Estimation of the Aortic Orifice Area: Comparison of the Classical and Modified Forms of the Continuity Equation

1993 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 259-262
Author(s):  
J. Chambers ◽  
G. Spiropoulos
Circulation ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 97 (16) ◽  
pp. 1597-1605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Curt G. DeGroff ◽  
Robin Shandas ◽  
Lilliam Valdes-Cruz

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesare Mantini ◽  
Mohammed Y. Khanji ◽  
Emilia D'Ugo ◽  
Marzia Olivieri ◽  
Cristiano Giovanni Caputi ◽  
...  

Objectives: Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the standard technique for assessing aortic stenosis (AS), with effective orifice area (EOA) recommended for grading severity. EOA is operator-dependent, influenced by a number of pitfalls and requires multiple measurements introducing independent and random sources of error. We tested the diagnostic accuracy and precision of aliased orifice area planimetry (AOAcmr), a new, simple, non-invasive technique for grading of AS severity by low-VENC phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging.Methods: Twenty-two consecutive patients with mild, moderate, or severe AS and six age- and sex-matched healthy controls had TTE and CMR examinations on the same day. We performed analysis of agreement and correlation among (i) AOAcmr; (ii) geometric orifice area (GOAcmr) by direct CMR planimetry; (iii) EOAecho by TTE-continuity equation; and (iv) the “gold standard” multimodality EOA (EOAhybrid) obtained by substituting CMR LVOT area into Doppler continuity equation.Results: There was excellent pairwise positive linear correlation among AOAcmr, EOAhybrid, GOAcmr, and EOAecho (p < 0.001); AOAcmr had the highest correlation with EOAhybrid (R2 = 0.985, p < 0.001). There was good agreement between methods, with the lowest bias (0.019) for the comparison between AOAcmr and EOAhybrid. AOAcmr yielded excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.997 and 0.998, respectively).Conclusions: Aliased orifice area planimetry by 2D phase contrast imaging is a simple, reproducible, accurate “one-stop shop” CMR method for grading AS, potentially useful when echocardiographic severity assessment is inconclusive or discordant. Larger studies are warranted to confirm and validate these promising preliminary results.


2002 ◽  
Vol 19 (Supplement 27) ◽  
pp. 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Rudolph ◽  
M. Hartrumpf ◽  
C. Schelenz ◽  
E. Hüttemann ◽  
J. M. Albes ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelson P. Trujillo ◽  
Jeffrey Kwon ◽  
Mark Kringlen ◽  
Edward Gill ◽  
Robin Shandas ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document