scholarly journals Ex vivo Rezafungin Adsorption and Clearance During Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 214-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soo Min Jang ◽  
Grayson Hough ◽  
Bruce A. Mueller

Background/Aims: To determine adsorption and transmembrane clearances (CLTM) of rezafungin, a novel long-acting echinocandin, in continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH). Methods: A validated ex vivo bovine blood CVVH model using polysulfone and AN69 hemodiafilters was used to evaluate urea and rezafungin CLTM at 3 different ultrafiltrate flow rates. Rezafungin adsorption to the CRRT apparatus was determined for each hemodiafilter. Results: The sieving coefficient (SC) from CVVH with 3 different ultrafiltrate flow rates was 0 for both HF1400 and Multiflow-150 hemodiafilters, while urea SC was approximately 1 at all flow rates. Hemodiafilter type and ultrafiltrate flow rate did not influence CLTM. Rezafungin adsorption to the CVVH apparatus was not observed for either hemodiafilter. Conclusion: Rezafungin is not removed by CVVH by membrane adsorption or via CLTM. Ultrafiltrate flow rates and hemodiafilter types are unlikely to influence rezafungin CLTM. No dosage adjustment of rezafungin is likely required for critically ill patients receiving CVVH.

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
M G Vossen ◽  
S Pferschy ◽  
C Milacek ◽  
M Haidinger ◽  
Mario Karolyi ◽  
...  

Background: Elimination of a drug during renal replacement therapy is not only dependent on flow rates, molecular size and protein binding, but is often influenced by difficult to predict drug membrane interactions. In vitro models allow for extensive profiling of drug clearance using a wide array of hemofilters and flow rates. We present a bovine blood based in vitro pharmacokinetic model for intermittent renal replacement therapy.Methods: Four different drugs were analyzed: gentamicin, doripenem, vancomicin and teicoplanin. The investigated drug was added to a bovine blood reservoir connected to a hemodialysis circuit. In total seven hemofilter models were analyzed using commonly employed flow rates. Pre-filter, post-filter and dialysate samples were drawn, plasmaseparated and analyzed using turbidimetric assays or HPLC. Protein binding of doripenem and vancomycin was measured in bovine plasma and compared to previously published values for human plasma.Results: Clearance values were heavily impacted by choice of membrane material and surface as well as by dialysis parameters such as blood flow rate. Gentamicin clearance ranged from a minimum of 90.12 ml/min in a Baxter CAHP-170 diacetate hemofilter up to a maximum of 187.90 ml/min in a Fresenius medical company Fx80 polysulfone model (blood flow rate 400 ml/min, dialysate flow rate 800 ml/min). Clearance of Gentamicin vs Vancomicin over the F80s hemofilter model using the same flow rates was 137.62 mL vs 103.25 ml/min. Doripenem clearance with the Fx80 was 141.25 ml/min.Conclusion: Clearance values corresponded very well to previously published data from clinical pharmacokinetic trials. In conjunction with in silico pharmacometric models. This model will allow precise dosing recommendations without the need of large scale clinical trials.


Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 1184
Author(s):  
Soo Min Jang ◽  
Lenar Yessayan ◽  
Michael Dean ◽  
Gabrielle Costello ◽  
Ravi Katwaru ◽  
...  

(1) Purpose of this study: determination of adsorption and transmembrane clearances (CLTM) of imipenem and relebactam in ex vivo continuous hemofiltration (CH) and continuous hemodialysis (CHD) models. These clearances were incorporated into a Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS), to develop drug dosing recommendations for critically ill patients requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT); (2) Methods: A validated ex vivo bovine blood CH and CHD model using two hemodiafilters. Imipenem/relebactam and urea CLTM at different ultrafiltrate/dialysate flow rates were evaluated in both CH and CHD. MCS was performed to determine dose recommendations for patients receiving CRRT; (3) Results: Neither imipenem nor relebactam adsorbed to the CRRT apparatus. The CLTM of imipenem, relebactam, and urea approximated the effluent rates (ultrafiltrate/dialysate flow rates). The types of hemodiafilter and effluent rates did not influence CLTM except in a dialysis flow rate of 1 L/h and 6 L/h in the CHD with relebactam (p < 0.05). Imipenem and relebactam 200 mg/100 mg every 6 h were sufficient to meet the standard time above the MIC pharmacodynamic targets in the modeled CRRT regimen of 25 kg/mL/h. (4) Conclusions: Imipenem and relebactam are not removed by adsorption to the CRRT apparatus, but readily cross the hemodiafilter membrane in CH and CHD. Dosage adjustment of imipenem/relebactam is likely required for critically ill patients receiving CRRT.


2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fekade B. Sime ◽  
Saurabh Pandey ◽  
Nermin Karamujic ◽  
Suzanne Parker ◽  
Elizabeth Alexander ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTThe combination product meropenem-vaborbactam, with activity against KPC-producing carbapenem-resistantEnterobacteriaceae, is likely to be used during renal replacement therapy. The aim of this work was to describe the extracorporeal removal (adsorption and clearance) of meropenem-vaborbactam during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH). Anex vivomodel was used to examine the effects of a matrix of operational settings. Vaborbactam did not adsorb to AN69 (acrylonitrile and sodium methallylsulfonate copolymer) ST100 (surface area, 1 m2) hemofilter; the mean (±standard deviation [SD]) meropenem adsorption was 9% (±1%). The sieving coefficients (mean ± SD) with AN69 ST100 and ST150 (surface area, 1.5 m2) filters ranged from 0.97 ± 0.16 to 1.14 ± 0.12 and from 1.13 ± 0.01 to 1.53 ± 0.28, respectively, for meropenem and from 0.64 ± 0.39 to 0.90 ± 0.14 and 0.78 ± 0.18 to 1.04 ± 0.28, respectively, for vaborbactam. At identical settings, vaborbactam sieving coefficients were 25% to 30% lower than for meropenem. Points of dilution, blood flow rates, or effluent flow rates did not affect sieving coefficients for either drug. However, doubling the effluent flow rate resulted in >50 to 100% increases in filter clearance for both drugs. Postfilter dilution resulted in 40 to 80% increases in filter clearance at a high effluent flow rate (4,000 ml/h), compared with ∼15% increases at a low effluent flow rate (1,000 ml/h) for both drugs. For all combinations of setting and filters tested, vaborbactam clearance was lower than that of meropenem by ∼20 to 40%. Overall, meropenem-vaborbactam is efficiently cleared in CVVH mode.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Andrews ◽  
Scott Benken ◽  
Xing Tan ◽  
Eric Wenzler

Abstract Background To evaluate the transmembrane clearance (CLTM) of apixaban during modeled in vitro continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), assess protein binding and circuit adsorption, and provide initial dosing recommendations. Methods Apixaban was added to the CRRT circuit and serial pre-filter bovine blood samples were collected along with post-filter blood and effluent samples. All experiments were performed in duplicate using continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) and hemodialysis (CVVHD) modes, with varying filter types, flow rates, and point of CVVH replacement fluid dilution. Concentrations of apixaban and urea were quantified via liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Plasma pharmacokinetic parameters for apixaban were estimated via noncompartmental analysis. CLTM was calculated via the estimated area under the curve (AUC) and by the product of the sieving/saturation coefficient (SC/SA) and flow rate. Two and three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) models were built to assess the effects of mode, filter type, flow rate, and point of dilution on CLTM by each method. Optimal doses were suggested by matching the AUC observed in vitro to the systemic exposure demonstrated in Phase 2/3 studies of apixaban. Linear regression was utilized to provide dosing estimations for flow rates from 0.5–5 L/h. Results Mean adsorption to the HF1400 and M150 filters differed significantly at 38 and 13%, respectively, while mean (± standard deviation, SD) percent protein binding was 70.81 ± 0.01%. Effect of CVVH point of dilution did not differ across filter types, although CLTM was consistently significantly higher during CRRT with the HF1400 filter compared to the M150. The three-way ANOVA demonstrated improved fit when CLTM values calculated by AUC were used (adjusted R2 0.87 vs. 0.52), and therefore, these values were used to generate optimal dosing recommendations. Linear regression revealed significant effects of filter type and flow rate on CLTM by AUC, suggesting doses of 2.5–7.5 mg twice daily (BID) may be needed for flow rates ranging from 0.5–5 L/h, respectively. Conclusion For CRRT flow rates most commonly employed in clinical practice, the standard labeled 5 mg BID dose of apixaban is predicted to achieve target systemic exposure thresholds. The safety and efficacy of these proposed dosing regimens warrants further investigation in clinical studies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 622-626
Author(s):  
Huub L.A. van den Oever ◽  
Marieke Zeeman ◽  
Polina Nassikovker ◽  
Carmen Bles ◽  
Fred A.L. van Steveninck ◽  
...  

Background: Clonidine is an α2-agonist that is commonly used for sedation in the intensive care unit. When patients are on continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) in the presence of kidney dysfunction, the sieving coefficient of clonidine is required to estimate how much drug is removed by CVVH. In the present study, we measured the sieving coefficient of clonidine in critically ill, ventilated patients receiving CVVH. Methods: A total of 20 samples of plasma and ultrafiltrate of 3 patients on CVVH, using a standard 1.5 m2 polyacrylonitrile AN69 membrane, during continuous clonidine infusion were collected. After correction for the effect of predilution, we calculated the sieving coefficient for clonidine. Results: The mean sieving coefficient of clonidine was 0.52 (SD 0.097). Conclusion: Using a polyacrylonitrile AN69 membrane in a CVVH machine, the in vivo sieving coefficient of clonidine was 0.52.


2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weerachai Chaijamorn ◽  
Alexander R. Shaw ◽  
Susan J. Lewis ◽  
Bruce A. Mueller

Background/Aims: To determine ceftolozane/tazobactam transmembrane clearances (CLTM) in continuous hemofiltration (CHF) and continuous hemodialysis (CHD) and to determine optimal ceftolozane/tazobactam dosing regimens for patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Method: Validated, ex vivo CHF and CHD bovine blood models using polysulfone (HF1400) and AN69 (Multiflow 150-M) hemofilters were used to evaluate adsorption and CLTM at different effluent flow rates. Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) using pharmacokinetic parameters from published studies and CLTM from this study were used to generate ceftolozane/tazobactam dosing for patients receiving CRRT. Results: CHF and CHD CLTM did not differ at equivalent effluent rates. CLTM approximated effluent flow rates. No adsorption of ceftolozane/tazobactam occurred for either hemofilter. Effluent flow was the most important determinant of MCS-derived doses. Conclusion: CRRT clearances of ceftolozane/tazobactam depended on effluent flow rates but not hemofilter types. MCS-derived ceftolozane/tazobactam doses of 750 (500/250)-1,500 (1,000/500) mg every 8 h met pharmacodynamic targets for virtual patients receiving CRRT at contemporary effluent rates.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S730-S730
Author(s):  
Molly Henry ◽  
Laura A Puzniak ◽  
Kelly Harris ◽  
Trevor C Van Schooneveld ◽  
Trevor C Van Schooneveld ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Our hospital recommends ceftolozane/tazobactam (CT) as a broad-spectrum agent for treatment of Gram-negative bacilli in patients with a recent or current multidrug resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas infection. CT is utilized in patients who are on renal replacement therapy (RRT) yet little data exist on the efficacy in this population. Currently there are no FDA-approved dosing recommendations for patients on continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD). The purpose of this study was to describe the indications, dosing and outcomes of patients on CT while receiving RRT. Methods All patients receiving CT from 2015-20 were included if on RRT, either CVVHD or intermittent hemodialysis (iHD). Clinical success was defined as the absence of pre-treatment signs/symptoms and/or no escalated antibiotic treatment within 48 hours of completing therapy. 30-day mortality was defined as death from any cause within 30 days of CT completion. Patients treated after 2019 approval of higher dosing for hospital-associated/ventilator-acquired pneumonia (HAP/VAP) were noted. Results 17 patients received 24 courses of CT while on RRT, 9 (53%) were immunocompromised. All patients were treated in the ICU for an MDR Pseudomonas infection. As shown in table 1, the most common indications were 49% HAP/VAP, 17% complicated intra-abdominal (cIAI), or 17% urinary tract infections (cUTI). 4 (24%) patients had additional treatment courses of CT started empirically when infection was suspected. Median time to initiation for all courses was 2 days after obtaining cultures and median duration was 7 days. 12 patients were on CVVHD (median flow rate 2.5L/hr) and 7 were on iHD. 2 patients received iHD after CVVHD. Median dose while on CVVHD was 1500mg every 8 hours. The median dose on iHD was that approved by FDA for cIAI and cUTI: 750mg x1 followed by 150mg every 8 hours. Clinical success was achieved in 12 (71%) patients and 30-day mortality was 8 (47%). Table 1: Details on first courses of CT for patients on RRT *Denotes treatment after 2019 FDA approval of 3g q8h for treatment of HAP/VAP in patients with normal renal function **Flow rate: Medium 1.5-2L/hr; High: &gt;2.5L/hr +NA denotes patient that had passed away and therefore additional C/T courses were not applicable Conclusion This case series provides real-world results of outcomes for critically ill patients on RRT treated with CT. Clinical success rates were similar to other published literature despite the severity of illness of this cohort, which is corroborated by the high 30 day, all-cause mortality. Ultimately, further evaluation of CT dosing in patients on RRT is warranted. Disclosures Laura A. Puzniak, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee) Kelly Harris, PharmD, BCPS, Merck & Co. Inc (Employee) Trevor C. Van Schooneveld, MD, FACP, BioFire (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator; Insmed (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Scientific Research Study Investigator; Merck (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Scientific Research Study Investigator; Rebiotix (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Scientific Research Study Investigator Scott J. Bergman, PharmD, FCCP, FIDSA, BCPS, BCIDP, Merck & Co., Inc (Grant/Research Support) Scott J. Bergman, PharmD, FCCP, FIDSA, BCPS, BCIDP, Merck & Co., Inc (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support


2001 ◽  
Vol 45 (10) ◽  
pp. 2949-2954 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca S. Malone ◽  
Douglas N. Fish ◽  
Edward Abraham ◽  
Isaac Teitelbaum

ABSTRACT The pharmacokinetics of intravenously administered levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were studied in intensive care unit patients during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH; four patients received levofloxacin, and five received ciprofloxacin) or hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF; six patients received levofloxacin, and five received ciprofloxacin). Levofloxacin clearance was substantially increased during both CVVH and CVVHDF, while ciprofloxacin clearance was affected less. The results of this study suggest that doses of levofloxacin of 250 mg/day and ciprofloxacin of 400 mg/day are sufficient to maintain effective drug concentrations in the plasma of patients undergoing CVVH or CVVHDF.


2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (8) ◽  
pp. 4053-4057 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Weiler ◽  
Christoph Seger ◽  
Hartwig Pfisterer ◽  
Eva Stienecke ◽  
Florian Stippler ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTCaspofungin pharmacokinetics was assessed in 27 critically ill patients, including 7 on continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH), 8 on continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD), and 13 not requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Caspofungin exposure during CRRT was very similar to that of the control group and comparable to that in healthy volunteers. Caspofungin clearance by CRRT was very low. Therefore, the standard dosage of caspofungin is probably adequate for critically ill patients undergoing CVVH or CVVHD.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Andrews ◽  
Scott Benken ◽  
Xing Tan ◽  
Eric Wenzler

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the transmembrane clearance (CLTM) of apixaban during modeled in vitro continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), assess protein binding and circuit adsorption, and provide initial dosing recommendations. Design: In vitro pharmacokinetic (PK) study.Setting: University research laboratory.Subjects: Not applicable. Interventions: Apixaban was added to the CRRT circuit and serial, undiluted pre-filter bovine blood samples were collected along with analogous post-filter blood and effluent samples. All experiments were performed in duplicate using continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) and hemodialysis (CVVHD) modes, with varying filter types (M150 and HF1400), flow rates (2 and 4 L/h), and point of CVVH replacement fluid dilution (pre, post, and pre/post filter). Concentrations of apixaban and urea were quantified via liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Plasma PK parameters for apixaban were estimated via noncompartmental analysis in WinNonlin. CLTM was calculated via the estimated area under the curve (AUC) and by the product of the sieving/saturation coefficient (SC/SA) and flow rate. Two and three-way ANOVA models were built to assess the effects of mode, filter type, flow rate, and point of dilution on CLTM by each method. Optimal doses were suggested by matching the AUC observed in vitro to the systemic exposure demonstrated in Phase 2/3 studies of apixaban. Linear regression was then utilized to provide dosing estimations for flow rates from 0.5-5 L/h. Measurements and Main Results: Mean adsorption to the HF1400 and M150 filters differed significantly at 38% and 13%, respectively, while mean (±SD) percent protein binding was 70.81±0.01%. Effect of CVVH point of replacement fluid dilution did not differ across filter types, although CLTM was consistently significantly higher during CRRT with the HF1400 filter compared to the M150. The three-way ANOVA demonstrated improved fit when CLTM values calculated by AUC were used (adjusted R2 0.87 vs. 0.52), and therefore, these values were used to generate optimal dosing recommendations. Linear regression revealed significant effects of filter type and flow rate on CLTM by AUC, suggesting doses of 5-10 mg BID may be needed for flow rates ranging from 0.5-5 L/h respectively. Conclusion: CLTM of apixaban during CRRT resulted in estimated dosing recommendations ranging from 5 mg BID for flow rates ≤3 L/h up to 7.5-10 mg BID for rates >3 L/h, depending on filter type, in order to match target systemic exposure thresholds. The safety and efficacy of these proposed dosing regimens warrants further investigation in clinical studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document