scholarly journals The Clinicopathological and Prognostic Significance of IDO1 Expression in Human Solid Tumors: Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 134-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng-Peng Yu ◽  
Shu-Fang Fu ◽  
Xuan Chen ◽  
Jing Ye ◽  
Yuan Ye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
High Expression ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Odds Ratios ◽  
Ido1 Expression ◽  
Human Solid Tumors

Background/Aims: Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) is a heme-containing enzyme catalyzing the initial and rate-limiting steps in the kynurenine pathway, which converts tryptophan into kynurenine. Upregulation of IDO1 decreases tryptophan levels and increases the accumulation of kynurenine and its metabolites. These metabolites can affect the proliferation of T cells. Increasing evidence has shown that IDO1 is highly expressed in various cancer types and associated with poor prognosis of cancer patients. However, the results were inconsistent. Methods: We searched the Web of Science, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library databases to identify studies evaluating the prognostic value of IDO1 in cancer patients. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by using fixed-effects/random-effects models. Results: This systematic review and meta-analysis included 2706 patients from 24 articles. The results indicated a shorter overall survival in patients with high expression of IDO1 (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.56-2.63). Furthermore, disease-free survival was worse in patients with high expression of IDO1 (HR = 2.47, 95% CI: 1.46-4.20). Additionally, the pooled odds ratios (ORs) showed that increased IDO1 was significantly associated with tumor differentiation (OR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.05-3.12), distant metastasis (OR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.02-2.06), and poor clinical stage (OR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.13-3.17). However, no significant correlation was observed of increased IDO1 expression with age, sex, lymph node metastasis, and tumor size. Conclusion: High expression of IDO1 is associated with poor clinical outcomes. IDO1 could serve as a biomarker of prognosis and a potential predictive factor of clinicopathology in various cancers. Further studies should be performed to verify the clinical utility of IDO1 in human solid tumors.

scholarly journals Prognostic Role of miR-221 and miR-222 Expression in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria Ravegnini ◽  
Sarah Cargnin ◽  
Giulia Sammarini ◽  
Federica Zanotti ◽  
Justo Lorenzo Bermejo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Fine Tuning ◽  
High Expression ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Free Survival

Background: A wealth of evidence has shown that microRNAs (miRNAs) can modulate specific genes, increasing our knowledge on the fine-tuning regulation of protein expression. miR-221 and miR-222 have been frequently identified as deregulated across different cancer types; however, their prognostic significance in cancer remains controversial. In view of these considerations, we performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of published data investigating the effects of miR-221/222 on overall survival (OS) and other secondary outcomes among cancer patients. A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Knowledge, and Cochrane Library databases was performed. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to assess the strength of association. Results: Fifty studies, analyzing 6086 patients, were included in the systematic review. Twenty-five studies for miR-221 and 17 studies for miR-222 which assessed OS were included in the meta-analysis. High expression of miR-221 and miR-222 significantly predicted poor OS (HR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.14–1.93, p = 0.003 and HR: 1.90, 95% CI: 1.43–2.54, p < 0.001, respectively). Subgroup analysis revealed that the finding on miR-221 was not as robust as the one on miR-222. Furthermore, high miR-222 expression was also associated with worse progression-free survival and disease-free survival pooled with recurrence-free survival. Conclusions: The meta-analysis demonstrated that high expression of miR-222 is associated with poor prognosis in cancer patients, whereas the significance of miR-221 remains unclear. More work is required to fully elucidate the role of miR-221 and miR-222 in cancer prognosis, particularly in view of the limitations of existing results, including the significant heterogeneity and limited number of studies for some cancers.

scholarly journals Evaluating Smoking Cessation Interventions and Cessation Rates in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

ISRN Oncology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Smriti Nayan ◽  
Michael K. Gupta ◽  
Doron D. Sommer
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tobacco Smoking ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Comprehensive Treatment ◽  
Oncology Patient

Background. Tobacco smoking cessation interventions in the oncology population are an important part of comprehensive treatment plan. Objectives. To evaluate through a systematic review smoking cessation interventions and cessation rates in cancer patients. Search Strategy. The literature was searched using Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (inception to November 2010) by three independent review authors. Selection Criteria. Studies were included if tobacco smoking cessation interventions were evaluated and patients were randomized to usual care or an intervention. The primary outcome measure was cessation rates. Data Collection and Analysis. Two authors extracted data independently for each paper, with disagreements resolved by consensus. Main Results. The systematic review found eight RCTs investigating smoking cessation interventions in the oncology patient population. Pooled relative risks were calculated from two groups of RCTs of smoking cessation interventions based on followup duration. In both groups, the pooled relative risk did not suggest a statistically significant improvement in tobacco cessation compared to usual care. Conclusions. Our review demonstrates that recent interventions in the last decade which are a combination of non-pharmacological and pharmacological approaches yield a statistically significant improvement in smoking cessation rates compared to usual care.

scholarly journals The Prognostic Roles and Clinical Features of CD44v9 in Human Solid Cancers—A Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanxiu Deng ◽  
Jie Wang ◽  
Shenhui Ji ◽  
Lu Huang ◽  
Meijiang Feng
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Features ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Expression ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Diagnosis And Prognosis

Abstract Background: CD44 is the primary receptor for hyaluronic acid and serves as a marker for cancer stem cells. CD44v9 is one of CD44’s variants and takes part in cancer’s growth and metastasis. However, the prognostic roles and clinical features of CD44v9 in cancers remain unclear. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to summarize the prognostic significance and clinical features of CD44v9 in human solid cancers.Methods: we systematically searched all of related studies in PubMed, the Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane library up to June 2020. We analyzed the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the prognostic functions and clinical features of CD44v9 in various human solid cancers.Results: In this meta-analysis, we included 1705 cancer patients among 12 studies. Results indicated that high expression of CD44v9 was significantly related to poorer overall survival (OS) (HR=1.60, 95%CI 1.28-1.99, P<0.0001), recurrence-free survival/progression-free survival/disease-free survival (RFS/PFS/DFS).( HR=1.81, 95%CI 1.16-2.84, P=0.009) and disease-specific survival/cancer-specific survival (DSS/CSS) (HR=2.93, 95%CI 1.69-5.10, P<0.001). At the same time, we also found that high expression of CD44v9 increased the possibility of lymphoid infiltrates (OR=1.59, 95%CI 1.16-2.20, P=0.005), vascular invasion (OR=1.57, 95%CI 1.11-2.22, P=0.010) and higher TNM stage (OR=1.63, 95%CI 1.19-2.23, P=0.002).Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that CD44v9 overexpression is associated with worse OS, RFS/PFS/CFS and DSS/CSS in patients with solid cancers, which might be a biomarker in the diagnosis and prognosis of cancers in the future.

scholarly journals Prognostic Significance of High Survivin Expression in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pingping Xu ◽  
Jiajia Lin ◽  
Qi Lin ◽  
Dexiang Zhu ◽  
Wentao Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Survivin Expression ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Gi Cancer ◽  
Literature Searches ◽  
The Cochrane Library

Previous studies on the prognostic impact of survivin expression in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer have yielded inconsistent results. This study was initiated to assess the relationship between survivin expression and overall survival (OS) or disease free survival (DFS) in GI cancer patients. We applied system literature searches on EMBASE, PubMed, Web of science, and the Cochrane library to conduct this up-to-date meta-analysis. Thirty studies with totally 3622 GI cancer patients were collected. The prevalence of high survivin expression in GI cancer was 0.57 (95% CI: 0.51-0.63). High survivin expression was significantly associated with shorter OS (HR 1.57, 95% CI: 1.42-1.74) and DFS (HR 1.38, 95% CI: 1.21-1.58). Subgroup analysis also showed significant association between high survivin expression and poorer OS or DFS in gastric cancer or colorectal cancer. In summary, our study indicated that high survivin expression was related to poor prognosis in GI cancer. Well-designed studies with large sample and more convincing data are needed to confirm our conclusion.

scholarly journals Prognostic Significance of Prostate-Specific Antigen Persistence after Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 948
Author(s):  
Shoji Kimura ◽  
Fumihiko Urabe ◽  
Hiroshi Sasaki ◽  
Takahiro Kimura ◽  
Kenta Miki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
Cochrane Library

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the prognostic value of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence 4–8 weeks after radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with prostate cancer, using studies from Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, on October 10, 2020. Studies were eligible if they compared patients with postoperative PSA persistence 4–8 weeks after RP to those without such persistence to assess the value of PSA persistence in prognosticating biochemical recurrence (BCR), disease recurrence, cancer-specific mortality (CSM), and overall mortality (OM) by multivariable analysis. Our review and analysis included nine studies published between 2008 and 2019 with 14,455 patients. Of those studies, 12.0% showed postoperative PSA persistence. PSA persistence was associated with BCR (HR: 4.44, 95% CI: 2.84–6.93), disease recurrence (HR: 3.43, 95% CI: 1.62–7.25), and CSM (HR: 2.32, 95% CI: 1.83–2.95). We omitted meta-analysis on the association of PSA persistence with OM due to an insufficient number of studies. PSA persistence was associated with disease recurrence in a sub-group of patients with pathological nodal involvement (HR: 5.90, 95% CI: 3.76–9.24). Understanding detection of PSA persistence at 4–8 weeks after RP might be useful for patient counseling, follow-up scheduling, and clinical decision-making regarding adjuvant therapies.

scholarly journals The prognostic value of B7H1 and B7H4 expression in pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 373-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zi-juan Qi ◽  
Dan Yu ◽  
Chun-hong Chen ◽  
Hong Jiang ◽  
Ran Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
High Expression ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Poor Overall Survival ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Low Expression

Objective: The clinical implications of B7H1 and B7H4 in pancreatic cancer have been described however, the prognostic significance of these genes in pancreatic cancer patients remains inconclusive. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic role of B7H1 and B7H4 in pancreatic cancer patients. Methods: Electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library) were searched for relevant articles published before May 2019. Meta-analyses were performed by pooling the hazard ratios (HRs) between overall survival or cancer-specific survival and high or low expression of B7H1/B7H4 in pancreatic cancer patients. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed, and sources of variabilities were explored by performing meta-regression. Results: Sixteen studies (1434 patients’ data) were included. Compared with low expression, high expression of B7H1 was associated with significantly poor overall survival (HR 1.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.35, 2.74); P<0.001) and cancer-specific survival (HR 2.46 (95% CI 1.55, 3.90); P<0.001). High expression of B7H4 also predicted poor overall survival (HR 2.38 (95% CI 1.89, 3.00); P<0.001). In subgroup analyses, a significant association between B7H1 and overall survival was observed for trials conducted in China (HR 2.08 (95% CI 1.29, 3.34)) but not in Japan (HR 1.98 (95% CI 1.33, 2.96)); or in studies with <50% patients having high expression (HR 2.02 (95% CI 1.40, 2.91)) but not in studies with >50% patients with high expression (HR 1.40 (95% CI 0.87, 2.26)). Conclusion: The current study suggests that high B7H1 and B7H4 expression is associated with a poor prognosis in pancreatic cancer patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document