The Effect of Laser Panretinal Photocoagulation on Diabetic Macular Edema Using the Pascal® Photocoagulator versus the Conventional Argon Laser Photocoagulator

2016 ◽  
Vol 235 (3) ◽  
pp. 137-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed M. Mahgoub ◽  
Tamer A. Macky
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Argon Laser ◽  
Panretinal Photocoagulation ◽  
Baseline Assessment ◽  
Foveal Thickness ◽  
Central Foveal Thickness ◽  
Corrected Visual Acuity ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of panretinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) on diabetic macular edema (DME) using a Pascal® Photocoagulator (PP) or a conventional argon laser photocoagulator (CALP). Methods: Eighty eyes with PDR and center-involving DME were randomized to PP or CALP. Both groups had baseline assessment of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and were examined with optical coherence tomography and fluorescein angiography. Results: The mean number of laser shots for the PP and CALP groups was 1,726.10 and 752.00 at session 1 and 1,589.00 and 830.00 (p < 0.001) at session 2, respectively. The mean central foveal thickness (CFT) at baseline was 306 ± 100 and 314 ± 98 for the PP and CALP groups, respectively. At 8 weeks, the mean CFT was 332 ± 116 and 347 ± 111 for the PP and CALP groups, respectively (p > 0.05). The mean BCVA was similar during the study period with no significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: PP and CALP had similar effects on DME in PDR eyes and were equally safe with no significant increase in CFT.

scholarly journals Restoration of Foveal Bulge after Resolution of Diabetic Macular Edema with Coexisting Serous Retinal Detachment

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Yijun Hu ◽  
Qiaowei Wu ◽  
Baoyi Liu ◽  
Manqing Huang ◽  
Qingsheng Peng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Retinal Detachment ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Outer Nuclear Layer ◽  
Serous Retinal Detachment ◽  
Foveal Thickness ◽  
Central Foveal Thickness ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Purpose. To evaluate the impact of restoration of foveal bulge (FB) in optical coherence tomography (OCT) images on visual acuity after resolution of diabetic macular edema with coexisting serous retinal detachment (SRD-DME). Methods. A total of 52 eyes with resolved SRD-DME and an intact ellipsoid zone at the central fovea were included. All eyes underwent best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) examination and OCT scanning at baseline and follow-up visits (1, 3, and 6 months). The eyes were divided into two groups according to the presence of FB at 6 months. BCVA, central foveal thickness (CFT), height of SRD (SRDH), outer nuclear layer (ONL) thickness, photoreceptor inner segment (PIS), and outer segment (POS) length were compared between the two groups. Results. A FB was found in 25 of 52 (48%) eyes at 6 months. The FB (+) group had lower SRDH at baseline, and better BCVA, longer POS length at 6 months (all P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the CFT, ONL thickness, and PIS length at 6 months between the two groups (all P>0.05). More eyes in the FB (+) group had complete SRD resolution at 1 month (P=0.009) and 3 months (P=0.012). Eyes with complete SRD resolution at 1 month (P=0.009) or 3 months (P=0.012) were more likely to have a FB at 6 months. Conclusions. The Presence of the FB is associated with better BCVA after resolution of SRD-DME. Eyes with lower baseline SRDH or faster SRD resolution are more likely to have a FB at 6 months.

scholarly journals Panretinal photocoagulation after or prior to intravitreal conbercept injection for diabetic macular edema: a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Zhang ◽  
Guiyang Zhao ◽  
Weijie Fan ◽  
Taihong Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Panretinal Photocoagulation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Photocoagulation Treatment ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference

Abstract Background Panretinal photocoagulation treatment (PRP) have been known as a standard treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) or severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (sNPDR). However, there is no consensus on when PRP should be administrated if anti-VEGF treatment is needed for the concurrent diabetic macular edema (DME). This study is to evaluate the difference between two groups of PRP prior to, or after intravitreal conbercept (IVC) for patients with PDR or sNPDR combined with DME. Methods This was a retrospective study. Fifty-eight eyes with DME secondary to PDR or sNPDR were divided into two groups; the PRP after (PRP-after group), or prior to (PRP-prior group), IVC. Changes in number of IVC injections, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central subfield macular thickness (CSMT) were compared after 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years from the first IVC injection. Results The mean number of injections in PRP-after group was 4.8 (1 year) and 6.4 (2 year), lower than 6.4 (1 year) and 8.5 (2 year) in PRP-prior group (both p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in change in BCVA and CSMT between two groups after each follow-up. Conclusion PRP after IVC requires less injections but also yields similar visual and anatomic outcome comparing with PRP prior to IVC in patients with diabetic retinopathy combined with DME.

scholarly journals Diabetic Macular Edema Estimation Using Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy Versus That Using Oct.

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Trisha Sharma ◽  
Susan DSouza ◽  
Manjunath Kamath
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Macular Thickness ◽  
Slit Lamp ◽  
Foveal Thickness ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Central Foveal Thickness ◽  
Group I ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy

Purpose: Comparison of Diabetic macular edema estimation using slit lamp biomicroscopy versus that using OCT.Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 121 patients (154 eyes) with established Type 2 diabetes mellitus, divided into three groups. Group I consisted of 62 eyes with NPDR, Group II ,27 eyes with PDR and  Group III ,66 eyes with CSME. Diagnosis of CSME was made as per ETDRS protocol, using slit lamp stereoscopic biomicroscopy. DME was defined on OCT as central foveal thickness greater than 250µm .OCT scanning was performed through the macula of each eye after pupillary dilatation. Results: The mean age of patients included was 60.70 ± 9.20years and 61.98% were males. Only 66 eyes were classified as having DME clinically as opposed to 109 eyes by OCT, leading to a significant sub-estimation of 39.44% eyes. The mean macular thickness in the CSME patients identified by slit lamp biomicroscopy was 399.59±105.31µm.The mean central macular thickness in the sub-estimated cases was 290.58 ±28.92 µm overall, 290.10±26.19 µm in the PDR group and 290.95± 31.46µm amongst NPDR patients.Conclusion: Mild macular thickening on OCT may not correspond to overt edema clinically and has been termed sub-clinical macular edema by some authors. We report a sub- estimation of DME in 39.44% eyes in our study. The emerging importance of monitoring of these vulnerable patients and early detection of their conversion to overt CSME must be realised. In conclusion, assessment of diabetic macular edema with OCT is probably more objective and reliable.

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Intravitreal Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema in Vitrectomized and Nonvitrectomized Eyes

2016 ◽  
Vol 236 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshito Koyanagi ◽  
Shigeo Yoshida ◽  
Yoshiyuki Kobayashi ◽  
Yuki Kubo ◽  
Muneo Yamaguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Treatment Option ◽  
Central Macular Thickness ◽  
Intravitreal Ranibizumab ◽  
Corrected Visual Acuity ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Best Corrected Visual Acuity

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) for diabetic macular edema (DME) between eyes with and without previous vitrectomy. Procedures: We prospectively assessed the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) after IVR for 6 months. Results: There were no significant differences in the baseline BCVA and CMT between both groups. In the nonvitrectomized group (n = 15), the mean changes of BCVA and CMT from baseline to month 6 were significant (p < 0.01). In the vitrectomized group (n = 10), the improvement appeared to be slower, and the mean BCVA improvement was not significant (p = 0.5), although the mean CMT decrease was significant (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the mean changes of BCVA and CMT between both groups at 6 months. Conclusions: The difference in the effectiveness of IVR between both groups was not significant. IVR can be a treatment option even for vitrectomized DME eyes.

scholarly journals Real-world outcomes of two-year Conbercept therapy for diabetic macular edema

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 416-422
Author(s):  
Yong Cheng ◽  
◽  
Ming-Wei Zhao ◽  
Tong Qian ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Vision Loss ◽  
Retinal Thickness ◽  
Corrected Visual Acuity ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Number Of Injections ◽  
Best Corrected Visual Acuity

AIM: To evaluate the two-year outcomes of patients treated for diabetic macular edema (DME) with intravitreal Conbercept (IVC). METHODS: The clinical data of 30 DME patients (36 eyes) were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were treated with IVC for 3mo. Additional IVC was given at subsequent monthly visits, if needed (3+PRN). The patients were followed up for 24mo. RESULTS: The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 24mo significantly increased (66.7±15.3 letters) in comparison with the baseline (54.4±15.4 letters, P<0.0001). The mean improvement in BCVA was 11.0±2.9 letters. At 24mo, 44.1% of the eyes surveyed gained ≥15 letters, 52.9% of the eyes gained ≥10 letters, and 70.6% of the eyes gained ≥5 letters. No vision loss was noted in 96.8% of the eyes, and 5.9% of the eyes lost ≥5 letters, but ≤10 letters. The central retinal thickness (CRT) at 24mo was significantly reduced (277.1±122.9 μm) in comparison with the baseline (510.9±186.1 μm, P<0.0001). At 24mo, 43.3% of the patients had a CRT ≤250 μm. The mean number of injections over 24mo was 10.6±2.0. No severe eye or systemic adverse events related to either the drug or injection were noted. CONCLUSION: IVC is safe and effective for the treatment of DME.

Outcomes of conbercept therapy for choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathological myopia

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 210-213
Author(s):  
Zheng-Feng Liu ◽  
◽  
Da-Dong Guo ◽  
Mei-Hua Ding ◽  
Hong-Sheng Bi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Choroidal Neovascularization ◽  
Fundus Fluorescein Angiography ◽  
Pathological Myopia ◽  
Foveal Thickness ◽  
Central Foveal Thickness ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
The Mean ◽  
One Year

AIM: To evaluate the one-year outcome of intravitreal conbercept injections for the treatment of choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathological myopia (pm-CNV) by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). METHODS: The medical records of 26 consecutive eyes of 23 patients who received intravitreal injections of conbercept for pm-CNV with a follow-up of one year were retrospectively reviewed. All the patients were diagnosed by fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and OCTA at the first visit. All approaches were performed as “1+PRN” treatment. Outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT) and the mean CNV area by OCTA. RESULTS: Mean Logarithm BCVA improved from (0.66±0.51) at baseline to (0.39±0.38) at one year (t=3.528, P=0.004). The CFT before treatment and after one year after were 275.08±48.74) μm and (205.15±43.74) μm respectively (t=4.630, P=0.001). The mean pm-CNV areas before treatment and after one year treatment were (0.48±0.24) mm2 and (0.15±0.11) mm2 respectively, with a significant difference among them (t=5.329, P=0.000). Twenty-one eyes had no needs after the first treatment. Four eyes received 2 injections and only one eye received 3 injections. No severe adverse events were noted relevant to the therapy. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal conbercept can improve the vision and relieve CFT and CNV area for the treatment of pm-CNV with “1+PRN” by OCTA for one year, however, long-term follow-up still need to be performed.

scholarly journals Clinical impact of the 0.2 µg/day fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant: outcomes from the ILUVIEN® clinical evidence study in Portugal

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 251584142091776
Author(s):  
Angela Carneiro ◽  
Angelina Meireles ◽  
João Paulo Castro Sousa ◽  
Carla Teixeira
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Clinical Evidence ◽  
Fluocinolone Acetonide ◽  
Foveal Thickness ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Central Foveal Thickness ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant

Introduction: The ILUVIEN® (fluocinolone acetonide) Clinical Evidence in Portugal (ICE-PT) study is a retrospective, multicenter, observational study evaluating the effectiveness and safety of the FAc implant in patients with diabetic macular edema. Methods: Patients included in this study had received the 0.2 µg/day fluocinolone acetonide implant for the treatment of diabetic macular edema and had measurements of visual acuity and retinal thickness assessed by optical coherence tomography for at least 12 months pre- and post-fluocinolone acetonide implant administration, with ⩾2 follow-up visits. Outcomes measured included visual acuity, central foveal thickness, and intraocular pressure. Results: There was a significant increase in mean visual acuity compared with baseline at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-fluocinolone acetonide in both the overall study population and the pseudophakic subgroup ( p < 0.05 at all time points in both groups). A significant reduction in mean central foveal thickness compared with baseline was seen in the overall study population at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-fluocinolone acetonide ( p < 0.05 at all time points). At 12-month post-fluocinolone acetonide, a small but significant intraocular pressure increase of 1.0 mmHg was seen in the overall study population. Conclusion: The results of this analysis show that switching from the current standard of care to the fluocinolone acetonide implant leads to beneficial effects in terms of vision and retinal structure in patients with diabetic macular edema and that patients benefited from FAc implant administration, regardless of lens status.

scholarly journals Treatment of diabetic macular edema and proliferative diabetic retinopathy with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents under the reimbursement policy of the Taiwan National Health Insurance Bureau: Aflibercept or ranibizumab?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Chieh Hsieh ◽  
Chieh-Yin Cheng ◽  
Kun-Hsien Li ◽  
Chih-Chun Chuang ◽  
Jian-Sheng Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Panretinal Photocoagulation ◽  
Reimbursement Policy ◽  
Micropulse Laser ◽  
The Mean

Abstract The purpose of this retrospective interventional case series is to compare the functional and anatomical outcomes in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) treated intravitreally with aflibercept or ranibizumab under the Taiwan National Insurance Bureau reimbursement policy. 84 eyes were collected and all eyes were imaged with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), color fundus photographs (CFPs), and fluorescein angiography (FA). At 24 months after therapy initiation, the logMAR BCVA improved from 0.58 ± 0.33 to 0.47 ± 0.38 (p < 0.01), the CRT decreased from 423.92 ± 135.84 to 316.36 ± 90.02 (p < 0.01), and the number of microaneurysms decreased from 142.14 ± 57.23 to 75.32 ± 43.86 (p < 0.01). The mean injection count was 11.59 ± 6.54. There was no intergroup difference in logMAR BCVA (p = 0.96), CRT (p = 0.69), or injection count (p = 0.81). However, the mean number of microaneurysms was marginally reduced (p = 0.06) in eyes treated with aflibercept at the end of the follow-up, and the incidence rates of supplementary panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) (p = 0.04) and subthreshold micropulse laser (SMPL) therapy sessions (p = 0.01) were also reduced. Multivariate analysis revealed that only initial logMAR BCVA influenced the final VA improvements (odds ratio (OR) 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21 ~ 0.93, p < 0.01); in contrast, age (OR -0.38, 95% CI -6.97~-1.85, p < 0.01) and initial CRT (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34 ~ 0.84, p < 0.01) both influenced the final CRT reduction at 24 months. To sum up, both aflibercept and ranibizumab are effective in managing DME with PDR in terms of VA, CRT and MA count. Eyes receiving aflibercept required less supplementary PRP and SMPL treatment than those receiving ranibizumab. The initial VA influenced the final VA improvements at 24 months, while age and initial CRT were prognostic predictors of 24-month CRT reduction.

scholarly journals CHOROIDAL THICKNESS IN PATIENTS WITH DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 433-37
Author(s):  
Amash Aqil ◽  
Muhammad Moin ◽  
Khadijah Abid ◽  
Ahsan Mehmood
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Choroidal Thickness ◽  
Macular Thickness ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Central Macular Thickness ◽  
Department Of Ophthalmology ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Objective: To evaluate central macular thickness and choroidal thickness in patients with macular edema due to diabetic retinopathy versus controls. Study Design: Cross-sectional comparative study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Ophthalmology, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, from Jan to Jul 2018. Methodology: A retrospective data of 100 eyes from 50 patients having with diabetic macular edema associated with diabetic retinopathy was extracted from hospital registry. Additionally, 100 eyes of 50 individuals without any preexisting ocular conditions, comprising a control group was included in the study. Choroidal thickness measurements were made from the posterior edge of the retinal pigment epithelium to the choroid/sclera junction at subfoveal level using optical coherence tomography. Central macular thickness was also measured for all the enrolled patients. Results: One hundred patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were enrolled in our study. The mean age was 56.27 ± 14.41 years. The mean Central macular thickness of all the patients were reported as 270.49 ± 72.38 μm, while the choroidal thickness was 284.89 ± 96.51 μm. There was statistically significant difference in central macular thickness between both healthy and diabetic retinopathy with diabetic macular edema groups (p=0.001), whereas insignificant difference existed between the two groups forchoroidal thickness (p=0.735). Conclusion: In patients with diabetic macular edema no significant change in choroidal thickness was observed compared with healthy controls, while the thickness of the retina was high in patients with macular edema due to diabetes.

scholarly journals Comparison of Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant and Ranibizumab in Vitrectomized Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Jia-Kang Wang ◽  
Tzu-Lun Huang ◽  
Pei-Yao Chang ◽  
Wei-Ting Ho ◽  
Yung-Ray Hsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Glycosylated Hemoglobin ◽  
Dexamethasone Implant ◽  
Intravitreal Ranibizumab ◽  
Foveal Thickness ◽  
Central Foveal Thickness ◽  
Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant ◽  
Intravitreal Dexamethasone ◽  
Treatment Number

Purpose. This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) and intravitreal dexamethasone implant (IDI) for pseudophakic vitrectomized eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) in a single institution. Methods. Pseudophakic vitrectomized eyes with treatment-naïve center-involved DME were enrolled, with one eye in each patient. They were divided into two groups: one group receiving IDI every 3 to 4 months and another group receiving IVR using 3 monthly plus treat-and-extend injections, all with monthly follow-up for 6 months. Switch of intravitreal drugs or deferred macular laser was not allowed. Primary outcome measures included change in central foveal thickness (CFT) in 1 mm by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at Month 6. Results. Twenty-two eyes were included in the IDI group and 26 eyes in the IVR group. The baseline demographics, glycosylated hemoglobin level, intraocular pressure (IOP), BCVA, and CFT did not significantly differ ( p > 0.05 ). Compared to baseline data, CFT decreased and BCVA improved significantly after either IDI or IVR at Month 6 ( p < 0.05 ). Significantly better mean final BCVA (0.38 logMAR vs. 0.62 logMAR, p = 0.04 ), more mean visual gain (−0.30 logMAR vs. −0.15 logMAR, p = 0.02 ), lower mean final CFT (310.9 μm vs. 384.2 μm, p = 0.04 ), and larger mean CFT decrease (−150.0 μm vs. −60.1 μm, p = 0.03 ) were found in the IDI group compared to those in the IVR group. A smaller mean treatment number (2.6 vs. 5.6, p < 0.001 ) and higher rate of postinjection ocular hypertension requiring topical hypotensive agent therapy (27.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.0002 ) were demonstrated in the IDI group than those in the IVR group. Conclusion. We concluded that IDI and IVR can both effectively treat vitrectomized eyes with DME. Dexamethasone implants had significantly better visual/anatomical improvement, smaller treatment number, and higher rate of elevated IOP after injection than IVR in pseudophakic vitrectomized eyes with DME in a 6-month period.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document