scholarly journals Use of Leflunomide in Renal Transplant Recipients with Ganciclovir-Resistant/Refractory Cytomegalovirus Infection: A Case Series from the University of Chicago

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. James Chon ◽  
Pradeep V. Kadambi ◽  
Chang Xu ◽  
Yolanda T. Becker ◽  
Piotr Witkowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Deceased Donor ◽  
Renal Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
University Of Chicago ◽  
Kidney Transplants ◽  
Cmv Infection ◽  
The University

Introduction: Although antiviral prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus (CMV) is widely used, CMV infection remains common in renal transplant recipients with adverse consequences. Methods: We report 5 cases of renal transplant recipients with resistant CMV infection who were successfully managed with leflunomide at the University of Chicago Medical Center. Results: Five renal transplant recipients (2 simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplants, 3 deceased donor kidney transplants) were diagnosed with GCV-resistant CMV infection from 2003 to 2011. Of the 4 patients who had resistance genotype testing, 3 showed a UL97 mutation and 1 patient had a clinically resistant CMV infection. All patients received CMV prophylaxis with valganciclovir for 3 months. The number of days from the date of transplant to viremia ranged from 38 to 458 days (median 219). All 5 patients received other antiviral agents (e.g. ganciclovir, foscarnet), and in 4 patients, viremia was cleared before leflunomide was initiated as consolidation (or maintenance) therapy. Conclusion: Leflunomide was well tolerated and successful in preventing recurrence of viremia in renal transplant recipients with resistant CMV infection. The beneficial effect of leflunomide in this setting warrants further investigation.

scholarly journals 531. COVID-19 infection outcome in African American Renal Transplant recipients: Detroit Medical Center experience

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S332-S333
Author(s):  
Angela Beatriz V Cruz ◽  
Claudia Jarrin Tejada ◽  
Mareena Zachariah ◽  
Shakir Hussein ◽  
Elizabeth Wilpula ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
African American ◽  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Deceased Donor ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Lower Mortality ◽  
Renal Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Laboratory Findings ◽  
Obstructive Sleep

Abstract Background Transplant recipients are more vulnerable to infections including COVID-19, given their co-morbidities and chronic immunosuppression. Most preliminary care series report rapid clinical progression and higher mortality compared to the general population. Methods Retrospective study at Harper University Hospital - Detroit Medical Center. Twenty-five renal transplant recipients (RTR) presenting consecutively with COVID-19 symptoms and positive NP swab PCR for SARS-CoV2 between 03/01/2020 - 05/01/2020 were included. Data on demographics, clinical presentation, laboratory findings, management and outcomes were collected. Results All 25 patients were hospitalized. Patients had a median age of 56, all African American and deceased donor transplant recipients. Most had hypertension (96%), about half (52%) had diabetes, 64% had pulmonary disease including obstructive sleep apnea, COPD and pulmonary hypertension. Most common presenting symptom was dyspnea (64%), followed by fever and cough (56%) and diarrhea (56%). One-half of patients had multifocal opacities on initial chest x-ray (52%). Immunosuppression with tacrolimus and low dose prednisone was continued, while mycophenolate mofetil was held on admission. Following institution guidelines, hydroxychloroquine was given to 32%, while 48% received both hydroxychloroquine and steroids. Prophylactic anticoagulation was given to 80% of patients and therapeutic coagulation to 8%. Oxygen supplementation given to 60% of patients and one patient required intubation. Three patients (12%) required transfer to the intensive care unit, one expired. At follow-up, treatment with mycophenolate was reintroduced based on resolution of symptoms and laboratory parameters. Conclusion COVID-19 infected RTR in this small cohort had lower mortality of 4% (n=1) compared to State-wide mortality of 10%. Despite multiple co-morbidities and chronic immunosuppression, our patient cohort had excellent prognosis and lower mortality compared to other series. Exact reasons for this optimal outcome are explored. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Radical prostatectomy outcomes in renal transplant recipients: a retrospective case series of Thai patients

BMC Urology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kun Sirisopana ◽  
Pocharapong Jenjitranant ◽  
Premsant Sangkum ◽  
Kittinut Kijvikai ◽  
Suthep Pacharatakul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Urinary Continence ◽  
Renal Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background The incidence of prostate cancer in renal transplant recipients (RTR) is similar to the general population. Radical prostatectomy (RP) is the standard of care in the management of clinically localized cancer, but is considered complicated due to the presence of adhesions, and the location of transplanted ureter/kidney. To date, a few case series or studies on RP in RTR have been published, especially in Asian patients. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety and report the experience with RP on RTR. Methods We retrospectively reviewed data of 1270 patients who underwent RP from January 2008 to March 2020, of which 5 patients were RTR. All available baseline characteristics, perioperative and postoperative data (operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), complications, length of hospital stay, complication), pathological stage, Gleason score, surgical margin status, and pre/postoperative creatinine were reviewed. Results Of the 5 RTR who underwent RPs (1 open radical prostatectomy (ORP), 1 laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP), 2 robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies (RALRP), and 1 Retzius-sparing RALRP (RS-RALRP)) prostatectomy, the mean age (± SD) was 70 (± 5.62) years. In LRP and RALRP cases, the standard ports were moved slightly medially to prevent graft injury. The mean operative time ranged from 190 to 365 min. The longest operative time and highest EBL (630 ml) was the ORP case due to severe adhesion in Retzius space. For LRP and RALRP cases, the operative times seemed comparable and had EBL of ≤ 300 ml. All RPs were successful without any major intra-operative complication. There was no significant change in graft function. The restorations of urinary continence were within 1 month in RS-RALRP, approximately 6 months in RALRP, and about 1 year in ORP and LRP. Three patients with positive surgical margins had prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence at the first follow-up and 1 had later PSA recurrence. Two patients with negative margins were free from biochemical recurrence at 47 and 3 months after their RP. Conclusions Our series suggested that all RP techniques are safe and feasible mode of treatment for localized prostate cancer in RTR.

Cardiorenal syndrome in renal transplant recipients - It’s the fistula at fault: A case series

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (11) ◽  
pp. e13417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Padmaraj Samarendra ◽  
Mohan Ramkumar ◽  
Vivek Sharma ◽  
Sarita Kumari
Keyword(s):  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Cardiorenal Syndrome ◽  
Renal Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Recipients

scholarly journals Effects of Rituximab on the Development of Viral and Fungal Infections in Renal Transplant Recipients

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samir J. Patel ◽  
Jennifer M. Devos ◽  
Richard J. Knight ◽  
Kyle L. Dawson ◽  
Wadi N. Suki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Fungal Infections ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Deceased Donor ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Renal Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients

Background. Rituximab is becoming increasingly utilized in renal transplant recipients; however, its association with infections remains unclear. Methods. We reviewed the incidence of viral and fungal infections in kidney transplant recipients treated with () or without () rituximab (RTX) in addition to standard immunosuppression. Results. Infections occurred in 134 (30%) patients, with a greater proportion in RTX versus no RTX patients (47% versus 28%; ). Viral infections occurred in 44% and 27% of RTX and no RTX patients, respectively (). This was largely driven by the frequency of BK viremia and noncytomegalovirus/non-BK viruses in RTX patients (27% versus 13% () and 15% versus 2% (), resp.). Fungal infections also occurred more often in RTX patients (11% versus 3 %; ). Multivariate analysis revealed deceased donor recipient (odds ratio = 2.5; ) and rituximab exposure (odds ratio = 2.2; ) as independent risk factors for infection. Older patients, deceased donor recipients, those on dialysis longer, and those with delayed graft function tended to be at a greater risk for infections following rituximab. Conclusions. Rituximab is associated with an increased incidence of viral and fungal infections in kidney transplantation. Additional preventative measures and/or monitoring infectious complications may be warranted in those receiving rituximab.

Cutaneous manifestations of cytomegalovirus disease in renal transplant recipients: a case series

2008 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.O. Kaisar ◽  
R.M. Kirwan ◽  
G.M. Strutton ◽  
C.M. Hawley ◽  
D.W. Mudge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Renal Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Cytomegalovirus Disease ◽  
Cutaneous Manifestations
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document