Comparison of Three Cross-Match Techniques to Select Platelet Donors1

2015 ◽  
pp. 47-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. J. Bowen ◽  
E. Berman-Wong ◽  
D. Dawson ◽  
B. Herbut ◽  
L. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cross Match

Parallel massive data oriented astronomical cross-match

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 2056-2059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing ZHAO ◽  
Ji-zhou SUN ◽  
Ce YU ◽  
Chen-zhou CUI ◽  
Jian XIAO
Keyword(s):  
Massive Data ◽  
Cross Match

scholarly journals Does a positive lymphocyte cross-match contraindicate living-donor liver transplantation?

Surgery ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 147 (6) ◽  
pp. 840-844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomohide Hori ◽  
Shinji Uemoto ◽  
Yasutsugu Takada ◽  
Fumitaka Oike ◽  
Yasuhiro Ogura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Living Donor ◽  
Living Donor Liver Transplantation ◽  
Donor Liver ◽  
Donor Liver Transplantation ◽  
Cross Match

Optimisation de l’épreuve directe de compatibilité au laboratoire : cross match automatisé

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 254
Author(s):  
H. Brouk ◽  
I.H. Saouli ◽  
A. Amireche ◽  
N. Zeribi ◽  
D. Khemiss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cross Match

scholarly journals Blood Transfusion Policies in Elective General Surgery: How to Optimise Cross-Match-to-Transfusion Ratios

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas C. Hall ◽  
Clare Pattenden ◽  
Chloe Hollobone ◽  
Cristina Pollard ◽  
Ashley R. Dennison
Keyword(s):  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
General Surgery ◽  
Cross Match

scholarly journals REJEIÇÃO HIPERAGUDA COM CROSS-MATCH POR CITOTOXICIDADE NEGATIVO EM UM PROGRAMA DE ALOCAÇÃO DE ÓRGÃOS BASEADO EM HLA – PODEMOS PREVENIR?

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 1489-1491
Author(s):  
Luciana Tanajura Santamaria Saber ◽  
Eduardo Antonio Donadi ◽  
Ana Paula Lucera ◽  
Silvio Tucci Jr ◽  
Tania Marisa Garcia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sao Paulo ◽  
São Paulo ◽  
De Se ◽  
Cross Match ◽  
United Network

Desde 1997, o estado de São Paulo tem adotado um programa de alocação de rins baseado nos critérios propostos pelo United Network for Organ Sharing (U.N.O.S.). Relatamos o caso de um paciente de sexo masculino submetido a transplante renal com doador falecido, com zero incompatibilidade HLA, que evoluiu com rejeição hiperaguda, apesar de o crossmatch por linfocitotoxicidade (CXM) ser negativo para linfócitos T e B. O paciente era do tipo sanguíneo AB, apresentava duas transfusões sanguíneas prévias e atividade de anticorpos contra painel (PRA) negativa para antígenos HLA classe I, classe II e antígenos MIC, tanto em soro recente quanto em soro histórico. A repetição do crossmatch com soros históricos também apresentou resultados negativos. Como não havia mais células disponíveis do doador, não foi possível realizar crossmatch por citometria de fluxo (FCXCM). Neste trabalho, discutimos as vantagens e desvantagens, assim como a viabilidade de se realizar FCXCM para todos os pacientes.

scholarly journals Blood Transfusion Practice before and after Implementation of Type and Screen Protocol in Emergency Department of a University Affiliated Hospital in Iran

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mostafa Alavi-Moghaddam ◽  
Mahmoud Bardeh ◽  
Hossein Alimohammadi ◽  
Habib Emami ◽  
Seyed-Mostafa Hosseini-Zijoud
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
Transfusion Practice ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Blood Transfusions ◽  
Common Diseases ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Transfusion Ratio ◽  
Cross Match

Background. Blood transfusion is the cornerstone of therapy for many serious and common diseases. This study was performed to assess blood transfusion practice before and after implementation of type and screen protocol in emergency department of a university affiliated hospital in Iran, 2012-2013.Methods. An audit was studied before and after the implementation of type and screen protocol. The number of blood transfusions, time interval between blood order and transfusion, cross-match to transfusion ratio (C/Tratio), and transfusion index (TI) were checked.C/Tratio was used as a measure of the efficiency of blood ordering practice. We compared our results before and after implementation of type and screen protocol.Results. In present study after implementation of type and screen protocol, the time interval between requesting blood transfusion and transfusion of blood has decreased significantly (P<0.001). The number of blood transfusions required by actual patients increased significantly from 1/2 to 2 (P<0.001). The average cross-match to transfusion (C/T) ratio got near 1.13 from 1.41 and TI got near 0.91 from 0.58 (P<0.001).Conclusion. The implementation of T&S protocol has been proven to be safe, efficient, and beneficial to the transfusion practice of our hospital from the current study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document