Lung Metastases in Patients with Well-Differentiated Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: An Appraisal of the Validity of Thoracic Imaging Surveillance

2019 ◽  
Vol 108 (4) ◽  
pp. 308-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kosmas Daskalakis ◽  
Marina Tsoli ◽  
Raj Srirajaskanthan ◽  
Eleftherios Chatzellis ◽  
Krystallenia Alexandraki ◽  
...  

Background/Aims: To evaluate the impact of lung metastases (LM) on overall survival (OS) in well-differentiated (WD) stage IV gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NEN) patients along with developing surveillance strategies for thoracic imaging. Methods: Thirty-four patients with LM, from 3 centres, were identified (22 small intestine/12 pancreatic; 17 grade 1/15 grade 2/2 of unknown grade). For comparison, we used 106 stage IV WD, grade 1 and 2 GEP-NEN patients with metastatic disease confined in the abdomen. Results: LM prevalence was 4.9% (34/692). Eleven patients (32%) presented with synchronous LM whereas 23 (68%) developed metachronous LM at a median of 25 months (range 1–150 months). Patients with metachronous LM had already established liver and/or para-aortic lymph node metastases. Eighteen of 23 patients (78%) with metachronous LM exhibited concomitant progression in the abdomen. Median OS of WD GEP-NEN patients with LM was shorter than for those with stage IV disease without extra-abdominal metastases (56 [95% CI 40.6–71.6] vs. 122.7 [95% CI 70.7–174.8] months; log-rank p = 0.001). Among patients with progressive stage IV disease, the subset of patients with LM exhibited shorter OS (log-rank p = 0.005). LM were also confirmed as an independent prognostic factor for survival in multivariable analysis (HR 0.18; 95% CI 0.07–0.45; p < 0.0001). Conclusion: LM, although relatively rare in patients with WD stage IV GEP-NENs, may impact patients’ outcome. The development of metachronous LM is associated with concomitant disease progression in established abdominal metastases in most patients. These patient-related parameters could be utilized for a stratified surveillance approach, mainly reserving thoracic imaging for GEP-NEN patients with progressive disease in the abdomen.

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi60-vi60
Author(s):  
Vasileios Kavouridis ◽  
Maya Harary ◽  
Timothy Smith ◽  
David Braun ◽  
Bryan Iorgulescu

Abstract BACKGROUND Urothelial carcinoma is a common malignancy with ~79,000 new cases diagnosed annually. However, urothelial brain metastases (UBM) are encountered uncommonly. Herein we evaluate their national prevalence, predictors, and treatment outcomes in the contemporary era. METHODS The characteristics, management, and overall survival (OS) of UBM patients (2010–2015) were evaluated using the National Cancer Database, which comprises >70% of all newly diagnosed cancers in the U.S. OS was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier methods and log-rank tests. National outcomes were compared to our institutional cohort of UBMs. RESULTS Out of 208,600 patients diagnosed with urothelial carcinoma, 8.4% presented with stage IV disease--of these only 216 (1.2%) had BMs at the time of diagnosis. Patients presenting with bone, liver, or lung metastases were more likely to present with synchronous BMs. Brain involvement demonstrated significantly worse median OS (3.9mos, 95%CI: 3.1–4.9) than non-BM stage IV disease (10.9mos, 95%CI: 10.6–11.2, p< 0.001). Compared to non-BM stage IV disease, UBMs were more likely to have surgery for metastatic disease and receive radiotherapy (p< 0.001); but were less likely to have primary resection or chemotherapy. In multivariable analysis of stage IV urothelial cancer, BMs demonstrated significantly worse OS (HR 1.43, 95%CI: 1.20–1.72, p< 0.001). In our institutional data, 10 urothelial cancer patients developed BMs; of which 7 were male, median age and KPS at diagnosis were 64.9yo (IQR 56.4–72.0) and 85 (IQR 75–100). Four patients had synchronous metastases; the median number of BM lesions was 2 (IQR 1–2), with a median size of 2.6cm (IQR 1.6–3.3). All 10 underwent GTR, 3 also with SRS and 7 with WBRT, associated with a median OS of 16.5mos. CONCLUSIONS Our results confirm the rarity of UBMs and suggest that BM screening may only be indicated in stage IV patients with neurological symptoms. Systemic therapies demonstrate improved OS in these patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i18-i19
Author(s):  
Vasileios Kavouridis ◽  
Maya Harary ◽  
Timothy Smith ◽  
David Braun ◽  
Bryan Iorgulescu

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Urothelial carcinoma is a common malignancy with ~79,000 new cases diagnosed annually. However, urothelial brain metastases (UBM) are encountered uncommonly. Herein we evaluate their national prevalence, predictors, and treatment outcomes in the contemporary era. METHODS: The characteristics, management, and overall survival (OS) of UBM patients (2010–2015) were evaluated using the National Cancer Database, which comprises &gt;70% of all newly diagnosed cancers in the U.S. OS was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier methods and log-rank tests. National outcomes were compared to our institutional cohort of UBMs. RESULTS: Out of 208,600 patients diagnosed with urothelial carcinoma, 8.4% presented with stage IV disease--of these only 216 (1.2%) had BMs at the time of diagnosis. Patients presenting with bone, liver, or lung metastases were more likely to present with synchronous BMs. Brain involvement demonstrated significantly worse median OS (3.9mos, 95%CI: 3.1–4.9) than non-BM stage IV disease (10.9mos, 95%CI: 10.6–11.2, p&lt; 0.001). Compared to non-BM stage IV disease, UBMs were more likely to have surgery for metastatic disease and receive radiotherapy (p&lt; 0.001); but were less likely to have primary resection or chemotherapy. In multivariable analysis of stage IV urothelial cancer, BMs demonstrated significantly worse OS (HR 1.43, 95%CI: 1.20–1.72, p&lt; 0.001). In our institutional data, 10 urothelial cancer patients developed BMs; of which 7 were male, median age and KPS at diagnosis were 64.9yo (IQR 56.4–72.0) and 85 (IQR 75–100). Four patients had synchronous metastases; the median number of BM lesions was 2 (IQR 1–2), with a median size of 2.6cm (IQR 1.6–3.3). All 10 underwent GTR, 3 also with SRS and 7 with WBRT, associated with a median OS of 16.5mos. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm the rarity of UBMs and suggest that BM screening may only be indicated in stage IV patients with neurological symptoms. Systemic therapies demonstrate improved OS in these patients.


Author(s):  
Enes Kaçmaz ◽  
Heinz-Josef Klümpen ◽  
Willem A. Bemelman ◽  
Els J. M. Nieveen van Dijkum ◽  
Anton F. Engelsman ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim Open resection of small bowel neuroendocrine neoplasms (SB-NEN) is still considered standard-of-care, mainly because of frequently encountered multifocality and central mesenteric masses. The aim of this study was to evaluate surgical approach for SB-NEN at a national level and determine predictors for overall survival. Methods Patients with SB-NEN who underwent resection between 2005 and 2015 were included from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patient and tumor characteristics were compared between laparoscopic and open approach. Overall survival was assessed by Kaplan–Meier and compared with the Log-rank test. Independent predictors were determined by Cox proportional hazards model. Results In total, 482 patients were included, of whom 342 (71%) underwent open and 140 (29%) laparoscopic resection. The open resection group had significantly more multifocal tumors resected (24% vs. 14%), pN2 lymph nodes (18% vs. 7%) and stage IV disease (36% vs. 22%). Overall survival after open resection was significantly shorter compared to laparoscopic resection (3-year: 81% vs. 89%, 5-year: 71% vs. 84%, p = 0.004). In multivariable analysis, age above 60-years (60–75, HR 3.38 (95% CI 1.84–6.23); > 75 years, HR 7.63 (95% CI 3.86–15.07)), stage IV disease (HR 1.86 (95% CI 1.18–2.94)) and a laparoscopic approach (HR 0.51 (95% CI 0.28–0.94)) were independently associated with overall survival, whereas multifocal primary tumor, grade and resection margin status were not. Conclusion Laparoscopic resection was the approach in 29% of SB-NEN at a national level with selection of the more favorable patients. Laparoscopic resection remained independently associated with better overall survival besides age and stage, but residual confounding cannot be excluded.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. P. van Uden ◽  
M. C. van Maaren ◽  
L. J. A. Strobbe ◽  
P. Bult ◽  
J. J. van der Hoeven ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Distant metastatic disease is frequently observed in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), with a poor prognosis as a consequence. The aim of this study was to analyze the association of hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) based breast cancer subtypes in stage IV inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) with preferential site of distant metastases and overall survival (OS). Methods For patients with stage IV IBC, diagnosed in the Netherlands between 2005 and 2016, tumors were classified into four breast cancer subtypes: HR+/HER2−, HR+/HER2+, HR−/HER2+, and HR−/HER2−. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics and sites of metastases were compared. OS of the subtypes was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test. Association between subtype and OS was assessed in multivariable models using logistic regression. Results In total, 744 eligible patients were included: 340 (45.7%) tumors were HR+/HER2−, 148 (19.9%) HR−/HER2+, 131 (17.6%) HR+/HER2+, and 125 (16.8%) HR−/HER2−. Bone was the most common metastatic site in all subtypes. A significant predominance of bone metastases was found in HR+/HER2− IBC (71.5%), and liver and lung metastases in the HR−/HER2+ (41.2%) and HR−/HER2− (40.8%) subtypes, respectively. In multivariable analysis, the HR−/HER2− subtype was associated with significantly worse OS as compared to the other subtypes. Conclusion Breast cancer subtypes in stage IV IBC are associated with distinct patterns of metastatic spread and display notable differences in OS. The use of breast cancer subtypes can guide a more patient-tailored staging directed to metastatic site and extend of disease.


2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (S1) ◽  
pp. S1-S16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Günter Klöppel

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are composed of cells with a neuroendocrine phenotype. The old and the new WHO classifications distinguish between well-differentiated and poorly differentiated neoplasms. All well-differentiated neoplasms, regardless of whether they behave benignly or develop metastases, will be called neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), and graded G1 (Ki67 <2%) or G2 (Ki67 2–20%). All poorly differentiated neoplasms will be termed neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) and graded G3 (Ki67 >20%). To stratify the GEP-NETs and GEP-NECs regarding their prognosis, they are now further classified according to TNM-stage systems that were recently proposed by the European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society (ENETS) and the AJCC/UICC. In the light of these criteria the pathology and biology of the various NETs and NECs of the gastrointestinal tract (including the oesophagus) and the pancreas are reviewed.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 384-384
Author(s):  
K. Rathmell ◽  
C. L. Cowey ◽  
G. Grigson ◽  
C. Watkins ◽  
E. Wallen ◽  
...  

384 Background: The impact of neoadjuvant or preoperative therapy in the setting of advanced renal cell carcinoma on recurrence-free or survival outcomes is not known. Methods: 28 patients with renal cell carcinoma were treated with preoperative sorafenib in a prospective pilot study (LCCC 0603). Patient files were reviewed a median of 885 days (2.42 years) following nephrectomy. Records were evaluated for 13 patients with nonmetastatic disease for development of recurrence, and for 15 patients with stage IV disease for survival. Results: For the nonmetastatic patients, only 2 patients had developed recurrent disease, one underwent metastectomy and remains in surveillance and the other is on second line systemic targeted therapy. A median recurrence-free survival has not been met after a median 2.5 years. For stage IV disease patients at a median follow up of 2.3 years, a median survival has also not been reached. Four patients are deceased, one patient is lost to follow up, and 10 remain alive. Treatments for metastatic disease included continued sorafenib, high dose interleukin-2, sunitinib, pazopanib, temsirolimus, and everolimus. Some stage IV patients have also enjoyed prolonged treatment-free intervals ranging from six months to over two years, with biopsy confirmed, but indolent disease. Conclusions: Although these data are descriptive, these observations are suggestive that preoperative therapy with sorafenib is unlikely to accelerate the growth of grossly metastatic or micrometastatic disease. Further studies are needed to determine whether preoperative therapy is valuable in improving recurrence-free or overall survival endpoints. [Table: see text]


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1113-1113
Author(s):  
Ella Harris ◽  
Malcolm R. Kell ◽  
Reem Salman ◽  
Maurice Stokes ◽  
Tom Gorey

1113 Background: The role of primary surgery in metastatic breast cancer is unclear. Here in we have performed metaanalysis on available data to assess the role of surgery on oncological outcome in patients with stage IV breast cancer. Methods: A comprehensive search for published trials that examined outcome following removal of primary disease in stage IV breast cancer was performed using MEDLINE and cross referencing available data. Reviews of each study were conducted, and data were extracted. Primary outcome was overall survival related to surgical removal of primary disease. Results: We identified 15 relevant studies of which 10 were appropriate for analysis. Data was available on 28,693 patients with stage IV disease, of whom 52.8% underwent removal of the primary carcinoma. Patients undergoing primary surgery in this setting were more likely to be alive at 3 years 40% vs. 22% (OR 2.32 CI 2.08-2.6, p<0.01 (surgery vs. no surgery)). Analysis of subgroups for selection to surgery or not, favoured smaller tumours, fewer comorbidities, fewer metastases (p<0.01). There was no difference between the two groups in location of metastases, grade of tumour or receptor status. Conclusions: Patients undergoing removal of primary carcinoma in the setting of stage IV breast cancer appear to have an improved overall survival. However the available data suggest that these surgical patients probably have better prognosis stage IV disease than those patients not undergoing surgery.


2020 ◽  
Vol 111 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 170-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elettra Merola ◽  
Wouter Zandee ◽  
Louis de Mestier ◽  
Heinz Josef Klümpen ◽  
Karolina Makulik ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> The correct histopathological diagnosis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) is crucial for treatment selection and prognostication. It is also very challenging due to limited experience in nonexpert centers. Revision of pathology is standard of care for most patients who are referred to NEN expert centers. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To describe the clinical impact of histopathological revision for GEP-NEN patients referred to an expert center. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Retrospective multicenter analysis of all GEP-NENs receiving a histopathological revision in 6 European NEN expert centers (January 2016 to December 2016) to evaluate the impact on patient management. <b><i>Results:</i></b> 175 patients were included and 14.7% referred for a second opinion. Histological samples were 69.1% biopsies, 23.4% surgical specimens, and 7.5% endoscopic resections. Histopathological changes due to revision included first assessment of Ki67 in 8.6% of cases, change in grading in 11.4% (3.4% G1 to G2; 5.7% G2 to G1; 0.6% G2 to G3; 1.7% G3 to G2), definition of tumor invasion in 10.8%, additional immunohistochemical staining in 2.3%, diagnosis of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma in 3.4%, exclusion of NEN in 3.4%, first diagnosis of NEN in 2.3%, and tumor differentiation for G3 in 1.7%. The revision had a clinical impact in 36.0% of patients, leading to a new therapeutic indication in 26.3%. The indication to then perform a new imaging test occurred in 21.1% and recommendation to follow-up with no further treatment in 6.3%. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Histopathological revision in expert centers for NENs can change the diagnosis, with a significant clinical impact in about one third of patients.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6505-6505
Author(s):  
C. M. Booth ◽  
G. Li ◽  
W. J. Mackillop

6505 Background: Lower SES is known to be associated with worsened cancer survival. Here we evaluate the impact of SES on stage of cancer at diagnosis in Ontario which has universal health insurance. Methods: All incident cases of breast, colon, rectal, non-small cell lung, cervical and larynx cancer diagnosed in Ontario 2003–2005 were identified using the Ontario Cancer Registry. Stage information is only captured routinely for patients seen at Ontario's 8 Regional Cancer Centers (RCCs). This represents approximately 68% of the population and forms the basis for all analyses. Using a best stage grouping approach, cases were assigned stage based on pathologic TNM if available and clinical TNM otherwise. The population of Ontario was divided into quintiles based on community median household income reported in the 2001 Canadian census. Using postal code at time of diagnosis cases were assigned to quintiles (Q); Q1 represents the communities where the poorest 20% of the Ontario population resided. Comparisons between Q1 and Q2–5 were made using the chi-square test. A Cox model was used to evaluate overall survival, SES, stage, and age. Results: Stage at diagnosis was available for 19,239/23,254 (83%) of cases seen at RCCs. Among cases with breast cancer, those in Q1 were less likely to have stage I disease (43 vs 47%, p = 0.004) and more likely to have stage IV disease (5 vs 4%, 0.008) than Q2–5. With lung cancer, cases in Q1 were more likely to have stage I disease compared to Q2–5 (16 vs 13%, p = 0.015). Distribution of stage I and stage IV disease did not differ by SES across other individual diseases. However, for all 6 cancers combined, cases in Q1 were less likely than Q2–5 to have stage I disease (27 vs 30%, p = 0.001) and more likely to have stage IV disease (21 vs 18%, p < 0.0001). We found significant gradients in 3-year overall survival across Q1-Q5 for breast (5% absolute difference in survival, p < 0.001), colon (4%, p = 0.049), and cervical (18%, p = 0.031) cancers. Adjustment for stage and age only slightly diminished these survival gradients. Conclusions: Despite universal health care, SES remains associated with survival among patients with cancer in Ontario. These data suggest that the difference in outcome is only partially explained by differences in stage at diagnosis. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19121-e19121
Author(s):  
Ravi Parikh ◽  
Angel Cronin ◽  
David E. Kozono ◽  
Geoffrey R. Oxnard ◽  
Raymond H. Mak ◽  
...  

e19121 Background: Although palliative chemotherapy is the standard of care for metastatic NSCLC, somepatients with oligometastatic disease may benefit from aggressive local therapy. We investigated factors associated with greater survival among patients diagnosed with a solitary metastatic lesion. Methods: We identified patients diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC who presented with a solitary metastatic lesion based on PET and MRI and who were prospectively consented and enrolled in our institutional database from 2002-2011. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze factors associated with overall survival among this cohort. Results: We identified 110 patients (10.7% of stage IV patients) meeting our inclusion criteria. Median age at diagnosis was 61 years, 50% of patients were female, 66% had adenocarcinoma histology, and 35% had N0-1 disease. Median survival from diagnosis was 18.7 months, with a median followup of 31.5 months. On univariable analysis, greater overall survival was associated with ECOG performance status 0-1 vs 2+ (median 21.5 months vs 12.6 months, HR 0.32, p<0.01); weight loss <2 vs >2 kg (22.4 vs 13.8, HR 0.56, p=0.03); and N stage 0-1 vs 2-3 (32.0 vs 17.6, HR 0.52, p=0.02). Adenocarcinoma vs non-adenocarcinoma histology (22.9 vs 13.8, HR 0.65, p=0.07) was borderline significant. Age, gender, race, current smoking, size of primary tumor, and metastatic organ were not significantly associated with survival. On multivariable analysis, adenocarcinoma histology (HR= 0.58, p=0.06); N stage 0-1 (HR= 0.43, p=0.01); and weight loss <2 kg (HR 0.53, p=0.03) were associated with greater overall survival. Conclusions: Select patient and tumor characteristics may predict for improved survival among patients with oligometastatic NSCLC. Future studies will evaluate the impact of aggressive local therapy in these patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document