scholarly journals Luteolin Inhibits Breast Cancer Development and Progression In Vitro and In Vivo by Suppressing Notch Signaling and Regulating MiRNAs

2015 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 1693-1711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Da-Wei Sun ◽  
He-Da Zhang ◽  
Ling Mao ◽  
Chang-Fei Mao ◽  
Wei Chen ◽  
...  

Background/Aims: This study aims to investigate the effect of Luteolin on breast cancer in vitro and in vivo and the interaction between miRNAs and Notch signaling after Luteolin intervention, and illustrates the possible underlying mechanism and regulation loop. Methods: Cell growth/survival assays and cell cycle analyses were performed to evaluate cell survival in vitro. Scratch tests, cell invasion assays and tube formation assays were carried out to analyze cell viability and identify the impact of Luteolin on angiogenesis. Critical components in the Notch pathway including proteins and mRNAs were detected by Western blotting analyses, ELISA assays and real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Matrix metalloproteinases activity was evaluated by gelatin zymography analyses. MiRNAs were analyzed by miRNA expression assays. After MDA-MB-231 cells were separately transfected with Notch-1 siRNA/cDNA and miRNA mimics, the above assays were also carried out to examine potential tumor cell changes. Xenograft models were applied to evaluate the treatment potency of Luteolin in breast cancer. Results: Luteolin significantly inhibited breast cancer cell survival, cell cycle, tube formation and the expression of Notch signaling-related proteins and mRNAs, and regulated miRNAs. After introducing Notch-1 siRNA and miRNA mimics, MDA-MB-231 cells presented with changes in miRNA levels, reduced Notch signaling-related proteins, and decreased tumor survival, invasion and angiogenesis. Conclusion: Luteolin inhibits Notch signaling by regulating miRNAs. However, the effect of miRNAs on the Notch pathway could be either Luteolin-dependent or Luteolin-independent. Furthermore, Notch-1 alteration may inversely change miRNAs levels. Our data demonstrates that Luteolin, miRNAs and the Notch pathway are critical in breast cancer development and prognosis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dexin Shen ◽  
Yayun Fang ◽  
Fenfang Zhou ◽  
Zhao Deng ◽  
Kaiyu Qian ◽  
...  

Abstract Background CDCA3 is an important component of the E3 ligase complex with SKP1 and CUL1, which could regulate the progress of cell mitosis. CDCA3 has been widely identified as a proto-oncogene in multiple human cancers, however, its role in promoting human bladder urothelial carcinoma has not been fully elucidated. Methods Bioinformatic methods were used to analyze the expression level of CDCA3 in human bladder urothelial carcinoma tissues and the relationship between its expression level and key clinical characteristics. In vitro studies were performed to validate the specific functions of CDCA3 in regulating cell proliferation, cell migration and cell cycle process. Alterations of related proteins was investigated by western blot assays. In vivo studies were constructed to validate whether silencing CDCA3 could inhibit the proliferation rate in mice model. Results Bioinformatic analysis revealed that CDCA3 was significantly up-regulated in bladder urothelial carcinoma samples and was related to key clinical characteristics, such as tumor grade and metastasis. Moreover, patients who had higher expression level of CDCA3 tend to show a shorter life span. In vitro studies revealed that silencing CDCA3 could impair the migration ability of tumor cells via down-regulating EMT-related proteins such as MMP9 and Vimentin and inhibit tumor cell growth via arresting cells in the G1 cell cycle phase through regulating cell cycle related proteins like p21. In vivo study confirmed that silencing CDCA3 could inhibit the proliferation of bladder urothelial carcinoma cells. Conclusions CDCA3 is an important oncogene that could strengthen the migration ability of bladder urothelial carcinoma cells and accelerate tumor cell growth via regulating cell cycle progress and is a potential biomarker of bladder urothelial carcinoma.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 226.3-226
Author(s):  
M. Filipović ◽  
A. Šućur ◽  
D. Flegar ◽  
Z. Jajić ◽  
M. Ikić Matijašević ◽  
...  

Background:Osteoclasts mediate periarticular and systemic bone loss in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Osteoclast progenitor cells (OCPs) derived from the myeloid lineage are susceptible to regulation through Notch signaling. Murine bone marrow and splenic OCPs, identified as CD45+Ly6G-CD3-B220-NK1.1-CD11blo/+CD115+CCR2+ cells, are specifically increased in arthritis. We previously identified an increased frequency of OCPs expressing Notch receptors in arthritic mice.Objectives:Several studies suggested that Notch signaling modulation affects the course of experimental arthritis. We aimed to determine the effects of Notch receptor signaling inhibition on OCP activity and arthritis severity in murine collagen-induced arthritis (CIA).Methods:Male C57/Bl6 and DBA mice were immunized with chicken type II collagen and treated with i.p. injections of anti-Notch 1 neutralizing antibodies (1mg/kg). Notch receptor 1 through 4 expression on OCPs was analyzed by flow cytometry in periarticular bone marrow (PBM) and spleen (SPL). Gene expression of Notch receptors, ligands and transcription targets as well as osteoclast differentiation genes RANK, cFos and cFms was determined by qPCR from tissues and sorted OCPs. FACS sorted OCPs were stimulated by osteoclastogenic factors (M-CSF and RANKL), in control, IgG, Jagged (Jag)1 or Delta-like (DLL)1 coated wells, with or without anti-Notch 1 antibodies. Research was approved by the Ethics Committee.Results:We confirmed the expression of Notch receptors on OCPs by flow cytometry with Notch 1 and 2 being most abundantly expressed (around 25% and 40% positive OCPs in PBM and 35% and 20% in SPL respectively), with a significant increase of Notch 2 expression in arthritis. Seeding OCPs on DLL1 coated wells significantly increased while seeding on Jag1 coated wells significantly decreased osteoclastogenesis as reflected on the number of TRAP+ osteoclasts and expression of osteoclast differentiation genes. The addition of anti-Notch 1 antibodies to ligand-stimulated OCPs resulted in an increased number of TRAP+ osteoclasts, partially reversing Jag1 inhibition. In vivo treatment with anti-Notch 1 antibodies did not affect total OCP frequency, but increased expression of Notch 4 both in PBM and SPL as seen by flow cytometry and qPCR. Additionally, anti-Notch 1 treatment stimulated Notch transcription factors HES and HEY. Both PBM and SPL cultured OCPs from anti-Notch 1 treated mice produced a higher number of large TRAP+ osteoclasts, doubling the area covered with osteoclasts in the latter compared to untreated mice. Increased osteoclastogenesis in vitro was further confirmed by an increased expression of osteoclast differentiation genes in the treated group.Conclusion:Our results confirm that Notch signaling may represent an important therapeutic target for the regulation of osteoclast activity in arthritis. Both in vitro and in vivo anti-Notch 1 neutralizing antibodies enhanced osteoclastogenesis in CIA model, implying an inhibitory role of Notch 1 signaling in osteoclast differentiation. As Notch 2 expression is increased on OCPs of arthritic mice, we next plan to determine the effects of Notch 2 neutralization on osteoclast activity and arthritis severity.References:[1]Ikić Matijašević M, Flegar D, Kovačić N, Katavić V, Kelava T, Šućur A, et al. Increased chemotaxis and activity of circulatory myeloid progenitor cells may contribute to enhanced osteoclastogenesis and bone loss in the C57BL/6 mouse model of collagen-induced arthritis. Clin Exp Immunol. 2016;186(3):321–35.[2]Šućur A, Filipović M, Flegar D, Kelava T, Šisl D, Lukač N, et al. Notch receptors and ligands in inflammatory arthritis – a systematic review. Immunology Letters 2020 Vol. 223, p. 106–14.Acknowledgements:The work has been supported by Croatian Science Foundation projects IP-2018-01-2414, UIP-2017-05-1965 and DOK-2018-09-4276.Disclosure of Interests:None declared.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xu Han ◽  
Xiujuan Qu ◽  
Beixing Liu ◽  
Yizhe Wang ◽  
Yang Cheng ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a tumor characterized by high recurrence and mortality, but without effective targeted therapy. It is urgent to explore new treatment strategy to improve the efficacy of TNBC therapy. Methods: Transcriptomic profiling datasets of TNBC were used for screening TNBC specific gene sets. Drug prediction was performed in Connectivity map (CMap) database. Molecular docking method was used for analyzing drug targets. In vitro and in vivo models of TNBC were constructed to examine the drug efficacy. Results: We screened out Mibefradil, a T-type Ca2+ channel blocker, might be a potential therapeutic drug for TNBC by transcriptomics and bioinformatics analysis, and verified that Mibefradil could inhibit the proliferation of TNBC cells by inducing apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. Furthermore, by network pharmacology and molecular docking analysis, AURKA was predicted as the most possible drug target of Mibefradil. Finally, it was proved that Mibefradil treatment could induce apoptosis by decreasing protein expression and phosphorylation level of AURKA in vitro and in vivo. Conclusions: Mibefradil played anti-cancer role in TNBC cells by targeting to AURKA to induce cell cycle and apoptosis. Our results repurposed Mibefradil as a potential targeted drug of TNBC and provided a fundamental research for a novel strategy TNBC treatment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (19) ◽  
pp. 10924-10939
Author(s):  
Zhong-Wei Zhou ◽  
Murat Kirtay ◽  
Nadine Schneble ◽  
George Yakoub ◽  
Mingmei Ding ◽  
...  

Abstract NBS1 is a critical component of the MRN (MRE11/RAD50/NBS1) complex, which regulates ATM- and ATR-mediated DNA damage response (DDR) pathways. Mutations in NBS1 cause the human genomic instability syndrome Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome (NBS), of which neuronal deficits, including microcephaly and intellectual disability, are classical hallmarks. Given its function in the DDR to ensure proper proliferation and prevent death of replicating cells, NBS1 is essential for life. Here we show that, unexpectedly, Nbs1 deletion is dispensable for postmitotic neurons, but compromises their arborization and migration due to dysregulated Notch signaling. We find that Nbs1 interacts with NICD-RBPJ, the effector of Notch signaling, and inhibits Notch activity. Genetic ablation or pharmaceutical inhibition of Notch signaling rescues the maturation and migration defects of Nbs1-deficient neurons in vitro and in vivo. Upregulation of Notch by Nbs1 deletion is independent of the key DDR downstream effector p53 and inactivation of each MRN component produces a different pattern of Notch activity and distinct neuronal defects. These data indicate that neuronal defects and aberrant Notch activity in Nbs1-deficient cells are unlikely to be a direct consequence of loss of MRN-mediated DDR function. This study discloses a novel function of NBS1 in crosstalk with the Notch pathway in neuron development.


2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 1431-1442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyun Chen ◽  
Wei Xiao ◽  
Weirong Chen ◽  
Xialin Liu ◽  
Mingxing Wu ◽  
...  

Abstract Fibrosis is a chronic process involving development and progression of multiple diseases in various organs and is responsible for almost half of all known deaths. Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) is the vital process in organ fibrosis. Lens is an elegant biological tool to investigate the fibrosis process because of its unique biological properties. Using gain- and loss-of-function assays, and different lens fibrosis models, here we demonstrated that microRNA (miR)-26a and miR-26b, members of the miR-26 family have key roles in EMT and fibrosis. They can significantly inhibit proliferation, migration, EMT of lens epithelial cells and lens fibrosis in vitro and in vivo. Interestingly, we revealed that the mechanisms of anti-EMT effects of miR-26a and -26b are via directly targeting Jagged-1 and suppressing Jagged-1/Notch signaling. Furthermore, we provided in vitro and in vivo evidence that Jagged-1/Notch signaling is activated in TGFβ2-stimulated EMT, and blockade of Notch signaling can reverse lens epithelial cells (LECs) EMT and lens fibrosis. Given the general involvement of EMT in most fibrotic diseases, cancer metastasis and recurrence, miR-26 family and Notch pathway may have therapeutic uses in treating fibrotic diseases and cancers.


2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 298-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Miceli ◽  
A Tejada ◽  
A Castaneda ◽  
S J Mistry

2013 ◽  
Vol 210 (2) ◽  
pp. 301-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camille Lobry ◽  
Panagiotis Ntziachristos ◽  
Delphine Ndiaye-Lobry ◽  
Philmo Oh ◽  
Luisa Cimmino ◽  
...  

Notch signaling pathway activation is known to contribute to the pathogenesis of a spectrum of human malignancies, including T cell leukemia. However, recent studies have implicated the Notch pathway as a tumor suppressor in myeloproliferative neoplasms and several solid tumors. Here we report a novel tumor suppressor role for Notch signaling in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and demonstrate that Notch pathway activation could represent a therapeutic strategy in this disease. We show that Notch signaling is silenced in human AML samples, as well as in AML-initiating cells in an animal model of the disease. In vivo activation of Notch signaling using genetic Notch gain of function models or in vitro using synthetic Notch ligand induces rapid cell cycle arrest, differentiation, and apoptosis of AML-initiating cells. Moreover, we demonstrate that Notch inactivation cooperates in vivo with loss of the myeloid tumor suppressor Tet2 to induce AML-like disease. These data demonstrate a novel tumor suppressor role for Notch signaling in AML and elucidate the potential therapeutic use of Notch receptor agonists in the treatment of this devastating leukemia.


2008 ◽  
Vol 86 (11) ◽  
pp. 2476-2487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwang-Woo Ahn ◽  
Yuyoung Joo ◽  
Yoori Choi ◽  
Minji Kim ◽  
Sang Hyoung Lee ◽  
...  

Oncotarget ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (68) ◽  
pp. 33050-33050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhimashankar Gurushidhappa Utage ◽  
Milind Shivajirao Patole ◽  
Punam Vasudeo Nagvenkar ◽  
Sonali Shankar Kamble ◽  
Rajesh Nivarti Gacche

Oncotarget ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (54) ◽  
pp. 30304-30323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhimashankar Gurushidhappa Utage ◽  
Milind Shivajirao Patole ◽  
Punam Vasudeo Nagvenkar ◽  
Sonali Shankar Kamble ◽  
Rajesh Nivarti Gacche

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document