Determination of Levels of Retinoic Acid Binding Protein in the Four Major Histologic Types of Human Lung Cancer1

2015 ◽  
pp. 327-329
Author(s):  
W. J. Uphouse ◽  
N. Oishi ◽  
J. Rundhaug
Keyword(s):  
Retinoic Acid ◽  
Human Lung ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Acid Binding Protein ◽  
Histologic Types

scholarly journals Determination of binding affinities of retinoids to retinoic acid-binding protein and serum albumin

1978 ◽  
Vol 171 (3) ◽  
pp. 711-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brahma P. Sani ◽  
Belinda C. Titus ◽  
Chandra K. Banerjee
Keyword(s):  
Retinoic Acid ◽  
Serum Albumin ◽  
Binding Affinity ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Side Chain ◽  
Binding Affinities ◽  
Acid Binding Protein ◽  
Relative Binding ◽  
Biological Potency

Binding affinities of retinoic acid and its synthetic analogues to intracellular retinoic acid-binding protein, which is a possible candidate for mediating their biological function, and to serum albumin, the plasma transport protein, were evaluated. A quantitative method involving elimination of interfering serum albumin by immunoprecipitation was developed to measure the binding efficiency of these retinoids, some of which are active in modifying epithelial differentiation and preventing tumorigenesis. Two cyclopentenyl analogues of retinoic acid and 13-cis-retinoic acid showed, like retinoic acid, a binding efficiency of 100% for the cellular binding protein. With the phenyl, dichlorophenyl and trimethylmethoxyphenyl analogues of retinoic acid, the binding efficiency increased as the substituents on the aromatic ring increased; thus the trimethylmethoxyphenyl analogue binds almost as efficiently as retinoic acid itself. However, the trimethylmethoxyphenyl analogue with a sulphur atom on the side chain has a much decreased binding affinity. The correlation noticed between the binding efficiency of these retinoids and their biological activity in differentiation and/or in the control of tumorigenesis particularly enhances the confidence in the present method of determining the relative binding efficiencies. None of the vitamins, hormones and cofactors tested, showed appreciable affinity for the retinoic acid-binding site. Studies on binding of retinoic acid and its analogues to serum albumin indicate that no correlation exists between binding affinity for albumin and their biological potency.

The transfer of transthyretin and receptor-binding properties from the plasma retinol-binding protein to the epididymal retinoic acid-binding protein

2002 ◽  
Vol 362 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manickavasagam SUNDARAM ◽  
Daan M. F. van AALTEN ◽  
John B. C. FINDLAY ◽  
Asipu SIVAPRASADARAO
Keyword(s):  
Retinoic Acid ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Binding Pocket ◽  
Retinol Binding Protein ◽  
Cell Surface Receptor ◽  
Acid Binding Protein ◽  
The Family ◽  
Surface Receptor ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Plasma Retinol

Members of the lipocalin superfamily share a common structural fold, but differ from each other with respect to the molecules with which they interact. They all contain eight β-strands (A—H) that fold to form a well-defined β-barrel, which harbours a binding pocket for hydrophobic ligands. These strands are connected by loops that vary in size and structure and make up the closed and open ends of the pocket. In addition to binding ligands, some members of the family interact with other macromolecules, the specificity of which is thought to be associated with the variable loop regions. Here, we have investigated whether the macromolecular-recognition properties can be transferred from one member of the family to another. For this, we chose the prototypical lipocalin, the plasma retinol-binding protein (RBP) and its close structural homologue the epididymal retinoic acid-binding protein (ERABP). RBP exhibits three molecular-recognition properties: it binds to retinol, to transthyretin (TTR) and to a cell-surface receptor. ERABP binds retinoic acid, but whether it interacts with other macromolecules is not known. Here, we show that ERABP does not bind to TTR and the RBP receptor, but when the loops of RBP near the open end of the pocket (L-1, L-2 and L-3, connecting β-strands A—B, C—D and E—F, respectively) were substituted into the corresponding regions of ERABP, the resulting chimaera acquired the ability to bind TTR and the receptor. L-2 and L-3 were found to be the major determinants of the receptor- and TTR-binding specificities respectively. Thus we demonstrate that lipocalins serve as excellent scaffolds for engineering novel biological functions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document