Clinical Aspects and Treatment of Diabetic Peripheral and Autonomic Neuropathy

Author(s):  
G. Pozza ◽  
G. Comi ◽  
M. C. Librenti ◽  
N. Canal
Doctor Ru ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 60-66
Author(s):  
A.V. Zilov ◽  
◽  

Objective of the Review: To analyse the incidence of polyneuropathy in diabetic patients focusing on autonomic neuropathy. Key Points. Polyneuropathy is one of the most common delayed complications of diabetes mellitus (DM); the condition has numerous clinical aspects. Major polyneuropathy studies focus on assessment, prevention and management of pain caused by sensory and sensory-and-motor defects, prevention of ulceration and Charcot foot. At the same time, various autonomic neuropathy variants in diabetic patients have either been studied not thoroughly enough, or are outside of clinical interest. Still, prevention and pathogenic effect from autonomic neuropathy are similar to those used in other types of diabetic neuropathy. We describe major pathogenic links in nerve fibre damaging and clinical forms of autonomic neuropathy. Major studies of the use of α-lipoic acid in DM are presented. Conclusion. α-lipoic acid medications are efficient in slowing down various forms of autonomic neuropathy. Dose-dependent action of these medications, adequate therapy duration (at least 3 months as a course of medication), improved glycaemic control in patients with DM are essential for autonomic neuropathy prevention and slowing down. Keywords: diabetes mellitus; diabetic polyneuropathy; diabetic autonomic polyneuropathy; α-lipoic acid.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gidon J. Bönhof ◽  
Christian Herder ◽  
Dan Ziegler

: The various manifestations of diabetic neuropathy including distal symmetric sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN) and cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) are among to the most prevalent chronic complications of diabetes. Major clinical complications of diabetic neuropathies such as neuropathic pain, chronic foot ulcers, and orthostatic hypotension are associated with considerable morbidity, increased mortality, and diminished quality of life. Despite the substantial individual and socioeconomic burden, the strategies to diagnose and treat diabetic neuropathies remain insufficient. This review provides an overview on the current clinical aspects and recent advances in exploring local and systemic biomarkers of both DSPN and CAN assessed in human studies (such as biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress) to better understand the underlying pathophysiology and to improve early detection. Current therapeutic options for DSPN are (I) causal treatment including lifestyle modification, optimal glycemic control, and multifactorial risk intervention; (II) pharmacotherapy derived from pathogenetic concepts; and (III) analgesic treatment against neuropathic pain. Recent advances in each category are discussed including non-pharmacological approaches such as electrical stimulation. Finally, the current therapeutic options for cardiovascular autonomic complications are provided. These insights should contribute to a broader understanding of the various manifestations of diabetic neuropathies from both the research and clinical perspectives.


2004 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. 121-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ascan Warnholtz ◽  
Maria Wendt ◽  
Michael August ◽  
Thomas Münzel

Endothelial dysfunction in the setting of cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypercholesterolaemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and chronic smoking, as well as in the setting of heart failure, has been shown to be at least partly dependent on the production of reactive oxygen species in endothelial and/or smooth muscle cells and the adventitia, and the subsequent decrease in vascular bioavailability of NO. Superoxide-producing enzymes involved in increased oxidative stress within vascular tissue include NAD(P)H-oxidase, xanthine oxidase and endothelial nitric oxide synthase in an uncoupled state. Recent studies indicate that endothelial dysfunction of peripheral and coronary resistance and conductance vessels represents a strong and independent risk factor for future cardiovascular events. Ways to reduce endothelial dysfunction include risk-factor modification and treatment with substances that have been shown to reduce oxidative stress and, simultaneously, to stimulate endothelial NO production, such as inhibitors of angiotensin-converting enzyme or the statins. In contrast, in conditions where increased production of reactive oxygen species, such as superoxide, in vascular tissue is established, treatment with NO, e.g. via administration of nitroglycerin, results in a rapid development of endothelial dysfunction, which may worsen the prognosis in patients with established coronary artery disease.


1965 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 790-804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carroll M. Leevy

Praxis ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 109 (14) ◽  
pp. 1141-1149
Author(s):  
Martina Boscolo Berto ◽  
Dominik C. Benz ◽  
Christoph Gräni

Abstract. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the industrialized countries. Assessment of symptomatic patients with suspected obstructive CAD is a common reason for a clinical visit. Noninvasive anatomical and functional imaging are established tools to rule-in and rule-out CAD, to assess the severity of disease and to determine the potential risk of future cardiovascular events. In this review, we discuss the updated Guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology on Chronic Coronary Syndromes and explore the different imaging modalities used in current clinical practice for the noninvasive assessment of CAD. The pros and cons of each method, especially comparing anatomical and functional testing, are presented. Furthermore we we address the practical clinical aspects in the selection of the optimal noninvasive tests according to clinical need.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document