J.M. Levis, Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation, Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series, Vol. 27, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2018

Phonetica ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 289-293
Author(s):  
Oliver Niebuhr
Keyword(s):  
Applied Linguistics ◽  
Oral Communication ◽  
Cambridge University

scholarly journals Los contenidos socioculturales de los actos de habla: el contexto del usuario ideal en cuestionarios de hábitos sociales

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 271-296
Author(s):  
Diana Bravo
Keyword(s):  
Language Use ◽  
Applied Linguistics ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Spanish Language ◽  
Human Interaction ◽  
Cambridge University ◽  
Cross Cultural Study ◽  
Pragmatic Failure ◽  
Actos De Habla ◽  
Cultural Pragmatics

ResumenEn este trabajo se aborda la problemática de la universalidad de los actos de habla (Searle, ([1969]1980. Actos de habla. Madrid: Cátedra Visor.) y de su relación con las amenazas a la imagen social (cf. Placencia y Bravo, 2002. Actos de habla y cortesía en español. London: LINCOM; ; Bravo y Briz, 2004. Pragmática sociocultural: estudios del discurso de cortesía en español. Barcelona: Ariel). Dentro de los estudios de orientación pragmática de mayor difusión entre los académicos, encontramos dos posiciones, por un lado la de autores como Leech (([1983] 1988). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.) y Brown y Levinson ([1978] 1987. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.), que asumen que determinados actos de habla serían inherentemente amenazantes para la mantención de la imagen social (face); por otro, la de Thomas ((1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4 (2), pp. 91–112.), Wierzbicka ((1991). Cross-cultural pragmatics. The Semantics of Human Interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.) y Blum-Kulka, S. y Olshtain, E. ((1984). Request and apologies: a cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, (5), pp. 196–213.), entre otros, para quienes la percepción de los mismos actos en distintas culturas estaría influida por factores socioculturales, de manera que los actos de habla no serían per se amenazantes, sino que esta condición dependería de su interpretación en contexto. Creemos que los actos se describen de modo distinto dependiendo de cuál sea el contexto del usuario ideal, término que refiere al uso habitual de la lengua en su contexto situacional y sociocultural. Por ello sostenemos que no basta con interpretar los actos con la sola ayuda de la bibliografía y de las propias intuiciones, sino que es necesario consultar al usuario de la lengua. En este artículo nos enfocaremos en justificar una metodología de recogida de datos socio-pragmáticos que establece relaciones directas entre los actos y los hábitos sociales de sus usuarios. Nos basaremos en un método de consulta usado por varios autores, el cuestionario de hábitos sociales (cf. Hernández Flores, (2002). La cortesía en la conversación española de familiares y amigos. La búsqueda de equilibrio entre la imagen del hablante y la imagen del destinatario. Tesis doctoral. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitet. Recuperado de http://edice.asice.se/?page_id=305, y Bernal y Hernández Flores, (2016). Variación socio-pragmática en la enseñanza del español: aplicación didáctica de un cuestionario de hábitos sociales. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 3 (2), pp. 114–126.).

Josiane F. Hamers and Michel H.A. Blanc, Bilinguality and bilingualism. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Pp. xiv + 468 pages. Hb $90.00, pb $30.00.

2003 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 419-421
Author(s):  
Pieter Muysken,
Keyword(s):  
Applied Linguistics ◽  
Birkbeck College ◽  
Cambridge University

This is the second edition of a very impressive handbook that was published first in French in 1983, and subsequently in English in 1989. This new edition was prepared directly in English. Josiane Hamers is Professor of Psycholinguistics and Bilingualism at the Université de Laval, Québec, and Michel Blanc is Emeritus Reader of Applied Linguistics and Bilingualism at Birkbeck College, University of London.

scholarly journals Abstracts: Applied linguistics

2007 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 364-366
Keyword(s):  
Second Language Acquisition ◽  
English Language ◽  
Electronic Materials ◽  
Applied Linguistics ◽  
Word Sense Disambiguation ◽  
Word Sense ◽  
Cambridge University ◽  
Oxford University ◽  
Discourse Processes ◽  
Oxford University Press

07–637Banerjee, Sudipta (C-DAC, India; [email protected]) & B. Mullick, Word sense disambiguation and WordNet technology. Literary and Linguistic Computing (Oxford University Press) 22.1 (2007), 1–15.07–638Cao, Deborah (Griffith U, Brisbane, Australia; [email protected]), Inter-lingual uncertainty in bilingual and multilingual law. Journal of Pragmatics (Elsevier) 39.1 (2007), 69–83.07–639De Vega, Manuel (U La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain), Mike Rinck, José M. Díaz & InmaculadaLeón, Figure and ground in temporal sentences: The role of the adverbs whenandwhile. Discourse Processes (Erlbaum) 43.1 (2007), 1–23.07–640L'Haire, Sébastien (U Geneva, Switzerland; [email protected]), Fipsortho: A spell checker for learners of French. ReCALL (Cambridge University Press) 19.2 (2007), 137–161.07–641López-Varela Azcárate, Asunción (U Complutense Madrid, Spain; [email protected]), Didactic patterns for electronic materials in the teaching of interculturalism through literature: The experience of the research group LEETHi. ReCALL (Cambridge University Press) 19.2 (2007), 121–136.07–642Ming-Ming, Pu (U Maine at Farmington, USA), The distribution of relative clauses in Chinese discourse. Discourse Processes (Erlbaum) 43.1 (2007), 25–53.07–643Oakes, Michael (U Sunderland, UK; [email protected]) & Malcolm Farrow, Use of the chi-squared test to examine vocabulary differences in English language corpora representing seven different countries. Literary and Linguistic Computing (Oxford University Press) 22.1 (2007), 85–99.07–644Truscott, John (National Tsing Hua U, China; [email protected]), Optionality in second language acquisition: A generative, processing-oriented account. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (Walter de Gruyter) 44.4 (2006), 311–330.

LANGUAGE PROGRAM EVALUATION: THEORY AND PRACTICE.Brian K. Lynch. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996. Pp. vii + 194. $47.95 cloth, $19.95 paper.

1998 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 120-122
Author(s):  
Pauline Rea-Dickins
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Program Evaluation ◽  
Applied Linguistics ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
Language Education ◽  
Theoretical Background ◽  
Education Programs ◽  
Evaluation Theory ◽  
Language Program ◽  
Cambridge University

Lynch, drawing on his experience of evaluation, in particular the Reading English for Science and Technology (REST) Project, aims to provide a “thorough theoretical background for the evaluation of language education programs” and “the necessary range of theory and practical techniques” (p. xi), and he highlights contributions for “program evaluation . . . in the development of applied linguistics as a field of research” (p. x).

scholarly journals Applied linguistics

2007 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-182
Keyword(s):  
Second Language ◽  
Cognitive Processes ◽  
Applied Linguistics ◽  
Language Planning ◽  
Mental Lexicon ◽  
Cambridge University ◽  
Oxford University ◽  
Discourse Processes ◽  
Language Problems ◽  
Oxford University Press

07–341Al-Kufaishi, Adil (Copenhagen U, Denmark; [email protected]), A pedagogic model of translating expository texts. Babel (John Benjamins) 52.1 (2006), 1–16.07–342Anderson, Wendy (U Glasgow, UK), ‘Absolutely, totally, filled to the brim with the Famous Grouse’. English Today (Cambridge University Press) 22.3 (2006), 10–16.07–343Boudreault, Patrick (California State U, Northridge, USA; [email protected]) & Rachel I. Mayberry, Grammatical processing in American Sign Language: Age of first-language acquisition effects in relation to syntactic structure. Language and Cognitive Processes (Routledge/Taylor&Francis) 21.5 (2006), 608–635.07–344Charles, M. (U Oxford, UK), The construction of stance in reporting clauses: A cross-disciplinary study of theses. Applied Linguistics (Oxford University Press) 27.3 (2006), 492–518.07–345Frazier, Lyn (U Massachusetts, Amherst, USA; [email protected]), Katy Carlson & Charles Clifton Jr., Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences (Elsevier) 10.6 (2006), 244–249.07–346Goatly, Andrew (Lingnan U, Hong Kong, China), Ideology and metaphor. English Today (Cambridge University Press) 22.3 (2006), 25–39.07–347Goral, Mira (City U New York, USA; [email protected]), Erika S. Levy, Loraine K. Obler & Eyal Cohen, Cross-language lexical connections in the mental lexicon: Evidence from a case of trilingual aphasia. Brain and Language (Elsevier) 98.2 (2006), 235–247.07–348Hellermann J. (Portland State U, USA), Classroom interactive practices for developing L2 literacy: A microethnographic study of two beginning adult learners of English. Applied Linguistics (Oxford University Press) 27.3 (2006), 377–404.07–349Joseph, John E. (U Edinburgh, UK), Linguistic identities: Double-edged swords. Language Problems & Language Planning (John Benjamins) 30.3 (2006), 261–267.07–350Kuo, I-Chun (Canterbury Christ Church U College, UK; [email protected]), Addressing the issue of teaching English as a lingua franca. ELT Journal (Oxford University Press) 60.3 (2006), 213–221.07–351McDonald, Janet L. (Louisiana State U, Baton Rouge, USA; [email protected]), Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners.Journal of Memory and Language (Elsevier) 55.3 (2006), 381–401.07–352Mori, Junko & Makoto Hayashi (U Wisconsin-Maddison, USA), The achievement of intersubjectivity through embodied completions: A study of interactions between first and second language speakers. Applied Linguistics (Oxford University Press) 27.2 (2006), 195–219.07–353Oberlander, Jon (U Edinburgh, UK) & Alastair J. Gill, Language with character: A stratified corpus comparison of individual differences in e-mail communication. Discourse Processes (Erlbaum) 42.3 (2006), 239–270.07–354Rosenberger Shankar, Tara (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA), Speaking on the record: A theory of composition. Computers and Composition (Elsevier) 23.3 (2006), 374–373.07–355Sanford, Anthony J. (U Glasgow, UK) & Arthur C. Graesser, Shallow processing and underspecification. Discourse Processes (Erlbaum) 42.2 (2006), 99–108.07–356Sears, Christopher R. (U Calgary, Canada), Crystal R. Campbell & Stephen J. Lupker, Is there a neighborhood frequency effect in English? Evidence from reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance (American Psychological Association) 32.4 (2006), 1040–1062.07–357Sebastian-Gallés, Núria (GRNC, Parc Científic Universitat de Barcelona & Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Spain; [email protected]), Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells, Ruth de Diego-Balaguer & Begoña Díaz, First- and second-language phonological representations in the mental lexicon. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (MIT Press) 18.8 (2006), 1277–1291.07–358Sebba, Mark (Lancaster U, UK), Ideology and alphabets in the former USSR. Language Problems & Language Planning (John Benjamins) 30.2 (2006), 99–125.07–359Valdois, Sylviane (Université Pierre Mendès France, Grenoble, France) & Sonia Kandel, French- and Spanish-speaking children use different visual and motor units during spelling acquisition. Language and Cognitive Processes (Routledge/Taylor & Francis) 21.5 (2006), 531–561.

RESEARCHING AND APPLYING METAPHOR. Lynn Cameron and Graham Low (Eds.). New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999. Pp. 311. $59.95 cloth, $22.95 paper.

2003 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 459-459
Author(s):  
Claire Kramsch
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Research Methodology ◽  
Applied Linguistics ◽  
Sociocultural Context ◽  
Making Meaning ◽  
Cambridge University ◽  
Written Sources

Whether they are collecting data from spoken or written sources, learners or teachers, English corpora or academic essays, or talk about disease and illness, applied linguists are confronted with the pervasive use of metaphor. Metaphor, as a mode of talk and thought, is a way of making meaning that is particularly linked to the sociocultural context. What counts as a metaphor? How can we operationalize, analyze, and categorize it? What research methodology is best suited for the study of metaphor? Cameron and Low's timely collection of papers is a first attempt to put metaphor research on the map of applied linguistics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document