scholarly journals Haploidentical Donors: Can Faster Transplantation Be Life-Saving for Patients with Advanced Disease?

2016 ◽  
Vol 135 (4) ◽  
pp. 211-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alina Tanase ◽  
Ciprian Tomuleasa ◽  
Alexandra Marculescu ◽  
Alexandru Bardas ◽  
Anca Colita ◽  
...  

Haploidentical stem cell transplantation is a therapeutic option for patients without an HLA-matched donor. It is increasingly being used worldwide due to the application of posttransplantation cyclophosphamide and is associated with lower incidence of graft-versus-host disease and treatment-related mortality. Haploidentical donors are generally available for most patients and stem cells can be rapidly obtained. Delays in transplantation while waiting for unrelated donor cells can be potentially problematic for patients with advanced disease at risk for progression; thus, the use of haploidentical donors, especially in this setting, can be life-saving. Here we reviewed the literature on haploidentical stem cell transplantation performed with posttransplantation cyclophosphamide.

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 3589
Author(s):  
Jacopo Mariotti ◽  
Stefania Bramanti ◽  
Armando Santoro ◽  
Luca Castagna

T-cell replete Haploidentical stem cell transplantation (Haplo-SCT) with Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) is an emerging therapeutic option for patients with advanced relapsed or refractory lymphoma. The feasibility of this platform is supported by several retrospective studies showing a toxicity profile that is improved relative to umbilical cord blood and mismatched unrelated donor (UD) transplant and comparable to matched unrelated donor transplant. In particular, cumulative incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is reduced after Haplo-SCT relative to UD and matched related donor (MRD) transplant thanks to PT-Cy employed as GVHD prophylaxis. This achievement, together with a similar incidence of acute GVHD and disease relapse, results in a promising advantage of Haplo-SCT in terms of relapse-free/GVHD free survival. Unmet needs of the Haplo-SCT platform are represented by the persistence of a not negligible rate of non-relapse mortality, especially due to infections and disease relapse. Future efforts are warranted in order to reduce life-threatening infections and to employ Halo-SCT with PT-Cy as a platform to build new immunotherapeutic strategies.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4308-4308
Author(s):  
Jean El-cheikh ◽  
Luca Castagna ◽  
Sabine Furst ◽  
Catherine Faucher ◽  
Benjamin Esterni ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4308 Allogenic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) as a therapy for secondary acute myeloid leukaemia (sAML) and myelodisplastic syndromes (MDS) is the most powerful treatment option. However, (Allo-SCT) is also complicated by a high risk for treatment-related morbidity and mortality. We analysed retrospectively the data of 70 patients transplanted at our institution from June 1995 to december 2008, 44 patients (63%) with sAML and 26 patients (37%) with MDS was treated with (Allo-SCT); median age at diagnosis was 41 years, (15-70), and the median age of 42, 5 years (16-70) at transplantation; The conditioning regimen was myeloablative combining (cyclophosphamide and TBI) in 16 patients (23%) and 54 patients (77%) was with a reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens combining fludarabine, busulfan, and antithymocyte globulin; 11 patients (16%) were infused with bone marrow (BM), 55 patients (79%) peripherical blood stem cells (PBSC), and 4 patients (5%) cord blood cells; in 49 cases (70%) donor was a HLA identical sibling and in 21 (30%) was a matched unrelated donor; 41 patients (59%) carried high risk cytogenetic features, like (7q-, 5q-, > 3 alterations), while was normal in 24 patients (34%), and in 5 patients (7%) was unknown. Disease status at transplantation was as follow: CR in 24 patients (34%), 34 patients (49%) was refractory or in progression after treatment, and 12 patients (17%) was with a stable disease. With a median follow-up of 55 months (3-150), 30 patients (43%) are alive, the overall survival OS at 2 years and 5 years was 48 % and 39% respectively, and after ten years of follow up, OS was 30%, 95%CI [17.8-50.8]. We observed also that 26 % of refractory patients and 54% of patients in CR are alive at five years of transplantation. The probability of progression after transplantation at five and ten years was 31% with 95%CI [20.-46.5]. 2 years and 5 years treatment related mortality (TRM) was 23% and 26% respectively, and no modification at ten year, 95%CI [14.3-37.3]. TRM occurred in 16 patients (23%). Cause of death was; infections in 5 patients (7%), GvHD in 3 patients (4%), GvHD and infection in 3 patients (4%), multi organ failure (MOF) in 5 patients (7%). In multivariate analysis; OS, PFS or TRM, were not influenced by donor type (HLA id sibling vs others), conditioning regimen (RIC vs MAC), and stem cell source (bone marrow vs PBSC). Allogenic stem cell transplantation can be considered as a good option for the treatment of patients with high risk sAML and MDS when compared with the remission rate at five years of the other nonallogeneic SCT therapies. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa ALANI ◽  
Jean Henri BOURHIS

Second allogeneic stem cell transplantation was realized in 48 patients with myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms at Gustave Roussy institute since 1987. Overall survival rate was about 30 % with better outcome in acute myeloid leukemia cases. Non-relapse related mortality is overwhelming, especially in myelodysplasia patients and despite the fact that complete remission was obtained in their majority. Graft versus Host disease is very common after second transplantation with many grade III IV cases and one death from severe pulmonary GvHD lesions. Reduced intensity conditioning is certainly less toxic and together with optimal GvHD and infectious disease management, Second SCT may be a reasonable therapeutic option and the only curative treatment for many hematological malignancies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (C) ◽  
pp. 250-253
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Pivkova-Veljanovska ◽  
Irina Panovska-Stavridis ◽  
Lazar Chadievski ◽  
Sanja Trajkova ◽  
Marija Popova-Labachevska ◽  
...  

  BACKGROUND: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a potentially curative therapeutic approach in patients with intermediate and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). If a family sibling or unrelated donor is not available mismatched donors are viable option for young patients with no comorbidities. The aim of this case presentation was to evaluate our first experience with haploidentical transplantation for this indication. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of 50 years male patient with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) diagnosed at University Clinic for hematology, Skopje, North Macedonia. Patient was scored in IPSS -R as high risk patient. He was referred for HLA DNA typing of family siblings and since he didn’t have identical sibling and unrelated donor, he was referred to continue treatment with haploidentical stem cell transplantation. He received Flu Bu conditioning and PTCY, cyclosporine and MMF for GVHD prophylaxis. Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) from his mismatched brother were infused in the amount of CD34=5.8x106/kg. He experienced prolonged engraftment, severe infective bacterial infections and CMV reactivation with clinical manifestation of CMV colitis. He was successfully treated with antiviral drug and completely resolved. His bone marrow analysis showed complete remission and chimerism evaluation revealed high donor engraftment. Patient is now +34 months post transplant in complete remission. CONCLUSION: The use of a mismatched donor increases the risk of NRM, but there is also evidence to suggest that an haploidentical donor is a valid choice, as general outcome appears to be at least similar to MUD.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying-Jun Chang ◽  
Xiang-Yu Zhao ◽  
Xiao-Jun Huang

Haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT), an alternative donor source, offers a curative therapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are transplant candidates. Advances in transplantation techniques, such as donor selection, conditioning regimen modification, and graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis, have successfully improved the outcomes of AML patients receiving haplo-SCT and extended the haploidentical transplant indictions for AML. Presently, treating de novo AML, secondary AML, therapy-related AML and refractory and relapsed AML with haplo-SCT can achieve comparable outcomes to those of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor transplantation (MSDT), unrelated donor transplantation or umbilical cord blood transplantation. For some subgroups of AML subjects, such as patients with positive pretransplantation minimal/measurable residual disease, recent studies suggest that haplo-SCT might be superior to MSDT in decreasing relapse and improving survival. Unfortunately, for patients with AML after haplo-SCT, relapse and infections remain the causes of death that restrict further improvement in clinical outcomes. In this review, we discuss the recent advances and challenges in haplo-SCT for AML treatment, mainly focusing on unmanipulated haplo-SCT protocols. We provide an outlook on future prospects and suggest that relapse prophylaxis, intervention, and treatment, as well as infection prevention and therapy, are areas of active research in AML patients who receive haploidentical allografts.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1317-1317
Author(s):  
Adam Giermasz ◽  
Lloyd E. Damon ◽  
Lawrence D Kaplan ◽  
Willis H. Navarro ◽  
Kristen Hege ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1317 Introduction: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation offers potentially curative therapy for selected patients with hematopoietic malignancies or bone marrow failure states. Only 20–25% of transplantation candidates have compatible related donors, and thus the majority of patients require stem cells from unrelated individuals matching their human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes. Unrelated donor transplantation (NMUDT) is associated with higher rate of acute and chronic graft versus host disease (aGVHD and cGVHD, respectively) resulting in significant treatment related morbidity and mortality. Severe aGVHD (grade III/IV) occurs in 30–40% of patients and many of these patients eventually die from the complications. The incidence of cGVHD following unrelated transplantation was reported to occur up to 80%. Treatment-related mortality in the first 100–180 days post-transplant ranges from 30–60% depending on the patient/donor age, disease status at time of transplant and HLA mismatch. This compares to a treatment-related mortality of approximately 20–30% for patients receiving sibling-donor transplants. More aggressive conditioning including total body irradiation is believed to result in severe organ toxicities fueling subsequent GVHD in the NMUDT patients. In this study we evaluated chemotherapy only based preparative therapy (busulfan and fludarabine) and tacrolimus plus methotrexate as the GVHD prophylaxis. Also the donors and recipients were matched with strict HLA compatibility. Patients and Method: Thirty-five patients meeting eligibility criteria for NMUDT were prospectively enrolled. Diagnoses included:14 AML, 6 NHL, 6 MDS, 5 ALL, 2 MPD, 2 CML. The median age was 46 years (18-61); 20 males and 15 females. Preparative therapy consisted of Fludarabine (F) 30mg/m2 daily for 5 doses, Busulfan (Bu) 0.8mg/kg IV q6 hrs for 16 doses. All patients received stem cells from allele-matched unrelated donors; 7/8 (n=1), 8/10 (n=1), 9/10 (n= 7) or 10/10 (n= 26) at HLA A, B, C, DR and DQ. 9 patients received bone marrow and 26 patients received G-CSF mobilized peripherial blood stem cells. All patients received TAC (target 5–10 ug/L), MTX (5mg/m2 d1,3,6,11) for GVHD prophylaxis. Infectious disease prophylaxis included; G-CSF, acyclovir, anti-bacterials, voriconazole, and CMV pre-emptive therapy. Results: The engraftment was documented as follows: ANC >1.0 median: day 12 (SD3.5), Plt >50×10e9/L median: day 16 (SD 7.2), Plt >100×10e9/L median: day 20 (SD 40.7). The frequent (>20%) toxicities included bone marrow suppression (grade 4 100%) mucositis (gr≥1 91%), enteritis (gr≥1 43%); elevated AST (gr 1 27%), elevated total bilirubin (gr 1 20%) and alkaline phosphatase (gr1 40%). Other significant toxicities (gr ≥3) included neutropenic fever (20%), bacteremia (11%), infections (including pneumonia, fungal pneumonia, CMV viremia) (26%), enteritis 6%, ARF 9%, rash 9%, respiratory failure 14%. The incidence of aGVHD (Gr II-IV) was 43%. The incidence of cGVHD was 60% (90% extensive cGVHD). The 100 day non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 9% (2 GVHD, 1 VOD). The late TRM (beyond 100 days) was 11% (3 GVHD, 1 infection). Cumulative relapse related mortality was 17% at 6 months, 26% at 9 months and 31% at 24 months. Overall mortality at 1 year was 44%. Overall survival is currently 40% with median follow-up of 4.4 years. Conclusions: In this prospective study of 35 patients undergoing matched unrelated donor transplantation, the busulfan/fludarabine preparative regimen is safe and resulting in reasonably low TRM and comparable GVHD rates. Disease relapse remains the most significant cause of death. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 3657-3657
Author(s):  
Benjamin Gesundheit ◽  
Mamet Aker ◽  
Igor Resnick ◽  
Michael Y. Shapira ◽  
Menachem Bitan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), the sole cure for β-thalassemia major (TM), is plagued by graft rejection or disease recurrence (10–30%). The risk of recurrence is influenced by age, type of allograft, presence of graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD), ferritin levels and hepatic iron overload. Complete donor hematopoiesis was believed essential for sustained marrow engraftment, but according to pre-clinical/clinical data, stable mixed chimera is also curative. We report our experience using T cell depletion (TCD) as prevention of GVHD versus fludarabine-based conditioning in unmanipulated HSCT. Material & Methods: 35 patients (6 mo-7 yr; median 29 mo; 10 female and 25 male) with TM were transplanted (1984–95) with HLA-matched donors siblings (29), parents (2), grandparents (2), cousin (1) and aunt (1). Conditioning encompassed total lymphoid irradiation (TLI) of 2 cGy/dx4 followed by busulfan 4 mg/kg/dx4 and cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg/dx4; TCD was performed in vitro with CAMPATH1M (21) or CAMPATH1G “in the bag” (14). No GVHD-prophylaxis was given. Based on our results with non-myeloablative regimens, we used since 1996 fludarabine-based conditioning for TM. A total of 24 patients (2–23 yr; median 5 yr; 14 female and 10 male) were transplanted with unmanipulated inocula from HLA-matched siblings (20), matched grand-father (1), mismatched sibling (1) and MUD (2). For 21 patients conditioning consisted of fludarabine 30 mg/m2/dx6, busulfex (BU) 3.2 mg/kg/dx4; 2 patients received BU 3.2 mg/kg/dx2, and 1 patient received TBI 2 cGy/dx1 without BU. All patients received ATG (Frisenius) 10 mg/kg/dx4 and Cyclosporine from day -4 for GVHD-prophylaxis. Results: In the TCD group, no GVHD occurred; 5 patient (14.3%) died from transplant related complications, 5 patients (14.3%) rejected the graft and in 3 patients (8.6%) recurrence of TM occurred; 11 patients (31.4%) were 100% donor, 10 patients (28.6%) had stable mixed chimera (70–96% donor); one patient had 5% of donor cells 5 years after transplant and with allogeneic HSCT from the same donor following ambulatory non-myeloablative conditioning, complete displacement of host cells was accomplished (R.Or et al. Br J of Haem1996:94;285–7). In the fludarabine based group no transplant related mortality occurred; 4 patients (16.7%) rejected the graft (2 patients with BUx2; 1 patient transplanted from a mismatched sibling; 1 patient with unrelated donor), but all survived with autologous rescue. All 7 patients (29.2%) suffering from acute GVHD responded to treatment. 11 patients (45.8%) had 100% donor cells; 9 patients (37.5%) had stable mixed chimera and overall survival up to 9 years after HSCT is 100%. Conclusions: TCD is a feasible conditioning preventing completely GVHD. Unstable mixed chimera can be converted to full donor with donor lymphocyte infusion. TCD requires more intensive conditioning to prevent allograft rejection, but is associated with increased transplant related mortality. Fludarabine based conditioning is well tolerated with minimal procedure related morbidity and no mortality. The incidence of acute GVHD was low and treatable. Low dose BU is not sufficient for consistent engraftment; mixed chimera was frequent, yet stable and associated with functionally normal hematopoiesis. With reduced intensity conditioning, age seems no longer to be contraindication for HSCT for TM.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document