Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 220-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hayemin Lee ◽  
Wook Kim ◽  
Junhyun Lee
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Total Gastrectomy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Open Total Gastrectomy

Background: Laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is a technically and oncologically challenging procedure for surgeons. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the technical safety and long-term oncological feasibility between LTG and open total gastrectomy (OTG) for patients with AGC using a propensity score (PS)-matched analysis. Methods: Between 2004 and 2014, 185 patients (OTG: 127, LTG: 58) underwent curative total gastrectomy for AGC. PS matching was performed using the patients’ clinicopathological factors, and comparisons were made based on surgical outcomes and long-term survival rates. Results: After PS matching, 102 patients (51 patients in each group) were enrolled. The total numbers of retrieved lymph nodes were similar in both groups. The numbers of retrieved lymph nodes around the splenic hilum were similar in both groups. A longer operation time was required for the LTG group than for the OTG group, but less intraoperative bleeding was observed in the LTG group. The overall morbidity and mortality rates of both groups were similar. Between the 2 groups, there was no difference in the 5-year overall survival rate or disease-free survival rate. Conclusions: For treating proximal AGC, LTG may be a technically and an oncologically safe and feasible method.

Long-term outcome of laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 77-77
Author(s):  
Hayemin Lee ◽  
Junhyun Lee
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Total Gastrectomy ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Open Total Gastrectomy

77 Background: Laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is technically and oncologically challenging procedure for surgeons. The aim of this study is to compare technical safety and long-term oncologic feasibility of LTG for AGC patients compared to open total gastrectomy (OTG) using propensity score (PS)-matched analysis. Methods: Between 2004 and 2014, 185 patients (OTG: 127, LTG: 58) underwent total gastrectomy due to advanced gastric cancer. PS-matching was done using patients’ age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status, extent of lymph node dissection, presence of combined resection and pathological stage of gastric cancer. Comparisons were made based on surgical outcomes and long-term survival rates. Results: After PS-matching, 102 patients, respectively 51 patients for each group, were enrolled. LTG had longer tumor-free proximal resection margin (OTG 2.5 cm vs. LTG 3.0 cm, p = 0.008). Total number of retrieved lymph node and metastasized lymph node was similar in both groups. The retrieved number of lymph nodes around splenic hilum (#10 and #11d) was similar in both groups (p = 0.105). Longer operation time was required in LTG (OTG 240 min. vs. LTG 320 min, p = 0.002) but less intraoperative bleeding was observed in LTG (OTG 390 cc vs. LTG 276 cc, p < 0.001). Patients of LTG were discharged earlier than OTG (OTG 12 days vs. LTG 10 days, p = 0.043). Overall morbidity and mortality of both group was similar. Between two groups, there was not a difference in 5-year overall survival rate (OTG 56.3% vs. LTG 56.5%, p = 0.597) or disease free survival rate (OTG 59.0% vs. LTG 67.6%, p = 0.455). Conclusions: For treating proximal AGC, LTG may be a technically and oncologically safe and feasible method.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic Versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter, Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study in China

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xingyu Feng ◽  
Xin Chen ◽  
Zaisheng Ye ◽  
Wenjun Xiong ◽  
Xueqing Yao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Total Gastrectomy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
D2 Lymphadenectomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Open Total Gastrectomy

BackgroundGiven the great technical difficulty and procedural complexity of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG), the technical and oncologic safety of LTG versus open total gastrectomy (OTG) in the field of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is yet undetermined.ObjectiveThis multicenter cohort study aimed to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes of LTG with those of OTG in AGC patients.Patients and MethodsIn total, 588 patients from 3 centers who underwent primary total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy, by well-trained surgeons with adequate experience, for pathologically confirmed locally AGC (T2N0–3, T3N0–3, or T4N0–3) between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2015, were identified, and their clinical data were collected from three participating centers. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), 450 cases (LTG, n = 225; OTG, n = 225) were eligible and assessed.ResultsNo significant difference in the number of retrieved lymph nodes, 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates, or 5-year overall survival (OS) rates between both surgical groups were observed. Although LTG had significantly longer surgical time (262 vs. 180 min, p &lt; 0.001), LTG was associated with fewer postoperative complications [relative risk (RR) 0.583, 95% CI 0.353–0.960, p = 0.047), less intraoperative bleeding (120 vs. 200 ml, p &lt; 0.001), longer proximal margin resection (3 vs. 2 cm, p &lt; 0.001), and shorter postoperative hospitalization (11 vs. 13 days, p &lt; 0.001). The mortality rate was comparable in both groups.ConclusionsLTG was not inferior to OTG in terms of survival outcomes and was associated with shorter surgical and postoperative hospitalization time and fewer postoperative complications, suggesting LTG with D2 lymphadenectomy as an important alternative to OTG for patients with AGC, but to be carried out in highly experienced centers.

scholarly journals Impact of the Number of Dissected Lymph Nodes on Survival for Gastric Cancer after Distal Subtotal Gastrectomy

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang-Ming Huang ◽  
Jian-Xian Lin ◽  
Chao-Hui Zheng ◽  
Ping Li ◽  
Jian-Wei Xie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Distal Gastrectomy ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Term Survival

Objectives. To investigate the prognostic impact of the number of dissected lymph nodes (LNs) in gastric cancer after curative distal gastrectomy.Methods. The survival of 634 patients who underwent curative distal gastrectomy from 1995 to 2004 was retrieved. Long-term surgical outcomes and associations between the number of dissected LNs and the 5-year survival rate were investigated.Results. The number of dissected LNs was one of the most important prognostic indicators. Among patients with comparable T category, the larger the number of dissected LNs was, the better the survival would be (). The linear regression showed that a significant survival improvement based on increasing retrieved LNs for stage II, III and IV (). A cut-point analysis yields the greatest variance of survival rate difference at the levels of 15 LNs (stage I), 25 LNs (stage II) and 30 LNs (stage III).Conclusion. The number of dissected LNs is an independent prognostic factor for gastric cancer. To improve the long-term survival of patients with gastric cancer, removing at least 15 LNs for stage I, 25 LNs for stage II, and 30 LNs for stage III patients during curative distal gastrectomy is recommended.

scholarly journals Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

Oncotarget ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (45) ◽  
pp. 80029-80038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian-Xian Lin ◽  
Ju-Li Lin ◽  
Chao-Hui Zheng ◽  
Ping Li ◽  
Jian-Wei Xie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Total Gastrectomy ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Open Total Gastrectomy ◽  
Short And Long Term

scholarly journals Preoperative Versus Postoperative Chemo-Radiotherapy For Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ning Li ◽  
Xiaoyong Xiang ◽  
Dongbin Zhao ◽  
Xin Wang ◽  
Yuan Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Postoperative Treatment ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

Abstract Background: peri-operative chemo-radiotherapy played important role in locally advanced gastric cancer. Whether preoperative strategy can improve the long-term prognosis compared with postoperative treatment is unclear. The study purpose to compare long-term oncologic outcomes in locally advanced gastric cancer patients treated with preoperative chemo-radiotherapy (pre-CRT) and postoperative chemo-radiotherapy (post-CRT). Methods: From January 2009 to April 2019, 222 patients from 2 centers with stage T3/4 and/or N positive gastric cancer who received pre-CRT and post-CRT were included. After propensity score matching (PSM), comparisons of local regional control (LC), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test between pre- and post-CRT groups.Results: The median follow-up period was 30 months. 120 matched cases were generated for analysis. Three-year LC, DMFS, DFS and OS for pre- vs. post-CRT groups were 93.8% vs. 97.2% (p=0.244), 78.7% vs. 65.7% (p=0.017), 74.9% vs. 65.3% (p=0.042) and 74.4% vs. 61.2% (p=0.055), respectively. Pre-CRT were significantly associated with DFS in uni- and multi-variate analysis. Conclusion: Preoperative CRT showed advantages of long-term outcome compared with postoperative CRT. Trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov NCT01291407, NCT03427684 and NCT04062058, date of registration: Feb 8, 2011

scholarly journals Long-Term Survival of Two Patients with Liver Metastases from Advanced Gastric Cancer Treated with Radiofrequency Ablation and Chemotherapy

2021 ◽  
pp. 67-72
Author(s):  
Sung Jin Oh
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Systemic Chemotherapy ◽  
Subtotal Gastrectomy ◽  
Hepatic Metastases ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival

Liver metastasis from gastric cancer has a very poor prognosis. Herein, we present two cases of liver metastases (synchronous and metachronous) from advanced gastric cancer. In the first case, the patient underwent radical subtotal gastrectomy. Liver metastases occurred 6 months after surgery while the patient was receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, but two hepatic tumors were successfully removed by radiofrequency ablation (RFA). In the second case, liver metastases occurred 15 months after surgery for gastric cancer. The patient also received RFA for one hepatic tumor, and other suspicious metastatic tumors were treated with systemic chemotherapy. Although these case presentations are limited for the efficacy of RFA treatment with systemic chemotherapy for hepatic metastases from gastric cancer, our findings showed long-term survival (overall survival for 108 and 67 months, respectively) of the affected patients, without recurrence. Therefore, we suggest that RFA treatment with systemic chemotherapy could be an effective alternative treatment modality for hepatic metastases from gastric cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document