Effects of Selected Vasoactive Agents on Resistance, Exchange, and Capacitance Vessels in Skeletal Muscle1

Author(s):  
S. Mellander
2003 ◽  
Vol 285 (1) ◽  
pp. E182-E188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Manuel Moreno ◽  
Rosemary Wangensteen ◽  
Juan Sainz ◽  
Isabel Rodríguez-Gomez ◽  
Virginia Chamorro ◽  
...  

This study analyzed the role of nitric oxide (NO) and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF) in the abnormal renal vascular reactivity of hypothyroid rats. Renal responses to vasoconstrictors [VC: phenylephrine (PHE) and ANG II] and vasodilators [VD: ACh, sodium nitroprusside (SNP), and papaverine (PV)] were studied in kidneys from control and hypothyroid rats under normal conditions and after NO or EDHF blockade. NO was blocked by the administration of Nω-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME) and EDHF by the administration of tetraethylammonium (TEA) or by an increased extracellular K+. The response to VC was also evaluated after endothelium removal. Hypothyroid kidneys showed reduced responsiveness to PHE and a normal response to ANG II. l-NAME and TEA administration produced an increased sensitivity to PHE and to ANG II in control preparations. l-NAME also increased the response to PHE in hypothyroid kidneys, but the differences between control and hypothyroid kidneys were maintained. TEA administration did not change the response to either VC in hypothyroid preparations. In endothelium-removed preparations, TEA was unable to increase pressor responsiveness to VC. Hypothyroid kidneys showed reduced responsiveness to ACh and SNP and normal response to PV. The differences between hypothyroid and control preparations in the responses to ACh and SNP were maintained after l-NAME or increased K+. In conclusion, this study shows that 1) the attenuated response to PHE in hypothyroidism is not related to an increased production of endothelium-derived relaxing factors NO and EDHF; 2) the response to VC in hypothyroid preparations is insensitive to EDHF blockade; and 3) hypothyroid preparations have a reduced reactivity to the NO donor, and NO-independent vasodilatation remains unaffected.


2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pia Moinzadeh ◽  
Gabriela Riemekasten ◽  
Elise Siegert ◽  
Gerhard Fierlbeck ◽  
Joerg Henes ◽  
...  

Objective.Vasculopathy is a key factor in the pathophysiology of systemic sclerosis (SSc) and the main cause for Raynaud phenomenon (RP), digital ulcers (DU), and/or pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). It is so far unknown how patients with SSc are treated with vasoactive agents in daily practice. To determine to which extent patients with SSc were treated with different vasoactive agents, we used data from the German Network for Systemic Scleroderma registry.Methods.The data of 3248 patients with SSc were analyzed.Results.Patients were treated with vasoactive drugs in 61.1% of cases (1984/3248). Of these, 47.6% received calcium channel inhibitors, followed by 34.2% treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, 21.1% treated with intravenous (IV) prostanoids, 10.1% with pentoxifylline, 8.8% with angiotensin 1 receptor antagonists (AT1RA), 8.7% with endothelin 1 receptor antagonists (ET1RA), 4.1% with phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors, and 5.3% with others. Patients with RP received vasoactive therapy in 63.3% of cases, with DU in 70.1%, and with PAH in 78.2% of cases. Logistic regression analysis revealed that patients with PAH were significantly more often treated with PDE5 inhibitors and ET1RA, and those with DU with ET1RA and IV prostanoids. In addition, 41.8% of patients were treated with ACE inhibitors and/or AT1RA. Patients registered after 2009 received significantly more often ET1RA, AT1RA, and IV prostanoids compared with patients registered prior to 2005.Conclusion.These data clearly indicate that many patients with SSc do not yet receive sufficient vasoactive therapy. Further, in recent years, a marked change of treatment regimens can be observed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document