Surgical Complications of Carotid Endarterectomy

2015 ◽  
pp. 122-130
Author(s):  
J. van Gijn
2006 ◽  
Vol 166 (8) ◽  
pp. 914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Press ◽  
Mark R. Chassin ◽  
Jason Wang ◽  
Stanley Tuhrim ◽  
Ethan A. Halm

Neurology ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 440-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas J. Lanska ◽  
Richard J. Kryscio

Objectives: To determine population-based estimates of in-hospital mortality following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and identify potential risk factors for in-hospital death.Methods: Data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP-3) were analyzed for the year 1993. Nationally representative estimates of risk were calculated by age, sex, race, income, census region, hospital location (urban versus rural), teaching status of hospital, number of hospital beds, hospital ownership, third-party payer, principal procedure, and presence of surgical complications. Multivariate models were developed using stepwise logistic regression and a logit model fit by generalized estimating equations.Results: There were 228 deaths among 18,510 CEAs performed in 17 states of the United States in 1993, yielding an estimated in-hospital mortality rate of 1.2%. Multivariate analysis showed that age, principal procedure, and presence of any surgical complication were significant predictors of in-hospital mortality increased with increasing age (from 0.9% in those younger than 65 years to 1.7% in those age 75 and older) and was markedly higher with CEA performed as a secondary procedure (6.1% versus 0.9%) or with any surgical complication (5.9% versus 0.9%).Conclusions: Increasing age, CEA performed as a secondary procedure, and surgical complications are important predictors of in-hospital mortality following CEA.


2007 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 1138-1146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander J. Greenstein ◽  
Mark R. Chassin ◽  
Jason Wang ◽  
Caron B. Rockman ◽  
Thomas S. Riles ◽  
...  

VASA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naz Ahmed ◽  
Damian Kelleher ◽  
Manmohan Madan ◽  
Sarita Sochart ◽  
George A. Antoniou

Abstract. Background: Insufficient evidence exists to support the safety of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) following intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischaemic stroke. Our study aimed to report a single-centre experience of patients treated over a five-year period. Patients and methods: Departmental computerised databases were interrogated to identify patients who suffered an ischaemic stroke and subsequently underwent thrombolysis followed by CEA. Mortality and stroke within 30 days of surgery were defined as the primary outcome end points. Results: Over a five-year period, 177 out of a total of 679 carotid endarterectomies (26 %) were performed in patients presenting with acute ischaemic stroke. Twenty-five patients (14 %) received IVT prior to CEA in the form of alteplase. Sixty percent of patients were male with a mean age of 68 years. Sixteen patients (64 %) underwent CEA within 14 days of IVT and the median interval between thrombolysis and CEA was 7.5 days (range, 3–50 days). One female patient died of a further intraoperative stroke within 30 days of surgery, yielding a mortality rate of 4 %. Two patients (8 %) suffered from cardiac complications postoperatively resulting in a short high dependency unit stay. Another two patients (8 %) developed local wound complications, which were managed conservatively without the need for re-operation. The median hospital length of stay was 4.5 days (range, 1–33 days). Conclusions: Our experience indicates that CEA post-thrombolysis has a low incidence of mortality. Further high quality evidence is required before CEA can be routinely recommended following IVT for acute ischaemic stroke.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document