The Planning of Cancer Centers

2015 ◽  
pp. 63-75
Author(s):  
D. F. Herring
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Centers

Wie bewährt sich das Konzept in der Praxis?

2010 ◽  
Vol 01 (01) ◽  
pp. 44-44
Author(s):  
Rainer Bubenzer
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Centers ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Centers

Comprehensive Cancer Centers als interdisziplinäre, die Grundlagenwissenschaften einbeziehende Kompetenzzentren für Krebserkrankungen erweitern das Aufgabenspektrum der klassischen Tumorzentren. Aktuelle Probleme betreffen ihre nachhaltige Finanzierung (vor allem im Bereich der Patientenversorgung), die noch unzureichende wissenschaftliche Evaluation, die potenziell größer werdende Kluft der Patientenversorgung in Zentren und in der Fläche sowie die unklare Positionierung der Forschung zwischen öffentlichen und kommerziellen Interessen. Ein Fach-Symposium in Berlin gab aktuelle Einblicke in die Arbeit einiger Spitzenzentren.

Differences in Patients, Surgical Complexity, and Outcomes After Cancer Surgery at National Cancer Institute-designated Cancer Centers Compared to Other Hospitals

Medical Care ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (7) ◽  
pp. 606-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan P. Merkow ◽  
David J. Bentrem ◽  
Jeanette W. Chung ◽  
Jennifer L. Paruch ◽  
Clifford Y. Ko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
National Cancer Institute ◽  
Cancer Surgery ◽  
Cancer Centers ◽  
Surgical Complexity ◽  
After Cancer

scholarly journals Interobserver variability in target volume delineation in definitive radiotherapy for thoracic esophageal cancer: a multi-center study from China

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Chang ◽  
Wei Deng ◽  
Xin Wang ◽  
Zongmei Zhou ◽  
Jun Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Gross Tumor Volume ◽  
Tumor Volume ◽  
Interobserver Variability ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Thoracic Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Target Volume Delineation ◽  
Cancer Centers ◽  
Definitive Radiotherapy ◽  
Volume Delineation

Abstract Purpose To investigate the interobserver variability (IOV) in target volume delineation of definitive radiotherapy for thoracic esophageal cancer (TEC) among cancer centers in China, and ultimately improve contouring consistency as much as possible to lay the foundation for multi-center prospective studies. Methods Sixteen cancer centers throughout China participated in this study. In Phase 1, three suitable cases with upper, middle, and lower TEC were chosen, and participants were asked to contour a group of gross tumor volume (GTV-T), nodal gross tumor volume (GTV-N) and clinical target volume (CTV) for each case based on their routine experience. In Phase 2, the same clinicians were instructed to follow a contouring protocol to re-contour another group of target volume. The variation of the target volume was analyzed and quantified using dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Results Sixteen clinicians provided routine volumes, whereas ten provided both routine and protocol volumes for each case. The IOV of routine GTV-N was the most striking in all cases, with the smallest DSC of 0.37 (95% CI 0.32–0.42), followed by CTV, whereas GTV-T showed high consistency. After following the protocol, the smallest DSC of GTV-N was improved to 0.64 (95% CI 0.45–0.83, P = 0.005) but the DSC of GTV-T and CTV remained constant in most cases. Conclusion Variability in target volume delineation was observed, but it could be significantly reduced and controlled using mandatory interventions.

scholarly journals Implementing Cancer Care in Rwanda: Capacity Building for Treatment and Scale-Up

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 7216
Author(s):  
Paul H. Park ◽  
Cyprien Shyirambere ◽  
Fred Kateera ◽  
Neil Gupta ◽  
Christian Rusangwa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Capacity Building ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Sub Saharan Africa ◽  
Essential Medicines ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Health Coverage ◽  
Cancer Centers ◽  
Implementation Approach ◽  
Single Cancer

Background: The majority of countries in sub-Saharan Africa are ill-prepared to address the rising burden of cancer. While some have been able to establish a single cancer referral center, few have been able to scale-up services nationally towards universal health coverage. The literature lacks a step-wise implementation approach for resource-limited countries to move beyond a single-facility implementation strategy and implement a national cancer strategy to expand effective coverage. Methods: We applied an implementation science framework, which describes a four-phase approach: Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS). Through this framework, we describe Rwanda’s approach to establish not just a single cancer center, but a national cancer program. Results: By applying EPIS to Rwanda’s implementation approach, we analyzed and identified the implementation strategies and factors, which informed processes of each phase to establish foundational cancer delivery components, including trained staff, diagnostic technology, essential medicines, and medical informatics. These cancer delivery components allowed for the implementation of Rwanda’s first cancer center, while simultaneously serving as the nidus for capacity building of foundational components for future cancer centers. Conclusion: This “progressive scaling” approach ensured that initial investments in the country’s first cancer center was a step toward establishing future cancer centers in the country.

Psychology Staffing at Cancer Centers: Data From National Comprehensive Cancer Network Member Institutions

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. e1343-e1354
Author(s):  
Laura Melton ◽  
Diana Krause ◽  
Jessica Sugalski
Keyword(s):  
National Comprehensive Cancer Network ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Direct Patient Care ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Network Member ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Cancer Centers ◽  
Cancer Network

PURPOSE: The field of psycho-oncology is relatively undeveloped, with little information existing regarding the use of psychologists at cancer centers. Comprising 30 leading cancer centers across the United States, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) set out to understand the trends in its Member Institutions. METHODS: The NCCN Best Practices Committee surveyed NCCN Member Institutions regarding their use of psychologists. The survey was administered electronically in the spring/summer of 2017. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 18 cancer centers. Across institutions, 94% have psychologists appointed to provide direct care to their cancer center patients. The number of licensed psychologist full-time equivalents (FTEs) on staff who provide direct patient care ranged from < 1.0 FTE (17%) to 17.0-17.9 FTEs (6%). Regarding psychologist appointments, 41% have both faculty and staff appointments, 41% have all faculty appointments, and 18% have all staff appointments. Forty-three percent of institutions indicated that some licensed psychologists at their centers (ranging from 1%-65%) do not provide any direct clinical care, and 57% indicated that all licensed psychologist on staff devote some amount of time to direct clinical care. The percent of clinical care time that is spent on direct clinical care ranged from 15%-90%. CONCLUSION: There is great variability in psychology staffing, academic appointments, and the amount of direct patient care provided by on-staff psychologists at cancer centers.

Guidelines for Pediatric Cancer Centers

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 113 (6) ◽  
pp. 1833-1835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Pediatric Cancer ◽  
Cancer Centers
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document