Tubular Cell Senescence in the Donated Kidney Predicts Allograft Function, but Not Donor Remnant Kidney Function, in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation

2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadashi Sofue ◽  
Yoshio Kushida ◽  
Taro Ozaki ◽  
Masahiro Moritoki ◽  
Yoko Nishijima ◽  
...  

Background: It is uncertain whether kidneys from marginal donors are suitable for live kidney transplantation. In deceased donor kidneys, tubular cell senescence affects allograft function. However, the degree of cell senescence in a living donor kidney with marginal factors has not been reported. In this study, we assessed the association of tubular cell senescence with allograft and remnant kidney function by a prospective observational clinical study. Methods: Thirty-eight living donor kidney transplantations were analyzed prospectively. Tissue sections obtained from preimplantation kidney biopsies were immunostained for p16INK4a to indicate cell senescence. Various kidney biomarkers were analyzed in urine and blood samples. Results: Of the 38 donors, 21 had marginal factors. Severe tubular senescence was found in living donors with overlapping marginal criteria. Tubular senescence in living donor kidneys was significantly related to donor age and lower recipient kidney function at 1 year after transplantation independently of donor age (β = –0.281; p = 0.050) but did not affect remnant kidney function after donation. Pretransplantation donor pre-estimated glomerular filtration rate and hypertension did not show a significant area under the curve (AUC) for prediction of high tubular senescence. High plasma levels of soluble αKlotho were associated with a higher predictive value for low tubular cell senescence with an AUC of 0.78 (95% CI 0.62–0.93; p < 0.01). Conclusions: The nuclear p16-staining rate in donated kidney tubules is a predictor for allograft kidney function but not donor remnant kidney function. Detection of tubular cell senescence may facilitate selection of appropriate living donor candidates.

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenxian Qiu ◽  
Yan Jiang ◽  
Jianyong Wu ◽  
Hongfeng Huang ◽  
Wenqing Xie ◽  
...  

Background: Simple renal cysts may be an early marker of renal disease. We investigated whether simple cysts in donor kidney are associated with the decline of allograft function in living donor kidney transplantation. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed records of donors and recipients from 716 living donor kidney transplants performed between April 2007 and April 2015 in our hospital. Ninety-one donors with renal cysts and 64 recipients with cysts in donor kidney were noted. We compared these 64 cases to 128 no cyst-bearing controls matched for the donor gender, recipient gender, donor baseline serum creatinine (sCr), donor/recipient body surface area ratio, donor age, recipient age and the date of kidney transplantation in turn. Results: The presence of cysts was interrelated with age, gender and renal function independently in donors. Pathological findings of time-zero biopsy revealed that donor kidney harboring cysts existed more glomerular sclerosis compared with no cyst-bearing controls (p = 0.040). The estimating glomerular filtration rate levels of recipients were 80.82 ± 26.61 vs. 88.21 ± 23.12, 66.95 ± 17.42 vs. 72.15 ± 16.42 and 60.92 ± 22.17 vs. 68.72 ± 14.43 ml/min· 1.73 m2 in cyst-bearing and no cyst-bearing group on day 7, month 6 and year 5, respectively, after surgery (p < 0.05). The mean sCr were 112.14 ± 48.32 vs. 98.75 ± 29.71 and 126.28 ± 42.32 vs. 115.05 ± 26.35 μmol/l on the 7th day and a half year after transplant, respectively (p < 0.05). The 2 groups did not significantly differ in terms of the other characteristics. Conclusion: Simple cysts in donor kidney can influence the early and long-term allograft function. In living donor transplantation, kidney presenting cysts should be considered carefully at the time of donor selection.


1998 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 3118-3119 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Kanematsu ◽  
K Tanabe ◽  
N Ishikawa ◽  
T Tokumoto ◽  
S Huchinoue ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Chaudhry Adeel Ebad ◽  
David Brennan ◽  
Julio Chevarria ◽  
Mohammad Bin Hussein ◽  
Donal Sexton ◽  
...  

Background. The role of kidney volume measurement in predicting the donor and recipient kidney function is not clear. Methods. We measured kidney volume bilaterally in living kidney donors using CT angiography and assessed the association with the donor remaining kidney and recipient kidney (donated kidney) function at 1 year after kidney transplantation. Donor volume was categorized into tertiles based on lowest, middle, and highest volume. Results. There were 166 living donor and recipient pairs. The mean donor age was 44.8 years (SD ± 10.8), and donor mean BMI was 25.5 (SD ± 2.9). The recipients of living donor kidneys were 64% male and had a mean age of 43.5 years (SD ± 13.3). Six percent of patients experienced an episode of cellular rejection and were maintained on dialysis for a mean of 18 months (13–32) prior to transplant. Kidney volume was divided into tertiles based on lowest, middle, and highest volume. Kidney volume median (range) in tertiles 1, 2, and 3 was 124 (89–135 ml), 155 (136–164 ml), and 184 (165–240 ml) with donor eGFR ml/min (adjusted for body surface area expressed as ml/min/1.73 m2) at the time of donation in each tertile, 109 (93–129), 110 (92–132), and 101 ml/min (84–117). The median (IQR) eGFR in tertiles 1 to 3 in kidney recipients at 1 year after donation was 54 (44–67), 62 (50–75), and 63 ml/min (58–79), respectively. The median (IQR) eGFR in tertiles 1 to 3 in the remaining kidney of donors at 1 year after donation was 59 (53–66), 65 (57–72), and 65 ml/min (56–73), respectively. Conclusion. Bigger kidney volume was associated with better eGFR at 1 year after transplant in the recipient and marginally in the donor remaining kidney.


2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 1150-1157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirjam Laging ◽  
Judith A. Kal-van Gestel ◽  
Jacqueline van de Wetering ◽  
Jan N.M. IJzermans ◽  
Willem Weimar ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. S500
Author(s):  
Takayoshi Yokoyama ◽  
Yu Kihara ◽  
Osamu Konno ◽  
Yuki Nakamura ◽  
Hitoshi Iwamoto ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Takahisa Hiramitsu ◽  
Toshihide Tomosugi ◽  
Kenta Futamura ◽  
Manabu Okada ◽  
Yutaka Matsuoka ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document