scholarly journals Is Intra-Arterial Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke Less Effective in Women than in Men

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 174-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inger R. de Ridder ◽  
Puck S.S. Fransen ◽  
Debbie Beumer ◽  
Olvert A. Berkhemer ◽  
Lucie A. van den Berg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Treatment Effect ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Neuro Imaging ◽  
Mr Clean

Introduction: Stroke etiology and outcome after ischemic stroke differ between men and women. We examined if sex modifies the effect of intra-arterial treatment (IAT) in a randomized clinical trial of IAT for acute ischemic stroke in the Netherlands (MR CLEAN). Patients and Methods: The primary outcome was the score on the modified Rankin scale at 90 days. We tested for interaction between sex and treatment and estimated the treatment effect by sex with multiple ordinal logistic regression with adjustment for prognostic factors. Results: All 500 patients were included in the analysis; 292 (58.4%) were men. The treatment effect (adjusted common odds ratio) was 2.39 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.55-3.68] in men and 0.99 (95% CI 0.60-1.66) in women (pinteraction = 0.016). In women, mortality was higher in the intervention group than in the control group (24 vs. 15%, p = 0.07). Serious adverse events occurred more often in women than in men undergoing intervention. There were no differences in neuro-imaging outcomes. Discussion and Conclusion: Contrary to other studies, we found a significant interaction between sex and treatment effect in the MR CLEAN trial. Pooled analyses of all published thrombectomy trials did not confirm this finding. In MR CLEAN, women seem to have a slightly more unfavorable profile, causing higher mortality and more serious adverse events, but insufficient to explain the absence of an overall effect. This suggests a play of chance and makes it clear that IAT should not be withheld in women.

scholarly journals Effect of Huoxiang Zhengqi Pill on Early Neurological Deterioration in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Undergoing Recanalization Therapy and Predictive Effect of Essen Score

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Zhi-Xin Huang ◽  
Jianguo Lin ◽  
Cheng Zhang ◽  
Ying-Yi Dai ◽  
Songbin Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Clinical Event ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Early Neurological Deterioration ◽  
Treatment Measures ◽  
Risk Patients

Early neurologic deterioration (END) in the acute phase of ischemic stroke is a serious clinical event, which is closely related to poor prognosis. Therefore, it is important to identify presentation features that predict END and take relevant treatment measures, as they could help to prevent the deterioration of high-risk patients. The prospective intervention study was carried out from January 2018 to December 2019. We included consecutive patients hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) within 6 hours of onset. Patients were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to recanalization therapy plus Huoxiang Zhengqi Pill (HXZQ) (intervention group) or standard recanalization therapy alone (control group). The primary outcome was the development of END according to predefined criteria within the first 1 week of stroke onset. Poisson regression was used to identify predictors for END. Of the 155 patients enrolled in the study (age, 63 ± 11 years; 28.4% female), 20 (12.9%) developed END. Univariate analysis showed that the use of HXZQ and Essen stroke risk score (ESRS) (low risk group) were protective factors for END, while advanced age was a risk factor for END. However, in multivariate analysis, only ESRS (OR, 0.232; 95%CI, 0.058–0.928; P=0.039) and the use of HXZQ (OR, 0.297; 95%CI, 0.096–0.917; P=0.035) were statistically significant. ESRS can be used as the prediction factor of END. HXZQ has small side effects and wide indication. It could be used in the treatment of AIS.

Abstract TP29: Endovascular Thrombectomy and Medical Therapy Versus Medical Therapy Alone in Acute Stroke (EASI): a Randomized Care Trial

Stroke ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Naim N Khoury ◽  
Tim E Darsaut ◽  
Jimmy Ghostine ◽  
Yan Deschaintre ◽  
Nicole Daneault ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Medical Therapy ◽  
Standard Care ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Stroke Treatment

Background: Until recently, clinical benefits of endovascular stroke treatment remained unproven. Care trials can be used to simultaneously offer yet-to-be validated interventions and verify treatment outcomes. Our aim was to implement care trial methodology for patients with severe acute ischemic stroke. Methods: The study was offered to all patients considered for endovascular management of acute ischemic stroke in one Canadian hospital. Inclusion criteria were broad: onset of symptoms ≤ 5h or at any time in the presence of clinical-imaging mismatch; suspected anterior or posterior circulation large vessel occlusion; patients eligible or ineligible for intravenous thrombolysis. Exclusion criteria were few: established infarction or hemorrhagic transformation of the target symptomatic territory; poor 3-month prognosis from comorbidities. The primary outcome was mRS ≤ 2 at three months. Patients were randomly allocated to standard care (control) or standard care plus endovascular treatment (intervention group). Analyses were by intention-to-treat. (Identifier NCT02157532) Findings: Seventy-seven patients were recruited in 19 months (March 2013 - October 2014) at a single center. Randomized allocation was interrupted when other trials showed the benefits of endovascular therapy. At three months, 20 of 40 patients (50·0 %; 95% C.I.: 35%-65%) in the intervention group had reached the primary outcome, compared to 14 of 37 patients (37·8%; 95% C.I.: 24%-54%) in the control group arm (P=0·36). Eleven patients in the intervention arm died within 3 months compared to 9 patients in the standard care arm. Interpretation: EASI met all the characteristics of a care trial: inclusion of all eligible patients, no extra risk, no extra test, no extra cost, simple case report forms filled by care personnel, normal follow-up, involvement of all regular practitioners, and flexible care. The trial was prematurely interrupted, but this approach offers a promising means to manage clinical dilemmas and guide uncertain practices in the care of patients. Funding: There was no funding source for this study.

Abstract 35: MR CLEAN Registry: A Post-trial Multicenter Registry of Intra-arterial Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivo Jansen ◽  
Maxim Mulder ◽  
Robert-Jan Goldhoorn ◽  
Aad van der Lugt ◽  
Henk Marquering ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Infarct Volume ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Post Trial ◽  
Mr Clean

Background & Purpose: Intra-arterial therapy (IAT) is being implemented worldwide as the main treatment option for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We wondered whether effectiveness and safety results that have been reported in randomized clinical trials can be reproduced in everyday clinical practice. We will report results of the Dutch National post MR CLEAN IAT registry including work flow parameters, primary and secondary outcomes, as well as serious adverse events. Methods: The MR CLEAN Registry is a prospective registry of all patients undergoing IAT for AIS in the Netherlands, started after completion of the MR CLEAN trial in March 2014. Registration was required for reimbursement. A core set was defined, with inclusion criteria similar to those of the MR CLEAN trial, including a proven anterior circulation occlusion and treatment possible withing 6 hours from onset. The primary study outcome is the score on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. The secondary clinical outcome is NIHSS after 24 to 48 hours. Secondary radiological outcomes include the mTICI score on DSA and final infarct volume and major bleeding on follow up NCCT. We used a propensity weighted and an unadjusted ordinal logistic regression model to compare outcomes in the MR CLEAN Registry core and total dataset with the treatment arm of MR CLEAN. Results: Between March 2014 and August 2016 the inclusion rate of the MR CLEAN Registry has been increasing steadily to an average of 79 (SD 22) per month for a cumulative inclusion of 1548 patients in July 2016 (Figure 1). Conclusions: The MR CLEAN registry data is now being analyzed. Results will be reported at the conference.

Abstract 104: Disability After Minor Stroke and TIA in the POINT Trial

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett L Cucchiara ◽  
Jordan Elm ◽  
J Donald Easton ◽  
Shelagh Coutts ◽  
Joshua Willey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Recurrent Stroke ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Minor Stroke ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Index Event

Background and Purpose: To assess the effect of combination antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel versus aspirin alone on disability following TIA or minor stroke and to identify factors associated with disability. Methods: The POINT trial randomized patients with TIA or minor stroke (NIHSS≤3) within 12 hours of onset to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin plus clopidogrel versus aspirin alone. The primary outcome measure was a composite of stroke, MI, or vascular death. We performed a post-hoc exploratory analysis to examine the effect of treatment on overall disability (defined as mRS>1) at 90 days as well as disability ascribed by the local investigator to index or recurrent stroke. We also evaluated predictors of disability. Results: At 90 days, 188/1964 (9.6%) of patients enrolled with TIA and 471/2586 (18.2%) of those enrolled with stroke were disabled. Overall disability was similar between patients assigned DAPT versus aspirin alone (14.7% vs. 14.3%, OR 0.97, 95%CI 0.82-1.14, p=0.69). However, there were numerically fewer patients with disability in conjunction with a primary outcome event in the DAPT arm (3.0% vs. 4.0%, OR 0.73, 95%CI 0.53-1.01, p=0.06), and significantly fewer patients in the DAPT arm with disability attributed by the investigators to either the index event or recurrent stroke (5.9% vs. 7.4%, OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.99, p=0.04). Notably, disability attributed to the index event accounted for the majority of this difference (4.5% vs. 6.0%, OR 0.74 95% CI 0.57-0.96, p=0.02). In multivariate analysis of patients enrolled with TIA, disability was significantly associated with age, subsequent ischemic stroke, serious adverse events, and major bleeding. In patients enrolled with stroke, disability was associated with female sex, hypertension, diabetes, NIHSS score, recurrent ischemic stroke, subsequent myocardial infarction, and serious adverse events. Conclusions: In addition to reducing recurrent stroke in patients with acute minor stroke and TIA, dual antiplatelet therapy might reduce stroke-related disability.

scholarly journals Combination therapy with beraprost sodium and aspirin for acute ischemic stroke: a single-center retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (7) ◽  
pp. 3014-3024 ◽  
Author(s):  
De Cai ◽  
Xiao-Pu Chen ◽  
Dun-Can Wei ◽  
Qian Zhang ◽  
Si-Qia Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Blood Coagulation ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Beraprost Sodium ◽  
Significant Difference

Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the combination of beraprost sodium (BPS) and aspirin in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Methods There were 384 patients with AIS enrolled in this single-center, retrospective study. The BPS group comprised patients who received combination therapy with BPS and aspirin, and the control group comprised those who received only aspirin. Primary measurements were glomerular filtration rate (GFR), cystatin-c (Cys-C), National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, modified activities of daily living index (MBI), modified Rankin scale (mRS), and blood coagulation indexes. Recurrence and adverse events were recorded. Results There were no significant differences in patient characteristics at baseline between the two groups. GFR and Cys-C levels increased in the BPS group compared with the control group. After treatment, the NIHSS and mRS score were significantly lower in the BPS group compared with the control group, whereas the MBI scores were significantly higher in the BPS group compared with the control group. There was no significant difference in blood coagulation between the two groups. There were no serious adverse events in either group. Conclusions Combination therapy with BPS and aspirin may be a safe and effective treatment for AIS.

scholarly journals Early Mobilization in Ischemic Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Trial of Safety and Feasibility in a Public Hospital in Brazil

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Rosa Poletto ◽  
Letícia Costa Rebello ◽  
Maria Júlia Monteiro Valença ◽  
Daniele Rossato ◽  
Andrea Garcia Almeida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Public Hospital ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Pilot Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Total Duration ◽  
Early Mobilization ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Control Group

Background: The effect of early mobilization after acute stroke is still unclear, although some studies have suggested improvement in outcomes. We conducted a randomized, single-blind, controlled trial seeking to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and benefit of early mobilization for patients with acute ischemic stroke treated in a public teaching hospital in Southern Brazil. This report presents the feasibility and safety findings for the pilot phase of this trial. Methods: The primary outcomes were time to first mobilization, total duration of mobilization, complications during early mobilization, falls within 3 months, mortality within 3 months, and medical complications of immobility. We included adult patients with CT- or MRI-confirmed ischemic stroke within 48 h of symptom onset who were admitted from March to November 2012 to the acute vascular unit or general emergency unit of a large urban emergency department (ED) at the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. The severity of the neurological deficit on admission was assessed by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). The NIHSS and modified Rankin Scale (mRS, functional outcome) scores were assessed on day 14 or at discharge as well as at 3 months. Activities of daily living (ADL) were measured with the modified Barthel Index (mBI) at 3 months. Results: Thirty-seven patients (mean age 65 years, mean NIHSS score 11) were randomly allocated to an intervention group (IG) or a control group (CG). The IG received earlier (p = 0.001) and more frequent (p < 0.0001) mobilization than the CG. Of the 19 patients in the CG, only 5 (26%) underwent a physical therapy program during hospitalization. No complications (symptomatic hypotension or worsening of neurological symptoms) were observed in association with early mobilization. The rates of complications of immobility (pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, and deep vein thrombosis) and mortality were similar in the two groups. No statistically significant differences in functional independence, disability, or ADL (mBI ≥85) were observed between the groups at the 3-month follow-up. Conclusions: This pilot trial conducted at a public hospital in Brazil suggests that early mobilization after acute ischemic stroke is safe and feasible. Despite some challenges and limitations, early mobilization was successfully implemented, even in the setting of a large, complex ED, and without complications. Patients from the IG were mobilized much earlier than controls receiving the standard care provided in most Brazilian hospitals.

Abstract P148: Safety And Efficacy Of Edaravone Dexborneol Versus Edaravone Alone For The Treatment Of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients With Hypertention: Analysis From Taste Trial

Hypertension ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 78 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Xu ◽  
Yongjun Wang
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Medical History ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Intention To Treat

Background and Aims: Evidenced by TASTE phase III trial, 90-day good functional outcomes favored the edaravone dexborneol group versus edaravone group when administered within 48 hours after Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS). The present study aimed to investigate the effects of edaravone dexborneol versus edaravone in AIS patients with hypertension medical history. Methods: This study was a subgroup analysis of the TASTE trial with hypertension medical history. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤1 on day 90 after randomization. The secondary outcome was the mRS score on day 90. The safety endpoints were the incidences of adverse events, serious adverse events and deaths. Analyses were by intention to treat. Results: We included 767 AIS patients with hypertension (390 in edaravone dexborneol group, 377 in edaravone group) in this analysis. Among them, 252 (64.62%) in edaravone dexborneol group versus 199 (52.79%) in edaravone group reached mRS score ≤1 on D90, revealing significantly higher proportion of mRS score ≤1 on D90 in edaravone dexborneol group (OR 1.63 [95% CI, 1.22-2.18]; P<0.001). Significant differences occurred between two groups in mRS score on D90 ([OR 1.32 [95% CI, 1.02-1.72]; P=0.038). The safety outcomes indicated that the two groups were similar in incidences of adverse events (366 [93.85%] versus 352 [93.37%], p=0.787), serious adverse events (48 [12.31%] versus 34 [9.02%], p=0.1405) and number of deaths (6 [1.54%] versus 4 [1.06%], p=0.56). Conclusion: This analysis demonstrated that AIS patients with hypertension receiving edaravone dexborneol had better functional outcomes than those with edaravone, which provided evidences for the clinical application of edaravone dexborneol in AIS patients with hypertension. Keywords: Edaravone dexborneol, Acute ischemic stroke, Hypertension, mRS score

Endovascular Treatment of Ischemic Stroke: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 215-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Vidale ◽  
Elio Agostoni
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Medical Treatment ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Best Medical Treatment

Background: Recent randomized trials demonstrated the superiority of the mechanical thrombectomy over the best medical treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to an occlusion of arteries of proximal anterior circulation. In this updated meta-analysis, we aimed to summarize the total clinical effects of the treatment, including the last trials. Methods: We performed literature search of Randomized Crontrolled Trials (RCTs) published between 2010 and October 2016, comparing endovenous thrombolysis plus mechanical thrombectomy (intervention group) with best medical care alone (control group). We identified 8 trials. Primary outcomes were reduced disability at 90 days from the event and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Statistical analysis was performed pooling data into the 2 groups, evaluating outcome heterogeneity. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs). Results: We analyzed data for 1845 patients (interventional group: 911; control group: 934). Mechanical thrombectomy contributed to a significant reduction in disability rate compared to the best medical treatment alone (OR: 2.087; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.718-2.535; P < .001). We calculated that for every 100 treated patients, 16 more participants have a good outcome as a result of mechanical treatment. No significant differences between groups were observed concerning the occurrence of symptomatic hemorrhage (OR: 1.021; 95% CI: 0.641-1.629; P = .739). Conclusion: Mechanical thrombectomy contributes to significantly increase the functional benefit of endovenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by arterial occlusion of proximal anterior circulation, without reduction in safety. These findings are relevant for the optimization of the acute stroke management, including the implementation of networks between stroke centers.

scholarly journals Natalizumab in acute ischemic stroke (ACTION II)

Neurology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 95 (8) ◽  
pp. e1091-e1104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitchell S.V. Elkind ◽  
Roland Veltkamp ◽  
Joan Montaner ◽  
S. Claiborne Johnston ◽  
Aneesh B. Singhal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Excellent Outcome ◽  
Scale Scores ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Improve Patient

ObjectiveWe evaluated the effect of 2 doses of natalizumab on functional outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).MethodsIn this double-blind phase 2b trial, patients with AIS aged 18–80 years with NIH Stroke Scale scores of 5–23 from 53 US and European sites were randomized 1:1:1 to receive a single dose of 300 or 600 mg IV natalizumab or placebo, with randomization stratified by treatment window (≤9 or >9 to ≤24 hours from patient's last known normal state). The primary endpoint was a composite measure of excellent outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤1 and Barthel Index score ≥95) at day 90 assessed in all patients receiving a full dose. Sample size was estimated from a Bayesian model; p values were not used for hypothesis testing.ResultsAn excellent outcome was less likely with natalizumab than with placebo (natalizumab 300 or 600 mg odds ratio 0.60; 95% confidence interval 0.39–0.93). There was no effect modification by time to treatment or use of thrombolysis/thrombectomy. For natalizumab 300 mg, 600 mg, or placebo, there were no differences in incidence of adverse events (90.0%, 92.1%, and 92.3%, respectively), serious adverse events (25.6%, 32.6%, and 20.9%, respectively), or deaths (6.7%, 4.5%, and 5.5%, respectively).ConclusionsNatalizumab administered ≤24 hours after AIS did not improve patient outcomes.ClinicalTrials.gov identifierNCT02730455Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class I evidence that for patients with AIS, an excellent outcome was less likely in patients treated with natalizumab than with placebo.

Economic Evaluation of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucie A. van den Berg ◽  
Olvert A. Berkhemer ◽  
Puck S.S. Fransen ◽  
Debbie Beumer ◽  
Hester Lingsma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life Year ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Unique Identifier ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life

Background and Purpose: Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke has been proven clinically effective, but evidence of the cost-effectiveness based on real-world data is scarce. The aim of this study was to assess whether endovascular therapy plus usual care is cost-effective in comparison to usual care alone in acute ischemic stroke patients. Methods: An economic evaluation was performed from a societal perspective with a 2-year time horizon. Empirical data on health outcomes and the use of resources following endovascular treatment were gathered parallel to the MR CLEAN trial (Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands) and its 2-year follow-up study. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated as the extra costs per additional patient with functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0–2) and the extra cost per quality-adjusted life year gained. Results: The mean costs per patient in the intervention group were $126 494 versus $143 331 in the control group (mean difference, −$16 839 [95% CI, −$38 113 to $5456]). Compared with patients in the control group, more patients in the intervention group achieved functional independence, 37.2% versus 23.9% (absolute difference, 13.3% [95% CI, 4.0%–22.0%]) and they generated more quality-adjusted life years, 0.99 versus 0.83 (mean difference of 0.16 [95% CI, 0.04–0.29]). Endovascular treatment dominated standard treatment with $18 233 saved per extra patient with a good outcome and $105 869 saved per additional quality-adjusted life year. Conclusions: Endovascular treatment added to usual care is clinically effective, and cost saving in comparison to usual care alone in patients with acute ischemic stroke. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/695 ; Unique identifier: NL695. https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN10888758 ; Unique identifier: ISRCTN10888758.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document