scholarly journals Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients with Refractory Congestive Heart Failure: A Systematic Review

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renhua Lu ◽  
María-Jimena Muciño-Bermejo ◽  
Leonardo Claudino Ribeiro ◽  
Enrico Tonini ◽  
Carla Estremadoyro ◽  
...  

Background: Refractory congestive heart failure (RCHF) is associated with a high mortality rate and is a major contributor to hospital admissions. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an option to control volume overload and perhaps improve outcomes in this challenging patient population. The aim of this systematic review is to describe the relative risk-benefit ratio based on data reported regarding the use of PD in RCHF. This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. An electronic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify relevant studies published from January 1951 to February 2014. Eligible studies selected were prospective or retrospective adult population studies on PD in the setting of RCHF. The following clinical outcomes were used to assess PD therapy: (1) hospitalization rates; (2) heart function; (3) renal function; (4) fluid overload, and (5) adverse clinical outcomes. Summary: Of 864 citations, we excluded 843 citations and included 21 studies (n = 673 patients). After PD, hospitalization days declined significantly (p = 0.0001), and heart function improved significantly (left ventricular ejection fraction: p = 0.0013; New York Heart Association classification: p = 0.0000). There were no statistically significant differences in glomerular filtration rate after PD treatment in non-chronic kidney disease stage 5D patients (p = 0.1065). Among patients treated with PD, body weight decreased significantly (p = 0.0006). The yearly average peritonitis rate was 14.5%, and the average yearly mortality was 20.3%. Key Messages: This systematic review suggests that PD may be an effective and safe therapeutic tool for patients with RCHF.

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 527-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang Yin Chionh ◽  
Anna Clementi ◽  
Cheng Boon Poh ◽  
Fredric O Finkelstein ◽  
Dinna N Cruz

Heart failure (HF) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Extracorporeal (EC) therapy, including ultrafiltration (UF) and haemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD) and peritoneal ultrafiltration (PUF) are potential therapeutic options in diuretic-resistant states. This systematic review assessed outcomes of PD and compared the effects of PD to EC. A comprehensive search of major databases from 1966 to 2017 for studies utilising PD (or PUF) in diuretic-resistant HF was conducted, excluding studies involving patients with end-stage kidney disease. Data were extracted and combined using a random-effects model, expressed as odds ratio (OR). Thirty-one studies ( n = 902) were identified from 3195 citations. None were randomised trials. Survival was variable (0–100%) with a wide follow-up duration (36 h–10 years). With follow-up > 1 year, the overall mortality was 48.3%. Only four studies compared PD with EC. Survival was 42.1% with PD and 45.0% with EC; the pooled effect did not favour either (OR 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.24–2.69; p = 0.710). Studies on PD in patients with HF reported several benefits. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improved after PD (OR 3.76, 95%CI: 2.24–5.27; p < 0.001). Seven of nine studies saw LVEF increase by > 10%. Twenty-one studies reported the New York Heart Association status and 40–100% of the patients improved by ≥ 1 grade. Nine of 10 studies reported reductions in hospitalisation frequency and/or duration. When treated with PD, HF patients had fewer symptoms, lower hospital admissions and duration compared to diuretic therapy. However, there is inadequate evidence comparing PD versus UF or HD. Further studies comparing these modalities in diuretic-resistant HF should be conducted.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Lisheng Chen ◽  
Ruilin Wang ◽  
Honghong Liu ◽  
Shizhang Wei ◽  
Manyi Jing ◽  
...  

Objective. The systematic review was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Qishen Yiqi dropping pill combined with conventional Western medicine in the treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF). Methods. Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the clinical efficacy of Qishen Yiqi dropping pill combined with conventional Western medicine in treating CHF were widely searched in electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CBM, CNKI, Read-show database, VIP database, and WanFang up to December 26, 2020. The methodological quality of each trial was assessed according to the Cochrane Reviewers’ Handbook 5.0. Meta-analysis was performed by using Review Manager 5.3. Results. Twenty-one RCTs (N = 2162) that met the criteria were included in the review for the assessment of methodological quality. Meta-analysis showed that compared with the conventional Western medicine (control group), Qishen Yiqi dropping pill combined with conventional Western medicine (experience group) significantly improved clinical efficiency, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), brain natriuretic peptide level (BNP), 6 min-walk distance (6-MWD), and adverse reactions. Conclusion. Qishen Yiqi dropping pill combined with conventional Western medicine are better than conventional Western medicine alone to improve the indicators of patients with CHF, which provides a certain basis for the treatment of CHF.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina T Van Leeuwen ◽  
Steven Luu ◽  
Howard Gurney ◽  
Martin R Brown ◽  
Sallie-Anne Pearson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Several targeted therapies for cancer have been associated with cardiovascular toxicity. The evidence for this association has not been synthesized systematically nor has the quality of evidence been considered. We synthesized systematic review evidence of cardiovascular toxicity of individual targeted agents. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for systematic reviews with meta-analyses of cardiovascular outcomes for individual agents published to May 2020. We selected reviews according to prespecified eligibility criteria (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42017080014). We classified evidence of cardiovascular toxicity as sufficient, probable, possible, or indeterminate for specific cardiovascular outcomes based on statistical significance, study quality, and size. Results From 113 systematic reviews, we found at least probable systematic review evidence of cardiovascular toxicity for 18 agents, including high- and all-grade hypertension for bevacizumab, ramucirumab, axitinib, cediranib, pazopanib, sorafenib, sunitinib, vandetanib, aflibercept, abiraterone, and enzalutamide, and all-grade hypertension for nintedanib; high- and all-grade arterial thromboembolism (includes cardiac and/or cerebral events) for bevacizumab and abiraterone, high-grade arterial thromboembolism for trastuzumab, and all-grade arterial thromboembolism for sorafenib and tamoxifen; high- and all-grade venous thromboembolism (VTE) for lenalidomide and thalidomide, high-grade VTE for cetuximab and panitumumab, and all-grade VTE for bevacizumab; high- and all-grade left ventricular ejection fraction decline or congestive heart failure for bevacizumab and trastuzumab, and all-grade left ventricular ejection fraction decline/congestive heart failure for pazopanib and sunitinib; and all-grade corrected QT interval prolongation for vandetanib. Conclusions Our review provides an accessible summary of the cardiovascular toxicity of targeted therapy to assist clinicians and patients when managing cardiovascular health.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars P. Kihm ◽  
Vinzent Hankel ◽  
Christian Zugck ◽  
Andrew Remppis ◽  
Vedat Schwenger

We report the case of a 57-year-old woman suffering from congestive heart failure. Due to refractory congestions despite optimised medical treatment, the patient was listed for heart transplantation and peritoneal dialysis was initiated. Peritoneal dialysis led to a significant weight loss, reduction of hyperhydration and extracellular water obtained by bioimpedance measurement, and a significant improvement in clinical and echocardiographic examination. Furthermore, residual kidney function increased during the long-term followup, and subsequently peritoneal dialysis was ceased. Pulmonary artery pressure and left ventricular ejection fraction remained stable and the patient did well. This case demonstrates the possibility of treating hyperhydration due to congestive heart failure with peritoneal dialysis resulting in recompensation of both heart and kidney functions.


2021 ◽  
pp. 039139882110168
Author(s):  
Dilushi Wijayaratne ◽  
Vasantha Muthu Muthuppalaniappan ◽  
Andrew Davenport

Introduction: Serum cancer antigen 125(SeCA125) has been reported to be increased in patients with heart failure and correlate with both extracellular water (ECW) overload and poor prognosis. Ultrafiltration failure and ECW overload are a major cause of peritoneal dialysis (PD) technique failure. We wished to determine whether SeCA125 could also be a marker of volume status in PD patients. Methods: We contemporaneously measured SeCA125, serum N terminal brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) and ECW by bioimpedance in adult PD patients attending for outpatient assessment of peritoneal membrane function. Results: The median SeCA125 was 19 (12–33) U/mL in 489 PD patients, 61.3% male, median age 61.5 (interquartile range 50–75) years. SeCA125 was positively associated with the ratio of ECW/total body water (TBW) ( r = 0.29, p < 0.001), 4-h peritoneal dialysate to serum creatinine ratio ( r = 0.23, p < 0.001), NTproBNP) ( r = 0.18, p < 0.001), and age ( r = 00.17, p = 0.001) and negatively with 24-h PD ultrafiltration volume ( r = −0.28, p < 0.001) serum albumin ( r = −0.22, p < 0.001), and echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction ( r = −0.20, p < 0.001), but not with residual renal function or C-reactive protein. Patients with above the median SeCA125, had greater median ECW/TBW 0.403(IQR 0.394–0.410) vs 0.395(0.387–0.404), p < 0.001 and NTproBNP (6870 (IQR 1936–20096) vs 4069 (1345–12291) vs) pg/mL, p = 0.03. Conclusion: Heart failure studies have reported SeCA125 is a marker of ECW overload. Our retrospective analysis suggests that SeCA125 is also associated with ECW volume in PD patients. Further studies are required to determine whether serial measurements of SeCA125 trend with changes in ECW status in PD patients and can be used to aid volume assessments.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (18) ◽  
pp. 8336
Author(s):  
Pedro Antunes ◽  
Dulce Esteves ◽  
Célia Nunes ◽  
Anabela Amarelo ◽  
José Fonseca-Moutinho ◽  
...  

Background: we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy of exercise training on cardiac function and circulating biomarkers outcomes among women with breast cancer (BC) receiving anthracycline or trastuzumab-containing therapy. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus were searched. The primary outcome was change on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Secondary outcomes included diastolic function, strain imaging and circulating biomarkers. Results: Four RCTs were included, of those three were conducted during anthracycline and one during trastuzumab, involving 161 patients. All trials provided absolute change in LVEF (%) after a short to medium-term of treatment exposure (≤6 months). Pooled data revealed no differences in LVEF in the exercise group versus control [mean difference (MD): 2.07%; 95% CI: −0.17 to 4.34]. Similar results were observed by pooling data from the three RCTs conducted during anthracycline. Data from trials that implemented interventions with ≥36 exercise sessions (n = 3) showed a significant effect in preventing LVEF decline favoring the exercise (MD: 3.25%; 95% CI: 1.20 to 5.31). No significant changes were observed on secondary outcomes. Conclusions: exercise appears to have a beneficial effect in mitigating LVEF decline and this effect was significant for interventions with ≥36 exercise sessions.


Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R MacDonald ◽  
Lilin She ◽  
Torsten Doenst ◽  
Philip Binkley ◽  
Jean Rouleau ◽  
...  

Introduction: Diabetes mellitus (DM), coronary artery disease (CAD) and heart failure commonly coexist. Hypothesis 1 of the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial enrolled 1212 patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 35% or less and CAD amenable to CABG. Patients were randomised to CABG and optimal medical therapy (OMT) or OMT alone. Hypothesis: We assessed the hypothesis that patients with DM enrolled in the STICH trial would have greater benefit of CABG than patients without DM. Methods: We compared the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with and without DM randomized to CABG and OMT or OMT alone. Cox-proportional hazards analyses were used to assess treatment effect. Results: Diabetes was present in 40.3%. At baseline, patients with DM had more triple vessel CAD (66% v 57%, p<0.001), higher LVEF [median 29% (IQR:22,35) vs 27% (IQR:22,33), p=0.015] and smaller left ventricular end diastolic volume index [median 105 ml/m2 (IQR:85, 128) vs 117 ml/m2 (IQR:93, 146) (p<0.001)]. Among patients with DM, there was a higher proportion of females, higher BMI on average, worse renal function, and more hypertension. Patients with DM undergoing CABG spent longer on cardio-pulmonary bypass [median 97 (IQR:71,126) vs 87 (IQR:65, 115) minutes, p=0.029], and were more likely to develop perioperative AF (23% vs 11%, p<0.001) and worsening renal function (9% vs 4%, p=0.021). Patients with DM on OMT had similar outcomes as those on OMT without diabetes (Table 1). A statistically significant or near statistically significant improvement in clinical outcomes with CABG compared to OMT was documented in patients without DM, but not in patients with DM. However, there was no significant interaction between DM and treatment group on formal statistical testing. Conclusions: Patients with and without DM enrolled in the STICH trial had similar outcomes at 5 years, and CABG did not exert greater benefit in patients with DM.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiuyuan Shao ◽  
Yangyang Xia ◽  
Min Zhao ◽  
Jing Liu ◽  
Qingyan Zhang ◽  
...  

Aims. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in treating refractory congestive heart failure (RCHF) with cardiorenal syndrome (CRS).Methods. A total of 36 patients with RCHF were divided into type 2 CRS group (group A) and non-type 2 CRS group (group B) according to the patients’ clinical presentations and the ratio of serum urea to creatinine and urinary analyses in this prospective study. All patients were followed up till death or discontinuation of PD. Data were collected for analysis, including patient survival time on PD, technique failure, changes of heart function, and complications associated with PD treatment and hospitalization.Results. There were 27 deaths and 9 patients quitting PD program after a follow-up for 73 months with an average PD time of22.8±18.2months. A significant longer PD time was found in group B as compared with that in group A (29.0±19.4versus13.1±10.6months,p=0.003). Kaplan–Meier curves showed a higher survival probability in group B than that in group A (p<0.001). Multivariate regression demonstrated that type 2 CRS was an independent risk factor for short survival time on PD. The benefit of PD on the improvement of survival and LVEF was limited to group B patients, but absent from group A patients. The impairment of exercise tolerance indicated by NYHA classification was markedly improved by PD for both groups. The technique survival was high, and the hospital readmission was evidently decreased for both group A and group B patients.Conclusions. Our data suggest that PD is a safe and feasible palliative treatment for RCHF with type 2 CRS, though the long-term survival could not be expected for patients with the type 2 CRS. Registration ID Number isChiCTR1800015910.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document