Colon Capsule Endoscopy ◽  
Neoplastic Lesions ◽  
Colon Capsule

Abstract Background Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) and CT colonography (CTC) are minimally invasive techniques for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Our objective is to compare CCE and CTC for the identification of patients with colorectal neoplasia among participants in a CRC screening programme with positive faecal immunochemical test (FIT). Primary outcome was to compare the performance of CCE and CTC in detecting patients with neoplastic lesions. Methods The VICOCA study is a prospective, single-centre, randomised trial conducted from March 2014 to May 2016; 662 individuals were invited and 349 were randomised to CCE or CTC before colonoscopy. Endoscopists were blinded to the results of CCE and CTC. Results Three hundred forty-nine individuals were included: 173 in the CCE group and 176 in the CTC group. Two hundred ninety individuals agreed to participate: 147 in the CCE group and 143 in the CTC group. In the intention-to-screen analysis, sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values for the identification of individuals with colorectal neoplasia were 98.1%, 76.6%, 93.7% and 92.0% in the CCE group and 64.9%, 95.7%, 96.8% and 57.7% in the CTC group. In terms of detecting significant neoplastic lesions, the sensitivity of CCE and CTC was 96.1% and 79.3%, respectively. Detection rate for advanced colorectal neoplasm was higher in the CCE group than in the CTC group (100% and 93.1%, respectively; RR = 1.07; p = 0.08). Both CCE and CTC identified all patients with cancer. CCE detected more patients with any lesion than CTC (98.6% and 81.0%, respectively; RR = 1.22; p = 0.002). Conclusion Although both techniques seem to be similar in detecting patients with advanced colorectal neoplasms, CCE is more sensitive for the detection of any neoplastic lesion. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02081742. Registered: September 16, 2013.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document