scholarly journals Neoadjuvant Treatment for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 455-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedikt Kaufmann ◽  
Daniel Hartmann ◽  
Jan G. D’Haese ◽  
Pavel Stupakov ◽  
Dejan Radenkovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Preoperative Treatment ◽  
Resectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Dismal Prognosis ◽  
First Choice

One of the main reasons for the dismal prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is its late diagnosis. At the time of presentation, only approximately 15–20% of all patients with PDAC are considered resectable and around 30% are considered borderline resectable. A surgical approach, which is the only curative option, is limited in borderline resectable patients by local involvement of surrounding structures. In borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC), neoadjuvant treatment regimens have been introduced with the rationale to downstage and downsize the tumor in order to enable resection and eliminate ­microscopic distant metastases. However, there are no official guidelines for the preoperative treatment of BRPC. In the majority of cases, patients are administered ­Gemcitabine-based or FOLFIRINOX-based chemotherapy regimens with or without radiation. Radiologic restaging after neoadjuvant therapy has to be judged with caution when it comes to predict tumor response and resectability, since inflammation induced by neoadjuvant therapy may mimic solid tumor. Patients who do not show any disease progression during neoadjuvant therapy should be offered surgical exploration, since a high percentage is likely to undergo resection with negative margins (R0) and, thus, achieve improved overall survival although imaging judged it unlikely. Despite the promising new approaches of neoadjuvant treatment regimens during the last 2 decades, surgery remains the first choice if the tumor appears to be primary resectable at the time of diagnosis. At present, there are no international guidelines regarding the preoperative treatment of BRPC. Therefore, in order to standardize and adjust neoadjuvant treatment in the future, new guidelines have to be determined on the basis of upcoming prospective randomized studies.

scholarly journals Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Relating Biomechanics and Prognosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 2711
Author(s):  
Benjamin M. MacCurtain ◽  
Ned P. Quirke ◽  
Stephen D. Thorpe ◽  
Tom K. Gallagher
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Cancer Progression ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Dismal Prognosis ◽  
Clinical Consequences

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most common form of pancreatic cancer and carries a dismal prognosis. Resectable patients are treated predominantly with surgery while borderline resectable patients may receive neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) to downstage their disease prior to possible resection. PDAC tissue is stiffer than healthy pancreas, and tissue stiffness is associated with cancer progression. Another feature of PDAC is increased tissue heterogeneity. We postulate that tumour stiffness and heterogeneity may be used alongside currently employed diagnostics to better predict prognosis and response to treatment. In this review we summarise the biomechanical changes observed in PDAC, explore the factors behind these changes and describe the clinical consequences. We identify methods available for assessing PDAC biomechanics ex vivo and in vivo, outlining the relative merits of each. Finally, we discuss the potential use of radiological imaging for prognostic use.

Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory C Wilson ◽  
Brent T Xia ◽  
Syed A Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Borderline Resectable

Despite decades of advancement and research into the multimodal care of pancreatic cancer, mortality after the diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains grim. The role of adjuvant therapy following surgical resection has been well established in the literature. However, adjuvant therapy is imperfect, and outside of a clinical trial, there are high rates of omission or delayed initiation of therapy. Neoadjuvant treatment strategies continue to be explored in the management of resectable, borderline-resectable, and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. With improved resection rates and the possibility for tumor downstaging, neoadjuvant therapy has become standard for patients with borderline-resectable and locally advanced unresectable tumors. Additional benefits of neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment of resectable tumors include improved completion rates of systemic therapy and R0 resection rates. Future clinical trials, including the use of novel treatment agents and combination treatment strategies in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant regimens, will add value to the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Key words: adjuvant therapy, borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer, locally advanced pancreatic cancer, neoadjuvant therapy, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, resectable disease 

Alliance for clinical trials in oncology trial A021501: Preoperative extended chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy plus hypofractionated radiation therapy for borderline resectable adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4151-TPS4151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew H. G. Katz ◽  
Fang-Shu Ou ◽  
Joseph Herman ◽  
Syed A. Ahmad ◽  
Brian M. Wolpin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Preoperative Treatment ◽  
Resectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Oncology Trial

TPS4151 Background: Borderline resectable pancreatic cancers infiltrate into adjacent vascular structures to an extent that makes an R0 resection unlikely when pancreatectomy is performed de novo. In a pilot study, Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Trial A021101, the median survival of patients who received chemotherapy and radiation prior to anticipated pancreatectomy was 22 months, and an R0 resection was achieved in 64% of operations. However, the individual contributions of preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy are poorly defined.This study, Alliance for Clinical Oncology Trial A021501, will help define a standard preoperative treatment regimen for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer and position the superior arm for further evaluation in future phase III trials. Methods: In this recently activated randomized phase II trial, 134 patients with a biopsy-confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma that meets centrally-reviewed radiographic criteria for borderline resectable disease are randomized to receive either 8 cycles of modified FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, irinotecan 180 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 and infusional 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 for 4 cycles) or to 7 cycles of modified FOLFIRINOX followed by stereotactic body radiation therapy (33-40 Gy in 5 fractions). Patients without evidence of disease progression following preoperative therapy undergo pancreatectomy and subsequently receive 4 cycles of postoperative modified FOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 and infusional 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 for 4 cycles). The primary endpoint is the 18-month overall survival rate of patients enrolled into each of the two treatment arms. An interim analysis of the R0 resection rate within each arm will be conducted to assess treatment futility after accrual of 30 patients. Secondary endpoints include rates of margin-negative resection and event-free survival. The trial is activated nationwide and eligible to be opened for accrual at any National Clinical Trials Network cooperative group member site. Clinical trial information: NCT02839343.

scholarly journals Neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced unresectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: oncological outcomes at a single academic centre

ESMO Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. e000929
Author(s):  
Susana Roselló ◽  
Claudio Pizzo ◽  
Marisol Huerta ◽  
Elena Muñoz ◽  
Roberto Aliaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Resectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Dismal Prognosis

IntroductionPancreatic cancer (PC), even in the absence of metastatic disease, has a dismal prognosis. One-third of them are borderline resectable (BRPC) or locally advanced unresectable PC (LAUPC) at diagnosis. There are limited prospective data supporting the best approach on these tumours. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ChT) is being increasingly used in this setting.MethodsThis is a retrospective series of consecutive patients staged as BRPC or LAUPC after discussion in the multidisciplinary board (MDB) at an academic centre. All received neoadjuvant ChT, followed by chemoradiation (ChRT) in some cases, and those achieving enough downstaging had a curative-intent surgery. Descriptive data about patient’s characteristics, neoadjuvant treatments, toxicities, curative resections, postoperative complications, pathology reports and adjuvant treatment were collected. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival was calculated with Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.ResultsBetween August 2011 and July 2019, 49 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and all of them received neoadjuvant ChT. Fluorouracil+folinic acid, irinotecan and oxaliplatin was the most frequently used scheme (77%). The most prevalent grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia (26.5%), neurotoxicity (12.2%), diarrhoea (8.2%) and nausea (8.2%). 18 patients (36.7%) received ChRT thereafter. In total, 22 patients (44,9%) became potentially resectable and 19 of them had an R0 or R1 pancreatic resection. One was found to be unresectable at surgery and two refused surgery. A vascular resection was required in 7 (35%). No postoperative deaths were observed. Postoperative ChT was given to 12 (66.7%) of resected patients. Median OS of the whole cohort was 24,9 months (95% CI 14.1 to 35.7), with 30.6 months for resected and 13.1 months for non-resected patients, respectively (p<0.001).ConclusionA neoadjuvant approach in BRPC and LAUPC was well tolerated and allowed a curative resection in 38.8% of them with a potential improvement on OS.

scholarly journals Recurrence Patterns for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma after Upfront Resection Versus Resection Following Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 2132
Author(s):  
Bathiya Ratnayake ◽  
Alina Y. Savastyuk ◽  
Manu Nayar ◽  
Colin H. Wilson ◽  
John A. Windsor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Locoregional Recurrence ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Resectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Recurrence Patterns ◽  
Patterns Of Recurrence

Background: Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) represents a paradigm shift in the management of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with perceived benefits including a higher R0 rate. However, it is unclear whether NAT affects the sites and patterns of recurrence after surgery. This review seeks to compare sites and patterns of recurrence after resection between patients undergoing upfront surgery (US) or after NAT. Methods: The EMBASE, SCOPUS, PubMed, and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched to identify eligible studies that compare recurrence patterns between patients who had NAT (followed by resection) with those that had US. The primary outcome included site-specific recurrence. Results: 26 articles were identified including 4986 patients who underwent resection. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC, 47% 1074/2264) was the most common, followed by resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC 42%, 949/2264). The weighted overall recurrence rates were lower among the NAT group, 63.4% vs. 74% (US) (OR 0.67 (CI 0.52–0.87), p = 0.006). The overall weighted locoregional recurrence rate was lower amongst patients who received NAT when compared to US (12% vs. 27% OR 0.39 (CI 0.22–0.70), p = 0.004). In BRPC, locoregional recurrence rates improved with NAT (NAT 25.8% US 37.7% OR 0.62 (CI 0.44–0.87), p = 0.007). NAT was associated with a lower weighted liver recurrence rate (NAT 19.4% US 30.1% OR 0.55 (CI 0.34–0.89), p = 0.023). Lung and peritoneal recurrence rates did not differ between NAT and US cohorts (p = 0.705 and p = 0.549 respectively). NAT was associated with a significantly longer weighted mean time to first recurrence 18.8 months compared to US (15.7 months) (OR 0.18 (CI 0.05–0.32), p = 0.015). Conclusion: NAT was associated with lower overall recurrence rate and improved locoregional disease control particularly for those with BRPC. Although the burden of liver metastases was less, there was no overall effect upon distant metastatic disease.

scholarly journals Neoadjuvant Therapy for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDA) Involving a High Volume Pancreatic Centre in Ireland

HPB ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S717-S718
Author(s):  
R. Abdul Rahman ◽  
L. Bonanni ◽  
S. O'Sullivan ◽  
M. Greally ◽  
A.N. Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Borderline Resectable

Changes in CRP and CA19-9 during Preoperative Oncological Therapy Predict Postoperative Survival in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Oncology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Anna Maria Nurmi ◽  
Harri Mustonen ◽  
Caj Haglund ◽  
Hanna Seppänen
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Postoperative Outcome ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Postoperative Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Preoperative Treatment ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Oncological Therapy ◽  
The Impact

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Tumor and systemic inflammatory markers predict survival. This retrospective study aimed to explore the changes in CRP, CA19-9, and other routine laboratory tests during preoperative oncological therapy as prognostic factors in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Between 2000 and 2016, 68 borderline resectable PDAC patients received preoperative oncological therapy and underwent subsequent surgery at Helsinki University Hospital, Finland. We investigated changes in CRP, CA19-9, CEA, albumin, leukocytes, bilirubin, and platelets and examined the impact on survival. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In the multivariate analysis, CRP remaining at ≥3 mg/L after preoperative oncological therapy predicted a poorer postoperative outcome when compared to CRP decreasing to or remaining at &#x3c;3 mg/L (hazard ratio [HR] 2.766, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.300–5.885, <i>p</i> = 0.008). Furthermore, a CA19-9 decrease &#x3e;90% during preoperative treatment predicted a favorable postoperative outcome (HR 0.297, 95% CI: 0.124–0.708, <i>p</i> = 0.006). In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the median survival for patients with CRP remaining at &#x3c;3 mg/L was longer than among patients with an increased CRP level at ≥3 mg/L (42 months vs. 24 months, <i>p</i> = 0.001). Patients with a CA19-9 decrease &#x3e;90% or level normalization (to ≤37 kU/L) during preoperative treatment exhibited a median survival of 47 months; those with a 50–90% decrease, 15 months; and those with a &#x3c;50% decrease, 17 months (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Changes in CRP and CA19-9 during preoperative oncological therapy predict postoperative survival.

Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory C Wilson ◽  
Brent T Xia ◽  
Syed A Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Borderline Resectable

Despite decades of advancement and research into the multimodal care of pancreatic cancer, mortality after the diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains grim. The role of adjuvant therapy following surgical resection has been well established in the literature. However, adjuvant therapy is imperfect, and outside of a clinical trial, there are high rates of omission or delayed initiation of therapy. Neoadjuvant treatment strategies continue to be explored in the management of resectable, borderline-resectable, and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. With improved resection rates and the possibility for tumor downstaging, neoadjuvant therapy has become standard for patients with borderline-resectable and locally advanced unresectable tumors. Additional benefits of neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment of resectable tumors include improved completion rates of systemic therapy and R0 resection rates. Future clinical trials, including the use of novel treatment agents and combination treatment strategies in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant regimens, will add value to the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Key words: adjuvant therapy, borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer, locally advanced pancreatic cancer, neoadjuvant therapy, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, resectable disease 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document