scholarly journals Endovascular Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment with FlowGate Balloon Guide Catheter: A Single-Center Observational Study of FlowGate Balloon Guide Catheter Use

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 327-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed S. Teleb

Background: Treatment of large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke with mechanical thrombectomy has become the standard of care after recent clinical trials. However, the degree of recanalization with stent retrievers remains very important in overall outcomes. We sought to review the utility of a new balloon guide catheter (BGC) in improving the degree of recanalization in conjunction with mechanical thrombectomy. Methods: The medical records of a prospectively collected endovascular ischemic stroke database were reviewed. All consecutive strokes when a FlowGate BGC was used with a thrombectomy stent retriever were identified. Use of a FlowGate BGC, number of passes, final Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) score, trackability, and use of adjunct devices were all collected and analyzed. Results: Use of a FlowGate BGC resulted in 64% (33/52) first-pass effect (FPE) of TICI 2b/3, and specifically 46% (24/52) TICI 3 FPE (true FPE). A total of 52/62 (84%) of thrombectomy cases were treated with BGCs. In the remaining 10, the BGC was not inflated or used due to the clot not being visualized or the lesions being distal and BGC use thus not deemed appropriate. Adjunct use of an aspiration catheter was seen in 12% (6/52) of cases. The overall success with FlowGate BGCs with one or more passes of TICI 2b/3 was 94% (49/52). Trackability was achieved in 92% (57/62) of cases. Conclusions: Use of the FlowGate BGC as an adjunct to mechanical thrombectomy was associated with good FPE and an overall recanalization of TICI 2b/3 of 94%.

Author(s):  
Ji Y. Chong ◽  
Michael P. Lerario

Select patients who are not eligible for IV tPA, or who do not recanalize with IV thrombolysis alone, may be treated with acute endovascular therapies within a 6-hour window. Mechanical thrombectomy, with or without intra-arterial tPA, has recently been shown to be effective in treating acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion. Intra-arterial therapy using approved stent retrievers has become the standard of care for acute large vessel occlusion.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-7
Author(s):  
Okkes Kuybu ◽  
Vijayakumar Javalkar ◽  
Abdallah Amireh ◽  
Arshpreet Kaur ◽  
Roger E Kelley ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) was demonstrated in five landmark trials published in2015.Mechanical thrombectomy is now standard of care for acute ischemic stroke and has been growing in popularity after publication of landmark trials.ObjectiveTo analyze outcomes and trends of the use of MT and intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke in US hospitals before and after publication of these trials.MethodsPatients discharged with a diagnosis of ischemic stroke between 2012 to 2017 were diagnosed using ICD codes from the National Inpatient Sample. Thereafter, patients given acute stroke treatment were identified using the corresponding procedure codes for IVT and MT. The primary clinical outcomes of in-hospital mortality and disability were then compared between two time periods: 2012–2014 (pre-landmark trials) and 2015–2017 (post-landmark trials). Binary logistic regression and Χ2 tests were used for statistical analysis.ResultsA total of 57 675 patients (median age 68.9 years (range 18-90), 50.1% female) were identified with acute procedures. Of these patients, 57.6% were from the post-landmark trials time period. Despite an increased number of cases, the rate of IVT decreased from 84.3% to 75.9% and the rate of IVT+MT decreased from 7.1% to 6.3%. After publication of the pivotal trials in 2015, the rates of MT increased from 8.7% to 17.8%. Significant reductions of in-hospital mortality (7.1% vs 8.7%, p<0.001) and disability (64% vs 66.2%, p<0.001) were noted.ConclusionThe analysis showed a significant increase in the proportion of patients receiving MT after 2015. This has translated into reduction of in-hospital mortality and improvement in disability.


2020 ◽  
Vol 132 (4) ◽  
pp. 1182-1187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carrie E. Andrews ◽  
Nikolaos Mouchtouris ◽  
Evan M. Fitchett ◽  
Fadi Al Saiegh ◽  
Michael J. Lang ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEMechanical thrombectomy (MT) is now the standard of care for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) secondary to large-vessel occlusion, but there remains a question of whether elderly patients benefit from this procedure to the same degree as the younger populations enrolled in the seminal trials on MT. The authors compared outcomes after MT of patients 80–89 and ≥ 90 years old with AIS to those of younger patients.METHODSThe authors retrospectively analyzed records of patients undergoing MT at their institution to examine stroke severity, comorbid conditions, medical management, recanalization results, and clinical outcomes. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to compare patients < 80 years, 80–89 years, and ≥ 90 years old.RESULTSAll groups had similar rates of comorbid disease and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) administration, and stroke severity did not differ significantly between groups. Elderly patients had equivalent recanalization outcomes, with similar rates of readmission, 30-day mortality, and hospital-associated complications. These patients were more likely to have poor clinical outcome on discharge, as defined by a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 3–6, but this difference was not significant when controlled for stroke severity, tPA administration, and recanalization results.CONCLUSIONSOctogenarians, nonagenarians, and centenarians with AIS have similar rates of mortality, hospital readmission, and hospital-associated complications as younger patients after MT. Elderly patients also have the capacity to achieve good functional outcome after MT, but this potential is moderated by stroke severity and success of treatment.


2021 ◽  
pp. 0271678X2199298
Author(s):  
Chao Li ◽  
Chunyang Wang ◽  
Yi Zhang ◽  
Owais K Alsrouji ◽  
Alex B Chebl ◽  
...  

Treatment of patients with cerebral large vessel occlusion with thrombectomy and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) leads to incomplete reperfusion. Using rat models of embolic and transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (eMCAO and tMCAO), we investigated the effect on stroke outcomes of small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) derived from rat cerebral endothelial cells (CEC-sEVs) in combination with tPA (CEC-sEVs/tPA) as a treatment of eMCAO and tMCAO in rat. The effect of sEVs derived from clots acquired from patients who had undergone mechanical thrombectomy on healthy human CEC permeability was also evaluated. CEC-sEVs/tPA administered 4 h after eMCAO reduced infarct volume by ∼36%, increased recanalization of the occluded MCA, enhanced cerebral blood flow (CBF), and reduced blood-brain barrier (BBB) leakage. Treatment with CEC-sEVs given upon reperfusion after 2 h tMCAO significantly reduced infarct volume by ∼43%, and neurological outcomes were improved in both CEC-sEVs treated models. CEC-sEVs/tPA reduced a network of microRNAs (miRs) and proteins that mediate thrombosis, coagulation, and inflammation. Patient-clot derived sEVs increased CEC permeability, which was reduced by CEC-sEVs. CEC-sEV mediated suppression of a network of pro-thrombotic, -coagulant, and -inflammatory miRs and proteins likely contribute to therapeutic effects. Thus, CEC-sEVs have a therapeutic effect on acute ischemic stroke by reducing neurovascular damage.


2017 ◽  
Vol 126 (4) ◽  
pp. 1123-1130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate A. Hentschel ◽  
Badih Daou ◽  
Nohra Chalouhi ◽  
Robert M. Starke ◽  
Shannon Clark ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE Mechanical thrombectomy is standard of care for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. However, limited data are available from assessment of outcomes of FDA-approved devices. The objective of this study is to compare clinical outcomes, efficacy, and safety of non–stent retriever and stent retriever thrombectomy devices. METHODS Between January 2008 and June 2014, 166 patients treated at Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience for acute ischemic stroke with mechanical thrombectomy using Merci, Penumbra, Solitaire, or Trevo devices were retrospectively reviewed. Primary outcomes included 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, recanalization rate (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction [TICI score]), and incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages (ICHs). Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression determined predictors of mRS Score 3–6, mortality, and TICI Score 3. RESULTS A total of 99 patients were treated with non–stent retriever devices (Merci and Penumbra) and 67 with stent retrievers (Solitaire and Trevo). Stent retrievers yielded lower 90-day NIH Stroke Scale scores and higher rates of 90-day mRS scores ≤ 2 (22.54% [non–stent retriever] vs 61.67% [stent retriever]; p < 0.001), TICI Score 2b–3 recanalization rates (79.80% [non–stent retriever] vs 97.01% [stent retriever]; p < 0.001), percentage of parenchyma salvaged, and discharge rates to home/rehabilitation. The overall incidence of ICH was also significantly lower (40.40% [non–stent retriever] vs 13.43% [stent retriever]; p = 0.002), with a trend toward lower 90-day mortality. Use of non–stent retriever devices was an independent predictor of mRS Scores 3–6 (p = 0.002), while use of stent retrievers was an independent predictor of TICI Score 3 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Stent retriever mechanical thrombectomy devices achieve higher recanalization rates than non–stent retriever devices in acute ischemic stroke with improved clinical and radiographic outcomes and safety.


2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 20-29
Author(s):  
А.М. Netliukh ◽  
V.М. Shevaga ◽  
A.V. Payenok ◽  
В.M. Salo ◽  
О.Ya. Kobyletskyi

Objective — to estimate safety and effectiveness of intra-arterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke in the interventional radiology department of multiprofile hospital. Materials and methods. Urgent endovascular treatment was applied at 15 patients with acute ischemic stroke in carotid circulation during 2015–2017. Mechanical intra-arterial therapy with thrombectomy by stent-retrievers and thromboaspiration was used at accordingly six and two recent cases (during 2017); in 7 cases intra-arterial thrombolysis was the treatment option (2015–2016). Results. The article consist brief review of literature about acute ischemic stroke treatment and discussion concerning results of treatment of selected patients. Mechanical thrombectomy or thromboaspiration were effective in 75.0 % of cases with good recanalization rate opposite to 42.9 % at 7 patients treated by either intra-arterial or bridging thrombolysis with rt-PA. Unexpected technical failures of mechanical thrombectomy regarding recent clinical guidelines for ischemic stroke management following are discussed on example of 2 clinical cases. Conclusions. Endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke has a high safety and well-known efficacy. It became evident at our patients that following current management guidelines for thrombectomy with stent-retrievers or thromboaspiration after thrombotic occlusions of extracranial and proximal segments of intracranial arteries allowed attaining in 2017 reperfusion rate 2b/3 Modified Treatment in Cerebral Ischaemia Scale in majority of cases. Intra-arterial thrombolysis contributed to the reperfusion rate 2b/3 on the Modified Treatment in Cerebral Ischaemia scale just in 42.9 % of cases, which indicates its lower effectiveness.


2020 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2020-016389
Author(s):  
Badih J Daou ◽  
Monica L Yost ◽  
John D Syrjamaki ◽  
Kelsey J Fearer ◽  
Sravanthi Koduri ◽  
...  

BackgroundAlthough mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke from a large vessel occlusion is now the standard of care, little is known about cost variations in stroke patients following thrombectomy and factors that influence these variations.MethodsWe evaluated claims data for 2016 to 2018 for thrombectomy-performing hospitals within Michigan through a registry that includes detailed episode payment information for both Medicare and privately insured patients. We aimed to analyze price-standardized and risk-adjusted 90-day episode payments in patients who underwent thrombectomy. Hospitals were grouped into three payment terciles for comparison. Statistical analysis was carried out using unpaired t-test, Chi-square, and ANOVA tests.Results1076 thrombectomy cases treated at 16 centers were analyzed. The average 90-day episode payment by hospital ranged from $53 046 to $81,767, with a mean of $65 357. A $20 467 difference (35.1%) existed between the high and low payment hospital terciles (P<0.0001), highlighting a significant payment variation across hospital terciles. The primary drivers of payment variation were related to post-discharge care which accounted for 38% of the payment variation (P=0.0058, inter-tercile range $11,977–$19,703) and readmissions accounting for 26% (P=0.016, inter-tercile range $3,315–$7,992). This was followed by professional payments representing 20% of the variation (P<0.0001, inter-tercile range $7525–$9,922), while index hospitalization payment was responsible for only 16% of the 90-day episode payment variation (P=0.10, inter-tercile range $35,432–$41,099).ConclusionsThere is a wide variation in 90-day episode payments for patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy across centers. The main drivers of payment variation are related to differences in post-discharge care and readmissions.


Author(s):  
Mandy J. Binning ◽  
Daniel R. Felbaum

This chapter will review the main endovascular principles of ischemic stroke treatment. Endovascular therapy has been revolutionized by the advent of modern devices for thrombectomy. Class I evidence in multiple trials has proven that intravenous alteplase plus endovascular thrombectomy is superior to intravenous alteplase alone. The combination of these factors has advanced the standard of care for patients who present with acute ischemic stroke who are also found to have a large vessel occlusion and salvageable brain tissue. The chapter will include information based on recently concluded Class I trials and American Heart Association guidelines. The chapter will review available imaging, current guidelines, controversies surrounding endovascular thrombectomy, recent advances in thrombectomy devices, and recent management principles pertinent to the endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Cases will be presented regarding diagnosis, management, and treatment paradigms currently being practiced.


2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annika Kowoll ◽  
Anushe Weber ◽  
Anastasios Mpotsaris ◽  
Daniel Behme ◽  
Werner Weber

IntroductionOver the past decade, endovascular techniques for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke have emerged significantly. However, revascularization rates are limited at approximately 80%, and mechanical thrombectomy procedures still last about 1 h. Therefore, we investigated the novel direct aspiration first pass technique for its efficacy and safety.MethodsOur neurointerventional database was screened for patients who received mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke using the Penumbra 5MAX ACE aspiration catheter on an intention to treat basis between November 2013 and June 2014. Procedural data, including modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score, procedural timings, and complications, as well as clinical data at admission and discharge, were analyzed.Results54 patients received mechanical thrombectomy using the 5MAX ACE. Median age was 69 (39–94) years (54% were men). Baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 15 (2–27) and 44/54 (81%) patients received intravenous thrombolysis. Vessel occlusion sites were 91% anterior circulation and 9% posterior circulation. A successful revascularization result (mTICI ≥2b) was achieved in 93% of cases whereas direct aspiration alone was successful in 30/54 (56%) cases; among these, median time from groin puncture to revascularization was 30 min (9–113). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 2/54 (4%) patients, and embolization to new territories in 3/54 (6%). Median NIHSS at discharge was 6 (0–24); 46% of patients were independent at discharge.ConclusionsThe direct aspiration first pass technique proofed to be fast, effective, and safe. Promising revascularization results can be achieved quickly in more than 50% of patients using this technique as the firstline option. Nevertheless, stent retrievers are still warranted in approximately 40% of cases to achieve a favorable revascularization result.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document