scholarly journals Real-Time Optical Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps in the Routine Clinical Practice Using the NICE and WASP Classifications in a Nonacademic Setting

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 314-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joana Castela ◽  
Susana Mão de Ferro ◽  
Isadora Rosa ◽  
Pedro Lage ◽  
Sara Ferreira ◽  
...  
Gut ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 887-895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin J Rees ◽  
Praveen T Rajasekhar ◽  
Ana Wilson ◽  
Helen Close ◽  
Matthew D Rutter ◽  
...  

Gut ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 64 (10) ◽  
pp. 1569-1577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tonya Kaltenbach ◽  
Amit Rastogi ◽  
Robert V Rouse ◽  
Kenneth R McQuaid ◽  
Tohru Sato ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 319-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cinzia Dello Russo ◽  
Lucia Lisi ◽  
Massimiliano Fabbiani ◽  
Dimitri Gagliardi ◽  
Iuri Fanti ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 146 (5) ◽  
pp. S-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tonya Kaltenbach ◽  
Robert V. Rouse ◽  
Sarah K. McGill ◽  
Channa R. Jayasakera ◽  
Aparna Motiwala ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 2479-2488.e4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung Ho Bae ◽  
Changhyun Lee ◽  
Hae Yeon Kang ◽  
Min-Sun Kwak ◽  
Eun Young Doo ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 175628481881494
Author(s):  
Ben Glover ◽  
Nisha Patel ◽  
Hutan Ashrafian ◽  
Julian Teare

Objective: i-Scan is a digital image enhancement technology, reported to improve diagnostic performance during endoscopy. Previous studies have investigated the accuracy of i-scan for distinguishing between neoplastic and non-neoplastic colonic polyps and suggested diagnostic accuracy close to that required for use in routine clinical practice. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of the available literature investigating diagnostic accuracy for i-scan optical diagnosis when made in real time for colorectal polyps <10 mm in size. Data sources: The databases of Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies. Methods: A bivariate random effects model was used to produce pooled sensitivity and specificity values, and univariable meta-regression was applied for subgroup analysis. Results: The meta-analysis included 15 studies, and diagnosis of 2817 polyps. The area under the hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.96. The pooled sensitivity of i-scan optical diagnosis was 0.92 (95% confidence interval 0.85–0.95). The specificity was 0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.83–0.94). Conclusions: This meta-analysis updates and summarizes the available evidence concerning the diagnostic performance of i-scan for small colorectal polyps. An acceptable degree of accuracy was found, showing potential to support a ‘resect and discard’ strategy for colonic polyps. There was not found to be a significant difference in diagnostic performance between different clinical settings (i.e. teaching hospitals or general hospitals).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document