Electrocardiographic Stress Testing: the Debate Goes On (Probably)

2015 ◽  
pp. 83-92
Author(s):  
James S. Forrester ◽  
George A. Diamond
Keyword(s):  
Stress Testing

Stress-testing Russian Banking System: Will Banks Need Government Assistance Again?

2010 ◽  
pp. 61-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Solntsev ◽  
A. Pestova ◽  
M. Mamonov
Keyword(s):  
Stress Testing ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Stress Test ◽  
Banking System ◽  
Government Assistance ◽  
Methodological Issues ◽  
Loan Portfolio ◽  
Macroeconomic Indicators ◽  
Remote Stress ◽  
Capital Injections

The article analyzes factors that affect growth of the share of non-performing loans in the loan portfolio of Russian banks and proposes approaches for this share forecasting on the basis of dynamics of macroeconomic indicators. It also deals with methodological issues of remote stress-test of lending agencies. Using the results of conducted stress-test of Russian banks the authors assess their perspective capital needs in 2010 and estimate the share of government assistance in capital injections. Furthermore, the authors define the scale of vulnerable banks groups in the Russian banking sector.

Stress Testing in a Value at Risk Framework

CFA Digest ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 76-78
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Latta
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Value At Risk ◽  
Stress Testing ◽  
A Value ◽  
Risk Framework

Integrating Stress Testing with Risk Management

CFA Digest ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 87-88
Author(s):  
Bruce D. Phelps
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Stress Testing

Liquidity Gap Report for Stress Testing Structural Liquidity Risk

GIS Business ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 43-53
Author(s):  
Eugenia Schmitt
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Risk Evaluation ◽  
Stress Testing ◽  
Gap Analysis ◽  
Liquidity Risk ◽  
Methodological Basis ◽  
Qualitative Risk Assessment ◽  
The Future ◽  
Liquidity Gap

The need to focus on banks funding structure and stress testing in an explicit way arose as a consequence of the crisis of past decades. Liquidity risks usually occur as a consequence of other kinds of risks, hence analysing scenarios in a prospective manner is essential for the assessment if the bank can fulfill its obligations as they come due and if its funding costs are appropriate. The structural liquidity risk and the degree of the liquidity mismatch can be measured based on the liquidity gap analysis, where expected cash-in- and outflows, divided in different time-buckets are depicted. The liquidity gap report (LGR) shows if a liquidity shortcoming appears in the future and how high is the amount a bank would have to pay, if any hedging were not possible. This paper shows how to build a comprehensive LGR which is the base for both, liquidity and wealth risk evaluation. To improve the accuracy of the forecast, the counterbalancing capacity will be incorporated into the LGR. This tool is a methodological basis for quantitative and qualitative risk assessment and stress testing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document