Management of a Multicomorbid Patient with Heart Failure

Cardiology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl. 1) ◽  
pp. 21-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianluigi Magri ◽  
Crescenzio Bentivenga ◽  
Eugenio Roberto Cosentino ◽  
Daniela Degli Esposti ◽  
Claudio Borghi ◽  
...  

The optimal use of sacubitril/valsartan in clinical practice needs further investigation, in particular for patients with multiple comorbidities, as such patients are usually poorly represented in clinical trials. To this end, well-documented case reports may add further evidence to the bulk of “field practice” experience on sacubitril/valsartan. We report here the case of a patient with heart failure with reduced ejection refraction with multiple comorbidities treated with sacubitril/valsartan. Overall, sacubitril/valsartan led to a prompt (within a few months) improvement in LVEF (+15%, from 38 to 53%), without any noticeable adverse events. This therapy also allowed the patient to discontinue furosemide.

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 133 (12) ◽  
pp. 1298-1307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah M. Stephens ◽  
John C. Byrd

Abstract Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) therapy has changed dramatically with the introduction of several targeted therapeutics. Ibrutinib was the first approved for use in 2014 and now is used for initial and salvage therapy of CLL patients. With its widespread use in clinical practice, ibrutinib’s common and uncommon adverse events reported less frequently in earlier clinical trials have been experienced more frequently in real-world practice. In particular, atrial fibrillation, bleeding, infections, and arthralgias have been reported. The management of ibrutinib’s adverse events often cannot be generalized but must be individualized to the patient and their long-term risk of additional complications. When ibrutinib was initially developed, there were limited therapeutic alternatives for CLL, which often resulted in treating through the adverse events. At the present time, there are several effective alternative agents available, so transition to an alternative CLL directed therapy may be considered. Given the continued expansion of ibrutinib across many therapeutic areas, investigation of the pathogenesis of adverse events with this agent and also clinical trials examining therapeutic approaches for complications arising during therapy are needed. Herein, we provide strategies we use in real-world CLL clinical practice to address common adverse events associated with ibrutinib.


2020 ◽  
pp. medethics-2019-105903
Author(s):  
Jeremy Howick

Unlike its friendly cousin the placebo effect, the nocebo effect (the effect of expecting a negative outcome) has been almost ignored. Epistemic and ethical confusions related to its existence have gone all but unnoticed. Contrary to what is often asserted, adverse events following from taking placebo interventions are not necessarily nocebo effects; they could have arisen due to natural history. Meanwhile, ethical informed consent (in clinical trials and clinical practice) has centred almost exclusively on the need to inform patients about intervention risks with patients to preserve their autonomy. Researchers have failed to consider the harm caused by the way in which the information is conveyed. In this paper, I argue that the magnitude of nocebo effects must be measured using control groups consisting of untreated patients. And, because the nocebo effect can produce harm, the principle of non-maleficence must be taken into account alongside autonomy when obtaining (ethical) informed consent and communicating intervention risks with patients.


2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 333-333
Author(s):  
Antonino Di Franco ◽  
Filippo M. Sarullo ◽  
Ylenia Salerno ◽  
Stefano Figliozzi ◽  
Rossella Parrinello ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2146-2146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ehab Atallah ◽  
Jean-Bernard Durand ◽  
Hagop Kantarjian ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Susan O’Brien ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: A recent report suggested that imatinib is cardiotoxic and can lead to severe left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure. Study Aim: To evaluate the incidence of congestive heart failure (CHF) in pts receiving imatinib. Methods: We reviewed all Grade III and IV cardiac or what could be considered cardiac-related adverse events (eg, shortness of breath, dyspnea on exertion, edema, etc) occurring in pts on clinical trials at MDACC involving imatinib. Results: 1276 pts were enrolled on clinical trials with imatinib from 7/28/1998 to 7/27/2006. After reviewing all reported adverse events, particularly those that could be considered of at least possible cardiac origin, 22 pts (1.8%) were identified as having symptoms that could be attributed to CHF. The median age for these 22 pts was 70 yrs (range, 49 to 83 yrs); 12 were male. Their diagnosis at the time of imatinib was started was chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (11 of 561 pts, 1.96%), accelerated phase (4 of 384 pts, 1.04%), or blast phase (2 of 123 pt, 1.62%), myeloproliferative disorder (4 of 124 pts, 3.2%), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (1 of 74 pts, 1.35%) and none in 10 pts with c-kit positive AML. Twelve pts (55%) had received prior interferon therapy and 3 pts had received anthracyclins. The median time from start of imatinib therapy to a cardiac adverse event was 162 days (2–2045 days). Imatinib dose at the time of AE was 300mg/d in 1 pt, 400mg/d in 8 pts, 600mg/d in 9 pts, and 800mg/d in 5 pts. At the time these events were reported, 8 were considered possibly or probably related to imatinib. Eighteen pts had previous medical conditions predisposing to cardiac disease: CHF (6 pts, 27%), DM (6 pts, 27%), hypertension (10 pts, 45%), coronary artery disease (CAD) (8 pts, 36%), arrhythmia (3 pts, 14%) and cardiomyopathy (1 pt 5%). Fifteen pts had an echocardiogram or MUGA scan at the time of the event, and 9 of them had documented low ejection fractions (<50%); in only 2 of these 9 pts was there an echocardiogram prior to imatinib (LVEF >50% in both). Of the 9 pts with low ejection fractions at the time of the event , 6 had prior cardiac conditions (3 CAD, 2 CHF and 1 cardiomyopathy), one patient’s low EF etiology could not be determined as no further cardiac evaluation was performed because of progressive disease, and one pt was on anagrelide prior to the event. Eleven of the 22 pts continued imatinib therapy with dose adjustments and management for the CHF symptoms with no further complications. Conclusions: Imatinib therapy as a causal factor of CHF is uncommon and is mainly seen in elderly patients with pre-existing cardiac conditions. Patients with a previous cardiac history should be monitored closely and treated aggressively with diuretics if they develop fluid retention.


1993 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 1504-1509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael T. Grier ◽  
David G. Meyers

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of edetate sodium (ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid; EDTA) chelation therapy for atherosclerosis. METHODS: Literature search using MEDLINE, encompassing 1966 through May 1993. Further references were obtained from articles and books, and from citations obtained from the American Academy of Medical Preventics. RESULTS: 16 case reports or case series, 2 longitudinal studies, and 3 clinical trials were reviewed, along with testimonials cited in 19 books. CONCLUSIONS: Little valid scientific evidence is available. Although the postulated mechanisms of action for EDTA are biologically plausible and EDTA appears to be safe, it has not been proven effective. Indeed, the best evidence shows it to be ineffective. Therefore, EDTA chelation therapy should not be used in clinical practice to treat atherosclerosis.


Author(s):  
Pinky Kotecha ◽  
Alexander Light ◽  
Enrico Checcucci ◽  
Daniele Amparore ◽  
Cristian Fiori ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectiveThe aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the data currently available regarding the repurposing of different drugs for Covid-19 treatment. Participants with suspected or diagnosed Covid-19 will be included. The interventions being considered are drugs being repurposed, and comparators will include standard of care treatment or placebo.MethodsWe searched Ovid-MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, clinical trial registration site in the UK(NIHR), Europe (clinicaltrialsregister.eu), US (ClinicalTrials.gov) and internationally (isrctn.com), and reviewed the reference lists of articles for eligible articles published up to April 22, 2020. All studies in English that evaluated the efficacy of the listed drugs were included. Cochrane RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tool were used to assess study quality. This systematic review adheres to the PRISMA guidelines. The protocol is available at PROSPERO (CRD42020180915).ResultsFrom 708 identified studies or clinical trials, 16 studies and 16 case reports met our eligibility criteria. Of these, 6 were randomized controlled trials (763 patients), 7 cohort studies (321 patients) and 3 case series (191 patients). Chloroquine (CQ) had a 100% discharge rate compared to 50% with lopinavir-ritonavir at day 14, however a trial has recommended against a high dosage due to cardiotoxic events. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has shown no significant improvement in negative seroconversion rate which is also seen in our meta-analysis (p=0.68). Adverse events with HCQ have a significant difference compared to the control group (p=0.001). Lopinavir-ritonavir has shown no improvement in time to clinical improvement which is seen in our meta-analyses (p=0.1). Remdesivir has shown no significant improvement in time to clinical improvement but this trial had insufficient power.DiscussionDue to the paucity in evidence, it is difficult to establish the efficacy of these drugs in the treatment of Covid-19 as currently there is no significant clinical effectiveness of the repurposed drugs. Further large clinical trials are required to achieve more reliable findings. A risk-benefit analysis is required on an individual basis to weigh out the potential improvement in clinical outcome and viral load reduction compared to the risks of the adverse events. (1-16)


2009 ◽  
Vol 66 (9) ◽  
pp. 639-642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thenral Socrates ◽  
Alexandre Mebazaa

Dyspnea is the most common presenting symptom of patients with acute heart failure (AHF). Although dyspnea is an important target for treatment in clinical practice and clinical trials, there remains a lack of consensus on how to assess it. We describe and recommend to use absolute scales such the Likert 5-point or the Visual Analogue Scale rather than any comparator scale such as the Likert 7-point scale. We further recommend starting dyspnea measurements in sitting position and perform, if possible, similar measurements in lying position. The same set of measurements may be repeated as needed during the time course of disease and the treatment.


Cephalalgia ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 321-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
RB Lipton ◽  
ME Bigal ◽  
PJ Goadsby

Although the migraine clinical trials literature is enormous, we identified only nine published double-blind studies which compare an oral triptan with a non-triptan acute treatment. Of the nine comparative trials that met inclusion criteria for this review, six compared sumatriptan with other drugs, zolmitriptan was studied in two trials and eletriptan in one trial. In seven of the nine studies reviewed herein, differences between active treatments on the primary endpoints were not dramatic. Experience in clinical practice suggests that, for many patients, oral triptans are superior to non-specific acute treatments, creating a discrepancy between clinical trials results and clinical practice experience. Four possible explanations for the disparities between clinical trials and clinical practice are likely: (i) statistically significant differences may not have emerged because the studies lack adequate statistical power; (ii) patients treated with triptans in clinical practice may be relatively more responsive to triptans and relatively less responsive to other agents than those who participate in clinical trials (patient selection); (iii) headache response at 2 h, as measured in clinical trials, may not fully capture the benefits of triptans relative to other therapies, as assessed in clinical practice; (iv) waiting until pain is moderate or severe, as required in clinical trials, may disadvantage triptans relative to comparators.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document