Assessment of 100% Rapid Review as an Effective Tool for Internal Quality Control in Cytopathological Services

2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Queiroz Filho ◽  
Janaina Cristiana de Oliveira Crispim Freitas ◽  
Daliana Caldas Pessoa ◽  
José Eleutério Júnior ◽  
Paulo César Giraldo ◽  
...  

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 100% rapid review (100%-RR) as an effective tool for internal quality control (IQC) in gynecological cytopathology services. Study Design: A total of 8,677 swabs were analyzed; the negative results were submitted to 100%-RR. Divergent cases were discussed in a consensus meeting to reach a conclusion on the final diagnosis. The data were entered into SAS statistical software, and the agreement of the 100%-RR results with the final diagnosis was tested with the weighted kappa statistic. Results: Of the 8,155 smears characterized as negative, 255 (3.13%) were abnormal smears, and 552 (6.77%) unsatisfactory smears were deemed negative. Regarding the results on the 8,155 smears subjected to 100%-RR when compared with the final diagnosis, there was agreement in 7,063 (86.60%) of them, and there were 1,092 (13.40%) discordant results (65.6%, unsatisfactory; 5.47%, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASC-US]). The κ index had an agreement of 0.867, with κ = 0.734 (p < 0.0001). Compared with the final diagnosis, the sensitivity of 100%-RR was 99.91% and its specificity was 99.4% for severe abnormalities. The sensitivity for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions was 88.2%, with a specificity of 100.00%. For abnormalities considered borderline, such as ASC-US, the sensitivity was 94.50% and the specificity was 99.5%. Conclusion: The 100%-RR was considered efficient when used as an IQC method.

2014 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 439-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suelene Brito do Nascimento Tavares ◽  
Nádja L. Alves de Souza ◽  
Edna J.C. Manrique ◽  
Cinara Zago Silveira Ázara ◽  
Erika Aparecida da Silveira ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-214
Author(s):  
José Queiroz Filho ◽  
José Eleutério, Jr. ◽  
Ricardo Ney Cobucci ◽  
Janaina Cristiana de Oliveira Crispim ◽  
Paulo César Giraldo ◽  
...  

Objective: The aim of this work was to evaluate 100% rapid review (100% RR) as a useful tool to detect false negative (FN) results. Study Design: A sample of 8,677 swabs was investigated; the unsatisfactory and negative results were referred to 100% RR, concordant results were taken as the final diagnosis, while the discordant results were debated in a consensus meeting to reach a conclusion. The positive results were examined by 2 cytologists. The data were entered into SAS statistical software, and the agreement of the 100% RR results with the final diagnosis was tested with the weighted kappa statistic. Results: There was a significant increase in unsatisfactory results from 348 to 1,927, and of positive results from 174 to 349. On the other hand, there was a substantial decrease in negative results from 8,155 to 6,401. Assessing the relative risk of FN results in smears that were not referred to quality control (100% RR) revealed the following results: atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US), 2.93; low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), 2.72; high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion/atypical squamous cells – cannot exclude HSIL (HSIL/ASC-H), 2.25. Evaluating by age group, a higher risk for LSIL (4.90) and ASC-US (3.85) was observed in patients aged under 25 years, whereas patients between 25 and 64 years and those over 64 years presented a higher risk for HSIL and ASC-H: 2.46 and 2.75, respectively. Conclusion: 100% RR is an effective screening tool for FN results in countries where molecular tests for DNA-HPV and prophylactic vaccines are not available in cervical cancer screening programs.


Cytopathology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 428-435
Author(s):  
A. H. G. Tobias ◽  
A. C. Vitalino ◽  
M. T. Rezende ◽  
R. R. R. Oliveira ◽  
W. Coura-Vital ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. e22643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huizhen Sun ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Haijian Zhao ◽  
Chuanbao Zhang ◽  
Falin He ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document