Meiotic Recombination in the Giraffe (G. reticulata)

2017 ◽  
Vol 152 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miluse Vozdova ◽  
Jan Fröhlich ◽  
Svatava Kubickova ◽  
Hana Sebestova ◽  
Jiri Rubes
Keyword(s):  
Meiotic Recombination ◽  
Mammalian Species ◽  
Distinct Species ◽  
Pseudoautosomal Region ◽  
Mlh1 Focus ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Complex Protein ◽  
Nucleolus Organiser ◽  
Mlh1 Foci ◽  
Pachytene Spermatocytes

Recently, the reticulated giraffe (G. reticulata) was identified as a distinct species, which emphasized the need for intensive research in this interesting animal. To shed light on the meiotic process as a source of biodiversity, we analysed the frequency and distribution of meiotic recombination in 2 reticulated giraffe males. We used immunofluorescence detection of synaptonemal complex protein (SYCP3), meiotic double strand breaks (DSB, marked as RAD51 foci) in leptonema, and crossovers (COs, as MLH1 foci) in pachynema. The mean number of autosomal MLH1 foci per cell (27), which resulted from a single, distally located MLH1 focus observed on most chromosome arms, is one of the lowest among mammalian species analysed so far. The CO/DSB conversion ratio was 0.32. The pseudoautosomal region was localised in the Xq and Yp termini by FISH and showed an MLH1 focus in 83% of the pachytene cells. Chromatin structures corresponding to the nucleolus organiser regions were observed in the pachytene spermatocytes. The results are discussed in the context of known data on meiosis in Cetartiodactyla, depicting that the variation in CO frequency among species of this taxonomic group is mostly associated with their diploid chromosome number.

Male Meiotic Recombination in the Steppe Agama, Trapelus sanguinolentus (Agamidae, Iguania, Reptilia)

2019 ◽  
Vol 157 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 107-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Artem P. Lisachov ◽  
Katerina V. Tishakova ◽  
Yakov A. Tsepilov ◽  
Pavel M. Borodin
Keyword(s):  
Meiotic Recombination ◽  
Mammalian Species ◽  
Recombination Rates ◽  
Mlh1 Focus ◽  
Closely Related Species ◽  
Lateral Element ◽  
Recombination Nodules ◽  
Repair Protein ◽  
Mlh1 Foci ◽  
Mismatch Repair Protein

Meiotic recombination rates and patterns of crossover distributions along the chromosomes vary considerably even between closely related species. The adaptive significance of these differences is still unclear due to the paucity of empirical data. Most data on recombination come from mammalian species, while other vertebrate clades are poorly explored. Using immunolocalization of the protein of the lateral element of the synaptonemal complex (SYCP3) and the mismatch-repair protein MLH1, which marks mature recombination nodules, we analyzed recombination rates and crossover distribution in meiotic prophase chromosomes of the steppe agama (Trapelus sanguinolentus, Agamidae, Acrodonta, Iguania) and compared them with data obtained for the genus Anolis (Dactyloidae, Pleurodonta, Iguania). We found that, despite a smaller genome size, the total SC length and the MLH1 focus number per cell are much higher in the agama than in the anoles. The distributions of the MLH1 foci in the agama are multimodal in larger chromosomes and bimodal in smaller chromosomes without a significant centromere effect, resembling the patterns known for birds. A possible relationship between karyotype remodeling and the evolution of recombination in Iguania is discussed.

scholarly journals Factors influencing meiotic recombination revealed by whole-genome sequencing of single sperm

Science ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 363 (6433) ◽  
pp. eaau8861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anjali Gupta Hinch ◽  
Gang Zhang ◽  
Philipp W. Becker ◽  
Daniela Moralli ◽  
Robert Hinch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Meiotic Recombination ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Pseudoautosomal Region ◽  
Whole Genome ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Molecular Assays ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Crossover Probability

Recombination is critical to meiosis and evolution, yet many aspects of the physical exchange of DNA via crossovers remain poorly understood. We report an approach for single-cell whole-genome DNA sequencing by which we sequenced 217 individual hybrid mouse sperm, providing a kilobase-resolution genome-wide map of crossovers. Combining this map with molecular assays measuring stages of recombination, we identified factors that affect crossover probability, including PRDM9 binding on the non-initiating template homolog and telomere proximity. These factors also influence the time for sites of recombination-initiating DNA double-strand breaks to find and engage their homologs, with rapidly engaging sites more likely to form crossovers. We show that chromatin environment on the template homolog affects positioning of crossover breakpoints. Our results also offer insights into recombination in the pseudoautosomal region.

scholarly journals Epigenetic activation of meiotic recombination in Arabidopsis centromeres via loss of H3K9me2 and non-CG DNA methylation

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles J. Underwood ◽  
Kyuha Choi ◽  
Christophe Lambing ◽  
Xiaohui Zhao ◽  
Heïdi Serra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Meiotic Recombination ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Pericentromeric Heterochromatin ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Histone 3 ◽  
Differential Control

AbstractEukaryotic centromeres contain the kinetochore, which connects chromosomes to the spindle allowing segregation. During meiosis centromeres are suppressed for crossovers, as recombination in these regions can cause chromosome mis-segregation. Plant centromeres are surrounded by repetitive, transposon-dense heterochromatin that is epigenetically silenced by histone 3 lysine 9 dimethylation (H3K9me2), and DNA methylation in CG and non-CG sequence contexts. Here we show that disruption of Arabidopsis H3K9me2 and non-CG DNA methylation pathways increases meiotic DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) within centromeres, whereas crossovers increase within pericentromeric heterochromatin. Increased pericentromeric crossovers in H3K9me2/non-CG mutants occurs in both inbred and hybrid backgrounds, and involves the interfering crossover repair pathway. Epigenetic activation of recombination may also account for the curious tendency of maize transposon Ds to disrupt CHROMOMETHYLASE3 when launched from proximal loci. Thus H3K9me2 and non-CG DNA methylation exert differential control of meiotic DSB and crossover formation in centromeric and pericentromeric heterochromatin.

scholarly journals Numerical and Spatial Patterning of Yeast Meiotic DNA Breaks by Tel1

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neeman Mohibullah ◽  
Scott Keeney
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Deep Sequencing ◽  
Meiotic Recombination ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Spatial Patterning ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Context Dependent

AbstractThe Spo11-generated double-strand breaks (DSBs) that initiate meiotic recombination are dangerous lesions that can disrupt genome integrity, so meiotic cells regulate their number, timing, and distribution. Here, we use Spo11-oligonucleotide complexes, a byproduct of DSB formation, to examine the contribution of the DNA damage-responsive kinase Tel1 (ortholog of mammalian ATM) to this regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. A tel1Δ mutant had globally increased amounts of Spo11-oligonucleotide complexes and altered Spo11-oligonucleotide lengths, consistent with conserved roles for Tel1 in control of DSB number and processing. A kinase-dead tell mutation also increased Spo11-oligonucleotide levels, but mutating known Tel1 phosphotargets on Hop1 and Rec114 did not. Deep sequencing of Spo11 oligonucleotides from tel1Δ mutants demonstrated that Tel1 shapes the nonrandom DSB distribution in ways that are distinct but partially overlapping with previously described contributions of the recombination regulator Zip3. Finally, we uncover a context-dependent role for Tel1 in hotspot competition, in which an artificial DSB hotspot inhibits nearby hotspots. Evidence for Tel1-dependent competition involving strong natural hotspots is also provided.

scholarly journals Meiotic Behavior of Achiasmate Sex Chromosomes in the African Pygmy Mouse Mus mattheyi Offers New Insights into the Evolution of Sex Chromosome Pairing and Segregation in Mammals

Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 1434
Author(s):  
Ana Gil-Fernández ◽  
Marta Ribagorda ◽  
Marta Martín-Ruiz ◽  
Pablo López-Jiménez ◽  
Tamara Laguna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Y Chromosome ◽  
Sex Chromosomes ◽  
Sex Chromosome ◽  
Mammalian Species ◽  
Evolutionary Process ◽  
Small Region ◽  
Pseudoautosomal Region ◽  
Evolution Of Sex ◽  
African Pygmy Mouse

X and Y chromosomes in mammals are different in size and gene content due to an evolutionary process of differentiation and degeneration of the Y chromosome. Nevertheless, these chromosomes usually share a small region of homology, the pseudoautosomal region (PAR), which allows them to perform a partial synapsis and undergo reciprocal recombination during meiosis, which ensures their segregation. However, in some mammalian species the PAR has been lost, which challenges the pairing and segregation of sex chromosomes in meiosis. The African pygmy mouse Mus mattheyi shows completely differentiated sex chromosomes, representing an uncommon evolutionary situation among mouse species. We have performed a detailed analysis of the location of proteins involved in synaptonemal complex assembly (SYCP3), recombination (RPA, RAD51 and MLH1) and sex chromosome inactivation (γH2AX) in this species. We found that neither synapsis nor chiasmata are found between sex chromosomes and their pairing is notably delayed compared to autosomes. Interestingly, the Y chromosome only incorporates RPA and RAD51 in a reduced fraction of spermatocytes, indicating a particular DNA repair dynamic on this chromosome. The analysis of segregation revealed that sex chromosomes are associated until metaphase-I just by a chromatin contact. Unexpectedly, both sex chromosomes remain labelled with γH2AX during first meiotic division. This chromatin contact is probably enough to maintain sex chromosome association up to anaphase-I and, therefore, could be relevant to ensure their reductional segregation. The results presented suggest that the regulation of both DNA repair and epigenetic modifications in the sex chromosomes can have a great impact on the divergence of sex chromosomes and their proper transmission, widening our understanding on the relationship between meiosis and the evolution of sex chromosomes in mammals.

scholarly journals Conserved HORMA domain-containing protein Hop1 stabilizes interaction between proteins of meiotic DNA break hotspots and chromosome axis

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (19) ◽  
pp. 10166-10180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryo Kariyazono ◽  
Arisa Oda ◽  
Takatomi Yamada ◽  
Kunihiro Ohta
Keyword(s):  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Meiotic Recombination ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Multiple Protein ◽  
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing ◽  
The One ◽  
Chromosome Axis

Abstract HORMA domain-containing proteins such as Hop1 play crucial regulatory roles in various chromosomal functions. Here, we investigated roles of the fission yeast Hop1 in the formation of recombination-initiating meiotic DNA double strand breaks (DSBs). Meiotic DSB formation in fission yeast relies on multiple protein-protein interactions such as the one between the chromosome axial protein Rec10 and the DSB-forming complex subunit Rec15. Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing demonstrated that Hop1 is colocalized with both Rec10 and Rec15, and we observed physical interactions of Hop1 to Rec15 and Rec10. These results suggest that Hop1 promotes DSB formation by interacting with both axis components and the DSB-forming complex. We also show that Hop1 binding to DSB hotspots requires Rec15 and Rec10, while Hop1 axis binding requires Rec10 only, suggesting that Hop1 is recruited to the axis via Rec10, and to hotspots by hotspot-bound Rec15. Furthermore, we introduced separation-of-function Rec10 mutations, deficient for interaction with either Rec15 or Hop1. These single mutations and hop1Δ conferred only partial defects in meiotic recombination, while the combining the Rec15-binding-deficient rec10 mutation with hop1Δ synergistically reduced meiotic recombination, at least at a model hotspot. Taken together, Hop1 likely functions as a stabilizer for Rec15–Rec10 interaction to promote DSB formation.

Double–strand breaks on YACs during yeast meiosis may reflect meiotic recombination in the human genome

1996 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 481-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shoshana Klein ◽  
Drora Zenvirth ◽  
Amir Sherman ◽  
Karin Ried ◽  
Gudrun Rappold ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Genome ◽  
Meiotic Recombination ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Yeast Meiosis

scholarly journals Targeted induction of meiotic double-strand breaks reveals chromosomal domain-dependent regulation of Spo11 and interactions among potential sites of meiotic recombination

2007 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 984-997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoyuki Fukuda ◽  
Kazuto Kugou ◽  
Hiroyuki Sasanuma ◽  
Takehiko Shibata ◽  
Kunihiro Ohta
Keyword(s):  
Meiotic Recombination ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks

scholarly journals A global view of meiotic double-strand break end resection

Science ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 355 (6320) ◽  
pp. 40-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleni P. Mimitou ◽  
Shintaro Yamada ◽  
Scott Keeney
Keyword(s):  
Meiotic Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Naked Dna ◽  
Global View ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
End Resection

DNA double-strand breaks that initiate meiotic recombination are exonucleolytically processed. This 5′→3′ resection is a central, conserved feature of recombination but remains poorly understood. To address this lack, we mapped resection endpoints genome-wide at high resolution inSaccharomyces cerevisiae. Full-length resection requires Exo1 exonuclease and the DSB-responsive kinase Tel1, but not Sgs1 helicase. Tel1 also promotes efficient and timely resection initiation. Resection endpoints display pronounced heterogeneity between genomic loci that reflects a tendency for nucleosomes to block Exo1, yet Exo1 also appears to digest chromatin with high processivity and at rates similar to naked DNA in vitro. This paradox points to nucleosome destabilization or eviction as a defining feature of the meiotic resection landscape.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document