scholarly journals oXirisNet Registry: A Prospective, National Registry on the oXiris Membrane

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (Suppl. 3) ◽  
pp. 16-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianluca Villa ◽  
Silvia De Rosa ◽  
Sara Samoni ◽  
Mauro Neri ◽  
Cosimo Chelazzi ◽  
...  

Worldwide, the widespread use of extracorporeal blood purification therapies (EBPTs) is progressively increasing in everyday clinical practice, particularly in critical care settings. The efficacy of EBPTs on removal of inflammatory mediators is already well established in the literature. Nonetheless, clinical research is particularly cumbersome in this setting, and many clinical trials aiming at exploring the effect of EBPTs on outcomes have failed in demonstrating consistent results regarding 28-day- or hospital-mortality rates. In recent years, data emerging from large registries have been increasingly used to provide real-world evidence on the effectiveness, quality, and safety of EBPTs. The philosophy behind this Italian Registry is a renewal of the concept of “clinical research” in the field of EBPTs applied to critically ill, septic patients with or without acute kidney injury. The platform used for the registry – specifically designed for research purposes and fed by clinical data prospectively observed – promotes good practice with a positive and active interaction with the physician/researcher. This interaction has favorable real-time effects for the specific patient, providing “bed-side clinical feedbacks,” similarly to the decision support system. Examples of these issues are bundles reminders, suggestions for drug adjustment according to the extracorporeal clearance, clinical calculator for body mass index, or mechanical ventilation setting. The platform-physician interaction has additional useful effects on the single utilizing center, providing “mid-term, center-specific clinical feedbacks.” These generally consist of clusters of data taken over a certain period, for example, regarding patients’ outcome, microbiological data, or use of disposable for EBPTs.

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cátia Caneiras ◽  
Cristina Jácome ◽  
Sagrario Mayoralas-Alises ◽  
José Ramon Calvo ◽  
João Almeida Fonseca ◽  
...  

The increasing number of patients receiving home respiratory therapy (HRT) is imposing a major impact on routine clinical care and healthcare system sustainability. The current challenge is to continue to guarantee access to HRT while maintaining the quality of care. The patient experience is a cornerstone of high-quality healthcare and an emergent area of clinical research. This review approaches the assessment of the patient experience in the context of HRT while highlighting the European contribution to this body of knowledge. This review demonstrates that research in this area is still limited, with no example of a prescription model that incorporates the patient experience as an outcome and no specific patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) available. This work also shows that Europe is leading the research on HRT provision. The development of a specific PREM and the integration of PREMs into the assessment of prescription models should be clinical research priorities in the next several years.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Wanner ◽  
Johannes Schuchhardt ◽  
Chris Bauer ◽  
Stefanie Lindemann ◽  
Meike Brinker ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims Chronic kidney disease (CKD) represents a global public health problem, with significant morbidity and mortality due to cardiovascular disease during CKD progression and due to kidney failure. Although non-diabetic CKD accounts for up to 70% of the global CKD burden, its clinical consequences are poorly understood, and data are needed to help identify individuals at high risk of adverse outcomes. This analysis uses real-world evidence to provide insights into clinical characteristics, care and outcomes in individuals with non-diabetic CKD in routine clinical practice. Method Individual-level data from the US administrative claims database, Optum Clinformatics Data Mart, from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2018 were analysed. Adults with non-diabetic CKD stage 3 or 4 and ≥365 days continuous insurance coverage were included and followed until insurance disenrollment, end of data availability or death. Individuals with diabetes mellitus, CKD stage 5 or end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) prior to the index date, or who experienced kidney failure (acute or unspecified), kidney transplant or dialysis in the baseline period, were excluded from the analysis. Study outcomes, captured in the database, were defined using common clinical coding systems. Primary outcomes were hospitalisation for heart failure (HHF), a kidney composite of ESKD/kidney failure/need for dialysis, and worsening of CKD stage from baseline. Individual CKD stage was assigned based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values (priority) or the respective International Classification of Diseases code at index and during follow-up. Further prespecified kidney outcomes included individual components of the kidney composite, acute kidney injury, and absolute and relative change in eGFR from baseline. Event-based outcomes were assessed by time-to-first-event analysis. Summary statistics for time-course analysis of metric outcomes were generated on a quarterly basis. Results In total, 504,924 of 64 million individuals in the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart satisfied the selection criteria. Over a median follow-up of 744 (interquartile range 328–1432) days, the incidence rates of primary outcomes of HHF, the kidney composite and worsening of CKD stage from baseline were 3.95, 10.33 and 4.38 events/100 patient-years (PY), respectively. The incidence rates of the components of the kidney composite outcome, namely ESKD/need for dialysis, kidney failure (acute and unspecified) and need for dialysis were 1.78, 9.53 and 0.49 events/100 PY, respectively. Kidney failure events were driven mainly by acute kidney injury, with an incidence of 8.61 events/100 PY. In individuals with at least one available eGFR value at baseline and one value during follow-up (n=295,174), the incidence rates of relative decreases in eGFR of ≥30%, ≥40% and ≥57% from baseline were 1.98, 0.97 and 0.30 events/100 PY, respectively; in this cohort, more rapid eGFR decline was associated with increased risk of HHF and the kidney composite outcome. In individuals with a baseline eGFR value and at least one follow-up eGFR value and an available urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (n=25,824), time-course analysis of eGFR showed that eGFR decline mostly occurred in individuals with moderately-to-severely increased albuminuria (≥30 mg/g). Conclusion This analysis generates real-world evidence on clinical outcomes in a cohort of individuals with non-diabetic CKD treated in routine clinical practice in the US. Despite known limitations of claims databases (e.g. low availability of some laboratory data, limited individual follow-up time and tactical coding), individuals with moderate-to-severe non-diabetic CKD are shown to be at high risk of serious clinical outcomes. This highlights the high unmet medical need, and urgency for new treatments and targeted interventions for patients with non-diabetic CKD.


Author(s):  
Fengyu Zhang ◽  
Claude Hughes

Transparency in reporting the results of clinical and preclinical research is critical for unbiased publications. Funding agencies, publishers, and regulators have the responsibility to advocate and implement reporting standards for rigorous design. While individual study protocols may have included these standards, the items reported in the respective publications have often been inconsistent or lack transparency. This editorial intends to provide some specific guidelines for reporting results of clinical research with standards required for rigorous study design. We recommend that reporting clinical research should include sufficient information on study design and analysis plan that contains data processing, quality assurance, and appropriate methods used for rigorous statistical analysis or modeling. Any discrepancy between publications and original study design should be disclosed and discussed. Additionally, recent advances in the analysis of outcome with repeated measurements and statistical modeling should be employed to obtain unbiased estimates. Finally, we briefly discuss some issues reporting real-world evidence in clinical research.


Author(s):  
Lingye Chen ◽  
Bryan D Kraft ◽  
Victor L Roggli ◽  
Zachary R Healy ◽  
Christopher W Woods ◽  
...  

Background: Bacterial pneumonia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide despite the use of antibiotics, and novel therapies are urgently needed. Building on previous work, we aimed to 1) develop a baboon model of severe pneumococcal pneumonia and sepsis with organ dysfunction; and 2) test the safety and efficacy of a novel extracorporeal blood filter to remove pro-inflammatory molecules and improve organ function. Methods: After a dose-finding pilot study, twelve animals were inoculated with S. pneumoniae (5x109 CFU), given ceftriaxone at 24 hours post-inoculation, and randomized to extracorporeal blood purification using a filter coated with surface-immobilized heparin sulfate (n=6) or sham treatment (n=6) for 4 hours at 30 hours post-inoculation. For safety analysis, four uninfected animals also underwent purification. At 48 hours, necropsy was performed. Results: Inoculated animals developed severe pneumonia and septic shock. Compared with sham animals, septic animals treated with purification displayed significantly less kidney injury, metabolic acidosis, hypoglycemia, and shock (P<0.05). Purification blocked the rise in peripheral blood S. pneumoniae DNA, attenuated BAL CCL4, CCL2, and IL-18 levels, and reduced renal oxidative injury and classical NLRP3-inflammasome activation. Purification was safe in both uninfected and infected animals and produced no adverse effects. Conclusions: We demonstrate that heparin-based blood purification significantly attenuates levels of circulating S. pneumoniae DNA and BAL cytokines, and is renal-protective in baboons with severe pneumococcal pneumonia and septic shock. Purification was associated with less severe acute kidney injury, metabolic derangements, and shock. These results support future clinical studies in critically ill septic patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (01) ◽  
pp. 193-202
Author(s):  
Anthony Solomonides

Objectives: Clinical Research Informatics (CRI) declares its scope in its name, but its content, both in terms of the clinical research it supports—and sometimes initiates—and the methods it has developed over time, reach much further than the name suggests. The goal of this review is to celebrate the extraordinary diversity of activity and of results, not as a prize-giving pageant, but in recognition of the field, the community that both serves and is sustained by it, and of its interdisciplinarity and its international dimension. Methods: Beyond personal awareness of a range of work commensurate with the author’s own research, it is clear that, even with a thorough literature search, a comprehensive review is impossible. Moreover, the field has grown and subdivided to an extent that makes it very hard for one individual to be familiar with every branch or with more than a few branches in any depth. A literature survey was conducted that focused on informatics-related terms in the general biomedical and healthcare literature, and specific concerns (“artificial intelligence”, “data models”, “analytics”, etc.) in the biomedical informatics (BMI) literature. In addition to a selection from the results from these searches, suggestive references within them were also considered. Results: The substantive sections of the paper—Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and “Big Data” Analytics; Common Data Models, Data Quality, and Standards; Phenotyping and Cohort Discovery; Privacy: Deidentification, Distributed Computation, Blockchain; Causal Inference and Real-World Evidence—provide broad coverage of these active research areas, with, no doubt, a bias towards this reviewer’s interests and preferences, landing on a number of papers that stood out in one way or another, or, alternatively, exemplified a particular line of work. Conclusions: CRI is thriving, not only in the familiar major centers of research, but more widely, throughout the world. This is not to pretend that the distribution is uniform, but to highlight the potential for this domain to play a prominent role in supporting progress in medicine, healthcare, and wellbeing everywhere. We conclude with the observation that CRI and its practitioners would make apt stewards of the new medical knowledge that their methods will bring forward.


2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 743-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olcay Dilken ◽  
Can Ince ◽  
Ben van der Hoven ◽  
Sjoerd Thijsse ◽  
Patricia Ormskerk ◽  
...  

Rhabdomyolysis, if severe, can lead to acute kidney injury (AKI). Myoglobin is an iron and oxygen-binding protein that is freely filtered by the glomerulus. Precipitation of myoglobin in the nephrons’ distal parts is responsible for tubular damage with AKI as a consequence. Extracorporeal clearance of myoglobin is conventionally attempted by the use of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) with high cut-off dialysis membranes to limit the extent of the damage. We describe a case of a 56-year-old man with traumatic crush injury and a persistent source of muscle ischaemia unresponsive to high dose CRRT with EMiC-2 filter. Due to therapy failure, he was subsequently treated with the addition of a haemoadsorber (CytoSorb®) to the circuit. This reduced myoglobin and creatine kinase levels successfully despite ongoing tissue ischaemia. However, CytoSorb® was not enough to maintain microcirculatory perfusion, resulting in the eventual demise of the patient due to severity of the injury. Our report indicates that myoglobin was efficiently removed with CytoSorb® following exchange with the conventional high cut-off filter in continuous venovenous haemodialysis in severe traumatic rhabdomyolysis.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miles D Witham ◽  
Eleanor Anderson ◽  
Camille Carroll ◽  
Paul M Dark ◽  
Kim Down ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Participants in clinical research studies often do not reflect the populations for which healthcare interventions are needed or will be used. Enhancing representation of underserved groups in clinical research is important to ensure that research findings are widely applicable. We describe a multicomponent workstream project to improve representation of underserved groups in clinical trials.Methods The project comprised three main strands: 1) a targeted scoping review of literature to identify previous work characterising underserved groups and barriers to inclusion; 2) surveys of professional stakeholders and participant representative groups involved in research delivery to refine these initial findings and identify examples of innovation and good practice; 3) a series of workshops bringing together key stakeholders from funding, design, delivery and participant groups to reach consensus on definitions, barriers and a strategic roadmap for future work. The work was commissioned by the UK National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network. Output from these strands was integrated by a steering committee to generate a series of goals, workstream plans, and a strategic roadmap for future development work in this area.Results ‘Underserved groups’ was identified and agreed by the stakeholder group as the preferred term. Three-quarters of stakeholders felt that a clear definition of underserved groups did not currently exist; definition was challenging and context-specific but exemplar groups were identified as underserved. Barriers to successful inclusion of underserved groups could be clustered into: communication between research teams and participant groups; how trials are designed and delivered, differing agendas of research teams and participant groups; and lack of trust in the research process. Four key goals for future work were identified: building long-term relationships with underserved groups; developing training resources to improve design and delivery of trials for underserved groups; developing infrastructure and systems to support this work, and working with funders, regulators and other stakeholders to remove barriers to inclusion.Conclusions The work of the INCLUDE group over the next 12 months will build on these findings by generating resources customised for different underserved groups to improve the representativeness of trial populations.


2012 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Harris ◽  
Kirstin W. Scott ◽  
Laurie Lebo ◽  
NikNik Hassan ◽  
Chad Lightner ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document