Cytogenetic Characterization of Human Melanoma Metastatic Variants: Role of Chromosome 7?1

Author(s):  
Suzanne Bertrand ◽  
Maryse Bailly ◽  
Marie-Jeanine Nguyen ◽  
Jean-Fran�ois Dor�
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Katja Piaszinski ◽  
Martina Rincic ◽  
Thomas Liehr ◽  
Shaymaa Azawi

Melanoma is considered to be one of the most aggressive human tumors. Thus, early molecular diagnosis with risk factor stratification could be an efficacious strategy to increase the survival rates in affected patients. Murine cell lines B16-F1, B16-4A5, and S91 clone M3 are the ones most commonly applied in melanoma research. However, genetic peculiarities of these 3 cell lines have not been studied in detail before. Here, we closed this gap by molecular cytogenetic and array-comparative genomic hybridization studies and the translation of the characterized imbalances into the human genome. This study revealed severely rearranged karyotypes with in parts similar imbalances for all 3 cell lines. Interestingly, they involve genes known to play major roles in human melanoma. These are specifically the oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes, being associated with aggressive forms of melanoma. B16-F1, B16-4A5, and S91 clone M3 revealed aberrations which were similarly observed in human eye and skin but not in human uveal melanoma. Thus, they can be considered as model systems for advanced eye and skin melanoma.


2008 ◽  
Vol 146A (22) ◽  
pp. 2955-2959 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronica Bertini ◽  
Angelo Valetto ◽  
Angela Uccelli ◽  
Alice Bonuccelli ◽  
Enrico Tarantino ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 121-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
CLAUDIA KAIRIYAMA ◽  
IRMA SLAVUTSKY ◽  
IRENE LARRIPA ◽  
VERONICA MORVILLO ◽  
ALICIA I. BRAVO ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
L. T. Germinario

Understanding the role of metal cluster composition in determining catalytic selectivity and activity is of major interest in heterogeneous catalysis. The electron microscope is well established as a powerful tool for ultrastructural and compositional characterization of support and catalyst. Because the spatial resolution of x-ray microanalysis is defined by the smallest beam diameter into which the required number of electrons can be focused, the dedicated STEM with FEG is the instrument of choice. The main sources of errors in energy dispersive x-ray analysis (EDS) are: (1) beam-induced changes in specimen composition, (2) specimen drift, (3) instrumental factors which produce background radiation, and (4) basic statistical limitations which result in the detection of a finite number of x-ray photons. Digital beam techniques have been described for supported single-element metal clusters with spatial resolutions of about 10 nm. However, the detection of spurious characteristic x-rays away from catalyst particles produced images requiring several image processing steps.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document