scholarly journals Adenoma Detection Rate: Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 53-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Pinto-Pais
Keyword(s):  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Adenoma Detection Rate ◽  
Adenoma Detection

ADENOMA DETECTION RATE CORRELATIONS WITH SECONDARY COLONOSCOPY QUALITY INDICATORS

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Triantafyllou ◽  
S Karamaroudis ◽  
A Stamou ◽  
V Papadopoulos ◽  
S Hariklia Vorri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Adenoma Detection Rate ◽  
Adenoma Detection ◽  
Colonoscopy Quality

Adenoma detection rate and cecal intubation rate: Quality indicators for colonoscopy

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 253-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Lourdes Ruiz-Rebollo ◽  
Noelia Alcaide-Suárez ◽  
Beatriz Burgueño-Gómez ◽  
Beatriz Antolin-Melero ◽  
M.ª Fe Muñoz-Moreno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Adenoma Detection Rate ◽  
Intubation Rate ◽  
Cecal Intubation ◽  
Adenoma Detection ◽  
Cecal Intubation Rate

Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy: Polypectomy Rate May Be a Reliable Surrogate of Adenoma Detection Rate

2016 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. S111-S112
Author(s):  
Vaibhav Wadhwa ◽  
Yash Jobanputra ◽  
Haider Al Taii ◽  
Malav Parikh ◽  
Prashanthi Thota ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Adenoma Detection Rate ◽  
Adenoma Detection

What is the valid proxy for adenoma detection rate among various colonoscopic quality indicators?

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. e76-e77
Author(s):  
W.S. Jeong ◽  
D.I. Park ◽  
Y.H. Kim ◽  
C.K. Lee ◽  
S.H. Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Adenoma Detection Rate ◽  
Adenoma Detection

scholarly journals Physician Perceptions on Colonoscopy Quality: Results of a National Survey of Gastroenterologists

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziad F. Gellad ◽  
Corrine I. Voils ◽  
Li Lin ◽  
Dawn Provenzale
Keyword(s):  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Quality Measurement ◽  
Adenoma Detection Rate ◽  
Withdrawal Time ◽  
Physician Perceptions ◽  
Continuous Quality ◽  
Adenoma Detection ◽  
Time Standards ◽  
Colonoscopy Quality

Background. Quality indicators for colonoscopy have been developed, but the uptake of these metrics into practice is uncertain. Our aims were to assess physician perceptions regarding colonoscopy quality measurement and to quantify the perceived impact of quality measurement on clinical practice.Methods. We conducted in-person interviews with 15 gastroenterologists about their perceptions regarding colonoscopy quality. Results from these interviews informed the development of a 34-question web-based survey that was emailed to 1,500 randomlyselected members of the American College of Gastroenterology.Results. 160 invitations were undeliverable, and 167 out of 1340 invited physicians (12.5%) participated in the survey. Respondents and nonrespondents did not differ in age, sex, practice setting, or years since training. 38.8% of respondents receive feedback on their colonoscopy quality. The majority of respondents agreed with the use of completion rate (90%) and adenoma detection rate (83%) as quality indicators but there was less enthusiasm for withdrawal time (61%). 24% of respondents reported usually or always removing diminutive polyps solely to increase their adenoma detection rate, and 20% reported prolonging their procedure time to meet withdrawal time standards.Conclusions. A minority of respondents receives feedback on the quality of their colonoscopy. Interventions to increase continuous quality improvement in colonoscopy screening are needed.

603 Quality Indicators to Enhance Adenoma Detection Rate: Should There Be Reconsideration of the Current Standard?

2011 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. AB138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madhusudhan R. Sanaka ◽  
Tushar Gohel ◽  
Amareshwar Podugu ◽  
Pokala R. Kiran ◽  
Prashanthi N. Thota ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Adenoma Detection Rate ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Adenoma Detection
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document