Clinicopathological Characteristics, Surgical Treatments, and Survival Outcomes of Patients with Duodenal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 206-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuisheng Zhang ◽  
Yuan Tian ◽  
Yingtai Chen ◽  
Jianwei Zhang ◽  
Cuiling Zheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Limited Resection ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stromal Tumors ◽  
Duodenal Gists

Background: Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare and their clinicopathological features have not been completely described. In this retrospective study, we examined the characteristics and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent surgical treatment for duodenal GISTs. Methods: We examined patients surgically treated for duodenal GISTs from 1999 to 2016 at the China National Cancer Center. We analyzed patient characteristics, treatments, histological examinations, and survival outcomes. Results: The 52 surgeries performed included 14 pancreaticoduodenectomies (26.9%), 37 limited resections (71.2%), and one palliative bypass procedure (1.9%). No surgery-related death occurred. The complication rate in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy was slightly higher than that in patients who underwent limited resection. The 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates for patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma were 89.1 and 72.9%, respectively. The overall survival and progression-free survival rates were not significantly related to surgical methods. Large tumor size and high mitotic rate were associated with poor overall survival outcomes. However, no independent factor was associated with prognosis, which may be due to the small sample size. Conclusion: The prognosis of duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors was good. Limited resection seems to be oncologically feasible, with outcomes being less worse than those of pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Treatment of nonresectable and metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Experience with the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in a third-level hospital in Mexico city.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 224-224
Author(s):  
Abdel Karim Dip Borunda ◽  
Alejandro J. Silva
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stromal Tumors

224 Background: Stromal tumors of the digestive tract are uncommon malignant diseases, and are subclassified as leiomyosarcomas and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) depending on the molecular expression of CD117 (KIT). GISTs represent 1% of malignant tumors affecting this anatomical site. Located diseases are reasonably well controlled by surgical resection and several criteria define the need for adjuvant therapy. In the case of metastatic disease a poor prognosis has been reported with systemic treatment based on chemotherapy. Recently, significant advances have been shown since Tyrosine – kinase inhibitors were introduced, with median overall survival close to 5 years. Unfortunately in Mexico, even though the therapy has been long used there are no published data of the experience in the treatment of these tumors. Methods: We used an electronic data base to obtain clinical, radiological and histological data of patients diagnosed with GIST and treated in the oncological center of the Mexican Institute of Social Security, patients were subclassified by stage, symptoms at diagnosis as well as the initial and subsequent systemic treatment. Finally we made an analysis for progression free survival and overall survival identifying prognostic factors. Results: We obtained information of 71 patients with metastatic, nonresectable or recurrent GIST, treated with a TKI, we observed a predominant relation for women (60.4%), with median age of 58 years. Stage at diagnosis was predominantly metastatic (46.5%) most frequently affected sites were lung, liver and retroperitoneum. Median progression free survival was 23.6m and overall survival was 81.3 months. All patients were initially treated with imatinib at a dose of 400mg per day. Treatment was well tolerated in most cases. Conclusions: Metastatic GIST evaluated in our center shows a different affection in gender and age, our population shows a different response to TKI’s, than reported in other series with superior overall survival, Poor prognosis is associated with lung affection. Biological studies will be started for the molecular evaluation of these tumors.

Standard versus personalized schedule of regorafenib in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST): A retrospective, multicenter, real-world study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e23521-e23521
Author(s):  
Margherita Nannini ◽  
Alessandro Rizzo ◽  
Maria Concetta Nigro ◽  
Bruno Vincenzi ◽  
Alessandro Mazzocca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Real World ◽  
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Term Therapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stromal Tumors ◽  
The Impact

e23521 Background: Regorafenib (REG) is a multikinase inhibitor approved as third-line treatment in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Although its proven activity, REG can present a relevant adverse profile which often leads to treatment modifications and transient or permanent discontinuation; thus, in clinical practice physicians usually adopt various dosing and interval schedules to counteract REG-related adverse events (AEs) and avoid treatment interruption. The aim of this real-world study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of personalized schedules of REG in metastatic GIST patients, in comparison with the standard schedule (160 mg daily, 3-weeks-on, 1-week-off schedule). Methods: Institutional registries across seven Italian reference centers were retrospectively reviewed and data of interest retrieved to identify GIST patients who had received REG from February 2013 to January 2021. The primary endpoint was Progression-Free Survival (PFS), with Overall Survival (OS) also assessed as secondary endpoint. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival and the log-rank test to make comparisons. The impact of variables on survival was assessed through univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: A total of 152 GIST patients (82 male and 70 female) were included and split in two groups on the basis of the REG treatment plan received (standard vs personalized). Among the 103 patients for whom the treatment was personalized (38 since the beginning and 65 during the treatment course), the main strategies adopted were the following: 120 mg/day d1-21 e28 (n = 56; 54.4%); 80 mg/day d1-21 e28 (n = 22; 21.4%); 160 mg/day d1-5 e7 (n = 13; 12.6%). At a median follow-up of 36.5 months, median Overall Survival (OS) was 16.6 months (95% CI 14.1-21.8) and 20.5 months (95% CI 15.0-25.4) in the standard-dose and the personalized schedule groups, respectively (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.49-1.22; p = 0.16). Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) was 5.6 months (95% CI 3.3-not reached) and 9.7 months (95% CI 7.9-14.5) in the same groups (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.34-0.75; p = 0.00052). Conclusions: Despite the expected limits of a retrospective analysis, we confirm that REG personalized schedules are commonly adopted in everyday clinical practice of high-volume GIST expert centers and correlate with significant improvement of therapeutic outcomes. Based on these results, REG treatment optimization in GIST patients may represent the best strategy to maximize long-term therapy, preserving tolerability and quality of life.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Institute of Oncology—Dr. “Luis Razetti” experience, Caracas, Venezuela.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21512-e21512
Author(s):  
Luis Chirinos ◽  
Maria Belen Fuentes ◽  
Maria Angelina Perez ◽  
Gustavo Gotera ◽  
Jesus Felipe Parra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Adjuvant Imatinib ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stromal Tumors ◽  
Localized Disease ◽  
Disease Free

e21512 Background: Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors are a heterogeneous group of tumors with clinical features and specific genetic alterations, which represent 1-3% of all gastrointestinal cancers. Imatinib, is the standard treatment in advanced and localized disease, and has demonstrated benefit in overall survival, progression free survival and disease free survival. Methods: The primary end point was to evaluate overall survival in patients with locally advanced, metastatic and early stage GIST treated with Imatinib; secondary end points were to evaluate disease-free survival and progression free survival. We included 34 patients with GIST treated between January 2005 and December 2011. Results: The most affected gender was male (55.88%), the average age was 51-60 years (26.47%), and most had localized disease at diagnosis (73.52%), mainly in the stomach (52.94%). As for the primary treatment, 25 underwent surgery (73.5%), applying adjuvant Imatinib in 18 patients (75%).The OS and DFS was higher in patients with localized disease compared with age (p = 0.0001 respectively). Regarding the use of adjuvant Imatinib, it produced clinical benefit in DFS and OS of 50 and 60 months respectively, regardless of risk. In patients with advanced or metastatic disease Imatinib was associated with higher PFS (p = 0.055) and OS (p = 0.1120). Relapses occurred in 24% of patients regardless of risk and the use of Imatinib. Conclusions: In our study we concluded that radical surgery and the use of Imatinib in GIST patients produce important clinical benefits which translate into higher survival rates.

Ten-Year Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic GI Stromal Tumors: Long-Term Analysis of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Italian Sarcoma Group, and Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group Intergroup Phase III Randomized Trial on Imatinib at Two Dose Levels

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15) ◽  
pp. 1713-1720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo G. Casali ◽  
John Zalcberg ◽  
Axel Le Cesne ◽  
Peter Reichardt ◽  
Jean-Yves Blay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Kit Mutation ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stromal Tumors

Purpose To report on the long-term results of a randomized trial comparing a standard dose (400 mg/d) versus a higher dose (800 mg/d) of imatinib in patients with metastatic or locally advanced GI stromal tumors (GISTs). Patients and Methods Eligible patients with advanced CD117-positive GIST from 56 institutions in 13 countries were randomly assigned to receive either imatinib 400 mg or 800 mg daily. Patients on the 400-mg arm were allowed to cross over to 800 mg upon progression. Results Between February 2001 and February 2002, 946 patients were accrued. Median age was 60 years (range, 18 to 91 years). Median follow-up time was 10.9 years. Median progression-free survival times were 1.7 and 2.0 years in the 400- and 800-mg arms, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.91; P = .18), and median overall survival time was 3.9 years in both treatment arms. The estimated 10-year progression-free survival rates were 9.5% and 9.2% for the 400- and 800-mg arms, respectively, and the estimated 10-year overall survival rates were 19.4% and 21.5%, respectively. At multivariable analysis, age (< 60 years), performance status (0 v ≥ 1), size of the largest lesion (smaller), and KIT mutation (exon 11) were significant prognostic factors for the probability of surviving beyond 10 years. Conclusion This trial was carried out on a worldwide intergroup basis, at the beginning of the learning curve of the use of imatinib, in a large population of patients with advanced GIST. With a long follow-up, 6% of patients are long-term progression free and 13% are survivors. Among clinical prognostic factors, only performance status, KIT mutation, and size of largest lesion predicted long-term outcome, likely pointing to a lower burden of disease. Genomic and/or immune profiling could help understand long-term survivorship. Addressing secondary resistance remains a therapeutic challenge.

Phase III Randomized, Intergroup Trial Assessing Imatinib Mesylate At Two Dose Levels in Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Expressing the Kit Receptor Tyrosine Kinase: S0033

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 626-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles D. Blanke ◽  
Cathryn Rankin ◽  
George D. Demetri ◽  
Christopher W. Ryan ◽  
Margaret von Mehren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stromal Tumors

PurposeTo assess potential differences in progression-free or overall survival when imatinib mesylate is administered to patients with incurable gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) at a standard dose (400 mg daily) versus a high dose (400 mg twice daily).Patients and MethodsPatients with metastatic or surgically unresectable GIST were eligible for this phase III open-label clinical trial. At registration, patients were randomly assigned to either standard or high-dose imatinib, with close interval follow-up. If objective progression occurred by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, patients on the standard-dose arm could reregister to the trial and receive the high-dose imatinib regimen.ResultsSeven hundred forty-six patients with advanced GIST from 148 centers across the United States and Canada were enrolled onto this trial in 9 months. With a median follow-up of 4.5 years, median progression-free survival was 18 months for patients on the standard-dose arm, and 20 months for those receiving high-dose imatinib. Median overall survival was 55 and 51 months, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in objective response rates, progression-free survival, or overall survival. After progression on standard-dose imatinib, 33% of patients who crossed over to the high-dose imatinib regimen achieved either an objective response or stable disease. There were more grade 3, 4, and 5 toxicities noted on the high-dose imatinib arm.ConclusionThis trial confirms the effectiveness of imatinib as primary systemic therapy for patients with incurable GIST but did not show any advantage to higher dose treatment. It appears reasonable to initiate therapy with 400 mg daily and to consider dose escalation on progression of disease.

scholarly journals Comparison of the survival outcomes of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingduo Kong ◽  
Hongyi Wei ◽  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Yilin Li ◽  
Yongjun Wang
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Review Manager ◽  
Early Stage Ovarian Cancer

Abstract Background Laparoscopy has been widely used for patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (eEOC). However, there is limited evidence regarding whether survival outcomes of laparoscopy are equivalent to those of laparotomy among patients with eEOC. The result of survival outcomes of laparoscopy is still controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis is to analyze the survival outcomes of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the treatment of eEOC. Methods According to the keywords, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for studies from January 1994 to January 2021. Studies comparing the efficacy and safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for patients with eEOC were assessed for eligibility. Only studies including outcomes of overall survival (OS) were enrolled. The meta-analysis was performed using Stata software (Version 12.0) and Review Manager (Version 5.2). Results A total of 6 retrospective non-random studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated that there was no difference between two approaches for patients with eEOC in OS (HR = 0.6, P = 0.446), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.6, P = 0.137) and upstaging rate (OR = 1.18, P = 0.54). But the recurrence rate of laparoscopic surgery was lower than that of laparotomic surgery (OR = 0.48, P = 0.008). Conclusions Laparoscopy and laparotomy appear to provide comparable overall survival and progression-free survival outcomes for patients with eEOC. Further high-quality studies are needed to enhance this statement.

Stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with oligometastatic or oligoprogressive gynecological malignancies: a multi-institutional analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 865-872 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cem Onal ◽  
Melis Gultekin ◽  
Ezgi Oymak ◽  
Ozan Cem Guler ◽  
Melek Tugce Yilmaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Local Control ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Oligometastatic Disease

IntroductionData supporting stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic patients are increasing; however, the outcomes for gynecological cancer patients have yet to be fully explored. Our aim is to analyze the clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy in the treatment of patients with recurrent or oligometastatic ovarian cancer or cervical cancer.MethodsThe clinical data of 29 patients (35 lesions) with oligometastatic cervical cancer (21 patients, 72%) and ovarian carcinoma (8 patients, 28%) who were treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy for metastatic sites were retrospectively evaluated. All patients had <5 metastases at diagnosis or during progression, and were treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic disease. Patients with ≥5 metastases or with brain metastases and those who underwent re-irradiation for primary site were excluded. Age, progression time, mean biologically effective dose, and treatment response were compared for overall survival and progression-free survival.ResultsA total of 29 patients were included in the study. De novo oligometastatic disease was observed in 7 patients (24%), and 22 patients (76%) had oligoprogression. The median follow-up was 15.3 months (range 1.9–95.2). The 1 and 2 year overall survival rates were 85% and 62%, respectively, and the 1 and 2 year progression-free survival rates were 27% and 18%, respectively. The 1 and 2 year local control rates for all patients were 84% and 84%, respectively. All disease progressions were observed at a median time of 7.7 months (range 1.0–16.0) after the completion of stereotactic body radiotherapy. Patients with a complete response after stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastasis had a significantly higher 2 year overall survival and progression-free survival compared with their counterparts. In multivariate analysis, early progression (≤12 months) and complete response after stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastasis were the significant prognostic factors for improved overall survival. However, no significant factor was found for progression-free survival in the multivariable analysis. No patients experienced grade 3 or higher acute or late toxicities.ConclusionsPatients with early detection of oligometastasis (≤12 months) and with complete response observed at the stereotactic body radiotherapy site had a better survival compared with their counterparts. Stereotactic body radiotherapy at the oligometastatic site resulted in excellent local control rates with minimal toxicity, and can potentially contribute to long-term survival.

Treatment outcomes of endometrial cancer patients with paraaortic lymph node metastasis: a multi-institutional analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cem Onal ◽  
Berna Akkus Yildirim ◽  
Sezin Yuce Sari ◽  
Guler Yavas ◽  
Melis Gultekin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Adjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Myometrial Invasion ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Radiotherapy Alone ◽  
Paraaortic Lymph Node Metastasis

ObjectiveTo analyze the prognostic factors and treatment outcomes in endometrial cancer patients with paraaortic lymph node metastasis.MethodsData from four centers were collected retrospectively for 92 patients with endometrial cancer treated with combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy or adjuvant radiotherapy alone postoperatively, delivered by either the sandwich or sequential method. Prognostic factors affecting overall survival and progression-free survival were analyzed.ResultsThe 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 35 % and 33 %, respectively, after a median follow-up time of 33 months. The 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were significantly higher in patients receiving radiotherapy and chemotherapy postoperatively compared with patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy alone (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). In a subgroup analysis of patients treated with adjuvant combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were significantly higher in patients receiving chemotherapy and radiotherapy via the sandwich method compared with patients treated with sequential chemotherapy and radiotherapy (P = 0.02 and P = 0.03, respectively). In the univariate analysis, in addition to treatment strategy, pathology, depth of myometrial invasion, and tumor grade were significant prognostic factors for both overall survival and progression-free survival. In the multivariate analysis, grade III disease, myometrial invasion greater than or equal to 50%, and adjuvant radiotherapy alone were negative predictors for both overall survival and progression-free survival.ConclusionWe demonstrated that adjuvant combined treatment including radiotherapyand chemotherapy significantly increases overall survival and progression-free survival rates compared with postoperative pelvic and paraaortic radiotherapy.

Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine Plus Tipifarnib Compared With Gemcitabine Plus Placebo in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 1430-1438 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Van Cutsem ◽  
H. van de Velde ◽  
P. Karasek ◽  
H. Oettle ◽  
W.L. Vervenne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Free Survival

Purpose To determine whether addition of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib (Zarnestra, R115777; Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium) to standard gemcitabine therapy improves overall survival in advanced pancreatic cancer. Patients and Methods This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared gemcitabine + tipifarnib versus gemcitabine + placebo in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma previously untreated with systemic therapy. Tipifarnib was given at 200 mg bid orally continuously; gemcitabine was given at 1,000 mg/m2 intravenously weekly × 7 for 8 weeks, then weekly × 3 every 4 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival; secondary end points included 6-month and 1-year survival rates, progression-free survival, response rate, safety, and quality of life. Results Six hundred eighty-eight patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two treatment arms. No statistically significant differences in survival parameters were observed. The median overall survival for the experimental arm was 193 v 182 days for the control arm (P = .75); 6-month and 1-year survival rates were 53% and 27% v 49% and 24% for the control arm, respectively; median progression-free survival was 112 v 109 days for the control arm. Ten drug-related deaths were reported for the experimental arm and seven for the control arm. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia grade ≥ 3 were observed in 40% and 15% in the experimental arm versus 30% and 12% in the control arm. Incidences of nonhematologic adverse events were similar in two groups. Conclusion The combination of gemcitabine and tipifarnib has an acceptable toxicity profile but does not prolong overall survival in advanced pancreatic cancer compared with single-agent gemcitabine.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document